DON'T BLAME HIM!

Hey, don't blame him. 

He is the product of Kiko's theology (see "Kiko and Purgatory") and Apuron's (fake) seminary. According to Kiko, there is no Purgatory. And the only reason for All Souls Day (today in Guam) is to pray for the Poor Souls in Purgatory.

So this priest makes the best of it... (sort of). 

However, let 's not get too excited about blaming Kiko or this priest or even the NCW. Almost all funeral sermons and nearly every funeral announcement in our local media - placed there by well-meaning families - misled by mostly cowardly teaching from cowardly clerics, canonizes their dearly departed loved ones as "already in heaven," or even an "ANGEL!" When in fact, they are probably suffering in Purgatory like most of us will.

Heaven, Probably Not Your Next Stop!

Personal note: Sadly. I like this priest. He normally celebrates the Mass in a reverential way which I seldom see anywhere else. Maybe the new archbishop will help. Meanwhile, the rest of us can stop "angel-icizing" and canonizing our departed relatives. They most likely need our prayers, not our platitudes.

TRICKY DICK AND HIS IRRESPONSIBLE RESPONSE - PART 6 - AND, BY THE WAY, HON, WE ARE DOWN TO 28 DAYS

Posted by Tim Rohr

Continued from Part 5

Oh shucks, Tricky Dick was only off by a year. Instead of meeting with the bishops of Oceania on December 5, 1999, it was actually 1998:

ADDRESS OF THE HOLY FATHER POPE JOHN PAUL II TO THE BISHOPS OF THE PACIFIC ON THEIR "AD LIMINA" VISIT, 5 December 1998 

LINK

But not only did Tricky Dick get the year wrong, he got the content wrong too.

Tricky Dick said: To form presbyters of the “New Evangelization” is not a characteristic of the Neocatechumenal Way, as is made clear by the St. Pope John Paul II’s Ad Limina message to CEPAC (Dec. 5, 1999).

Actually, the pope's address says nothing about the Neocatechumenal Way or even about the formation of presbyters - you will note that the pope does NOT use that word. Rather the pope said this:

KIKO'S PASSOVER PROBLEM

Reposted by Chuck White

The Jewish Passover looms large in the Catholic theology of the Eucharist, and while it is very important in Kiko Arguello’s religion too, he deforms it dangerously by ignoring a very key element.  This deformation is disastrous for him, because  if Kiko is wrong about the Passover celebrated by the Jews in first century Palestine, then he is WRONG about the worship of the first century Christians and WRONG about modern Catholic worship.  Read more.

THE BLACKLIST

(Posted by Glaucon Jr)

If Diana's blog had a family crest

Ok, I'm pretty much ready to wrap up this five-part series on the NCW, its paradosephobic bad theology, its broken Christology, and its natural terminus in pride and injustice. It's long work for you to read and digest, but it's important that we know what we're up against. 

In other words, there's a big steaming pile of Kiko we've stepped in, and right now if feels like we're not getting our shoes clean for a while.

But one thing has been bothering me, so I thought I'd put it out there for your consideration.

FOLLOW-UP: PIUS, PRIDE, EVIL, AND THE GOOD

(Posted by Glaucon Jr)

In KIKO'S DEFORMED VISION, PT 4: PRIDE DISGUISED, we finally addressed the problem of pride as the evil fruit  (among a whole vine of evils, in particular injustice) flowing from Kiko's theology and practice. 

And that's why we must be clear on what we mean by the evil fruit of the NCW. 

CAN YOU SMELL THE LOVE?

(Posted by Glaucon Jr)

Ever since I began writing posts dealing with the Neocatechumenal Way, I have in faith and in charity been compelling to become immersed in their theology. I knew there was grave error present if only from the de facto liturgical schism on Guam as well as the shockingly prideful statements of the superiority of NCW member faith over “traditional Catholics” whom they regard as quasi-Catholics, half-pagan and wholly immature in everything Christ.

So we had to get into the nitty-gritty, and man, this is nasty, pungent stuff!

KIKO'S DEFORMED VISION, PT 2: THE LENS AT WORK

(Posted by Glaucon Jr)

Apuron's ideal location for the Institution of the Holy Eucharist

In Part One (if you haven't read it, please do so for greater clarity), we set the stage for explaining the abyss that is the result of NCW theology. It's not easy, and it takes a few minutes. In light of our whole project here of fleshing out why dialogue with the NCW simply isn’t possible unless you accept their view of Church-divorced-from-Tradition, I’m a little surprised that some have told me that I need to quote the Catechism to back up what I say. To what purpose? Most readers know exactly what we are talking about. Bishops by and large don't care anyway. And the NCW types read with Catechism with a lens that makes the Magisterium as a whole incoherent.

Which explains about everything else that makes them so disconnected from the rest of the Church, poor souls. So let's continue on to KIKO'S DEFORMED VISION, PT 2: THE LENS AT WORK

(If you don't "get" the caption, click here  and/or here to see what we've been talking about all along)

KIKO'S DEFORMED VISION, PT 1: KIKO'S CHURCH

(Posted by Glaucon Jr)

Remember when you were a kid in school, and you had to start learning algebra? You had to solve for unknowns, like x+2=5. By knowing one addend as well as the sum, we can discover that missing element. In this example of course, x can only be 3. There is no other solution possible.

In the same way, because NCW is so secretive and keeps it teaching from prying theological eyes, we must employ a certain algebraic approach. We know the addend: that they make heretical statements believing them to be Church teaching. We also know that the sum of their catechesis: a conversion of souls that then leads to division in the Church, contempt for non-NCW Catholics, a persecution complex, and a desire to destroy whatever of the Tradition does not meet their worldview.

So what's that unknown that seems so elusive?  Read more. 

HON OFFERS MASS "IN HONOR" OF CARMEN (?)

(Photo: DOUG MILLS, The New York TImes,
via Getty Images (Pool photo))

Posted by Tim Rohr

In his homily for his father's funeral, the Rev. Paul Scalia, son of former Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia, began:

"We are gathered here because of one man. A man known personally to many of us, known only by reputation to even more. A man loved by many, scorned by others. A man known for great controversy, and for great compassion. That man, of course, is...."

We can be sure that everyone listening expected the son to say his father's name. 

He did not. 

He finished the sentence with the name: "Jesus of Nazareth."

BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER: THE DOCTRINE OF KIKO ARGUELLO IS HERESY...A GRAVE ABUSE

EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Bishop Athanasius Schneider

Mr. Fülep: While the tradition is persecuted, there are some new modern movements which are highly supported. One of them is the community of Kiko. What is your opinion about the Neocatechumenal Way?[11] 

THE "MILIEU FOR A NEW AESTHETIC"

AnonymousAugust 20, 2015 at 6:13 AM

Repairs which will necessitate moving table to the middle of CB with plenty of room for dancing around with accompanying clap, clap, clapping!!! Altar for sale to raise funds.

KEEP AN EYE ON THIS

With the VG and Adrian running the show, we can bet that "no-good" for us "regular Catholics" is afoot.

FIGHT BACK: PRAY THE ROSARY

As can be seen from the comments on KIKO: "NO ROSARY FOR 12 YEARS", most are taken aback by the obvious assault on one of the most central practices of our faith: praying the rosary.

KIKO: "NO ROSARY FOR 12 YEARS"

Apparently Kiko knows better than the Mother of God who at Fatima asked the children to "pray the rosary." Imagine that! The nerve of the Mother of God instructing those poor, ignorant, un-KAKA-fied children to "pray the rosary" without spending 12 years in "the Way" first! I guess she didn't check with her catechist. (I would add an LOL, but I am too sick to my stomach.)

FRENCHIE VS MARIO - (AND DID APURON MISTAKE KIKO-SMOKE FOR SHEKINAH GLORY?)

This exchange between Mario Gomez and Frenchie deserves some attention so I am copying their comments to this post. Mario Gomez is responding to an episode in Frenchie's account of Kiko and Carmen's history. 

Frenchie's account and his replies to Mario are very important to our overall cause because, as I have emphasized from the beginning, getting rid of Apuron or even the NCW on Guam is not our sole aim. 

EXPOSING THE KIKO-BEAST IN OUR MIDST

Chuck White is being very accommodating in only suggesting that this "professor" is an "academic hack". The "professor" is not here to teach at the University of Guam. He is here to do the same thing his kiko-beast-presbyter counterparts are here to do: destroy the Catholic faith from within and replace it with Kiko's heretical theology. 

And due to Apuron, Guam just happens to be the most hospitable place in the world for this disease to fester.

The "professor" and his kiko-beast-presbyter counterparts, like the good alinsky-ites that they are, do this subtly at first under the guise of appearing to be credible and normal. Thus the disguise as a university and RMS professor. But the "professor" is really a kiko-beast-missionary. And one doesn't have to look very deep to discover Kiko's rotten agenda.

Once again, Chuck scratches through the thin disguise of the kiko-beast in our midst.

ACADEMIC HACK

by Chuck White

http://thoughtfulcatholic.com/?page_id=44346

KIKO EXPOSED! TEACHES THAT JUDAS IS SAVED

Chuck White again pulls back the curtain on Kiko's evil ploy to remake the Church in his own image and suck thousands into his black hole with him.

Read

JUDAS IS SAVED!

by Chuck White

KIKO’S TROUBLE WITH THE TRINITY

"[Jesus Christ] experienced the forgiveness of the Father, because he was a sinner. He became a sinner." 

- Fr. Angelo Veraldi, a Neocatechumenal seminary professor from Italy, instructing permanent deacon candidates in Guam, March 15, 2014.

As Chuck White demonstrates in his newest expose of Kiko's ill theology, Kiko obviously has a different God than ours.

http://thoughtfulcatholic.com/?page_id=44045

KIKO ON DISPLAY

If you want to know what Kiko really believes and teaches about what we "normal people" call the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, here it is, on full display:

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "DIVERGENCE FROM CATHOLIC DOCTRINE IN THE NEOCATECH...":

Dear RYaeger, I do not know about anyone who was "hurt" by liturgy. Liturgy is a business of the clergy and not the flock. Only a few select nerds think it is their duty to police others over liturgy, but normal people don't really care. This is a fact of life.

You have to be weak and very insecure in your faith if you overemphasize some formal features over spiritual content. Our Christian brothers in many other denominations do not have any trouble to follow their own liturgies which is pretty much distinct from the Catholic liturgy. Do you thing they are hurt and suffering? Honestly, I don't think so. The tent of God is spacious enough to give room for liturgical variations without compromising the faith in Christ.

So take courage the Lord is good.

****

Let's compare this KIKO-THINK to what the Church, the real one, actually teaches:

THE ZOFFOLI REPORT

Part of the reason I made posts about the Legionnaires of Christ scandal and the horrible consequences of Arianism was to give some background as to how the Church has had to deal with the "smoke of Satan" in the Church, even at the "highest levels" (as Paul VI said) throughout its history and to show that the problems with Kiko Arguello and the protection he has at "the highest levels" is nothing new. 

Twenty years ago the problems posed by the errors of Kiko Arguello were thoroughly pointed out to Vatican authorities by the eminent Italian scholar, Fr. Enrico Zoffoli. At the time, the Vatican (Cardinal Ruini) replied with an admonition to Zoffoli not to make premature judgments on topics that are reserved to "competent bodies" (meaning the Roman Curia). 

Zoffoli's reply to Rome is an example for us today. He replied that he was not presuming to act in the place of "competent bodies" but that (as a Catholic and a priest) he had the "right and duty to act in this way" because of observable errors and especially since it appeared that the "competent bodies" did NOT have access to all the facts, namely Kiko's catechism ("secret texts").