By Tim Rohr
On the post ANY QUESTIONS, a certain Anonymous takes issue:
the title of your post "any questions?" Starts the toxic backyard oil drum fire as if there is a surety of something untoward here. Again, did you get permission to post these photos? Especially from the private parishoner in the center. Did this old lady know?
The photo (singular) in question is this one:
I wonder if Anonymous got permission to call "the private parishioner in the center" an "old lady." Something tells me she'd be more offended by being called an "old lady" - publicly, as Anonymous does - than my reposting the picture that she is obviously proud of.
There were several exchanges between Anonymous and me on the post, none of which had anything to do with why I posted the picture or why I titled it as I did.
The picture and the title had nothing to do with anything "untoward" - as Anonymous calls it - between the lady and the two clerics (Harold and the Archbishop); the point of the post was (and still is) to question - as JW has consistently done - the relationship between Archbishop Jimenez and the Neocats.
My position has been that Jimenez has done nothing to assure us that he isn't a Neocat, or at minimum, beholden to them.
He has refused to enforce the 2017 moratorium imposed by Archbishop Byrnes. And, if Jimenez considers the moratorium no longer valid, that's fine, but he should publicly rescind it. He has not.
He has not addressed the fact that Fr. Alberto, in violation of canon law, is a financial guarantor for the Neocat corporation, Rainan I Langet Foundation, Inc.
He has not addressed the fact that the Neocats continue to celebrate their "Eucharist" in an unconsecrated space.
He has not addressed the status of Luis Camacho's "appeal."
The list goes on.
My position remains that Jimenez is beholden to the Neocats. They were his ticket here. And they are his ticket out of here.
"No smoke without fire" Anonymous is in error in stating "your post starts the toxic backyard drum fire". The post "any questions" just pointed to the smoke while the comments of 'Anonymous " led the readers to the toxic drumfire from where the smoke emitted
ReplyDeletePrecisely.
Deletehttps://www.cultodivino.va/en/attivita/2026/ad-limina-visit-of-the-episcopal-conference-of-panama.html Here the Dicastery for divine worship is accusing the devout catholics for causing divisions while being blind to the divisions caused by the Neo Catechumenal way Liturgy, and the liturgical abuses liberally committed by many priests during the Novus Ordo Mass. It seems the Dicastery members have not read Is 5:20 "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."
ReplyDelete