The post THANK YOU FOR STATING THE OBVIOUS brought out some pretty vitriolic comments, evidence that there is extreme, deep-seated anger against Apuron.
This is no surprise. I have been hearing such comments whispered privately for many years.
However, no matter how badly Apuron has hurt others, most people were willing to keep their hurt to themselves or at least to keep it to a low murmur. We all have our failings and we were willing to put up with Apuron's.
His mistake was when he took his hatred for Fr. Paul and Msgr. James public, trashing their family and friends a long the way with reckless disregard.
So he should not wonder why others now do the same to him.
P.S. It's not about the swim.
Oh, tony with hair! And that gross big fat TONGUE. feeling really ILL. And a younger , not so haggard Pat, the Tall Woman. Diana, any comment? BTW ...Tony's dirty feet.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous (May 24, 2015 at 12:54 PM), I was curious if "The Diana" would have any comment so I went to check That Other Blog and discovered that "The Diana" did not disappoint and defended AAA in two separate comments …
DeleteAccording to the first response: "… suddenly, the jungle comes up with a photo of a very young Archbishop with a head full of hair and makes it look like he was frolicking in the Dead Sea of THIS YEAR, 2015. It appears to me that some people did some photo cropping and editing. How desperate the jungle must be and how gullible the junglefolks are."
Note that, according to "The Diana," the photo was taken in 2015. A follow-up comment made by "Anonymous" indicated that regardless of when the photo was actually taken, AAA's behavior appears to be inappropriate. The response to that comment by "The Diana" indicated "You did not understand what I said about cropping and editing. Those are fake pictures. The Archbishop's face and Pat Cotman's [sic] face were put in someone's bodies swimming at the beach."
AAA is probably doing his Happy Dance now that "The Diana" declared the photo to be a fake. LOL!
That's pretty funny, but typical. No, nowhere did I say that this was recent. In fact, if I had intended to position the photo as recent I would not have been dumb enough to post a picture of Apuron with hair. And if it was photoshopped as the idiots claim, then I would have photoshopped more recent heads of Apuron and Cottman.
DeleteThe picture is just one picture in a whole album of pictures showing Apuron and others (like the Vicar General) romping about the Holy Land with their playmates. In fact, not only did not I not have any need to make the pic out to be recent, I in fact wanted to show HOW LONG Apuron has been neglecting his duties as bishop and instead has been whoring around with his mistress, and I don't mean Cottman.
A whole allllllbum? Oh, my.
DeleteThere's that big tongue that trashed the reputations Paul and James and many others. God forgive him and send him on another mission. How can Rome just let that go? Things are such a wreck, guess they don't have a replacement. Whoever has to be strong enough to handle uneducated, large neo presbyter population. Hey, fellas, take a good look closeup of your Ordinary. Not you, Edivaldo, you would think its ok.
ReplyDeleteI want a picture of Arch A Bishop with the fuchsia cape with the fat tongue sticking out all while he is standing on a table on Cathedral balcony gazing out on all the losers he will steal from. Are the victims in the crowd.? Why do I think this revelation will slide off Teflon Tony? Whyyyy, Rome?
ReplyDeleteOHHHH, brother, Ton!!! Tee, hee, hee! Giggle, giggle.
ReplyDeleteWait minute, Brother Ton, you mean I'm not your playmate? The hell with you. Pat C.
Delete
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately he was never loyal to his priestly vow of celibacy.
Don't interject useless, untrue, comments. 6:34. Just how do u know that! Liar.
Delete
ReplyDeleteOne victim only reported in march this year direct to the Vatican.
How many victims does it take for the Vatican to act? The victim who notified the Vatican needs a good lawyer.
DeleteBS
DeleteThat photo! Years ago they found the Dead Sea Scrolls! Now we just discovered the Dead Sea Trolls!
ReplyDeletedon't you wish you're me, call me tony
ReplyDeleteI need time for myself
I want to relax
My ministerial and personal lives are separate
I need diversion
Those who always wear their collars are insecure and seek to hide behind their uniforms
I do not want to stand out in a crowd
The Roman collar erects a barrier between me and my people
I can’t be one of the guys when I am ‘dressed up
I don’t want to offend non-Catholics or be provocative in our pluralistic society
Clerical clothing is for a clerical Church – I believe in the radical equality of all believers
My work with young people is hampered by the collar
Clothes do not make the man – the people of God can see my priesthood by the way I live, not by the way I dress
External symbols are not my thing – I am who I am, not what other people want me to be
Priests who always wear the Roman collar are rigid, arch-conservative, inflexible, elitist, vain and selfish attention-seekers. I am not one of them.
more oil please
Diana claims this is a photo-shopped picture...that it's not pat and tony.
ReplyDeleteDeep seated anger is so soft Tim. There is intense hatred for this
ReplyDeletemonster operating in the church. Hatred for this bastard of a man
Who claims to be a bishop.
He is Bishop, you are not.
DeleteAll the more reason for the "intense hatred". He stopped being a bishop long ago, but continued to use his position to abuse the church entrusted to him.
DeleteAll your hate for the bishop TIM TIM TIM
Delete
ReplyDeleteDianaMay 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM
Dear Anonymous at 3:05 pm,
You did not understand what I said about cropping and editing. Those are fake pictures. The Archbishop's face and Pat Cotman's face were put in someone's bodies swimming at the beach.
We want to see the tall, sickly, pale Vicar General. With a playmate???
DeleteAnonymous 8:55 a.m. I agree. Since he tries to portray himself as so shy, timid, meek and holy, it would be great fun to see photos of the Vicar General romping around the Holy Land with his playmates.
DeleteYah, King David Q mounting a camel. Poor camel.
DeleteYes is photoshop. Can tell by heads different color!! Ahhhh, haaaa. Gotcha Tim.
ReplyDelete@Anon 7:04 You're the fool. Silly, the different shade of their heads is because their bodies are usually covered -- where the sun don't shine -- except for the times they are in the company of their ilk! GROSS! @Tim, OMG even the VicarGeneral? Oh my! Not sure I'd like to see that image as this one's really rattled me! For shame!!
DeleteTo 7:04 AM, haven't you learned that Tim will not post anything unless he can authentically prove it? Of course the picture is real. The heightened color is only for emphasis.
ReplyDeleteSeveral people were on that trip.
DeleteLet the good times roll! Such good example for new presbyters.
DeleteNever mind the others, Rome, what do you think? Advisable to see more? Perhaps not. Putting more priest in a bad light, eh?
DeleteDiana, ( I mean Pius) yellow choppers are chattering on this one. Just can't keep silence on this one. Having indigestion what photo will be next. Denial, much?
DeleteShow us the next picture of what happens after Tony dog paddled his way onto Pat. Lol.
ReplyDeleteDon't think so.
DeleteHeck,
ReplyDeleteAAA is not even dog paddling, he's crawling on his hands, feet in the air, and got that killer look - "I'm gonna get you".
Hope he's proud of himself. ass.
Delete