Thursday, July 31, 2025

WELL, JAYNE, IS THAT TRUE OR NOT?

By Tim Rohr



This morning, a friend sent the following:

Jayne Flores wrote an opinion piece on your analysis of the Epstein case.  She went off the rails.  Does she really believe you condone and agree with what Epstein was doing with young girls and women?  She obviously doesn't know you that well.  

Secondly, she can't see that you were mocking how loose our society has become with sex. . . You see it in movies, magazines, women wearing flimsy clothes, etc.  Epstein took advantage of this to make money and to share it with the girls he brought to his pleasure island.  They were all seemingly "happy" like those in Sodom and Gomorrah, till they got caught.  

Sure, the girls changed from "thanks for the money" to "I was abused" when they all got caught and shamed in public. Maybe some tried to resist and some were naive.  Who knows. . . and neither does Jayne Flores.  The trouble with people like Jayne, they're so arrogant and think they are so righteous they know best what'd good for Guam and society.  They can't see the truth through their "colored lenses."

. . . and what's happening to our society when people like her are in positions of authority and power and try to push a radical agenda, like abortion is okay.  She also believes selling or giving out free condoms to 18 year olds is okay.  That's opening a Pandora's Box.  Doesn't she know when we were teenagers, we tried to buy cigarettes or beer by asking older teens to buy those items for us?  Or we get fake ID's made to fool the store clerks?

+++++

There is only one thing not correct in the above message. Jayne Flores isn't "giving out free condoms to 18 year olds," she is pushing contraceptives to anyone of any age...some of whom are much younger than 18, not to mention the almost exclusive use of her office and our money to push "legal murder they call abortion" (to quote the Steel Pulse song "Wild Goose Chase").

I haven't read Jayne's piece and I'm not going to. Find it and read it if you want. I'll rely on the above summary because it's already an old story with Jayne and her militant abortion-loving friends, including the governor. 

Back to my Epstein piece, as I shared, it got me CANCELLED from the Guam Daily Post as a regular columnist for nearly two years. I sort of knew it might, but someone needed to tell the truth and that's what I do.

In fact, if you read my Epstein piece carefully there is not a single false statement. And, even though I was being ironic, the truth itself was ironic enough that I didn't need to stretch anything. 

Here were my key points:

1. The girls were paid sex-workers, not victims. As my friend point out above, the only became "victims" after the whole thing was outed.

2. In the context of who can have sex with who, age 18 means nothing given that the age of consent and even the marrying age can be much younger. 

3. We already tacitly condone minors having sex with whoever they want by pushing - as Jayne's office does - free contraception for all and even abortions in case those condoms and pills fail (which they do). 

4. Pedophilia is a sexual preference for prepubescent children, not the adolescents that Epstein and his clients preferred. 

5. Pedophilia is a convenient label to take the spotlight off the real issue: we live in a sex saturated culture and we are already okay with our 14 year-olds engaging in sex or we wouldn't be trying so hard to hand out contraceptives and abortions - as Jayne and her boss do.

In my Epstein piece, I called out Jayne and her office:

Here in Guam, as advertised on the website for the Bureau of Women’s Affairs, contraception is free at all public health facilities. Apparently there is no age limit. Hmmm. Kids can’t buy cigarettes until they’re 18, but can help themselves to condoms and birth control pills as soon as they’re tall enough to peer over the counter and say “Please Sir, I want some more.”

Well, Jayne, is that true or not?

The fact is that contraception and abortion, Jayne's two beloved step-children, go hand in hand with sex-trafficking. And, more than dirty old men like Jeffrey Epstein, government agencies like the one Jayne runs contribute more to the degradation, defilement, and destruction of the young, especially girls. 

Remember our own Blue House scandal a few years ago? It was functionally a sex-trafficking whore house. Some mamasan was bringing in Micronesian girls, confiscating their passports, and forcing the girls to have sex with the customers, most famously certain police officers. 

Well, in case you didn't know, sex with young women of child-bearing age can make young women child-bearing, so of course putting the girls on the pill, or the patch, or whatever, would have been requisite for mamasan's business. But, as the news exposed, some of those girls still got pregnant and they were hustled down to the abortuaries in Tamuning, which in those days were killing a baby a day.

Contraception and abortion isn't about the rights of females - as Jayne and her ilk would have us believe. It's about covering the tracks of dirty old men like the Jeffrey Esptein's or even, in the Blue House case, some of our own police officers. 

And apparently in Guam, sex-traffickers have no better friend than the Bureau of Women's Affairs, and the woman who runs it.

Note: The Blue House Case was back in the news this past January 2025

Wednesday, July 30, 2025

CASTI CONNUBII

By Tim Rohr


Relative to the last few posts over the furor my Epstein column created, for anyone who really cares about God's plan for "be fruitful and multiply," the gold-standard in the Catholic Church is Pope Pius XI's CASTI CONNUBII (On Christian Marriage). 

Upon reading it (and listening to it here), I can't help but wonder how much happier married life would be if our priests simply sat down with couples and read through it.  It's so clear and comforting. 

Monday, July 28, 2025

SINGAPORE?

Our Flag Counter (side bar) shows the countries with the most views of this blog. As of today, Guam is followed by the United States. And Singapore comes in 3rd. Why Singapore? I don't know.

 


ANONYMOUS OFFERS GOOD ADVICE...MY REPLY

By Tim Rohr

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "ANONYMOUS: "THERE'S A SPECIAL PLACE IN HELL FOR YOU"":

If I were in your shoes and the hate comments kept coming in against me, I would, 1. Refuse to dignify hate comments 2. I would refuse to comment back 3. Understanding I cannot change a persons position especially if they believe it to their core would prompt me to go into silent mode 4. Respond only to conversations worthy of dialogue that are productive, positive and engaging. People will never be satisfied even if you're doing something positive. There's always that negative anomaly lurking about. People that express hatred openly have a real issue with decorum, maturity and healthy dialogue. They come into a conversation to win the argument and ignoring results. 

MY REPLY

Thank you for your thoughts. Whenever I get hate comments, the thought does occur to me to do as you say. However, I also see these comments as an opportunity, not to change the haters’ minds, but to educate other readers on issues that wouldn’t make sense if I brought them up in isolation. 

For instance, the post IT’S JUST NATURE: MY RESPONSE TO THE HATERS gave me an opportunity to share the solid Catholic teaching about God’s plan for our procreative faculties. If I had brought this topic up on its own, it may have been seen as preachy and out of context of anything. 

The post on which you are commenting, initiated by the latest hate comments, allows me to continue to spotlight what the Catholic Catechism terms an “objective disorder.” I keep heavily hinting at it, but I am still allowing readers to determine what it is for themselves. 

The fact is that this level of hate is itself an “objective disorder” which is way out of line from just a difference of opinion. So I want to put it on display as evidence of what I am talking about. This kind of unhinged malevolence can only come from someone who's intellect is deeply darkened by sin.

Also, the accusations against me in my legal matter are well known since the press smeared them all over the media in 2018. I was able to disprove them but the press is never going to print that side of the story, so whenever I’m accused by a commenter, it gives me the opportunity to set the record straight.

One more thought on this. Your advice - I know it is well meaning - is exactly the advice I received from my lawyer after I was falsely accused of child and spousal abuse. I took the advice and promptly lost my children and 5 years of their lives and who knows how much damage to their psyche for the rest of their lives. All because my lawyer didn’t want to “dignify” those accusations with a response. 

When falsely accused, what we don’t want to do is get angry and lash back in the same unhinged way. Better to expose the accusations and deal with them rationally in a truthful, calm way which is what I try to do and will continue to do. 

People like to say “the truth will come out.” I have learned that it doesn’t happen that way. Someone has to do something to make the truth come out. So I do it.

Thanks again. 

Saturday, July 26, 2025

ANONYMOUS: "THERE'S A SPECIAL PLACE IN HELL FOR YOU"

By Tim Rohr

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "IT'S JUST NATURE: MY RESPONSE TO THE HATERS":

So he doth protest too much. After reading up on your own abuse scandal, no wonder you lost custody of your kids and your wife had to move away. As a survivor of CSA and having dealt with my father's denial and "false accusation" accusation-- I know there's a special place in hell for you. Vile.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "IT'S JUST NATURE: MY RESPONSE TO THE HATERS":

Surely there are less humiliating ways to solicit attention.


Most of these hate comments appear to be coming from the same guy, so apparently I'm living rent-free in his head. 

I'm used to this, of course. Twelve years on this blog, nearly 15 Million page views, 6,000+ posts and 70,000 comments - dealing with some of the most terrible stuff and getting shot at by haters through it all. 

I call them "haters," but a better word is "cowards." A self-respecting, strong person would contact me with a real name and explain his or her differences. And who knows, I might be convinced. But instead these cowards hide in the bushes behind "anonymous" and throw stones. 

It's been awhile though since I've received this level of hate: "there's a special place in hell for you." 

That seems a bit extreme for my thoughts about the Epstein thing. So I'm quite sure it wasn't what I said about Epstein that tripped this guy's trigger, but what I said about the real reason for the clergy sex abuse thing when I said it wasn't pedophilia (given the actual data), and then followed that fact with "I'll let you figure out what it was."

I knew when I wrote that last little "figure it out" thing that it would trigger exactly what this guy is displaying. And I also believe this is what triggered Marc Watanabe to fire me as a featured columnist at the Post. I've written about very controversial topics for two years, but I hadn't touched this particular one until the Epstein column a couple days ago.

The timing was interesting. The Post not only ran my column this past Wednesday, but also touched up a few of my sentences including the "figure it out." I had originally written: "I'll let you figure out what was." I intended the sentence that way. However, the Post inserted the word "it": "I'll let you figure out what it was." 

So whoever was doing the editing had no problem with the column or it wouldn't have run. But then only a few hours later I received the "you're cancelled" email from Marc Watanabe. I've never dealt with Watanabe before, only Paul Charfarous. I'm assuming it was Paul who edited my column and put it in print, and either Watanabe later took personal offense to it or someone with influence got a hold of him.

Anyway, the "it" is a sacred cow, and how dare I call it out. (And I'm still going to let you "figure out what it was.")

Meanwhile though, back to this stuff about my personal case referenced in the first comment. The allegations were not true and things worked out for me in the end - though nothing can ever make up for the trauma my minor children suffered because of it all. The haters and the cowards will pay one day. And I'm not referring to my accusers. I'm referring to the people who paid them.

Friday, July 25, 2025

IT'S JUST NATURE: MY RESPONSE TO THE HATERS

By Tim Rohr


It appears my Epstein post has caused a bit of a stir. First, it got me "fired" from the Guam Daily Post, and since, I've received a steady stream of hate mail and comments like the following:

bruce gulick <bruce.gulick@gmail.com>
You’re deranged, and a disgrace to the family that attempted to raise you.
May God have mercy on your soul.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "HAPPY PAGE VIEW ANNIVERSARY":
And yet NO COMMENTS. Well, none except for this one mocking you. Turns out everyone hates you. Isn’t that correct, pedophile-lover?
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "CANCELLED ":
You literally asked what the fuss was about over 14-year-old sex workers while immediately pointing out after that the age for consensual sex was at minimum 16.
there.third.below@clkdmail.com
Good afternoon,
I just came across you blog. You are definitely a pedophile and then I saw that you are involved with the Catholic Church and it all made sense.Thank you 
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "THE EPSTEIN THING":
Have you lost your fucking mind? He abused literal CHILDREN you sick sonofabitch 

No problem, the hate gives me the opportunity to go further on the issue than I could in a space-limited column.

The question is not at what age is it okay to engage in sex, and I mean sexual activity of any sort, but when is it right at all?

I hold to the Catholic position as copied here directly from the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

The fecundity of marriage

2366 Fecundity is a gift, an end of marriage, for conjugal love naturally tends to be fruitful. A child does not come from outside as something added on to the mutual love of the spouses, but springs from the very heart of that mutual giving, as its fruit and fulfillment. So the Church, which is "on the side of life," teaches that "it is necessary that each and every marriage act remain ordered per se to the procreation of human life." "This particular doctrine, expounded on numerous occasions by the Magisterium, is based on the inseparable connection, established by God, which man on his own initiative may not break, between the unitive significance and the procreative significance which are both inherent to the marriage act."

The essential statement in this paragraph is:
"it is necessary that each and every marriage act remain ordered per se to the procreation of human life."

Notice that it's not called a "sex act," but a "marriage act." Marriage is assumed as the good and natural state for "the act," and since "the act" must "remain ordered...to...procreation," marriage is assumed to be between a man and a woman.

In short, and to be blunt, sex is only "okay" when it occurs within a marriage between a man and a woman and only when sex is ordered to procreation - in other words: no contraception - thus the Church's prohibition.

This isn't my opinion. It is the universal teaching of the Catholic Church, always was and always will be, simply because it is founded in the very beginnings of humanity:

God created mankind in his image; in the image of God he created them; male and female* he created them. God blessed them and God said to them: Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.* (Genesis 27-28)

This is also why even so-called "natural family planning" (periodic continence) is also wrong (a sin) when it is employed without grave reason. (Look it up.) The whole point of marriage, God's point, (properly called "the ends of marriage") is to "be fruitful and multiply." 

Argue with God. Not me.

And this is why, in my Epstein post, I mocked the whole idea of these false lines we draw which say at this age this is okay, and not at that age. As I pointed out, the ages of majority and consent are artificial government-made lines, and they are made even more irrelevant by our making contraception available and even free to minors of any age at our public health centers and even our schools. 

In fact, to further demonstrate the point, consider the following from a group organized to oppose child marriage:

Child marriage occurs when one or both of the parties to the marriage are below the age of 18. Child marriage is currently legal in 34 states, and 4 U.S. states do not require any minimum age for marriage, with a parental or judicial waiver.

Here in Guam, until 2015, the legal marrying age for a female was age 14 with parental consent, which, at the time, was pretty much the standard throughout the U.S. I'll explain why it changed in 2015 in a minute. But it's clear that our laws approved of a 14 year old girl engaging in sexual relations pursuant to the consent of the parents to marry. There was no maximum age for her husband so presumably he could be much older. 

So there's another moveable line. And if a line is moveable, it really has no meaning. Thus, my sarcastic quip in my Epstein piece: "What's all the fuss?" For anyone with a brain not yet darkened by whatever perverse prejudice may be beholding it at the moment, I believe my sarcastic quip was clear: On the one hand we self-righteously condemn a dirty old man like Jeffrey Epstein and on the other we're handing our kids contraceptives and even legislating that they be paid with tax dollars and handed out at our public health centers. 

In Guam in 2015, then-Senator Narissa Underwood introduced Bill 119-33, the "Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015." The bill raised the marriage age to 16. The aim of the bill was not to protect 14 year old girls, but was a reaction to Guam's marriage law being caught between a rock and a hard place after SCOTUS legalized same-sex marriage. 

Since two persons of the same sex could now marry, gender language (male and female) had to be eliminated. The legal minimum age for marriage for males was already 16, so what to do with the "girls." Oh, wait a minute, there are no longer boys and girls, just partners, so the bill made it 16 for everybody. Another moveable, government-made line. 

Thus my sarcasm about our sanctimonious crusade against a single dirty old man and this meaningless appeal to something magical happening at 18 that makes it okay to have sex but not buy beer. Here is the relevant portion of Senator Underwood's Bill 119-33 which became Public Law 33-65.


The bottom line, even if you don't believe in God is that sex makes babies, or at least is designed to, even if it is only Nature's design. And the best place for those babies to grow up, prosper, and make babies of their own, i.e. the survival of our species, is in the context of a mother and a father committed to each other for life. It's just Nature. 

As a P.S., I know where the hate is coming from. It's this line: "So pedophilia was not the operative perversion. I’ll let you figure out what it was."

 

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

CANCELLED

By Tim Rohr

I've been submitting columns as a featured columnist since August 2023. I'm surprised they kept me this long. Received today:



However, in my "false allegations" series, I was getting dangerously close to the conspiracy that tried to destroy me in 2018. In fact, in the back of my mind, upon submitting those first two installments (Part 1, Part 2), I was tacitly testing to see what would happen. It didn't take long. 

Meanwhile, this blog gets far more views than the Post ever will. So I will continue. I'll put up Part 3 in a few days. There will probably be 4 parts total.

THE EPSTEIN THING


LINK to online version

Putting my “false allegations” series on hold for the moment, I want to address the Epstein thing.

I don’t have a problem acknowledging that Jeffrey Epstein was most likely a deep state intelligence operative. Nothing else explains how he got away with so much for so long. It also explains why the so-called “client list” remains elusive.

I am also quite on board with the assertion that Epstein rose mysteriously to unprecedented wealth and influence because he was extraordinarily adept at supplying a steady stream of sex-workers to powerful people.

I call them “sex-workers” and not “victims” on purpose.

Hardly an Epstein story goes by without the requisite media sobbing about his “victims.” There are two problems with this. First, they weren’t victims. Second, it’s a distraction from the real matter: uncovering Epstein’s deep-state connections and activities - in short, who Epstein was really working for and why.

His “girls,” minors or not, was just the currency he trafficked in to do his job, a job that made him a billionaire since no other business activity or financial venture can be identified as the source of his voluminous cash flow.

They weren’t victims

According to the court papers I have read, all of Epstein’s “girls” arrived at his many mansions willingly and were well-paid for their services. They were sex-workers, not victims, and it appears the majority of them not only liked their “jobs,” but recruited others for similar employment.

I saw and worked with real victims of sexual abuse in the Apuron case. At the time of their being victimized, they were young, trusting altar boys who thought they were only helping their pastor when he invited them to his house of horrors. They weren’t expecting to be molested, raped, and then threatened to keep their mouths shut for the rest of their now ruined lives.

That’s what a victim looks like. That’s what abuse looks like.

Underage?

Court papers say some of Epstein’s sex-workers were as young as 14. So? What’s all the fuss? Being less than 18 years old might keep you from buying cigarettes, but the law in most states, including Guam, says it’s okay to engage in consensual sex at 16.

Meanwhile, while the majority of Americans are all riled up about Epstein and his clients, according to the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry that same majority of Americans (67%) supports distribution of free contraceptives in schools. Ummm, what do you think these little girls and boys are going to do with that stuff?

Here in Guam, as advertised on the website for the Bureau of Women’s Affairs, contraception is free at all public health facilities. Apparently there is no age limit. Hmmm. Kids can’t buy cigarettes until they’re 18, but can help themselves to condoms and birth control pills as soon as they’re tall enough to peer over the counter and say “Please Sir, I want some more.”

Those who think “they’re just going to do it anyway” are probably thinking their teens are having sex with teens, so they might as well be “protected.” But as the Epstein story (and many others) demonstrates, why would a fourteen year old girl want to have sex with a broke fourteen year old boy when she can score thousands of dollars off an older man with means?

So don’t give me that “they were only 14 and didn’t know any better.” Parents (67% anyway) are practically handing their minor children contraceptives and signing a permission slip to have sex with whoever they want. Should we now be upset when those same kids figure out a way to make money at it - as Epstein’s girls did?

Pedophile?

It’s a useful word because of its “disgust” level, but Epstein was no pedophile - a pervert yes, but no pedophile. Pedophilia is clinically defined as a sexual preference for prepubescent children. While the record shows that Jeffrey liked them young, he didn’t like them that young.

The same with Apuron and just about all of the clergy sex abuse cases nationwide. The record (the John Jay Report) shows that the sexual preference was for adolescents, i.e. sexually mature, and in the clergy cases, overwhelmingly male. So pedophilia was not the operative perversion. I’ll let you figure out what was.

Given the filth and perversity we as a society unthinkingly accommodate daily, it’s hard not to see that all this righteous fixation on Epstein’s “list” isn’t a collective Freudian conscience-swabbing exercise in projection.

Tim Rohr has resided in Guam since 1987. He has raised a family of 11 children, owned several businesses, and is active in local issues via his blog, JungleWatch.info, letters to local publications, and occasional public appearances. He may be contacted at timrohr.guam@gmail.com 

Monday, July 21, 2025

HAPPY PAGE VIEW ANNIVERSARY

Per our page view counter in the side bar, 7/20/13 was the day we started counting. Yesterday, 7/20/25, that makes 12 years. 

That comes out to 1,234,448 per year and 103,962 views per month. 

Thanks for hanging with us.

Friday, July 18, 2025

FR. HAROLD: "FULL OF PAGANS AND BALONEY"

 Fr. Harold says he's "trying to sanctify this whole situation fool of pagans and baloney." I guess he means anyone not in his cult.


Friday, July 11, 2025

HOW TO HANDLE FALSE ALLEGATIONS - PART 2



LINK to online version

To review, this is a series of columns in which I am addressing how to handle false accusations of domestic violence (or worse), especially if you are a husband and/or father.

In Part 1, I laid out the “pit” I found myself in in May 2018 and how false accusations led to the loss of my minor children for five years.

I ended that first column by urging the reader to not leave your interests to your lawyer and to at least get a fundamental understanding of legal procedural basics.

There’s a lot to know, but the most important procedural thing to know is this: Motion-Opposition-Reply.

After the legal proceeding is initiated by a complaint or petition, there will usually be a number of motions. A motion is when a party moves the court to do something. The important thing to know is that you have a right to either oppose the motion or reply to the other party’s opposition to your motion. Not knowing this is what cost me my children and five tragic, damaging, and expensive years.

In my case, I had moved the court for custody of my children. The other party opposed my motion on grounds that I had sexually abused my children and supported her opposition with declarations from two of my adult daughters.

My then-attorney failed to file a reply which left the court no option but to assume the allegations were true and deny my motion for custody. But that was only the beginning of the damage because those unanswered allegations became headlines in May 2018 when for a full week I was smeared in the local media as a wife-beater and a molester of my own children.

Had my attorney filed a reply, I could have presented evidence disproving the allegations, and, while the press may have still done the story, at least my side, and maybe even a court decision in my favor, would have been in the record. Years of damage might have been avoided.

The problem was that at the time I didn’t know that I could have filed a reply because I completely trusted my attorney who not only failed to file a reply but chose not to inform me of her decision not to file.

Two months after the fact, and after being destroyed in the media, an attorney friend asked me if I filed a reply. I didn’t even know what that was. He told me. I called my attorney to inquire. Let’s just say I ended up firing that attorney and got my retainer back.

Bottom line is you must know your rights in court. That’s why it’s called a “justice system.” You always have a right to respond. True, there was no guarantee that the court would have ruled in my favor had I replied, but at least my reply would have been in the record.

The foregoing is critical because at the beginning of a case there is likely to be a flurry of false allegations - just mud up against the wall - in an attempt to overwhelm you and make you throw in your bloodied towel. So remember: Motion-Opposition-Reply.

Just to be clear, this isn’t legal advice. Just my experience. So going on.

The next thing to know is never - I repeat - never speak to the other party once legal action is initiated - or even once it looks like legal action is coming. Keep everything in writing, preferably email as email is easier to authenticate than texts or even physical writings.

However, if you must communicate orally, record your communications. It doesn’t have to be a secret recording. You are in a legal battle at this point and it should be understood that “everything you say can or will be held against you in a court of law.” So record, record, record.

The next thing is to gather, gather, gather. Search everywhere for anything and everything written: cards, letters, notes, emails, texts, messages, everything. You are going to need to prove - if the allegations are false - that not only was there no evidence of what you are being accused of, but that prior to your breakup, you had  mostly normal and even loving relationships with your now-accusers, and written communications are the best evidence.

Now, before I go on to the next step, there is something you should already be doing: take care of yourself, especially physically. You’re going to need your health - every bit of it.

See you next time.

Tim Rohr has resided in Guam since 1987. He has raised a family of 11 children, owned several businesses, and is active in local issues via his blog, JungleWatch.info, letters to local publications, and occasional public appearances. He may be contacted at timrohr.guam@gmail.com 

Sunday, July 6, 2025

IT APPEARS O'MALLEY DID NOTHING

By Tim Rohr

Pope Leo has appointed a new bishop to head the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. French bishop, Thibault Verny, will replace the now retired Cardinal Sean O’Malley. 

The Newsmax story notes that the commission under O’Malley “lost influence” and that O’Malley’s “crowning recommendation…went nowhere.”

Said “recommendation” was “the creation of a tribunal to judge bishops who covered up for predator priests.” 

This caught my eye.

One of the reasons the Vatican was slow to get involved in addressing Guam's "Apuron problem" back in 2016 when O'Malley was running the commission, was that while the Vatican was equipped to discipline "predator priests," it had no protocol for disciplining "predator bishops." 

Guam and the Apuron Scandal were unique in that regard, and the Vatican was left scrambling in 2016-2017 when those incessant picketers, mostly elderly, for 54 straight weeks, refused to lay down their signs and go away.



The distant but ever increasing thunder in Guam finally forced the Vatican to investigate Apuron and ultimately try him despite not having a canonical protocol, which means they probably threw one together ad hoc

It also means that had not "those lay people" taken matters into their own hands, the Vatican never would have gotten involved and Apuron would have remained the archbishop, at least until he was 75, the age all diocesan bishops are required to submit their resignation to the pope.

The canonical "ad hoc-ness" of the Apuron Affair became evident when Apuron appealed his guilty verdict and Pope Francis stepped in to handle it personally. 

At the time, Apuron filing an appeal didn't seem out of the ordinary. But in hindsight, especially with the recent news - which I'll get back to - Francis was probably advised to take on the appeal because if there wasn't a canonical protocol to handle Apuron's trial, there certainly was no protocol to handle his appeal.

I've written much about this before, but at the time, I and others were quite sure that the Neocat Generals were hard at work attempting to take advantage of this big hole in Canon Law to get their boy off the hook. 

And I think they would have succeeded if not for the untimely events relative to the McCarrick Scandal occurring (August 2018) just as Francis had taken on Apuron's appeal. In short, the McCarrick Scandal was so damaging to Francis that he had to look "tough on crime," so he threw Apuron under the bus. 

And that brings us back to the news and to why Cardinal O'Malley's "crowning recommendation" - a protocol for judging bishops - "went nowhere."

The Vatican action on Apuron (2017-2019) occurred smack dab in the middle of O'Malley's tenure (2014-2025). In fact, given the timing, it appears the Apuron Mess was probably the prompt for O'Malley to at least suggest doing something about bad bishops - even if his "recommendation" only dealt with bishops who covered for predator priests and for some reason skipped on addressing predator bishops.

So why - with the Apuron case right in front of both O'Malley and the pope - did O'Malley's "recommendation" go "nowhere?" And why, given O'Malley's high and powerful profile as the Cardinal Archbishop of Boston - and even considered "papabile" - did he "lose influence" - as the Newsmax story points out?

The common denominator

It's not hard to figure out when you step back and see the common denominator: THE NEOCATS. 

O'Malley was, and still is, a big promoter of the Neocatechumenal Way and especially its priest factory system: the Redemptoris Mater seminaries. 

A 2023 article, praises O'Malley for the significant growth of the NCW in the Boston Archdiocese: "There was only one Neocatechumenal Way community in the archdiocese when the cardinal arrived. Now, there are 52 communities in 11 parishes throughout the archdiocese."

In fact, O'Malley is openly campaigning for Neocat co-founder Carmen Hernandez' cause for sainthood. 

Just google "Cardinal Sean O'Malley Neocatechumenal Way" for lots more.

O'Malley's problem with advancing any agenda as head of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors is that the Neocatechumenal communities - as we well know in Guam - are a safe haven for the very "predator priests" and protector bishops O'Malley was tasked to take on.

Think of it. Who do you think has been supporting Apuron all these years? Where did Luis Camacho run to? And where is Wadeson? John Wadeson. All three of them - not to mention Adrian and others - ran away from Guam after being outed. 

We found Luis hiding in Qatar under the protection of a Neocat-friendly bishop. A friend of mine recently came across Wadeson in Hawaii - "ministering" to Neocat communities. And Apuron. We can be sure he is not only being well taken care of by the Neocats but is probably fully functioning as a bishop in those communities as well. And let's not forget who his attorney has been for 10 years. 

Oh and speaking of McCarrick, the worst of the worst, where did the finally disgraced Cardinal go after he was publicly outed? The Redemptoris Mater Seminary in Maryland.

Next to Cardinal Filoni, O'Malley was the Neocats' best friend in high office. So how was he going to push forward any sort of discipline for bishops when the one bishop in the world who needed to be disciplined was the one bishop who was - and still is - a Neocat: Apuron.

So, in the name of saving Neocats - and probably with plenty of "gentle pressure" from the Neocat Generals - it appears O'Malley did nothing.


Monday, June 30, 2025

PUA FRAUD SCHEME - RESOURCE PAGE

This page will be updated as the news progresses.


Jun 26, 2025. CASE FILED IN DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM

Jun 27, 2025. 7 indicted in PUA fraud conspiracy  (Guam Daily Post)

Jun 27, 2025. Seven indicted in pandemic unemployment fraud scheme (KUAM)

Jun 27, 2025. Alleged $1.9M PUA fraud ring implicates lieutenant governor's family, GovGuam workers (Pacific Daily News)

Jun 28, 2025. 7 in alleged PUA fraud ring released, arraignment set for July 3 (Pacific Daily News)

Jun 29, 2025. Arraignment for 7 indicted in PUA fraud scheme continued to July 3 (Guam Daily Post)

Jun 29, 2025. A sad day for Guam (Kandit News)

Jun 30, 2025. Comfort Cuts had GovGuam contracts, named in pandemic scam (KUAM)

Jul 02, 2025. Adelup Staffers, Cabinet Members Caught Attempting to Manipulate Public Opinion for Tenorios on Social Media. (Kandit)

Jul 02, 2025. All the Poor, Honest Working People Who Could Have Benefitted from $1.9M (Kandit)

Jul 02, 2025. Dell'Isola: GDOL ‘fully cooperated’ with $1.9M PUA fraud investigation, program closes with $809.3M paid out (Pacific Daily News)

Jul 03, 2025: Six of seven indicted in pandemic fraud scheme pleaded not guilty in court (KUAM)

Jul 03, 2025: 6 of 7 indicted in alleged $1.9M PUA fraud ring plead not guilty (Pacific Daily News)

Jul 03, 2025: PUA fraud defendants plead not guilty (Guam Daily Post)

Jul 03, 2025: 'Some people may be rushing to judgment': Tenorio says he knew of investigation of his family but did not discuss it (Pacific Daily News)

Jul 03, 2025: TENORIO CORRUPTION DEFENDANTS PLEAD NOT GUILTY, EXCEPT FOR ONE (Kandit)

Jul 09, 2025: Fisher to represent Topasna in District Court PUA fraud case (Guam Daily Post)

Jul 10, 2025: Fisher representing Topasna in PUA fraud case, arraignment set for Friday (Pacific Daily News)

Jul 10, 2025: Arraignment reset in $1.9M PUA fraud case as Topasna gets new attorney (KUAM)

Jul 11, 2025: The last of 7 indicted in PUA fraud scheme pleaded 'not guilty' Friday (KUAM)


RELATED:

Jun 18, 2021. Jerome M. Cruz Sentenced to Prison for Unemployment Fraud Charge Related to COVID-19 Pandemic

Nov 25, 2024. Pressure builds on fraud witnesses (Kandit News)


Wednesday, June 25, 2025

'WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE NEW POPE?"


LINK to online version

I will return to my series on “What to do when falsely accused” in my next column. But for this column, given the extraordinary moment of the surprise election of the man who took the name Leo 14, I thought I’d share a few thoughts on the new man in Rome. 

“What do you think of the new pope?” is a question I’ve been getting since the day the American, Robert Prevost, walked out onto the loggia as “Leonem Decimum Quartum.” 

First, I think he is a very smart man, and being smart, I predict he will be very careful, much more careful than his predecessor - who didn’t seem to care about being careful. In fact, you might say Francis’ order to “make a mess” at World Youth Day 2013 became the modus operandi  of his entire pontificate. 

During Francis’ reign, I had friends who went so far as to claim Francis was an anti-pope, an imposter to “the chair.” Some joined groups and movements to militate against him. 

Me…not so much. After every new discombobulation of the faith, from “Who am I to judge?” to the fabrication of “synodality,” I just shrugged my shoulders and repeated my usual refrain: “God gives us the leaders we deserve.”

And why wouldn’t God give us a discombobulating pope, given that for the better part of a century now, most Catholics have rejected Church teaching on everything from contraception to transubstantiation?

In fact, the election of the subdued and little known Robert Prevost is - I think - a quiet admission by his electors that Francis made too much of a mess, even for the progressive cardinals, many of whom were anointed by Francis to make more of a mess.

And speaking of “synodality,” this appears to be Leo’s first test. And how he handles it will bear witness to the remainder of what appears will be a long pontificate. 

While Francis flirted with blessing same-sex unions and permitting communion to adulterers, it really was just flirting. Of course flirting is dangerous, but with “synodality” Francis was “all in.” 

Synodality is the disturbance that it is because it functionally changes the nature of the Catholic Church. Let me explain. 

Earlier I referred to "synodality" as a fabrication. In fact, as I type “synodality” into my current draft, it keeps showing up with those squiggly underlines indicating that the word is misspelled or doesn’t exist. 

It doesn’t exit. The words “synod” and “synodal” do exist, but not “synodality.” Francis made it up. In fact, Cardinal Cupich, one of Francis’ “make a mess” boys, admitted “synodality” is a made-up word in a 2023 post titled: “‘Synodality’: a new word for an ancient reality.” 

Etymologically, “synod” means “assembly” or “meeting.” Okay, an assembly of who? Because the term has been hijacked by those who want to change Catholic Church governance, let’s take a look at an unadulterated definition in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

Synod: an ecclesiastical governing or advisory council: such as a): an assembly of bishops in the Roman Catholic Church; b): the governing assembly of an Episcopal province; c): a Presbyterian governing body ranking between the presbytery and the general assembly; d: a regional or national organization of Lutheran congregations.

Up until Francis, a “synod” in a Catholic context meant “a): an assembly of bishops…” And as you can see, it means a different sort of assembly in a non-Catholic context. With “synodality,” Francis appears to have adopted “c,” the Presbyterian model: a meeting of “the presbytery (clergy) and the general assembly (laity). 

Suspiciously, Cupich’s blurb about an “ancient reality” conveniently avoids the actual “ancient reality” that was in fact the first synod: the Council of Jerusalem as described in Acts of the Apostles (15:2-35). Cupich skips it because, per the scriptural account, the only attendees were “the apostles and the elders” - in other words, the pastors or overseers (clergy). There is no mention of the “overseen” (laity) being present.

The motivation behind Francis’ fabrication of “synodality” was the creation of a so-called “listening church.” And that’s the problem. Jesus didn’t command his apostles to “go and listen.” Jesus commanded the apostles to “go and teach.”

So how will Leo handle this? He has already said at the outset “We are a synodal church.” It was a careful thing to say at the moment. But because the Catholic Church is first and foremost and always will be an Apostolic church, I think he’s going to let the whole thing die quietly.

Tim Rohr has resided in Guam since 1987. He has raised a family of 11 children, owned several businesses, and is active in local issues via his blog, JungleWatch.info, letters to local publications, and occasional public appearances. He may be contacted at timrohr.guam@gmail.com    

Sunday, June 15, 2025

REPOST: MARTIN HENRY ROHR - A FATHER'S DAY REMEMBRANCE

Today, while searching for something else online, I came across this article I wrote in 2021 about my Dad for Father's Day. I'd like to think my finding it just now is a message from my Dad - or about him - since I wasn't looking for it, forgot I had ever written it, and it's Father's Day. The story was published in the Pacific Daily News on June 20, 2021.

Martin Henry Rohr had a tough Ohio upbringing

Dad was a big strong man with a big strong name: Martin Henry Rohr. He was born in the 1930s during the Great Depression and grew up in what was already a hundred-year-old farmhouse outside of Massillon, Ohio, on what is still called "Mudbrook Road." 

Martin Henry was the 10th of 14 children born to Elmer Rohr, a veteran of WW1, and Helen Lindberger. ... The Ohio Rohrs were farmers who carved their life out of the tough Ohio climate, a life that hammered my Dad into a tough, massive man at an early age.

During the Korean War, Dad joined the Navy. And while stationed in San Diego, Dad met a Mexican señorita through a Navy buddy who was my mom’s first cousin. Eight children were born of this union, starting with me.


It was not an easy life. One of my earliest memories of Dad is seeing him trudging into our flooded backyard in pouring rain with a bicycle on his shoulder. Dad couldn’t afford a car so he rode a bicycle to work, and that day his bike had a flat tire.

I never knew we were poor then. Mom and Dad never talked about it. They worked and worked and worked. Dad was a milkman, a paperboy, a lineman, a ditch digger, and finally a “rod buster” - the equivalent of a human mule who carries rebar on rough and bloodied shoulders down into a ditch or onto a bridge deck.

Today, most of the freeways in and around Los Angeles are stained with Dad’s blood and sweat — and pieces of his shoulders. 

In memory of Dad’s brother, Albert, who was killed in 1934 when he fell down the cellar stairway, Dad named his second son after him. Albert, my brother, was killed in 1989 when he fell down a different stairway in Irvine, California. Dad never got over it.

Martin Henry Rohr died in February 2014. He left his body to science and there is no grave to mourn at. I believe he wanted it that way. But I don’t need a grave to mourn at. I only need to look at your picture.

Requiem Aeternam (Eternal Rest), Dad.

Your firstborn, Tim 

Thursday, June 12, 2025

HOW TO HANDLE FALSE ALLEGATIONS - PART 1



LINK to online version

On Father’s Day 2014, this paper ran a feature titled “The Ultimate Father.” The article was subtitled: “Tim Rohr knows the definition of the word ‘father’ very well. He is the father of 11 children.” The article featured a big picture of my wife and I with our 11 children.

Four years later, in May 2018, I was smeared for an entire week in local headlines as a wife beater and a sexual molester of my own children.

The allegations were false, and according to credible estimates, such allegations against men in particular are false 55% of the time. But I couldn’t rely on estimates. I had to prove those allegations false or lose everything.

So how does a husband and a father defend himself against those kinds of allegations coming from his own family? And just as important, how does a man, a husband and father, recover from the angst and despair wrought by such a malignant situation?

I’ve been hesitant over the years to share any of my personal story relative to this drama for two reasons: 1) I didn’t (and still don’t) want to hurt any of my children by dragging any of this into the present; and 2) I wanted (and still want) to leave my door open for reconciliation. So other than the foregoing, I will be reserved about further details.

However, because my aim in this series of columns is to give some hope to other husbands and fathers (and even wives and mothers), who may find themselves in similarly desperate straits, it is necessary to describe the “pit” I found myself in in 2018 so I can share how I clawed my way out of it, and how, if you find yourself in the same pit, you can too.

Why and how those things happened to me at that time is not unrelated to my role in exposing the largest clergy sex abuse conspiracy and scandal per capita in the whole Catholic world. In order for the “bad guys” to “save Apuron,” it was critical that I be “taken out” before Apuron was taken down.

But I digress. I’ll get to that story another time.

So back to the point: what to do if you find yourself falsely accused of abuse by your spouse or even your children - and I should add: formally accused in a legal proceeding.

I suppose there is no shortcut through the grief, so the first thing to do is to just suffer it. Your grief will probably go through the well-known Kubler-Ross pattern of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.

You don’t have to get to “acceptance” before taking the next step though. In fact, this pattern of grief can repeat many times. And there is never any predicting when that “jab of red-hot memory” - as C.S. Lewis described it - is going to erupt out of your heart and into your throat. So just accept it. Cry as much as you need.

Ultimately, though, especially if you find yourself in court, you must get your wits about you because it is very likely if you have been thus accused - falsely accused - that your accuser is hoping you will break before you can turn the tables. The idea is to accuse you of violence to make you react violently so your accuser can say “See, Your Honor. There he goes again!”

The next thing to do is get an attorney, especially if the other party has already initiated legal action. Due to court rules which set out timelines, you will need to immediately file whatever you need to file to initially protect yourself.

However, and this is a big “however,” do not - I repeat - do not leave it to your attorney to see to your interests. You must - I repeat - you must educate yourself as if you are your own attorney, at least on the procedural basics.

The failure of one of my attorneys (I had six - not including myself) to file a reply to the most damning of the allegations left the court no option but to take my children away from me - a situation that persisted for five terrible years and caused untold damage to those children.

The problem was that I didn’t even know - at the time - that I could have replied, and that had I replied, I might have put a quick end to that traumatic mess. But because I left my interests to “the professionals,” I lost my children.

More next time.

Note: For the readers of this blog, I share more details and resources at a link in the side bar: "Keep Breathing."

Tim Rohr has resided in Guam since 1987. He has raised a family of 11 children, owned several businesses, and is active in local issues via his blog, JungleWatch.info, letters to local publications, and occasional public appearances. He may be contacted at timrohr.guam@gmail.com    



Tuesday, June 10, 2025

TOO MANY OF US GAVE UP TOO MUCH TO JUST LOOK AWAY

By Tim Rohr


November 2, 2022. Bishop Ryan Jimenez of Chalan Kanoa, Saipan
joins an interview with Fr. Jason Granado about the work of the
Neocatechumenal Way in his then-diocese.


In DEJA VU, ALL OVER AGAIN, Frenchie refers to the documents prohibiting the formation of new Neocatechumenal Way communities - all of which are still in effect. For your reference, here are the documents with the relevant passages:

March 15, 2017, Prot. No. 2017-074, Archbishop Byrnes

"In the conversation with Pope Francis last October, he appealed to me in a particular way to do what I can to bring some healing to the divisions existing in the Archdiocese of Agana. While I have been on island only two months, hardly a day goes by when that same appeal comes to me from you. From listening to many of you I realize that a number of factors have contributed toward the divisions. I cannot deal with them all at once hence what I outline below represents a beginning…First of all, I have asked the lead catechists here in Guam to put a “pause” on the formation of new communities for a period of about a year.”


March 15, 2017, Prot. 2017-075, Archbishop Byrnes

"In the context of the pastoral charge entrusted me by the Holy Father, I present the following actions…First of all, I have asked the lead catechists here in Guam to put a “pause” on the formation of new communities for a period of about a year.”


NOTE: Because the original directive put the length of the pause "for about a year," the Neocats, specifically the Atienza's, took it upon themselves to lift the pause after "about a year," without consulting the archbishop, thus necessitating the next two documents:


August 18, 2021, Prot. No. 2021-064, Office of the Episcopal Vicar to Dr. Davide and Mrs. Maruxa Atienza

“It has come to the attention o the Archbishop the NCW has begun the work of pursuing the formation of new communities…In many of the meetings, the Archbishop has had with you, he has stressed his unwillingness to allow for new communities of the NCW to be formed. The pause dated March 15, 2017, he placed on the formation of new communities, remains in effect today.”


March, 27, 2023, MEMORANDUM, From Vicar General to Clergy, Religious, Neocatechumenal communities, School Administrators,Catholic groups and ministries

"On March 15 2017, Archbishop Michael Byrnes instructed the lead catechists of the Neocatechumenal Way in Guam to put a “pause” on the formation of new communities…let it be clear that the moratorium on the formation of new communities of the Neocatechumenal Way remains in effect unless otherwise instructed. All must abide by the directive.”

THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER DIRECTIVES, THUS THE PAUSE REMAINS IN PLACE. Nevertheless, the NCW continues to recruit local parishioners and even some pastors.

The real issue

Recently Anonymous left this comment: "What is your problem with the NCW? Pure hate against the fruits of the Holy Spirit."

Another Anonymous answered: "Liturgical abuse, doctrinal deformations, a parallel and superseding heirarchy of catechists, fraudulent convenance of Archdiocesan property, cult-like manipulation during the Scrutinies...just to get started."

While all of the above reasons are glaringly valid, the real issue is absolute and persistent "disobedience" to proper Catholic Church authorities as evidenced by the foregoing. However, I put "disobedience" in quotes because it's actually not disobedience. How is that?

The real issue is that the NCW does not recognize legitimate Catholic Church authority which is the clearest evidence that the NCW is in fact not Catholic but a parallel church with its own magisterium and authority, and to which it is singularly obedient. This is why it has been called out as a heresy by those courageous enough to do it. 

SEE: BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER: THE DOCTRINE OF KIKO ARGUELLO IS HERESY...A GRAVE ABUSE

Thus this is the litmus test for Archbishop Jimenez. If he doesn't handle this and handle it quickly, he will lose all authority and the archdiocese he now shepherds will descend into even deeper chaos than when he was appointed to it. 

It will be difficult for Jimenez. There is credible speculation that his rise from Filipino contract worker to the office of Bishop in Saipan was due in large part to the same forces that invaded Guam and protected Apuron. The idea was always for Saipan to be a fallback should Guam fail. 

At this point, we have only credible speculation that Jimenez owes his rise to the Neocrats (notice "Neocrats" v Neocats - emphasizing the Neocat brass), and we don't intend to investigate because we won't have to. Jimenez' action or inaction, and in very short order, will tell us who he is. 

Too many of us gave up too much to just look away.

Sunday, June 8, 2025

DEJA VU, ALL OVER AGAIN

 Posted by Frenchie






For more than 3 decades the Neocatechumenal way, through its leaders, starting with Carmen and Kiko, soon to be coopted by the Genarrini brothers repeated ad nauseum that the Popes had endorsed their Sect within the Catholic Church.

Short of real endorsement they made claims over and over again that the Pope was supporting their gnostic movement despite evidence to the contrary. Many gullible people unfortunately fell for the con job and apparently continue to do so.



Here on this blog, and on many others who are aware of the Neos bait and switch tactics, people have laid bare the lies and the fake endorsements. This started with Pope John Paul II who in his zeal to endorse any movement related to the new evangelization, that was so dear to his heart, fell prey to their religious Ponzi scheme. Kiko and Carmen were relentless in getting photo ops and conferences where the Pope was present, in order to claim that his presence which they seeked at every turn, was in fact an endorsement.



It is also during John Paul II pontificate that the Neos, then in full expansion, were able to get permission to start their biggest bait and switch ever: the Redemptoris Seminaries. We on Guam were at the forefront of that money laundering system. While the efforts of several hundred faithful on our island led to the closing of said "seminary" and the uncovering of the many misdeeds of disgraced former Archbishop Apuron, despite the protection of Cardinal Filoni (aka the red Pope), the Neos never relented.

After Archbishop Hon discoveries, and his ultimate eye opening, we were granted a co Adjutor in the person of Archbishop Byrnes (who sadly left this world, after a long catastrophic illness, last week). It is to be noted that throughout his first years here, the Neos through their presbyters failed by design to recognize him as their Bishop, claiming Apuron was still their Boss despite the finding of the Vatican court and the ultimate confirmation of that Judgement by Pope Francis. Until finally Archbishop Byrnes was confirmed fully as Archbishop of Agana.



Following the decision by Archbishop Byrnes, which is still standing, to put the movement on strict restrictions in our Archdiocese, they went on acquiring a center in Asan, where they continue their separate services in total contradiction with the edict. Of course, this was allowed thanks to the lengthy illness of Archbishop Byrnes and the subsequent vacuum of power at the head of our Archdiocese, with the discreet approval of corrupt clergy members. But even as recently as this past Easter celebrations, the Chancery had given strict instructions to all Neo Presbyters to not celebrate the Easter Vigil Mass before 7.00pm. Guess what?... All parishes with Neo pastors celebrated the Easter Vigil as early as 5.00pm, in order to meet for their separate celebration of Easter at their own "center" in total and overt disobedience of Archbishop Jimenez decision.

It is obviously clear to all, but the blind and the stupid that the Way and its leaders on Island have absolutely no intention to follow the instructions of both Archbishop Byrnes, and Archbishop Jimenez.



While the Neos were checked by Pope Benedict after they tried to trick him to sign their so-called Statutes in 2012, (which they had claimed were authorized in 2008) during their yearly meeting with the Pope, in the audience hall of the Vatican, with thousands of Neos from around the world in attendance (one of these mega events they cherish, as a show of force). Unfortunately for Kiko and Carmen, Cardinal Arinze just prior to the Pope's signature uncovered the many irregularities, in the document prepared for approval, that were in contradiction with the 5 years of hard work his dicastery had done. The main effort was to try to reconcile the 13 volumes of the Catechism used by the Neocatechumenal Way, which needed numerous corrections and about 2000 references to parallel passages of the official Catechism of the Catholic Church. The Document was also supposed to give Special approval of the Neos most visible, controversial and distinctive ways of celebrating the Mass, which was not at all intended by the Vatican.

These four elements are very important if you wish to understand the heretical approach of the NCW.



  • 1)Masses are celebrated in small groups corresponding to the different stages of advancement on the Catechetical journey. If in a parish for example there are 12 Neo communities, each at a different stage. There will be 12 Masses celebrated in separate places more or less at the same time, preferably on Saturday evening.
  • 2) The surroundings and furnishings trace out the image of a banquet: a table with the participants seated around it. Even when the Neocatechumenals celebrate the Mass not in a parish hall, but in a church, they ignore the Altar. They put a table in the middle and seat around in a circle.
  • 3) Each Biblical readings of the Mass are preceded by an extensive "monition" on the part of one or the other of the catechists who lead the community, and is followed especially after the Gospel, by "resonances" or personal reflections by a substantial number of those present. The priest's homily is added to the "resonances" without being distinguished from them.
  • 4) Communion also takes place in a banquet form. The consecrated bred- a large unleavened loaf, 2/3 white flour and 1/3 whole wheat flour, prepared and baked according to detailed rules established by Kiko- is broken and distributed to those present, who remain in their places. After the distribution, it is eaten at the same time by all, including the presbyter. After that the priest goes from one person to the next with the Chalice of consecrated wine, which everyone drinks.
While there are many other peculiarities, these four are enough to understand how different in form and substance these "Masses" are from those celebrated according to the Catholic general liturgical rules.

This having been reestablished for the benefit of new readers, or simply those who have forgotten after 10 years of the Neos hiding in the shadows. Let's look at some of the latest events regarding the NCW on Guam, their strawmen and their strategy for a comeback.

Since the approved resignation of Archbishop Byrnes for health reasons, The NCW on Guam has had two approaches.

  1. Ignoring the restrictions imposed by Byrnes, regarding new communities and meetings, yet not flaunting it, to avoid obvious questions from the rest of the faithful. In a way: passive resistance and continued progression, but undercover.
  2. Engage in a campaign of reconstruction of their image for the general public, but also by wooing members of the clergy who for one reason or the other might feel overlooked or threatened by a possible new administration.

This pincer approach had several advantages. Strengthening their fragilized position, buying time to regroup, continue a discreet proselytization within the parishes. Put in place new figure heads that would appear more friendly and less threatening (a softer approach.) Gain new unsuspecting allies. Reassure the hardcore members that there is light at the end of the tunnel.

This was facilitated by the fact that the delegate to the NCW, deacon Martinez was feeling abandoned by his hierarchy and ended having health issues, which greatly curtailed his duties. This in turn allowed the NCW to take a lot of liberties at their new center in Asan, knowing full well there would be no reckoning, as well as creating a climate of arrogance and defiance on the part of the most vocal presbyters.



Upon the arrival of Archbishop Jimenez on August 15th, 2024, the local NCW and their handlers in New Jersey, had reasons to be optimistic. As the Bishop of Chalan Kanoa, Ryan Jimenez had a fairly amiable relation with the Neos on Saipan. While the Neos in the Northern Marianas are fairly active and have had a successful growth, without raising eyebrows, as they had originally done when they first landed in Guam in the 90s. Their history in Guam had revealed a very different and not so pleasant experience, and our new Archbishop found a very different and much more complex situation in his new Diocese. Scars were still very fresh, the damage done over 30 years of liturgical colonization by the hordes of Kiko and Carmen, under the leadership of the Putrid Pius could not be erased that easily. 

Yet, true to their form, the Neos kept pushing forward for a new reset. One of their charmers, the very dangerous Fr Prieto, was able to charm his ways into the immediate surrounding of the Archbishop who was very unaware of the potential of Boboboy. In the past Harold had been extremely successful in getting close to some of our weakest, and/or compromised priests to carry favors or exert influence through compromission.  Harold was also very successful in using his charms to sway the mind of some of our local social media mud rackers. In particular he somewhat won over the attention of Kandit News. He also was able to insert himself into the Right for life group in order to gain respectability.

None the less, the different personalities who had led the struggle against the NCW, took the time to share their concerns with our new leader. By the same token Dr Atienza and his spouse also got an opportunity to give their version of the situation. I think we can be reassured that the Archbishop is a lot less naive about the real situation of the Church in his Archdiocese and more realistic about the challenges facing him and our Church...



The NCW and their communication network.

Over the years, we have learned about the NCW communications, by trials and errors, not knowing how widespread and devious it could be

The communication is very well oiled and starts at the level of the communities. As soon as one decides to join an NCW community, this person will very slowly at first and then increasingly be exposed to one-on-one communication that follows extremely closely the so called NCW Catechism. People are paired with others in a loose but very intricate network of cohorts that follow to the letter their catechist, discuss themes and are encouraged at every step to reflect. Every outside situation is then explained through the prism of the NCW, through teaching and conversations. The role of the local responsible is extremely important in analyzing and identifying issues with the person and the group. Every outside situation is explained through that prism. People are given the why, the how and because.

This is all build around the community, the bond and dependency of the individual to the group is essential and ultimately gets very strong.

The next step is the communication with the outside. The projection of the image wanted to the outside world. There are several levels to this dimension. It is all related on how both Kiko and Carmen started their movement. Most of the wording, approach to the rationale is built around the image they decided to project.


One of the key pieces of that game on Guam is May Llanes aka Diana, who is the main actor of a local blog called "Neocatechumenal Way- An insider's view", which is picked up throughout the Neo blogosphere. Diana pushes forward the Neo narrative of the moment. Last month it was to rekindle the Apuron was a victim charade, meant to refurbish the image of the serial sexual abuser. Tim wrote extensively about that latest mental diarrhea, which was just the warming up of a 10-year-old tale.
But on the first week of June Diana was finally back flirting with her glory days, picking up one of the best Neo propaganda pieces of recent years, at least in Guam.
All local media from KUAM, the PDN, the Post, but also radio shows like the Ray Gibson Show, or Patti Arroyo (the niece of Msg Bibi) ran without checking with the story of newly minted Chamorro Priest in Rome, Fr Cody Merfalen, incardinated by the "1st American Pope"



Apparently, the story was leaked through some West Virginia paper, by the neo middlemen and picked up in unison by our local media, proud of the connection. Few of course understood that they were hoodwinked by the Neo Propaganda machine. The Vicar General on the Ray Gibson show, smelling a rat, was able to diplomatically skirt the issue and redirect the conversation. While the Archbishop on Patti Arroyo's show appeared lost for words. Later the chancery graced us with a general communique, but the Neos had their earned media hour, which was underlined by the Diana, Zenit News, and la Stampa all affiliated with Kiko and his ilk
This was a typical Neo operation. Take a somewhat mundane issue: the incardination of 10 new priest in the Diocese of Rome, by its newly minted new Bishop (Leo XIV), and press the story like a lemon to get the most coverage possible. Which is exactly what they did.  Two weeks after the story of Apuron's victims dropping their civil suit, for the Neos it is like manna from the sky. And cherry on the cake to top it all, while the Pope celebrated all the communities falling under the "new evangelization" he granted an audience to Kiko, who was so elated he played his guitar for hours on end.

Diana could not be more pleased.

Of course the NCW will continue to publicize their mega meeting by region, or in Rome and Domus Galilae in Israel. 

Life goes on. The Neos will stick to their rehearsed mantra:
The Pope loves us.
We were sent by the Pope
Who are you to doubt the Pope?

Meanwhile it is rumored that Fr Merfalen is planning to visit the communities in late August, early September. Msg David Quitagua (the tall) has been spotted at the Airport, apparently bringing good news to Atienza, Eusebio and Jackie Terlaje from the East Coast where he is sheltered right now. It also has been revealed that since Krystoff has left for school, the NCW is lacking meeting areas for their growing communities, and that they are actively looking for new locations for their nonprofit located in Hawaii, with their tried-and-true approach of leasing with an option to buy. The black bags have been circulating relentlessly, and they are eyeing for property on the cheap, maybe even church property. This is something we warned they would do back in 2020.

As the old adage reminds us, the devil never sleeps.