Friday, July 10, 2026

APURON: "PRAY ABOUT IT - YOU'LL GET OVER IT"

By Tim Rohr



On November 16, 2017, the Guam Daily Post reported the death of Fr. Raymond Cepeda, a priest of the Archdiocese of Agana who was removed from the priesthood in 2009 due to what the news report termed “serious allegations of abuse,” abuse which allegedly had occurred over the course of at least two decades, the 1980’s and 1990’s. 

In the same news story, it was reported that Apuron’s attorney, Jacquiline Taitano-Terlaje, reported Cepeda’s death “during a hearing for sex abuse cases involving her client, suspended Archbishop Anthony Apuron…at the District Court of Guam.” 

In reading this, I thought it odd that Terlaje, during a hearing for her client, Apuron, would report Cepeda’s death to the court. Terlaje did not represent Cepeda, and smart attorneys are usually very careful not to provide information irrelevant to the case at hand. And since Terlaje is generally considered a smart attorney, we have to assume that Cepeda’s death was relevant to Apuron’s case. But how?

We can only guess, but since, as the record would show for the next ten years, one of the main prongs of Terlaje’s defense of Apuron was his health and his age, it is quite possible that Terlaje used the announcement of Cepeda's death to provoke sympathy from the court in order to have the lawsuits against Apuron dismissed, a motion that the court was then considering:

“The chief judge is also taking a motion to dismiss the lawsuits against Apuron under advisement.”

However, if Terlaje’s intention was to evoke sympathy for Apuron, the same news story functionally argued against it:

“Cepeda has been named in more than 10 cases of child sexual abuse from the 1980s and ’90s. One accuser claimed he endured eight years of sexual abuse by Cepeda and reported it to Apuron, who reportedly told him during a meeting to “pray about these types of evil in the world.” Court documents also allege Apuron told the boy he would “get over it, if he prayed about it.”

Recently, Lester Gonzales shared his story of clergy sexual abuse in a Substack post. Lester wrote that he reported the abuse to church officials, and the answer he received was a question: "What do you want to do about it?" Lester rightly wondered why "the church" was asking this question when the real question was "What are YOU (the archbishop, etc.) going to do about it?

Of course, the archbishop, Apuron, the Vicar-General, David C. Quitugua, et. al were not going to do anything about it. To do something about it would have opened the can of worms that Apuron et. al were desperately trying to keep a lid on for decades, a can that would eventually be forced open in 2016 by a band of lay people who were finally sickened by "these types of evil" that Apuron had told that poor boy mentioned in the Post story above. 

The "types of evil" that Apuron et. al, for decades, simply shrugged off are cruelly illustrated in the account of Cepeda's alleged rape of 9-year-old Timothy Shiroma as reported in the Guam Daily Post  on March 16, 2017:

A former Catholic school student is the latest victim to come forward and file a lawsuit against the Archdiocese of Agana alleging sexual abuse at the Dulce Nombre de Maria Cathedral-Basilica in Hagåtña. All of the 28 lawsuits filed thus far alleged incidents of abuse at parishes around the island in the 1960s and 1970s.

The new case filed by Timothy Ryan Shiroma, 37, alleges sexual abuse that occurred in the late '80s.

According to court documents, in 1988 Shiroma was attending Cathedral Grade School, next to the Hagåtña cathedral. After school, Shiroma would pass the time playing football with other kids near the cathedral until his grandfather picked him up, or he walked over to his office nearby.

On one occasion, Shiroma stopped by a nearby hotdog stand before heading to his grandfather’s office. When he noticed his grandfather’s car wasn’t in the office parking lot, Shiroma returned to the cathedral, looking for him there.

While near the garage of the cathedral, Shiroma encountered Father Raymond Cepeda, who was a priest at the cathedral. Cepeda was scolding other kids for leaving trash and reminding them to clean up after themselves because the area was “God’s house,” court documents state.

Shiroma asked Cepeda to use the phone to call his grandfather and was told he could only do so after he helped collect the trash. After picking up trash, Cepeda took Shiroma to use the phone in an office of the cathedral, but he was unable to get a hold of his grandfather.

The lawsuit alleges that when Shiroma got off the phone, the priest threw him to the floor and pinned him to the ground belly down.

The 9-year-old began to cry, and Cepeda unzipped his backpack and shoved Shiroma’s head inside, then took off the boy’s pants and sexually assaulted him, the lawsuit states.

Shiroma struggled to fight Cepeda, but the priest had all his weight on him, court documents state.

The incident left Shiroma scarred and afraid to see Cepeda or be anywhere near him, the lawsuit states. Shiroma rode the bus home and feigned sickness when the school had Mass at the cathedral.

This was the kind of stuff that Apuron not only did himself (see Walter Denton's testimony) but also, for decades, oversaw, enabled, and, by his "shut up and pray" advice, promoted.

This is the real reason why Apuron never really wanted his "day in court." Even if he could have discredited his public accusers - and he well could have at the outset - there were hundreds of stories like Lester's and Timothy Shiroma's waiting in the wings. Apuron and his attorney could not risk a "day in court," and if I were Apuron's attorney, I would tell him to shut up and stay away, rather than trot him out to proclaim his innocence at every opportunity. 

 

Sunday, July 5, 2026

ANGRY, CONFUSED, AND LOST - HE OR SHE IS NOT ALONE

AnonymousJan 4, 2026, 6:56:00 PM

I joined the Neocatechumenal Way believing it was an initiation to Christianity, as they put it. I'm a migrant, I had to learn English and all. I was baptised catholic but never really practised with my family or after marriage.
Their way of teaching inculcate to the members that the community reflects the old way, the first Christians, and so practising like them with unleavened bread,drinking wine on the table of Jesus's last meal. Ignoring two thousands years of history within the Catholic Church with her twenty plu councils and written doctrine, including the ones from the doctors of the Church.
When I left the cult I was angry, confused and lost.
I fund my home in the Gregorian Chants, the incense, the Traditional Latin Mass, the ancient mass of old.I got back home.
The NO was too similar to the ncw community.
My home is the latin mass. One only in my city. I hope it will continue to exist.

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, TOO!

By Tim Rohr



Over the years, I have been asked to speak publicly about what became the largest clergy sex abuse scandal per capita in the entire Catholic world.  

The scandal in Guam, at least by 2019, was, per capita, 14 times the size of the Boston scandal that provided the story for the Academy Award-winning movie, "Spotlight." 14 TIMES!

The question I posed to my audiences was always "how could this happen in an island community that was so Catholic and boasted of its tightly knit family culture?" 

I don't recall anyone in any audience ever venturing to answer, so I always answered for them. And my answer was always the same: "because this island community is so Catholic and boasts of its tightly knit family culture."

I've laid this out in other posts, so I'll keep the explanation brief to get to my main story. In short, the Catholic culture in Guam traditionally holds an inordinate "respect" for the clerical offices. I've often heard that you must not say anything bad about the priest, even if it's true, or something bad will happen to you or your family. 

This unhealthy, even superstitious "respect" for the bishop and the priest was an open door for clerics to use and abuse hundreds of children, and, as the record now shows, so they did - not all, but many, and for decades. 

Many times, as I increasingly became the local face of the opposition to Guam's clerical abuse scandal, many would quietly tell me of their abuse at the hands of a cleric. And just as quietly, they would tell me how their parent or grandparent would slap their face for speaking of it.

Recently, my friend, Lester Gonzales, who grew up in Guam, wrote about the abuse that he suffered both at the hands of his pastor and his parents:

After being serially sexually molested as a teen by his pastor, Lester went to his parents for help:

I didn’t tell anyone at first. I didn’t have the words. I didn’t know if anyone would believe me. Eventually I found the courage to tell my parents. My father told me not to tell anyone, for fear of his embarrassment and that people would talk. My mother quietly suggested I leave. Just quit and walk away. So I did.

And then one day my father said it. “You should forgive and forget.” I stormed out of the house and drove away. That was the moment I understood something clearly, I was completely alone in this. My father allowed it to happen. 

Lester's story is the constant story I've been hearing for years from so many, and it has caused me to be even angrier at these victims' parents than at the pastors who molested, raped, and otherwise mutilated the minds, bodies, and souls of so many innocent young people.

As horrible as clerical sex abuse of our young is, it was not only allowed to happen but even encouraged by parents who would rather curry the favor of the powerful than protect their own children.

Today's Pacific Daily News tells an all-too-familiar story about another family who preferred their minor daughter remain a sex slave than lose the favor of a police officer. The story is copied here in part (emphases added):

A Guam Police Department sergeant was taken into federal custody Monday and faces charges of sex trafficking a minor, following an FBI investigation that alleges he knowingly recruited, harbored, transported and solicited a girl under the age of 18 for commercial sex acts from Jan. 1, 2024, through July 31, 2025.

According to a federal affidavit filed Monday, the girl reported to GPD officers on July 26, 2025, that she was sexually assaulted by Santos.

Police and FBI documents state the girl told authorities the abuse began around February 2017, when she was about 7 or 8.

The girl told police on July 29, 2025, that she wanted to withdraw her complaint and said she fabricated the allegation out of anger and for attention. A similar complaint and recantation occurred in January 2025.

The girl told a relative that another family member instructed her to recant, warning that Santos would stop helping the family financially if prosecuted. The girl maintained that the assault occurred, but changed her story under pressure.

Pressure from whom? Her family, just like so many victims who told me their stories of clergy sex abuse. This is the so-called "tight-knit family" at work: apparently, it is better to let your child be raped, abused, and molested than to bring shame or disfavor from the powerful upon your family. 

The police officer, the abuser in this case, should be prosecuted and punished accordingly, but so should the girl's family members who enabled the abuse and even told the girl to lie (recant) to protect whatever favors they were receiving from the police officer. 

Maybe...maybe, someday, Guam's parents will stop sucking up to the powerful at the expense of their own children.