WHERE IS ADRIAN (CONTINUED)

(Posted by Frenchie)

While lawsuits are starting to pile up against the former Chancellor, and former Apuron's Whip, the Archdiocese has to finally take some action against the man, whom the Seminary had advised Apuron against making him a priest. (only one of two at the time, but the other was for subpar studies, while Cristobal was for serious moral and ethical reasons).

Once again, the Archdiocese has to clean up after another mess Apuron and the Neos left us with.

So we learned about another victim, suing the Archdiocese, because of Adrian.

This lawsuit falls within the sick and manipulating modus operandi Cristobal is famous for: intimidation, black mail, threats. The run of the mill for this truly corrupt individual.

Following the refusal by Adrian to obey Archbishop Byrnes, and return to Guam to face the complaints, the Archbishop had no other choice but to strip him from his priest faculties, (wearing the collar, celebrating mass, and other restrictions)

This is what the canon law, recommends as first steps in this kind of cases. Unfortunately we have ample evidence that the NCW leaders seldom obey such command, and usually hide and shelter the presbyters who have been accused. Giving them time to besmirch the victims and circle the proverbial wagons against their proteges. Often these runaways keep on celebrating within their communities despite the restrictions imposed upon them by the lawful Ecclesiastical authority.

The fact that the "responsible" use these kinds of tactics, and in the process put in danger the children of their honest followers, says more about their lack of ethics, that anything else.

This left little options to the Chancery, but to up the antes a little bit.


 So here we are, faced with the continued disobedience of Cristobal, the Archdiocese of Guam, could only go to the next step, which is to stop payment to Cristobal.

Of course this shall not impact Adrian, since he is  one of the few accused, that could actually pay a multi million settlement. Adrian is independently filthy rich. So we are not going to shed crocodile tears on his financial situation.

We know, here that he is at the center of the plot to destroy Tim Rohr.

So far, none of the normal measures taken by the chancery, shall have much impact on Adrian and the evil people who abetted his crimes.

Two questions remain:

Where is Adrian?

How long is it going to take to defrock the SOB?

In the meantime, if you are the parent of a child in close proximity to Adrian, keep a watchful eye.

PACIFIC ISLAND TIMES: "DEMYSTIFYING THE WAY."

The Neocatechumenal Way inspires commitment, stirs controversy

MY COMMENT

The entire controversy would go away if the NCW Catechist(s) for Guam would simply submit the NCW Catechetical Directory to Archbishop Byrnes for his review and approval. As the Ordinary of this Archdiocese, his is canonically the sole authority to approve or disapprove of its doctrine and practice, as was Apuron before him (though Apuron never bothered to ask for it). 

The fact that after more than two years of asking for the Directory, the local NCW "authorities" continue to deny Archbishop Byrnes this simple request, is WHY the controversy continues. 

The entire Catholic Church has made its "directory" (i.e. the Catechism of the Catholic Church) universally available in every possible format, but the local NCW "authorities" continue to deny this very kind Archbishop even a glimpse of what the NCW "catechists" officially teach. In fact, they abuse him, telling him if he wants a copy, he has to ask Rome. (Note to NCW "authorities": HE IS ROME.)

That the NCW continues to exist at all in thIS Archdiocese is a testament to the great kindness and mercy of OUR NEW ARCHBISHOP. 

I put that in CAPS because now, with the final demise of Apuron and the elevation of Archbishop Byrnes to the "cathedra" (i.e. "the chair") by Pope Francis, Archbishop Byrnes is now OUR BISHOP. 

And I put "OUR BISHOP" in CAPS because the main argument by the NCW "authorities" has always been "Byrnes is NOT our bishop. Apuron is our bishop." But now, with Byrnes reception of the Pallium, to continue to hold this position is to place oneself OUTSIDE the Catholic Church (i.e. Latae sententiae - automatically excommunicated).

Now that Archbishop Byrnes is certainly, canonically, and officially OUR ARCHBISHOP, will the NCW "authorities" humbly present the NCW Catechetical Directory to a true descendant of the Apostles or will they continue to follow Martin Luther out of the one true Church?

The Pope will hand over the Pallium to 31 Metropolitan Archbishops, 13 of whom are Ordinaries from territories entrusted to the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, from Africa (8), Asia (4) and Oceania (1). Their names, in order of appointment...Mgr. Michael Jude BYRNES, Archbishop of Agaña (Guam)...

Note: I refer to NCW "authorities" because these are the true "responsibles." Most "members" of the NCW are truly good people who have found solace in what, sadly, their "traditional" pastors and priests never offered them, because, as we are now seeing, they were too busy pursuing pervetred sexual pleasures. Still, despite the gross sinfulness of these "Judases", WE HAVE JESUS AND HIS CHURCH. And because "the gates of Hell will NOT prevail," we have NO excuse NOT to follow HIM. 

UPDATE ON FR SAN ANDRES

(Posted by Frenchie)

A Memorial Mass for Fr Vito San Andres  will be held at 

Our Lady  of Lourdes Catholic Church

On Monday July 8th

 Order of the Memorial is as follow:

5.00pm

Exposition and Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament

Funerary rosary and Divine Mercy Chaplet

5.45pm

Office of the Dead

Including Evening Vespers, Benediction and Reposition of the Blessed Sacrament

6.30pm

Mass for the Dead

Main celebrant Archbishop Byrnes

All his former parishioners are welcome to attend.

FATHER VITO SAN ANDRES

(Posted by Frenchie)

Father Vito San Andres

Several of his former Parishioners in Chalan Pago, Dededo and Yigo requested that we share with you the news of the passing of Father Vito San Andres.

Father Vito was a straight forward priest.

Lately he was on leave of absence to allow him to seek treatment for a long ailment.

He had gone back to his country of origin: the Philippines, to be able to do so.

Unfortunately last weekend, while he was very pleased of the progress he had made, father Vito suffered a sudden loss of conscience, and fell down a set of stair.

He fell in a deep coma and never regained consciousness.

He shall be sorely missed by many of his former parishioners.

Please join us in prayers for the eternal rest of Father Vito

IT HAS BEEN SLOW, BUT PEOPLE ARE FINALLY STARTING TO GET IT

(Posted by Frenchie)

The Pacific Island Times addresses the issue of the Neocatechumenal way, and its impact.

Unfortunately this issue is not available online yet, Only in the paper version.

For those of you that are interested, it is on sale in most stores for a misly $1.25

In the meantime, we shall look at their take on the issue, and give you our analysis.

More to come, soon.

WHY IS THE ISSUANCE OF THE PALLIUM TO ARCHBISHOP BYRNES IS SUCH A BIG DEAL

(Posted by Frenchie)

The Umatuna Newspaper has covered extensively for several weeks the Pallium attribution by Pope Francis to the 31 new Metropolitan Archbishops.

Archbishop Byrnes, as Archbishop of Agana, is the Metropolitan Archbishop of the archdiocese of Agana, and Archbishop to the suffragans of the diocese of Chalan Kanoa, the diocese of the Caroline Islands and of the Apostolic Prefecture of the Marshall Islands.

The official celebration took place this past Saturday, which marks the feast day of both 

St Peter (the patron Saint of Rome) and St Paul. (known as the two pillars of the Church)

It is therefore becoming that this highly symbolical handing down of the Papal authority should take place on that most special feast day.

If you want more explanation on the pallium, its history and significance Read Here

for an excellent article from Vatican News.

The story was widely covered worldwide, and somewhat noticed here on Guam.

The Guam Post doing a better job at the coverage that either the PDN or KUAM.

Read Here

FROM BOB: WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' ABORTIONIST!

No abortions have been reported to the Registrar of Vital Statistics since May of last year. To deal with this “crisis” Governor Leon Guerrero apparently wants to procure an abortionist for the island. She has tasked Jayne Flores to be the abortionist procurer. I have drafted legislative language that would prohibit the use of public funds or resources to procure an abortionist. I sent the proposed language to all senators yesterday pursuant to this transmittal:

“Honorable Senators:

Transmitted herewith is draft legislation entitled PROHIBITION OF PROCURING AN ABORTIONIST ACT OF 2019. The recent activities of the Governor and her abortionist procurer, Jane Flores, to promote a personal agenda vice the governmental functions of their respective offices suggest that a statute similar to that which the national government put in place to deal with a similar problem called the Hyde Amendment is required. Draft legislative language to accomplish that purpose is set out in the attachment.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert Klitzkie

Robert Klitzkie”

You can read the proposed bill and find out why WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' ABORTIONIST! by clicking on https://frombob.blogspot.com/. If you want to email or call senators you can find their contact info here: http://www.guamlegislature.com/senators_35th.htm.

Bob

FROM ABORTION HAVEN TO NO ABORTIONS - GUAM. THE REST OF THE STORY.

By Tim Rohr

For nearly 30 years our “Catholic” island of Guam was the abortion capital of the nation in terms of providing the fewest legal protections for the unborn. A friend and I discovered this sad fact when we compared Guam’s abortion laws to a state by state study published by Americans United for Life in 2008. 

Compared to all 50 states and other U.S. Territories, Guam had the fewest laws regulating abortion; in fact, only two: 1) only physicians could perform abortions, and 2) abortions were supposed to be reported (to GMH Medical Records). 

After the Supreme Court decisions in Webster v Reproductive Health Services (1989) and Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992), states began enacting legislation that increasingly regulated abortion such as restricting the use of state funds, requiring informed consent and parental consent (for minors), requiring abortion providers to have local hospital admitting privileges, and mandating normal medical care for babies who survive an abortion. But Guam did nothing. Why? CONTINUED

ABORTIONS ON GUAM 2008-2017

The Media apparently wants the world to believe that the reason why there are currently no doctors willing to do abortions on Guam is because that this is a "Catholic" island. The facts say otherwise. 

The Esperansa Project

TIM ROHR W RAY GIBSON ON THE POINT

Re LLG's search for an abortionist to kill more Chamorros.

adf

From the 2016 Abortion Report. Every year, it's the same story.