Monday, July 21, 2014

THIS IS ON YOU, ARCHBISHOP.

LA priest accused of molestation now in Hagåtña archdiocese



http://pacificnewscenter.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47048:snap-twice-accused-los-angeles-priest-now-working-on-guam&catid=45:guam-news&Itemid=156

Sadly, Fr. Wadeson may be wrongly accused. I personally have always thought so. However, these were questions that were never answered. And now they are being asked. Let this be a lesson to all who work with and for Archbishop Apuron. 
Posted by
Labels: ,

24 comments:

  1. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 6:36 AM

    Anti-Catholic Blog. Jungle Watch Hate Blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TimJuly 21, 2014 at 8:06 AM

      Truth is Hate. Kiko-think. LOL. More fruit.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 6:40 AM

    Take action today, Archbishop. A public statement please.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 9:28 AM

    6:36am, good point,..exactly what the Pharisees of old said of Jesus. When you compare your NEO practice and the Pharisees, there's a stark similarity...quite ironic even after 2000 years.

    Boy did the Holy Spirit make someone look like a fool in yesterday's Gospel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 10:01 AM

      Jesus was not an accused child molester. Your neo structured mind blinds you to simple context.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 10:01 AM

      . . . not to mention the irony of judgment in your "Gospel" statement.

      Delete
  4. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM

    Here it is again: it's that kiko-double-standard behavior demonstrated by 6:36am! Remember, kikos: when you point a finger, three fingers show your hypocracy and point three times back to you!

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 11:07 AM

    I can't see how the Chancery can keep quiet about this recent revelation. It is now out in the public that Archbishop Apuron has incardinated a ousted priest formerly from the Archdiocese of Los Angeles that has banned him and taken away his priestly faculties due to allegations of child molestation. These allegations were deemed credible enough for the Los Angeles Archdiocese to remove him. Why should Guam ignore this and accept this priest into our island. An explanation from the Chancery is definitely warranted to say the least. The people of Guam is entitled to know the status of this priest. If he is being financially sponsored and supported by the Chancery, what is his capacity on Guam? Where does he work and does his work bring him into possible contact with vulnerable children. Until he is totally cleared of the child molestation allegations for which he has been accused of, he has no business being a member of the Guam clergy. This matter should be reported to the Guam Police as well as to the Attorney Generals Office. Please, somebody take action on this matter before another child becomes the next victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 4:48 PM

      Time for Archbishop to go off island. Let Lady Di take care. She's such a good spokeswoman.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 8:22 PM

      We will probably never know. Most likely settled out of court with a gag order on it.
      Hopefully SNAP can get the truth.

      Delete
    3. concernedJuly 22, 2014 at 1:17 PM

      http://www.kuam.com/story/26075589/2014/07/21/archdiocese-removes-priest-accused-of-child-molestation#.U83UbUYJ64s.facebook

      They couldn't keep ignoring the outcry! Good job, Tim for getting the word out.

      Delete
  6. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 12:36 PM

    Does a neo priest, incardinated in one diocese, need permission of the bishop in another diocese to be a priest (presbyter) for a neo community in that diocese?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 8:23 PM

      yes.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJuly 22, 2014 at 1:54 AM

      In that case: Archbishop Cordileone, what say you?

      Delete
    3. TimJuly 22, 2014 at 3:17 AM

      He probably doesn't even know Wadeson is there since he doesn't work in a parish. He works only in the ncw

      Delete
  7. AnonymousJuly 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM

    I think someone like parents should sue the archdiocese for exposing their school children to this risk.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJuly 22, 2014 at 12:57 PM

    Breaking news...Archbishop removes Wadeson from public ministry. My guess is he only did this because Tim exposed the truth and SNAP got involved. Archbishop should do even more and start rebuilding those bridges the nuncio spoke about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 22, 2014 at 1:54 PM

      Absolutely. Now the subject of abuse is front and center. Pandora's box.

      Delete
  9. AnonymousJuly 22, 2014 at 2:31 PM

    Oh my God.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousJuly 22, 2014 at 2:34 PM

    Pandora's box.

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousJuly 23, 2014 at 7:25 PM

    Actually, we don't just want him "removed from public ministry" but removed from this Diocese and anything connected to this diocese.
    return him to SVD to spend the rest of his years in contemplative prayer in a monastery somewhere. The allegations were serious enough for L.A. to remove him and ban him. If he was a diocesan maybe even defrocked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 23, 2014 at 8:36 PM

      Doubt defrocked.

      Delete
    2. TimJuly 23, 2014 at 8:45 PM

      Actually, it's not Wadeson we want removed. He wasn't here anyway. Wadeson is not the problem. I repeat, Wadeson is not the problem. I repeat.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJuly 23, 2014 at 8:52 PM

      Got, it, Tim. wow. Are getting warm?

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)