SO WHERE DOES ROHR FIT IN?

By Tim Rohr

In today's Pacific Daily News we learned that the Archdiocese of Agana is selling two of its most valuable properties, the property occupied by the FHP Health Center across from the ITC building, and the Chancery property atop San Ramon Hill. Its other "most valuable" property, the former Seminary property in Yona, was sold a few years ago.

We also learned that Clare Delgado of Home Ventures is the listing broker for the FHP property and is the preferred broker should the Chancery property be publicly listed for sale. The listing broker for the Yona property was Liz Duenas of Remax Diamond Realty. 

So to quote a KUAM news story, "Where does Rohr fit in?" Wasn't Tim Rohr behind the "conspiracy" to oust the former Archbishop Apuron in order to profit on selling these properties as "a real estate mediator?"

From a KUAM story on June 3, 2016:

The church meanwhile is also accusing Martinez of being part of a conspiracy or the "Rohr Group" to topple the archbishop. Tim Rohr operates the JungleWatch blog, which has been critical of the archbishop over the last several years.

The church further claims Martinez, who was the former archdiocesan financial officer was incompetent in his position and for six years in a row failed to submit required financial reports to the Vatican.  The archdiocese alleges this finance council conspired to sell the Yona seminary property in order to cover their financial misdeeds. So where does Rohr fit in? (Emphases added)

According to the church they allege he had a personal interest in the plan and was supposed to be involved in the multi-million dollar sale as a real estate mediator.

And from a September 21, 2017 LA STAMPA story:

In 2012, a blog called “Jungle Watch” was created online, attacking Archbishop Apuron and the Neocatechumenal Way, accusing them of manipulating the prelate and “colonizing” the entire Agaña diocese. The site is managed by Tim Rohr, a real estate agent employed by Msgr. Benavente and involved in the projected sale of the seminary. (Note: La Stampa does not identify its source, but of course it could only have been Apuron's people.)

For my supposed role in this conspiracy, Apuron and his people planned to sue me in both civil and church courts. 

From a May 31, 2016 Pacific Daily News story:

This time around, the archdiocese’s statement has named at least one specific person and his “associates.”

“Tim Rohr and his associates launched a vicious and calumnious attack on the Archbishop and the Church,” the Archdiocese of Agana said.

“Those who are orchestrating this campaign are inciting people into hatred of the Archbishop and the Catholic Church. They have produced scandal, confusion and grave errors with the cruel intent to injure the Archbishop, the Catholic Church in Guam and many other people of good will who have been outraged and harassed. Therefore, the Archdiocese of Agana is in the process of taking canonical and legal measures against those perpetrating these malicious lies,” the Archdiocese said. (Emphases added)

 Of course they never sued me or anyone else. In fact, at the time of these stories, Apuron had already run away and was caught on camera in Rome trying to cozy up to Pope Francis. And we all now know the rest of the story.

Meanwhile, instead of monstrously profiting off the sale of these properties as "a real estate mediator," I not only have never made a dime - because I never was involved in that way to begin with, but my role in outing decades of previously unimaginable horrific abuse has cost me tens of thousands of dollars, which is a story I will save for another day. 

WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH THE YONA PROPERTY?

Posted by Frenchie

I have been contacted by several of our readers, with questions regarding the Yona property.

Questions ranged from some of the usual venom on the "other blog", to why has the Yona property not been sold yet?

Here is what we can comment on so far.

While some have been dismayed by the personal attacks against Tim and Mother Dawn, regarding the old NCW canard about its acquisition.

You should not be surprised by this. It is almost a logical step for Diana and her puppet masters.

Why am I saying this?

It is simple: the repeated blows to the NCW here on Guam, from the running away of Apuron and his subsequent guilty verdict, Pius declared persona non grata, the closing of the RMS in Yona, the limitations imposed (even if not observed) by Archbishop Byrnes on the NCW, the eloping of their dirty tricks agent Adrian Cristobal, have severely dented the image of holier than thou that the Neos like to project. In fact the damage to said image in Europe and in the USA has been quite important.

This is why they need to shine their own armor and polish their narrative.

One of the way to do it, is the continued slandering and attempts at destruction of the people that outed them for who they really are.

The other one is to distract from other events

Finally they have to lay the ground work for what seems to be a possible payback.

This where the other questions about the Yona property come into play.

You have all observed that the bankruptcy administrator has rejected several offers for the purchase of the Yona property.

As of late, a mysterious new investor from outside the Marianas has made a bid too.

The bankruptcy court is considering an auction.

Part of the reasons, was that some of the creditors were objecting to the price being too low.

Among the leading creditors pushing this narrative: the Bank of Guam.

Remember who ran the bank of Guam?

Remember who used Neo cadre to run a governor's campaign, and gave them access to Adelup?

Connect the dots, it is not rocket science.

Now one complicating issue is the fact that the Archbishop when he first arrived, and tried to wrestle the Yona property away from the clutches of  Genarrini, filed a suit, but rather than listen to local real estate attorneys took the advise of one of his Michigan friend, and failed to serve the people's named on the title. A little bird has told us that someone in NJ is complicating the issue of the sale of the 

Yona property. Connected the dots yet?

So Diana being a good little soldier for her puppet masters, is doing her work of the termites inside the wood.

It is looking as if someone is holding a grudge, and is not gonna make it easy to settle the lawsuits and the bankruptcy.

If that someone turns out to purchase the Yona property, and give it to an entity tied to the Evangelization of Asia and the Pacific, that would be a whopper wouldn't it. 

(please read the article on Filoni's moves in Macau, and Japan)

Ummmh!!! wondering who that could be?

If Diana does not mind her name being used as a front, never forget who feeds her the material....?

Connecting the dots yet?

Nothing happens in a vaccum. The devil never rest.

A MESSAGE FROM SUNDAY PICKETERS IN ACTION FROM LFM

SUNDAY PICKETERS IN ACTION

Fellow Catholics,

We started out with three R's--Restore, Return, Remove.We have come a long way. When we had the first big prayer rally (protest) on the steps of the Cathedral Basilica on March 25, 2015, we demanded justice for two priests that apuron had not only improperly fired but publicly trashed. The two have been publicly restored to the good graces of the the diocese. 

A couple months later we discovered that apuron had deceitfully given away the Yoña property. In November the Yoña property was returned to the patrimony and control of the Archdiocese of Agaña.

We are on our final demand to remove and defrock apuron for his scandalous behavior. We are persistent and determined in our battle to remove the evil forces within our church. We are

SUNDAY PICKETERS IN ACTION

Let's commemorate our one year of picketing by bringing  family and friends Sunday, June 11, 2017 to the front of the Cathedral Basilica at 9 a.m. Last Sunday 60+ faithful Catholics picketed.    Click on  SUNDAY PICKETERS IN ACTION   and you'll see your Catholic friends, neighbors and family.

Let's join them this Sunday:  We can all be SUNDAY PICKETERS IN ACTION

Cathedral, 9-9:45 AM.

God bless Us All,

Lou Klitzkie, LFM

THE AFC SPEAKS - FINALLY!

Posted by Tim
Sept 1, 2016: UPDATED with links to supporting documents

Following is the statement given to the media today regarding the Yona Property by the members of the Archdiocesan Finance Council who Apuron fired in 2012.

Statement Concerning Yona Property

August 31, 2016

Download PDF copy here

We, the former members of the Archdiocesan Finance Council along with Deacon Steve Martinez, who was the Finance Officer during our tenure, make the following statements.

GUAM RMS VS A REAL SEMINARY, (PART III) SECTION B

Posted by Frenchie

Continued from Part 3A

It is now a well established fact, that the founders of the NCW used the Goodwill of John Paul II to gain access to many doors inside the Vatican, and that they shamelessly used his name in vain, to advance their agenda of a new version of the "body snatchers". Until now, except for some minor regional setback, they have been successful well behind the real power of their organization.

Guam has been until very recently one of their most striking demonstration of how a Catholic Diocese could be completely taken over. Part of their strategy has been the establishment of the RMS on Guam, which we have demonstrated is nothing but a crude scam.

A little less than two years ago, under the mounting pressure of a public who was becoming more and more aware of the catastrophic situation of the seminary, and slightly a year after the eviction of fr Paul as the vocation Director and his replacement by Cristobal, Archbishop Apuron decided to pull out of his magical hat a new seminary, this one was supposed to be dedicated to the candidates to the priesthood that did not wish to go through the Neos ' system of education.

Never being short on the sensational, Apuron, egged on by his Catechist the evil Pius, decided to name this new institution :

ST. JOHN PAUL THE GREAT ARCHDIOCESAN SEMINARY OF GUAM.

THE WORTHY ADVERSARY: IT'S TIME FOR THE BISHOP QUIZ

Of course this is exactly what Apuron did...or should we say, his handlers (blackmailers) had him do. Just insert RMS for "parishes."

6) Have you transferred land to parishes? Why? Do you still exercise all oversight on those properties—choose pastors, approve spending, take a percentage of collections, pay the salaries of priests? Can you cite the exact canon law where it says that parishes should own their own land? Why does your lawyer contradict you—saying that transferring the land “reduces your legal exposure” in sex abuse cases? - See more at: http://theworthyadversary.com/3775-its-time-to-take-the-bishop-quiz#sthash.8x4xdIIS.dpuf

ON THE DEFINITION OF "DECREE" AND A POSSIBLE SUIT

Dear Apostolic Visitors:

We realize you will not be able to assist us directly in a civil challenge of Archbishop Apuron's assignment of the Yona Property to RMS, but we hope you can convince him to reverse it before this matter becomes a civil suit. 

Here, though, is a concern involving the Church: the use of the term DECREE when in fact there was none.

*****

Attached to Archbishop Apuron's DEED RESTRICTION relative to the perpetual use of the "Yona Property" by the Redemptoris Mater Seminary (RMS) - a seminary limited by its Articles of Incorporation to serve ONLY the formation of priests in the Neocatechumenal Way (Art. III), Archbishop Apuron attaches a DECREE OF DESIGNATION.

THE YONA PROPERTY SCANDAL - CONTINUED

aka "Seminarygate"

Relative to the legal observations in the previous post,  I want to point out the language in the first "WHEREAS" in the Decree of Designation. 

Archbishop Apuron predicates his whole Decree on RMS being the "major seminary of the Archdiocese of Agana." 

A "major seminary" is defined as a "Roman Catholic seminary giving usually the entire six years of senior college and theological training required for major orders."

It is quite obvious from its "product" (presbyters), even if it will not publish its credentials, courses, or list of faculty, that RMS is NOT a place where one goes to get "the entire six years of senior college and theological training." 

LAWYERS (?) WEIGH IN ON THE "YONA PROPERTY SCANDAL"

Note: Sorry folks from Yona, we couldn't figure out what else to call it. 

We can't call it the Seminary property scandal because it is NOT the Seminary's property. We didn't want to call it the RMS scandal because there are so many other RMS scandals that it would get confusing. Likewise, we couldn't call it the Apuron scandal. Too many of those. And we didn't want to use the "Old Accion Hotel" moniker as it would sound a Harlequin novel (but then again...). 

So we called it the Yona Property Scandal", at least for now. We needed to give it a name because we will use it as a Label to file all the posts about this story, and there may be a lot by the time we are done. 

We've been getting some interesting "legal" observations from some folks who sound like they know what they are talking about, so we will use this post to collect them. You can check back on this post for updates as we collect more of these types of observations. I will also offer some of my own.  The hyperlinked date and time stamp will take you to the original comment so you can see it in context.

Update: Yona you are spared. We will be calling this "Seminarygate" in the upcoming posts.