A CHURCH IN TROUBLE

Please go out and buy all available copies of the Sunday Variety. Important.

It can be viewed online here: http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/launch.aspx?pbid=f720eb2d-91af-4778-af5d-488025f9c9be

I'M GONNA BE RICH! NOT!

I recently received an order for bibles from a local parish. I heard later that the person who placed the order got "grief" for ordering from me. My crime? I'm a "businessman". But who do churches go to whenever they want a donation, or sponsorship for this or that? Who do they always go to with their hand out? But actually give these businesses business? NO. They are "businessmen". The great "evil". Well, thanks. I'll remember that the next time I get asked. But for the record, here is the business transacted.

The following was revised after Mary Lou pointed out that I had used the cost for the wrong item to do the calculations the first time. Apparently my company lost money on this deal.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

There is a letter to the editor by Ben Mesa in today's PDN:

New Way doesn't seem to be following mandate

LOL! AND THANK YOU!

Well, maybe I should reconsider not posting the insults and personal attacks of the kiko's. In the past, posting of such insults usually resulted in an increase in donations to the blog. So here, I've collected a few. LOL! And thank you. Courage.

FOIA - SECOND REQUEST - RESPONSE

DIVERGENCE FROM CATHOLIC DOCTRINE IN THE NEOCATECHUMENAL CATECHESIS

The following is an excerpt from the videotape transcription of a debate/seminar held in Rome on 20 April 1997. I have formatted it for easier reading and added highlights and my comments [in red]. The original can be found here. 

Here's the "pull quote":

Kiko is aware of being on the other side of the fence and he entreats his people to not get into these discussions at all when they talk with others "because it would create a ton of problems."

THE NEOCATECHUMENATE: Testimonies

I. Divergence from Catholic Doctrine in the Neocatechumenal Catechesis

Presented by Mario Frugiuele, Engineer, from Florence, Italy.

Introduction: The speaker is in his fifties, married with two children and he has been a secular Franciscan for nine years. Six years ago his parish went from the guidance of monks to the direction of a diocesan priest who then introduced the parishioners to the Neocatechumenal movement. Several parishioners were enthusiastic about this invitation to participate in the hope that it would enrich their own Christian and Franciscan spirituality. But soon their expectations turned into disappointment because of the exasperatingly prophetic way in which the catechists presented: "We are the angels of the Lord!", "Jesus Christ is coming with us!", "Seize this opportunity now because it may never come again!"

WHAT HEALING LOOKS LIKE

Dear Archbishop,

Your people do talk. So we understand that Rome is going to give you a chance to fix things. Good. We thought we'd help. We don't want any more "I'm sorry if I offended anybody". The fact is, you did much more than "offend", you broke stuff, you broke people, you trampled on lives, helpless ones. So please, no more "reaching out" sermons written by Larry. We don't want you to reach out. Here's what we want. Here's what healing looks like:

WELCOME VATICAN CITY

http://s06.flagcounter.com/logs/or4G/1/VA

DEAR CHIEF BORDALLO. A SECOND LETTER.

YA GOTTA WONDER...

From the Archdiocese of Agana website under Seminary:

Seminarians: 

1. Aukusotino Alailesulu
2. Fernando Amaya
3. Joseph Cabana
4. Gabriel Camacho
5. Pedro Durango Agudelo
6. Eduardo Andres Guerrero Torrez
7. José Santos Hernandez Mejía
8. Keone Hurdle
9. Viane Ilimaleota
10. Edmond Ilg
11. Cesar Javier Izaguirre Gonzlaez
12. Eneliko Lamositele
13. Leaega Leaega
14. Tavete Maugautega
15. Matteo Matarazzo
16. Andrew Meisake
17. Martin Muñoz
18. Tawaia Natibu
19. K. Paul O’Really
20. Preston Daniel Perez
21. Frenel Phanord
22. Andrew Ramirez
23. Christian David Ruiz Quntero
24. José Angel Salinas Garcia
25. Karoro Temate
26. Andy Andrew Wilson
27. Ashton Wong
28. Motua Batiara
29. Teeta Timanako

On itinerancy:

1. Wilmen Chirini Gonzalez
2. Alfonso Jordan Escamilla
3. Juan Alberto Gomez Franyutti
4. Drazen Hosi
5. Darren Santo Tomas
6. Victor Vitug

Dear seminarians at the so-called St. John Paul II Seminary, not only are your names not listed, your "seminary" isn't even listed. 

TIM ROHR ON THE BUZZ. APRIL 8, 2015

Part 1: http://www.kuam.com/category/173022/video-landing-page?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=11368019


Part 2: http://www.kuam.com/category/173022/video-landing-page?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=11368020

WHERE DO I STAND?

One of the tricks that was used by the proponents of Guam's previous attempt at legalizing same-sex unions was to make it look like the archbishop personally was not willing to compromise. This allowed the proponents to objectify a single target and freeze it, or in this case: him. 

Unfortunately, due to the archbishop's lack of control of the message that was being put out in his name, the trick worked. And once the archbishop was objectified as the sole opponent of the bill, it was easy to then vilify the whole Catholic Church as homophobic, which is standard "m-o" for same-sex protagonists. 

The truth is of course that no bishop or priest has the authority to say anything other than what the Church says on matters of faith and morals where those matters are magisterially defined. And the right use of the sexual function is one of those matters. In short, sex by design, God's design, makes babies:

"God created man in his image; in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them and God said to them: Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it." (Gen 1:27-28)

We might use sex for other things (money, pleasure, or even intimacy), but then we depart from God's design.

THE FACTS ABOUT BILL 185. THE REAL ONES.

It's in the news, so it's time we get some things straight. 

The letter entitled BILL 185: THE STAKES ARE VERY HIGH was not written by Archbishop Apuron nor was it distributed by him. 

However, the fiasco which followed the publication and distribution of the letter is a Class A example of exactly what we are shouting to Rome about 5 years later: Archbishop Apuron is NOT in charge and he doesn't know what he's doing!

The letter, which was more of an opinion paper, was written by a priest who has no position at all in the Archdiocese of Agana. He was and still is a professor at the Redemptoris Mater Seminary, a corporation separate from the Archdiocese of Agana, and an entity most of the Catholics on Guam have come to regard with deep suspicion.

TONIGHT ON KUAM

I'll be on Jesse Lujan's THE BUZZ tonight, 6:30 to 7:00, KUAM.

KATOLIKU T-SHIRT

If you are interested in purchasing a "Katoliku" tee shirt, the last day to order will be Thursday, April 9.  Orders will be taken at the CCOG village meeting at the MTM Community Center at 6 pm.  You can also place your order by emailing Mary at marybonz@gmail.com.  Children and adult sizes are available for $15.

Tee shirts will be available for pick up at the prayer service on April 16 at 4:30pm in front of the Cathedral.

thank you...vangie

KEEP CALM AND...

NO BETTER EVIDENCE OF THE FALSEHOODS OF NEO-DOCTRINES THAN THIS

AnonymousApril 7, 2015 at 6:09 AM

I just read the article in the PDN and I think it important to note that Fr. Zoffoli passed away in 1996, several years before Saint Pope John Paul II had the statutes reviewed by 5 Dicasteries in the Curia and 12 years before the statutes were approved. Additionally, Fr. Zoffoli was a strong GLBT supporter. You decide.

Again we have a classic example, EXHIBIT A, of what Kiko Arguello produces. As expected, not a single point of Zoffoli's is engaged, but he is attacked as a "strong GLBT". (Umm, it's LGBT, btw.)

The commenter also chose to ignore the prefatory remarks in my post where I specifically noted that Zoffoli's analysis was published in 1995, several years before the final versions of the NCW Statute and catechetical directory were approved in 2008 and 2011. 

THE NEXT PRAYER RALLY

The next prayer rally will be on Thursday, April 16, 2015 in front of the Dulce Nombre de Maria Cathedral Basilica....gathering 5:00 p.m.  Prayer 5:30 p.m.

THE ZOFFOLI REPORT

Part of the reason I made posts about the Legionnaires of Christ scandal and the horrible consequences of Arianism was to give some background as to how the Church has had to deal with the "smoke of Satan" in the Church, even at the "highest levels" (as Paul VI said) throughout its history and to show that the problems with Kiko Arguello and the protection he has at "the highest levels" is nothing new. 

Twenty years ago the problems posed by the errors of Kiko Arguello were thoroughly pointed out to Vatican authorities by the eminent Italian scholar, Fr. Enrico Zoffoli. At the time, the Vatican (Cardinal Ruini) replied with an admonition to Zoffoli not to make premature judgments on topics that are reserved to "competent bodies" (meaning the Roman Curia). 

Zoffoli's reply to Rome is an example for us today. He replied that he was not presuming to act in the place of "competent bodies" but that (as a Catholic and a priest) he had the "right and duty to act in this way" because of observable errors and especially since it appeared that the "competent bodies" did NOT have access to all the facts, namely Kiko's catechism ("secret texts"). 

HISTORY LESSON: WHEN "THE WHOLE WORLD GROANED TO FIND ITSELF ARIAN"

Several times on this blog I have restated the quote from St. Jerome: "The whole world groaned to find itself Arian." 

I used the quote in response to the many times we have heard from the Kiko's about how many bishops or cardinals support them, etc., etc, etc. For at the height of the Arian heresy, there were more bishops who sided with the heretic Arius than sided with the successor of Peter. 

But I've used the quote from St. Jerome for another reason. As Kiko's theology leaks out, it suspiciously sounds like Arianism, specifically the extremely troublesome teaching of a certain neo-priest who was recorded teaching local diaconate candidates that "Jesus was a sinner". This is Arianism. 

It is also interesting to note how Kiko rejects Constantine and the church after Constantine until, in Kiko's mind, the Church was restored at Vatican II. This is evidenced in his drawing of his version of the timeline of church history:

As you can see, nothing happens in the history of the Catholic Church worth documenting on Kiko's timeline between Constantine and 1962, when Vatican II (and Kiko) arrive on the scene. Read more about this on Chuck White's blog. 

NOTICE: OFFICIALLY BORED

For nearly two years I have enjoyed receiving insults, attacks, and sneering, snotty comments of every kind. I can't say that I enjoyed the similar attack on my wife and children, but they served the same purpose. 

I say "enjoyed" because those comments validate all my efforts and probably account for much of the enormous traffic on this blog. Of course attacking the messenger is what one does when one cannot discredit the message. 

I have regularly shared many of these insults and attacks as proof of who we are dealing with, proof of the rot that invades a soul the closer one gets to Kiko's sick inner orbit: Apuron, Quitugua the VG, and Adrian the Chancellor being Exhibit A.

As you know, I often intellectually engage these rabid and spiritually deformed souls, seeing their slobbering, foaming at the mouth rantings as opportunities. 

As they continued their descent into hell, I had some fun with them, turning their words on their cowardly selves and punctuating their panting ramblings with an LOL or a "yawn". 

However, as of today (maybe because it's Easter and I'm tired of small things), I am officially bored with these sad and pathetic people and their narcissistic fetish for garbage. 

- NOTICE -

If any of you haters want to intellectually and factually discredit any of the information I post on this blog then feel free to do so. Otherwise, your trash will go in the trash. I have bigger things to do, and I'm sure the decent people who are in the Neocatechumenal Way will be relieved that I will no longer provide a forum for you to discredit them. You can do that on The Dianas blog. 

IN CASE YOU'RE WONDERING

In case you're wondering why I haven't posted anything about the so-called attempt at "reconciliation" supposedly in evidence at the Chrism Mass and carried in a story by KUAM, it's because I'm reserving my comments for "The Buzz" with Jesse Lujan. Tune in this Wednesday, 6:30pm, on KUAM. 

NOT FOR THIS GUY

Looks like he might have read the Luis Camacho story and thought he'd give the same line a try. LOL.

Man admits to sex with minor, but says it was consensual

http://www.kuam.com/story/28712234/2015/04/03/man-admits-to-sex-with-minor-but-says-it-was-consensual

SAYS IT ALL

HOW KIKO GETS AWAY WITH "IT"

Perhaps one of the hardest things for us to understand is, with all of Kiko's atrocities so widely known, how Rome and especially the pope can continue to at least appear to be supporting his "movement." 

The problem is that most of us have just as an inflated view of Rome as we once had of our own chancery. Because while Jesus promised us that the "gates of hell would not prevail against his church", He only promised us that they would not "prevail". He did not promise us that there would not be a battle. In fact, He promised us the "battle", and to the end. 

The reasons Pope Benedict gave for his resignation from the Chair of Peter should have given us a clue. Things were (and still are) so bad inside the Roman Curia (the government of the church) that he, a great and holy man, after much prayer, knew he did not have the physical or spiritual stamina to withstand the evil onslaught from within. 

Part of that "onslaught", that "smoke of Satan" as Paul VI coined it, is these spiritual interlopers like Kiko Arguello, men who have the gifts to fool millions, including popes. This is nothing new, the church has been beset by such men (and women) from the beginning. Even Judas was found within the ranks of Jesus' personally chosen inner circle. 

The problem is that the average Catholic has not taken the time to learn Church history. And this is probably because he or she has never been encouraged to do so. But lack of such understanding of history makes us easy prey to the earthquakes and storms within the church that have always occurred. 

So here's a very short and recent history lesson relative to the damage that Kiko is now doing to the Church: