Showing posts with label Fr. John Wadeson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fr. John Wadeson. Show all posts

Saturday, September 21, 2024

WHERE ARE THESE PRIESTS AND WHY ARE WE PAYING THEM?

By Tim Rohr


In a recent post titled I'LL BE READY FOR THAT, I questioned who is the "Priest in Guam 'dumped' here after sex scandal..." as reported by Troy Torres in Kandit News. 

Troy's story was a take off on a story that had appeared in the New York Times and had alleged that a number of priests who had been credibly accused or convicted of sex with minors elsewhere had been "dumped" on Pacific islands in the 1990's including an "itinerant" priest who "still serves" in Guam.

I noted in my post that the words "itinerant priest" usually refer to priests in the Neocatechumenal Way but that I could not think of a "neo" priest who was "dumped" here in the 1990's and is "still serving" in Guam. 

The only priest who comes close to matching that description is Fr. John Wadeson. 

Wadeson was (or is) a "neo" priest and he arrived in Guam sometime in the early 2000's after Redemptoris Mater Seminary was established in Yona. An archdiocesan document of diocesan priests and how they get paid shows Wadeson on the payroll in 2005. 

On a personal note, Wadeson always seemed alright to me and I never had any issues with him. I even - for several months - refused to post anything negative about him after others started sending me information about his name being on a list of credibly accused priests in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

However, after a clergy meeting with the then-Apostolic Nuncio, Archbishop Martin Krebs, on July 15, 2014, Wadeson sent out an email attacking this blog and inferring that I was in cahoots with Satan. So I decided to open the flood gates on his record of clergy sex abuse in LA and it became news pretty quick. 

One week later, on July 22, 2014, then-Archbishop Apuron removed Wadeson from public ministry even though Apuron had stated that the LA allegations against Wadeson were "never substantiated."

If that was the case, Apuron had a duty to make that known when he incardinated Wadeson at least ten years earlier and put him on our payroll. But when it came to "neo" business, Apuron was never calling the shots. He was being told/ordered what to do by the real bosses.

In hindsight, ten years later and with Apuron outed and ousted, we can see why he got rid of Wadeson so quickly. This was 2 years before Apuron's accusers came forward (2016), but it was also after Apuron had been publicly accused by John Toves. Apuron knew what Toves was after and he (Apuron) was hot to make it look like he was tough on clergy sex abuse. So he threw Wadeson under the bus. 

Note: There are over 100 posts about Wadeson. Type "Wadeson" into the search box at the top of the blog and read away.

Two days after being removed from ministry, Wadeson left (fled) Guam, surfaced in San Francisco, and has never been back. The last we heard from him was a nasty letter to the PDN about me on July 25, 2014. 

At first I thought that the NY Times guy got it wrong. Wadeson has not "served...in Guam" since 2014. However, the author can be forgiven for thinking Wadeson is still here because even though Wadeson has been gone for ten years, and appeared to be in active ministry for some time in the Archdiocese of San Francisco, he's still on our payroll. 

The link is to the clergy directory of the Archdiocese of Agana which lists Fr. John Wadeson as "Priest retired - off island." No kidding, he's been off-island for ten years and has been on our payroll all that time.

According to a trusted source, the monthly stipend for diocesan clergy is $1800 per month and about $1500 a month for retired priests. I don't know how long Wadeson has been "retired," but even if he has been retired all these ten years, we have paid a priest who ran away ten years ago $180,000 ($1500 x 12 months x 10 years). 

And we're still paying him!

Meanwhile, we have priests who are not retired but are "off-island" for no reason known to us. From the Clergy Directory:

  1. Akinyemi, Rev. Fr. Julius, Leave of Absence
  2. Asproni, Rev. Fr. Francesco, Priest off-island
  3. Camacho, Rev. Fr. Luis, Priest off-island
  4. Oliveira, Rev. Fr. Edivaldo, Priest off-island
  5. Quitugua, JCD, Msgr. David C., Priest off-island
  6. Stoia, Rev. Fr. Aurelius, Priest off-island

Six priests at $1800 per month = $10,800 per month x 12 months = $129,600 per year. And who knows for how many years!

They're all "neos" by the way, and I believe 5 of them were formed at our local RMS, which means we paid tens of thousands of dollars for their formation as well as tens of thousands of dollars for them to BE GONE.

Also, we know that some of these priests are active elsewhere which means they are probably "double-dipping." Not a bad gig. 

I know the new archbishop is busy getting his bearings, but, as I've already said elsewhere, given all that Catholics in this archdiocese have had to suffer these last several years and the selling off of many properties that were given to the Church by the families of those same Catholics, it is time for ACCOUNTABILITY...on EVERYTHING.

So where are these priests and why are we paying them?

Sunday, March 18, 2018

WELL, WELL, WELL

Throughout the ETWN news story, there was the consistent mention of an unnamed source who was curiously "close" to several parts of Apuron's case: 1) the case itself and thus close to Apuron, 2) close to the goings on in the Archdiocese of Agana, and 3) close to EWTN.

And well, well, well, it appears that it may be our old disappearing friend, The Wandering Wadeson, who, while not apparently assigned to this parish just down the road from EWTN headquarters, is nevertheless operating in the area. 

So perhaps it is time to review the Wadeson File. For now just find his name on the labels in the right side bar. I'll assemble a more thorough file soon. 

Full bulletin





Irondale, Alabama. EWTN headquarters


Saturday, July 1, 2017

WHAT WE MUST BE PREPARED FOR

Posted by Tim


A new article by Vatican insider, John Allen, about the Cardinal Pell situation contains a reference to our own situation:
Beyond failure to report cases of clerical sexual abuse, bishops have been prosecuted for their own sexual offenses. For instance, Archbishop Anthony Apuron, 70, of Guam, has been accused of molesting at least five altar boys in the 1960s and 70s. He has denied the allegations, has not been charged and refused calls to step down, until he was forced by the Vatican to do so. His trial is ongoing.
Once again we see the difference between Pell and Apuron. Pell asked the pope to vacate his position, Apuron had to be forced by the pope to do the same. And whereas Pell intends to return home to "defend the charges vigorously," Apuron ran away from home while he hides 'neath the skirts of the "trained lawyer." 

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

FR. JEFF WANTS IT BOTH WAYS

Fr. Jeff wants it both ways...or is he simply part of the Plan of Deceit? 

He tells us that the priests who are not living in the archdiocese are "on mission." 

He then tells us that they are no longer receiving financial support from us.

If these missing priests are really "on mission" then they are on official archdiocesan assignment and it is canonically ILLEGAL to withhold normal financial support. 

So either these missing priests are NOT really "on mission" or Fr. Jeff is supporting a policy which violates Canon Law. 

Of course the truth is they are NOT on mission. They are AWOL. Where is Wadeson, Apuron, Luis Camacho, Fabio...? 

Why did we spend tens of thousands of dollars on Jason Granado and then give him to Saipan? Or is there another reason he is in Saipan. 

On mission? Quit lying to us, Jeff. 

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

BIG MISTAKE - THE DESTRUCTION OF MSGR. JAMES

Posted by Tim


Last Friday, June 16, days after he was completely blocked from a position on the newly elected presbyteral council, Msgr. James Benavente submitted his resignation to Archbishop Byrnes for his position as Delegate for Church Patrimony.

Kiko Hate

From the moment Msgr. James was appointed to that position by Archbishop Hon, the Kiko's had gone ballistic. 

From the beginning of the Kiko-empire on this island, Msgr. James was the one person who had to be crushed, and now he had gone from near banishment to a powerful position overseeing the property of the Archdiocese of Agana, property the Kikos had coveted as theirs. 

Msgr. James must be crushed some other way!

Monday, January 9, 2017

IT'S NOW IN BYRNES COURT

Posted by Tim

- Archbishop Michael Byrnes, THE GUAMANIAN, January-February, 2017

Those who are members of the Neocatechumenal Way who have not consciously embraced teachings contrary to Catholicism can still be considered Catholics. However, in offering the above quote, Archbishop Byrnes essentially makes the same mistake other bishops have made in thinking that because the NCW has an approved statute, that what actually is taught inside the NCW is "Catholic." 

Consider this. In a November 1, 2016 interview given to KUAM, Byrnes admitted to not knowing much about the Neocatechumenal Way and only having "some familiarity, not close." In fact, he even referred to it at one point as a "movement," a "mistake" for which he was immediately chastised by The Diana. Yet Archbishop Byrnes apparently knows enough about the NCW to proclaim it (albeit by extension) "Catholic." 

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

THE DIANA: "PRIESTS OF GUAM LACK OXYGEN TO THEIR BRAINS"

Posted by Tim


And what have the Kikos' to show us as an alternative to priests who "lack oxygen to their brains?" Tony the Penetrator? Adrian the Drain? David the Doorknob? Edi the Waldo? Louie the Licker? and Wadeson the Wanderer? LOL, Diana. Yes, go ahead and show us how your "way" breaths (sic) life into community. I guess that's what Lickin' Louie was caught doing.

Sunday, December 4, 2016

DEFEND US IN BATTLE

Posted by Tim

In the wake of the good vibes of the recent advent of Archbishop Michael Jude Byrnes, there is quite a bit of talk about healing and forgiveness, as well there should be. Archbishop Byrnes appears to be the type of man and religious leader who can inspire and bring about both, and I personally look forward to his spiritual and administrative leadership.

Meanwhile, down here in the trenches, we want to make clear that said "healing and forgiveness" does not devolve to simply a smoothing over of just some simple misunderstandings. I believe Archbishop Byrnes knows that. I am not so sure that others do. 

What occurred in our diocese over the last three years was not just a reaction to hurt feelings over some "misunderstandings," but the vomiting out of a sickening Evil, an Evil which had been fermenting and foaming for decades just beneath the crust of our fiesta faces. 

The public battering of first, Fr. Paul, then Msgr. James, followed by the discovery of the real nature of RMS, the flagrant flogging of local sensibilities by the RMS product, the hiding and absconding of Luis Camacho, John Wadeson, and now Apuron, and the in-your-face smiling lies to cover all this by the previous Vicar General and Chancellor...all of this and more combined to break the thinning crust of our happy-face local church and finally the rotten, stinking torrent of filth burst forth for the whole world to see with the stench wafting all the way to the Vatican. 

Healing and forgiveness apply to fallen human beings on both sides, but NOT the Evil itself. We do not dialogue with Evil. We do not give it "equal time." We resist "It" and call on St. Michael (the new archbishop is aptly named) and all the angels of Heaven to defend us in battle, to be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil. We humbly ask God to rebuke "It," and call on the Prince of the Heavenly Hosts, by the divine power of God, to thrust into hell Satan and all the evil spirits who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Amen

There are those who want us to just stop, to just go away, to "be quiet now." They've wanted that from the beginning. It's in God's hands, they say. Yes it is. But note: The prayer says "defend us in battle." 

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

WAITING IMPATIENTLY FOR THE CLOUDS TO CLEAR.


Posted by Frenchie

LIKE MOST PEOPLE ON GUAM, NOVEMBER IS THE TIME WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE SKIES TO START CLEARING UP, AND THE SUN AND THE BLUE SKIES OF THE DRY SEASON TO FINALLY COME BACK.


YESTERDAY THE CHANCERY, MADE A DECLARATION MANY OF US HAD BEEN WAITING FOR, FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW, REGARDING THE SEMINARIES.

Many of us felt that the Sun and blue skies, were finally coming through these thick dark clouds that had enveloped our Island for so long, specially our beloved Church.


Archbishop Apuron, for the many reasons we have already highlighted before, had allowed people of different backgrounds and walks of life, to corrupt the core of our Church, most gravely he had allowed the Neocatechumenal Way to take root on our shores, and expand its web of lies and deceptions throughout our Church, and basically facilitated an almost perfect takeover of an Archdiocese from the Top Down.

Friday, October 28, 2016

THE NCW: A PLACE TO HIDE

Posted by Tim

The Fr. Luis Camacho case made it strikingly clear that the NCW operates as a type of underground syndicate within the Church to move around, protect, harbor, and otherwise keep beneath the radar, problem clerics. 

In fact, there may not even be known problems, other than the fact that their bishop, or in our case the appointed Apostolic Administrator, does not know where they are, which itself makes them "problem clerics."  

In our diocese, there are three particular cases with KNOWN problems: Fr. John Wadeson, Fr. Luis Camacho, and Archbishop Apuron, and there are two glaring similarities in all three cases:
1) a declaration of innocence of any wrongdoing
2) the absolute disappearance of all three


In the case of Wadeson, which we will review in more detail very soon, after being "cleared" by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles of sex abuse charges dating back to the 70's, Apuron was quick to celebrate his so-called exoneration and just as quick to hide him again. Wadeson remains incardinated in this diocese and thus, on our payroll, but provides no known benefit to the diocese and does not show up "on loan" to any bishop (as with Fr. Jason Granado who is "on loan" to Saipan). If Wadeson, is "innocent" of all the charges, why hide him? 

Luis bin Camacho
In the case of Luis Camacho, we were told that the case against him was "expunged" and that he never did anything wrong. Yet, he was whisked away within hours of his release after his March 17, 2015 arrest, and has not been seen again since, showing up only in Qatar about a year later. And, like Wadeson, after being so-called exonerated (by both our own chancery and Luis' adoptive bishop in Qatar) disappears again. (He is gone from Qatar.)

Who? Me?
Then we have Apuron who not only maintains his innocence but calls his accusers liars. And then suddenly he disappears, with even the Apostolic Administrator confessing that he does not know where he is. (Rumor is that he has moved from RMS - after being spotted there - to the former Carmelite monastery in Malojloj. Keep an eye out for him.)

Clerics cannot live long on their own. They either have to have a personal benefactor or an organization like the NCW which is capable of hiding them and shuffling them when found out (like we did with Luis.) 

More to come


Wednesday, August 10, 2016

GUAM'S RMS VS A REAL SEMINARY (PART I) THE SELECTION PROCESS

Posted by Frenchie.

It is time to go back and see what it is that Pius and Genarrini worked so hard on, and why they used Apuron to get what they wanted.


I shall leave our good friend Bob Klitzkie to pursue the real estate fiasco, regarding this property, since he has become the de facto specialist of this sad swindle of both the original gift giver and the further snow job given to us, courtesy of our not such good friends in New Jersey.

It is rather illuminating, in retrospect that the three individuals, most involved  in the establishment of a Neocatechumenal Seminary on Guam, under the false pretense that it was a Diocesan operation, thanks to their manipulation of our failed Bishop; are still in place, and so far have not been subjected to any kind of inquiry of any sort regarding their misdeeds.

Pius, Cristobal and Quitagua, the triumvirate of the backroom deals and of false statements are still here.

Friday, August 5, 2016

THE "SPOTLIGHT" IS ON GUAM--A COVER UP?

Posted by Webster.

Archbishop Hon is wrong. He better check his facts again. He should check with Archbishop Apuron, or Monsignor David, the former Vicar General, or Fr. Adrian, the former Chancellor. They know why Fr. Brouillard is being paid monthly despite being absence from Guam for over 35 years.

Fr. Brouillard is not being paid monthly by the Chancery because he had retired. No priest retires at the age of 59. Maybe 75 but not 59. Something reeks of COVER-UP here.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

A KIKO COMPARES LUIS CAMACHO TO FR. PAUL

I don't know what we would do without the likes of The Diana and her ilk. Thanks to them, we are able to keep all these issues alive and re-present them over and over for the world to see. Thank you Diana. Thank you, Kiko's. It is you who have driven all these issues to where they are...and soon, even into the courts. Keep at it.  Here's the latest:



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "NOTE TO BISHOP CAMILLO BALLIN, DOHA, QATAR: INVOIC...": 


Was he not already expelled from the catholic community on Guam? Should he not be forgiven his sins should he have asked for it? Should he continually be expelled until he is no longer a part of the catholic community? If Apuron's actions against the dededo parishioner and Father Paul was uncalled for, then why are you doing the same to this man? Should you not show him the mercy that you wanted shown to Father Paul and that man? 



Friday, June 17, 2016

ORCHESTRATED? PART 1


I heard again today that some think the coming forward of the victims was "orchestrated." Of course it was orchestrated. 

I had to be terribly careful with said victims. I knew what (Archbishop) Apuron would do to them. I knew he'd threaten them just like he did when he molested and raped their tender souls and bodies. We knew he'd say "no one will believe you." And in fact, that is exactly what he said in a different way 40 years later, except this time he accused them of spreading "malicious lies and calumnies" and threatened to sue them into silence. 

I knew he would do this. So I had to work long and hard. I had to find money. I had to find an attorney who would protect them. I had to gain their trust. l had to organize, organize, organize. Even now, I have to see to their care and protection SINCE THE CHURCH STILL WON'T. 

These were horribly damaged boys who had carried their long nightmare into a tormented adulthood, a suffering that was deeply visible on the faces and in the voices of those who stood before us, including the mother of a now dead boy. A boy whose life might have been very different but for what Apuron did to him when he was nine years old. A boy who might be alive today, and a mother who instead of caving into tears at the mere thought of what she unknowingly permitted, might break into a great smile at the thought of a very much alive son who blessed her with grandchildren. 

You don't just throw people who have suffered so long and so hard out there and say go for it. Months of conversations and care had to happen first. And right up to the last minute, it was still up to them if they wanted to go public or not. I was quite willing to assist them. For all they wanted to do at the time was to simply deliver their statements to Apuron and to the appropriate Roman authorities. In fact, that was the plan. 

But then something changed. Something happened. 

Someone in the chancery released a statement on May 13, 2016 listing two pages of accusations against the laity who had been speaking up against Apuron's offenses. The statement said that in response to our speaking up, the Archbishop would be seeking legal action against us. Of specific interest to the victims was this:
These ads were paid for by the Concerned Catholics of Guam (CCOG) according to media statements by Gregory Perez and, as admitted by Tim Rohr, with the intent to target specifically the Archbishop. This demonstrates that they have no proof to substantiate any allegations and that their purpose is to confuse and mislead the people or, even, to induce some to bring false testimony.
The "ads" of course was this one:



READ THAT AGAIN: "...they have no proof to substantiate any allegations and that their purpose is to confuse and mislead the people or, even, to induce some to bring false testimony."

Well these men had "proof," and 40 years of it. And any thought of keeping this a private matter disappeared. It was time to call out this horrible man who had mutilated them, body and soul. It was time to present THE TRUTH.

Four days later, Roy Quintanilla came forward. 

But I'm getting ahead of myself. I wanted to present the back story to this. Because, you see, I never intended to find these victims of Anthony S. Apuron. Instead, they found me. And little did I know, that this was what Apuron feared when he went to Rome to try to shut me up. Yes. Went to Rome. 

Here's what happened.

Beginning in July of 2013, I began following and posting about Apuron's sadistic treatment of Fr. Paul Gofigan. The story quickly descending into a horror story and my posts rapidly drew a crowd. 

The page-views and comments were beginning to pile up. It was a combination of both Apuron's sadistic treatment of Fr. Paul and the disturbing fact that someone was actually willing to go public about the evil acts of one, Archbishop Anthony S. Apuron. 

At the time I didn't know that Apuron had been (and maybe still was/is) a serial child molester. * I had heard rumors for several years, but paid little attention to them. The Father Paul story continued to get more horrific and my page-views began to climb and climb. Apparently Apuron had never had anyone call him out in public before, and, in hindsight, I can see that he foresaw THE DANGER.

* Later, clinically speaking, it can be said that Apuron was not molesting "children." Legally "children" are persons under 18 years of age, But biologically and clinically, "children" are prepubescent persons. All of Apuron's reported victims were post-pubescent, i.e. adolescents (biological adults), which makes Apuron's alleged acts against these legal minors, homosexual acts, not pedophilia. (Note: Ephebophilia is the clinical name.) 

And here it is:

Apuron knew that his perverted past had to be known. But he counted on the same "no one will believe you" he used on those boys to keep adults quiet as well. As long as his evil acts remained only whispered, he could continue to prance and flutter about, pretending to be the pope of Guam, singing "No one can touch me, No one can touch me. Nah, nah nah, nah, nah, ...!

But then came JungleWatch, and someone who wasn't afraid of his High and Mighty-ness.

Apuron hadn't counted on that. 

+++++

Things got out of hand quickly. If there was a public forum for all the people he had hurt over so many years, especially a forum where people could comment without being known...then Apuron knew he was in trouble.

+++++

I didn't know it at the time, but those initial postings about what he did to Fr. Paul were the beginning of the end for 'Tony' (Apuron). In fact, it was just the beginning of his own "arduous and painful closure to his assignment" - words he had used to threaten Fr. Paul only a few months before. 

Tony had to do something. So he did. 

On October 10, 2013, I got a "shut up and sit down" letter from a Cardinal Edwin O'Brien. 



Apuron apparently thought that I was like him, that being "important" mattered. The Order into which I had (then) only recently been initiated (Sep. 2012) is an important Order in the Church and it is considered an honor to be a member.

But I wasn't about to sacrifice the truth for a club membership. So in fact, not only did I laugh this off, I bombarded Cardinal O'Brien with two letters full of details about Apuron's horrific reign of terror. You can read more about that here.

You might say that Apuron himself opened up the door, permitting the first details about his evil reign to leak into Rome. By the way, I never heard from O'Brien again. 

I had some fun with this letter, showing it to friends over beer many nights down at The Mermaid Tavern. I mean, who else gets a letter from Vatican City? But the more I thought about it, the more I began to suspect that something was up. This was way over the top. This was way out of proportion to what I was doing. I mean, really? He went to Rome to take me - a nobody with a little blog - down? What?

Hmmmmm. 

The Fr. Paul affair descended into an absolute nightmare, climaxing with Tony's (Apuron's) sick, run-off-at-the-mouth, filthy speech to the clergy on retreat at Tagaytay, Philippines (October 2013) wherein he inferred that Fr. Paul had built a secret stairway to his room to facilitate drunken midnight homosexual trysts. You can listen to it here. 

The story continued to get worse and worse. The diocese was coming apart and the war was going public. In fact, one could write a book about it. In fact, I DID write a book about it. 



Get your free copy here. Or you can read it on the blog here. 

After about January 2014 or so, things began to die down a bit, and I thought the story would go away. I remember one day thinking: "Well that's that!" Nothing more I can do. And lo and behold, the Holy Spirit descended like a dove and gave us THE DIANA! LOL. 

This thing was dead in the water, but "The Diana" (A Neocat Blog), with her absolutely insane pronouncements and perspectives, breathed new life into what was pretty much dead and the war was on again.

The arguments between our two blogs exploded and so did my page-views. Things began to mount and mount, the noise grew louder and louder, and finally Rome took note, sending Archbishop Martin Krebs, the Apostolic Nuncio to this region, to Guam in mid July 2014 to see what all the ruckus was about. 

This is when Fr. John Wadeson decided to come out of the closet. Poor Fr. Wadeson, he had no idea I was waiting for him. 

I had gotten a recording of the clergy meeting with Archbishop Krebs. And the recording revealed some pretty horrid things. I published the recording and Wadeson decided to slap me down for my publishing of the recording. I then blasted Wadeson with a ten year old report showing that he was twice credibly accused for molesting minors in Los Angeles. 

All hell broke loose and Apuron (attempting to save his own ...) threw Wadeson under the bus. You can read all the posts related to The Wandering Wadeson here. 

And then came the Msgr. James thing. 

On July 25, 2014, Msgr. James Benavente was called to Apuron's office where he was read a list of charges against him. No warning. No sit down let's work this out. No attempt to paternally correct. Just the accusations, the accusations, the accusations, and no opportunity for Msgr. James to even engage said accusations or even get a copy of them. The next day, the evil stepsisters, Msgr. David C. Quitugua and then-Fr. Adrian Cristobal, showed up on Msgr. James' door step and handed him his "get the hell out of here" decrees. 

Apparently that was the final straw. People blew up, including someone over in San Francisco named John Toves.

I remember the morning John left a comment on my blog accusing Apuron of molesting his "relative." 

I didn't publish it because he didn't leave his name. I posted back that I needed his name to publish the comment. He posted back: "My name is John Charles Ada Toves." I realized that this was too important for just a series of comments on the blog. I struck up an ongoing conversation with John Toves over the next few months - a conversation that led to John's coming to Guam to take his accusations directly to "Tony" (Archbishop Apuron) himself. 

John Toves was adamant about what Apuron did to his "relative." After I learned his relative's name, I remembered that I had heard the rumors many times. John's "relative" still prefers to let the past be the past so we are not going to go there. But as some on Guam may remember, things got nuts during December of 2014, leading to the infamous "for sure for sure" interview, which you can enjoy here. For more on the fun with Apuron and Toves see Apuron vs Toves. 

Apuron probably messed his pants when John Toves showed up. Nevertheless, Apuron probably figured he was still safe so long as the actual victim never came forward...and Apuron knew he wouldn't - and he was right.

But John Toves was dangerous in another way. 

Toves was an altar boy...an altar boy in Agat, an altar boy who had been one of the altar boys during Apuron's days in Agat in the 1970's. 

Toves knew Walter, Roy, Roland, Sonny, and many more. If news got out that John Toves was in town and making noise about Apuron molesting boys, Apuron had to know that this was not good. Old skeletons might come alive. And the old skeletons did start to shake, but they would not put flesh on for several months. 

Meanwhile, though, the pressure on Apuron - brought on by John Toves - once again shook Rome awake, and they paid us a visit the following month in January 2015. 

It took a few months for that to happen. Meanwhile, Diana kept things lively and drove the blog bigger and bigger, louder and louder. 


Tuesday, June 14, 2016

WADESON WADES IN

The infamous Wadeson wades into our local issues. Always easy to do this from afar. Lecturing us on the truth when he hid the truth from us about himself for ten years while he sucked off our archdiocese and pretended to the position of "formator" at RMS all the while living in San Francisco with his precious neocats. And who knows where he is today.

What a great opportunity to tell the truth - once again - about Wadeson. Here it is. Go here for more of who Wadeson is.


Monday, June 13, 2016

PICK YOUR POISON ROME



THE LAY FAITHFUL DEMONSTRATE AT THE RMS GALA
View more photos at this link. 


Sunday, June 5, 2016

FUNNY QUOTES-4



ADRIAN CRISTOBAL: The Archbishop has always taken very seriously any allegations, and even rumors, of sexual abuse and acted on them:…this is what he did when he limited the faculties of Fr. John Wadeson following the surfacing of an old unproven allegation (subsequently cleared by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles).

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

SEX ABUSE REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS: A STRANGE RECUSAL

12:40pm Updated - see ****** below



  1. Vincent P. Pereda - RESIGNED May 18, 2016
  2. Deacon Larry Claros
  3. Trinie Pangelinan
  4. Juan Rapadas - RESIGNED May 18, 2016
  5. Mariles Benavente - RECUSED self May 20, 2016*
  6. George Kallingal
NOW CHECK THIS OUT