Since the military intervention on February 24th by the Russian military, of large swaths of the Ukrainian national territory, we have been bombarded by an endless cascade of war propaganda emanating from the White House offices of the actual tenant, who likes to pose as a deeply Catholic individual, despite his clearly anti-Catholic positions on a myriad of issues.
The hyperbolic of the Military Industrial Complex's proxy media, has made it almost impossible for the average main street Joe to make any sense on the issues at hand. The attention span of the average citizen makes it even more difficult to comprehend the challenges in view of the clear suffering of the civilian population. Yet this conflict could have been avoided and thousands of death prevented, has it not been for the Johnnies go to war, who have made it hard for the truth to shine.
Archbishop Carlos Vigano a rare voice of reason, clamoring in the desert of intellectual and moral turpitude wrote an excellent piece in mid March, which was posted in several Catholic websites and newspapers.
Junglewatch has decided to share this with our readers.In this season of lent, it is even more important to shed light on the sea of lies and deceptions surrounding us on daily basis.
Do not refrain to comment and ask questions about this issue.
One unforeseen consequence of these actions has been the consecration of Russia as requested by the Virgin Mary herself to the Children in Fatima, back in 1917.
While the motives of Pope Francis for that consecration might remain murky, the fact that said consecration did take place is a giant step in itself.
DECLARATION
of Msgr. Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop,
Former Apostolic Nuncio to The United States of America
on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis
Nothing
is lost with peace. All can be lost with war. Let men return to
understanding. Let them resume negotiating. Negotiating with good will
and with respect for each other’s rights, let them realize that an
honorable success is never precluded when there are sincere and active
negotiations. And they will feel great – with true greatness – if
imposing silence on the voices of passion, whether collective or
private, and leaving reason to its proper domain, they will spare their
brothers bloodshed and their homeland ruin.
Thus
it was that on August 24, 1939, Pius XII addressed both rulers and
peoples as war was imminent. These were not words of empty pacifism, nor
of complicit silence about the multiple violations of justice that were
being carried out in many quarters. In that radio message, which some
people still remember hearing, the appeal of the Roman Pontiff invoked “respect for each other’s rights” as a prerequisite for fruitful peace negotiations.
This
is the trap set for both Russia and Ukraine, using both of them to
enable the globalist elite to carry out its criminal plan.
The Media Narrative
If we look at what is happening in Ukraine, without being misled by the gross falsifications of the mainstream media, we realize that respect for each other’s rights
has been completely ignored; indeed, we have the impression that the
Biden Administration, NATO and the European Union deliberately want to
maintain a situation of obvious imbalance, precisely to make impossible
any attempt at a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis, provoking
the Russian Federation to trigger a conflict. Herein lies the
seriousness of the problem. This is the trap set for both Russia and
Ukraine, using both of them to enable the globalist elite to carry out
its criminal plan.
It
should not surprise us that pluralism and freedom of speech, so praised
in countries that claim to be democratic, are daily disavowed by
censorship and intolerance towards opinions not aligned with the
official narrative. Manipulations of this kind have become the norm
during the so-called pandemic, to the detriment of doctors, scientists
and dissenting journalists, who have been discredited and ostracized for
the mere fact of daring to question the effectiveness of experimental
serums. Two years later, the truth about the adverse effects and the
unfortunate management of the health emergency has proven them right,
but the truth is stubbornly ignored because it does not correspond to
what the system wanted and still wants today.
We
should ask ourselves why, in the present situation, the world media
should suddenly rediscover that intellectual honesty and respect for the
code of ethics widely denied with Covid.
If the
world media have so far been able to lie shamelessly on a matter of
strict scientific relevance, spreading lies and hiding reality, we
should ask ourselves why, in the present situation, they should suddenly
rediscover that intellectual honesty and respect for the code of ethics
widely denied with Covid.
But if
this colossal fraud has been supported and disseminated by the media,
it must be recognized that national and international health
institutions, governments, magistrates, law enforcement agencies and the
Catholic Hierarchy itself all share responsibility for the disaster –
each in its own sphere by actively supporting or failing to oppose the
narrative – a disaster that has affected billions of people in their
health, their property, the exercise of their individual rights and even
their very lives. Even in this case, it is difficult to imagine that
those who have been guilty of such crimes in support of a pandemic that
was intended and maliciously amplified could suddenly have a jolt of
dignity and show solicitude for their citizens and their homeland when a
war threatens their security and their economy.
These,
of course, can be the prudent reflections of those who want to remain
neutral and look with detachment and almost disinterest at what is
happening around them. But if we deepen our knowledge of the facts and
document them, relying on authoritative and objective sources, we
discover that doubts and perplexities soon become disturbing
certainties.
Even
if we only want to limit our investigation to the economic aspect, we
understand that news agencies, politics and public institutions
themselves depend on a small number of financial groups belonging to an
oligarchy that, significantly, is united not only by money and power,
but by the ideological affiliation that guides its action and
interference in the politics of nations and the whole world. This
oligarchy shows its tentacles in the UN, NATO, the World Economic Forum, the European Union, and in “philanthropic” institutions such as George Soros’ Open Society and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The
truth, if you want to know it, allows us to see things differently and
to judge the facts for what they are and not for how they are presented
to us.
All
these entities are private and answer to no one but themselves, and at
the same time they have the power to influence national governments,
including through their own representatives who are made to be elected
or appointed to key posts. They admit it themselves, when they are
received with all the honors by Heads of State and world leaders,
beginning with Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, respected and feared
by these leaders as the true masters of the fate of the world. Thus,
those who hold power in the name of the “people” find
themselves trampling on the people’s will and restricting their rights,
in order to be obedient like courtiers to masters whom nobody has
elected but who nevertheless dictate their political and economic agenda
to the nations.
We
come then to the Ukraine crisis, which is presented to us as a
consequence of Vladimir Putin’s expansionist arrogance towards an
independent and democratic nation over which he is trying to claim
absurd rights. The “warmonger Putin” is said to be massacring the
defenseless population, who have courageously arisen to defend the soil
of their homeland, the sacred borders of their nation and the violated
freedoms of the citizens. The European Union and the United States,
“defenders of democracy,” are therefore said to be unable not to
intervene by means of NATO to restore Ukraine’s autonomy, drive out the
“invader” and guarantee peace. In the face of the “tyrant’s arrogance,”
it is said that the peoples of the world ought to form a common front,
imposing sanctions on the Russian Federation and sending soldiers,
weapons and economic aid to “poor” President Zelensky, “national hero”
and “defender” of his people. As proof of Putin’s “violence,” the media
spread images of bombings, military searches, and destruction,
attributing responsibility to Russia. And there’s still more: precisely
in order to guarantee a “lasting peace,” the European Union and NATO are
opening wide their arms to welcome Ukraine as members. And in order to
prevent “Soviet propaganda”, Europe is now blacking out Russia Today and Sputnik, in order to ensure that information is “free and independent.”
This
is the official narrative, to which everyone conforms. Being at war,
dissent immediately becomes desertion, and those who dissent are guilty
of treason and deserving of more or less serious sanctions, starting
with public execration and ostracism, well experienced with Covid
against those who are “un-vaxxed”. But the truth, if you want to know
it, allows us to see things differently and to judge the facts for what
they are and not for how they are presented to us. This is a true and
proper unveiling, as indicated by the etymology of the Greek word ἀλήθεια. Or perhaps, with an eschatological gaze, a revelation, an ἀποκάλυψις.
As
we can see, NATO has failed to keep its commitments to Russia, or has at
least forced the situation at a very delicate moment for geopolitical
balances.
The expansion of NATO
First
of all, it is necessary to remember the facts, which do not lie and are
not susceptible to alteration. And the facts, however irritating they
are to recall to those who try to censor them, tell us that since the
fall of the Berlin Wall the United States has extended its sphere of
political and military influence to almost all the satellite states of
the former Soviet Union, even recently, annexing into NATO Poland, the
Czech Republic, and Hungary (1999); Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania,
Slovenia, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Romania (2004); Albania and Croatia
(2009); Montenegro (2017); and North Macedonia (2020). The North
Atlantic Treaty Organization is preparing to expand to Ukraine, Georgia,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia. Practically speaking, the Russian
Federation is under military threat – from weapons and missile bases –
just a few kilometers from its borders, while it has no military base in
similar proximity to the United States.
To be
considering the possible expansion of NATO into Ukraine, without
thinking that it will arouse Russia’s legitimate protests, is nothing
short of puzzling, especially given the fact that in 1991 NATO pledged
to the Kremlin not to expand further. Not only that: at the end of 2021,
Der Spiegel published drafts of a treaty with the United States and an agreement with NATO on security guarantees (here, here and here).
Moscow demanded legal guarantees from its Western partners that would
prevent NATO from further eastward expansion by adding Ukraine to the
alliance and also from establishing military bases in post-Soviet
countries. The proposals also contained a clause on the non-deployment
of offensive weapons by NATO near Russia’s borders and on the withdrawal
of NATO forces in Eastern Europe back to their 1997 positions.
As we
can see, NATO has failed to keep its commitments to Russia, or has at
least forced the situation at a very delicate moment for geopolitical
balances. We should ask ourselves why the United States – or rather the
American deep state which regained power after the electoral
fraud that brought Joe Biden to the White House – wants to create
tensions with Russia and involve its European partners in the conflict,
with all the consequences we can imagine.
As
General Marco Bertolini, former commander of the Joint Summit
Operational Command, has lucidly observed: “The United States did not
just win the Cold War but also wanted to humiliate [Russia] by taking
everything that in a certain sense fell within its area of influence.
[Putin] bore with the Baltic countries, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria
[joining NATO]. Faced with Ukraine [joining NATO], which would have
taken away any possibility of access to the Black Sea, he reacted” (here).
And he adds: “There is a problem of the regime’s stability, a situation
has arisen with a fairly unlikely prime minister [Zelensky], one who
comes from the world of entertainment.” The general does not fail to
recall, in the case of a US attack on Russia, that “the Global Hawks
flying over Ukraine depart from Sigonella [Italy]; Italy is an American
military base in large part. The risk is there, it is present and real” (here).
Interests arising from the blockade of Russian gas supplies
We
should also ask ourselves whether, behind the destabilization of the
delicate balance between the European Union and Russia, there are also
economic interests, deriving from the need of EU countries to obtain
American liquid gas (for which we also need the regasification plants
which many nations are deprived of, and for which in any case we will
have to pay much more) instead of Russian gas (which is more
ecological).
The
decision of Italian oil and gas company ENI to suspend investments in
Gazprom’s Blue Stream pipeline (from Russia to Turkey) also entails the
deprivation of an additional source of supply, since it feeds the
Trans-Atlantic Pipeline (from Turkey to Italy).
It
therefore does not sound like a coincidence if, in August 2021, Zelensky
declared that he considered the Nord Stream 2 pipeline between Russia
and Germany as “a dangerous weapon, not only for Ukraine but for all of
Europe” (here):
bypassing Ukraine, it deprives Kiev of about one billion euros per year
in revenue from transit tariffs. “We view this project exclusively
through the prism of security and consider it a dangerous geopolitical
weapon of the Kremlin”“ the Ukrainian president said, agreeing with the
Biden administration. American Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland
said: “If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not go forward.”
And so it has happened, not without serious economic damage to German
investments.
It is worth mentioning the virological laboratories located in Ukraine which are under the control of the Pentagon.
The Pentagon’s virological laboratories in Ukraine
Still
on the subject of American interests in Ukraine, it is worth mentioning
the virological laboratories located in Ukraine which are under the
control of the Pentagon and where it seems that only US specialists with
diplomatic immunity are employed directly under the American Ministry
of Defense.
We
should also remember the complaint made by Putin regarding the
collection of genomic data about the population, which can be used for
bacteriological weapons with genetic selection (here, here and here).
Information about the activity of laboratories in Ukraine is obviously
difficult to confirm, but it is understandable that the Russian
Federation considered, not without reason, that these laboratories could
constitute an additional bacteriological threat to the safety of the
population. The U.S. Embassy has removed all files related to the Biological Threat Reduction Program from its website (here).
Maurizio Blondet writes: “Event 201,
which simulated the pandemic explosion a year before it happened, was
attended (along with the usuals, Bill and Melinda) by the apparently
inoffensive John Hopkins University with its blessed Center for Health Security. The humanitarian institution had for a long time a less innocent name: it was called Center for Civilian Biodefence Strategies
and did not deal with the health of Americans, but rather with its
opposite: the response to military attacks of bio-terrorism. It was
practically a civil-military organization. When it held its first
conference in February 1999 in Crystal City in Arlington [Virginia],
where the Pentagon is located, it brought together 950 doctors, military
personnel, federal officials and health officials to participate in a
simulation exercise. The aim of the simulation is to counter an imagined
“militarized” smallpox attack. It is only the first of the exercises
that will blossom in Event 201 and in the Pandemic Imposture” (here).
Experiments also emerge on the Ukrainian military (here)
and interventions by the American Embassy regarding the Ukrainian
Prosecutor Lutsenko in 2016 so that he would not investigate “a
billionaire round of funds between G. Soros and B. Obama” (here).
An indirect threat to China’s expansionist ambitions on Taiwan
The
current Ukrainian crisis entails secondary, but no less serious,
consequences on the geopolitical balance between China and Taiwan.
Russia and Ukraine are the only producers of palladium and neon, which
are indispensable for the production of microchips.
“Moscow’s
possible retaliation has attracted more attention in recent days after
market research group Techcet published a report highlighting the
dependence of many semiconductor manufacturers on materials of Russian
and Ukrainian origin such as neon, palladium and others. According to
Techcet’s estimates, more than 90% of U.S. supplies of semiconductor
neon come from Ukraine, while 35% of U.S. palladium comes from Russia.
[...] According to the US International Trade Commission, neon
prices rose by 600% before Russia’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula
in 2014, because chip companies relied on some Ukrainian companies” (here).
“If
it is true that a Chinese invasion of Formosa would put the global
technology supply chain at risk, it is also true that a sudden shortage
of raw materials from Russia could stop production, so as to make the
island lose the “microchip shield” and induce Beijing to attempt the
annexation of Taipei.”
Democrats claimed that Trump had created a media scandal to harm Biden’s campaign, but his accusations turned out to be true.
The Biden’s’ conflict of interest in Ukraine
Another
issue that we tend not to analyze in depth is that related to Burisma,
an oil and gas company operating on the Ukrainian market since 2002.
Recall that “during the American presidency of Barack Obama (from 2009
to 2017) his right hand man with a “delegation” to handle international
politics was Joe Biden, and it is since then that the “protection’
offered by the Democrat US leader was given to Ukrainian nationalists, a
line that created the irreconcilable disagreement between Kiev and
Moscow. [...] It was Joe Biden in those years who carried out the policy
of bringing Ukraine closer to NATO. He wanted to take away political
and economic power from Russia. [...] In recent years, Joe Biden’s name
has also been associated with a scandal over Ukraine that had also
shaken his candidacy. [...] It was April 2014 when Burisma Holdings, the
largest energy company in Ukraine (active in both gas and oil), hired
Hunter Biden as a consultant [...] with a salary of $50,000 a month. All
transparent, except that during those months Joe Biden continued the
American policy aimed at regaining possession by Ukraine of those areas
of the Donbass that have now become Republics recognized by Russia. The
Donetsk area is believed to be rich in unexplored gas fields that have
been targeted by Burisma Holdings. An international policy intertwined
with the economic one that made the American media turn up their noses
in those years” (here).
Democrats
claimed that Trump had created a media scandal to harm Biden’s
campaign, but his accusations turned out to be true. Joe Biden himself,
during a meeting at the Rockefeller Council for Foreign Relations,
admitted to having intervened on then-President Petro Poroshenko and
Prime Minister Arsenij Yatseniuk to prevent investigations into his son
Hunter by Procurator General Viktor Shokin. Biden had threatened “to
withhold a billion dollars loan guarantee in the United States during a
December 2015 trip to Kiev,” reports the New York Post. (here). “If [the Procurator General Shokin] is not fired, you will not have the money” (here). And the Prosecutor was effectively fired, saving Hunter from further scandal, after those involving him.
Biden’s
interference in Kiev politics, in exchange for favors to Burisma and
corrupt oligarchs, confirms the current US President’s interest in
protecting his family and image, fueling disorder in Ukraine and even a
war. How can a person who uses his role to take care of his own
interests and cover up the crimes of his family members govern honestly
and without being subject to blackmail?
The Ukrainian nuclear question
Finally,
there is the issue of Ukrainian nuclear weapons. On February 19, 2022,
at a conference in Munich, Zelensky announced his intention to end the
Budapest Memorandum (1994), which prohibits Ukraine from developing,
proliferating and using atomic weapons. Among the other clauses of the
Memorandum, there is also the one that obliges Russia, the United States
and the United Kingdom to refrain from using economic pressure on
Ukraine to influence its policy: the pressure of the IMF and the United
States to grant economic aid in exchange for reforms consistent with the
Great Reset represent a further violation of the agreement.
The Ukrainian Ambassador in Berlin, Andriy Melnyk, argued on Deutschlandfunk
radio in 2021 that Ukraine needed to regain nuclear status if the
country failed to join NATO. Ukraine’s nuclear power plants are
operated, rebuilt and maintained by the state-owned enterprise NAEK
Energoatom, which completely ended its relationship with Russian
companies between 2018 and 2021. Its main partners are companies that
can be traced back to the US government. It is easy to understand how
the Russian Federation considers the possibility of Ukraine acquiring
nuclear weapons as a threat and demands Kiev’s adherence to the
non-proliferation pact.
It
was an operation sponsored by George Soros, as he candidly told CNN: “I
have had a foundation in Ukraine since before it became independent of
Russia; this foundation has always been in business and has played a
decisive role in today’s events.”
The color revolution in Ukraine and the independence of Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk
Another
fact. In 2013, after the government of President Viktor Yanukovych
decided to suspend the association agreement between Ukraine and the
European Union and to forge closer economic relations with Russia, a
series of protest demonstrations known as Euromaidan began,
which lasted several months and culminated in the revolution that
overthrew Yanukovych and led to the installation of a new government. It
was an operation sponsored by George Soros, as he candidly told CNN: “I
have had a foundation in Ukraine since before it became independent of
Russia; this foundation has always been in business and has played a
decisive role in today’s events” (here, here and here).
This change of government provoked the reaction of Yanukovych’s
supporters and of a part of the Ukrainian population opposed to the
pro-Western shift of Ukraine, which had not been wanted by the
population but was obtained by a color revolution, of which there had
been general rehearsals in previous years in Georgia, Moldova and
Belarus.
Following the clashes of May 2, 2014, in which nationalist paramilitary fringes (including those of Pravyi Sektor)
also intervened, there was also the massacre in Odessa. The Western
press also spoke of these terrible events in a scandalized way; Amnesty
International (here)
and the UN denounced these crimes and documented their brutality. But
no international court initiated any proceedings against those
responsible, as is intended to be done today against the alleged crimes
of the Russian army.
Among
the many agreements not respected is also the Minsk Protocol, signed on
September 5, 2014 by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, composed
of representatives of Ukraine, Russia, the Donetsk People’s Republic and
the Lugansk People’s Republic. Among the points of the agreement was
also the removal of armed illegal groups, military equipment, as well as
fighters and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the
supervision of the OSCE and the disarmament of all illegal groups.
Contrary to what was agreed, neo-Nazi paramilitary groups are not only
officially recognized by the government, but their members are even
given official assignments.
Why
are we scandalized today by a Russian intervention in Ukraine, when NATO
carried out the same sort of thing in Yugoslavia (1991), Kosovo (1999),
Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2003), and in Libya and Syria (2011), without
anyone raising any objections?
Also
in 2014, Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk declared their independence from
Ukraine – in the name of self-determination of peoples recognized by the
international community – and declared themselves annexed to the
Russian Federation. The Ukrainian government still refuses to recognize
the independence of these regions, sanctioned by popular referendum, and
leaves the neo-Nazi militias and the regular military forces themselves
free to rage against the population, since it considers these entities
as terrorist organizations. It is true that the two referendums of
November 2, 2014 constitute a stretching of the Minsk Protocol, which
provided only for a decentralization of power and a form of special
status for the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.
As
Professor Franco Cardini recently pointed out, “on February 15, 2022,
Russia delivered to the United States a draft of a treaty to end this
situation and defend the Russian-speaking populations. Wastepaper. This
war began in 2014” (here and here).
And it was a war in the intentions of those who wanted to fight the
Russian minority of Donbass: “We will have a job and pensions, and they
will not. We will receive bonuses for having children, and they will
not. Our children will have schools and kindergartens; their children
will stay in the basements. In this way we will win this war,” said
President Petro Poroshenko in 2015 (here).
It will not escape notice that these measures are similar to the
discrimination against the so-called “un-vaxxed,” who have been deprived
of work, pay and education. Eight years of bombing in Donetsk and
Lugansk, with hundreds of thousands of victims, 150 dead children, and
very serious cases of torture, rape, kidnapping and discrimination (here).
It
is dismaying to see with what hypocrisy the European Union and the
United States – Brussels and Washington – are giving their unconditional
support to President Zelensky, whose government for eight years now has
continued to persecute Russian-speaking Ukrainians with impunity.
On
February 18, 2022 the Presidents of Donetsk and Lugansk, Denis Pushilin
and Leonid Pasechnik, ordered the evacuation of the civilian population
of their provinces into the Russian Federation due to the ongoing
clashes between the Donbass People’s Militia and the Ukrainian Armed
Forces. On February 21, the State Duma (Lower House of the Russian
Parliament) unanimously ratified the treaties of friendship, cooperation
and mutual assistance introduced by President Putin with the Donetsk
and Lugansk People’s Republics. At the same time, the Russian President
ordered the sending of troops from the Russian Federation to restore
peace in the Donbass region.
Here
one may wonder why, in a situation of blatant violation of human rights
by neo-Nazi military forces and paramilitary apparatuses (who fly flags
bearing swastikas and display the effigy of Aldolf Hitler) against the
Russian-speaking population of the independent republics, the
international community feels obliged to consider the intervention of
the Russian Federation worthy of condemnation, and indeed to blame Putin
for the violence. Where is the much-vaunted right of the people to
self-determination, which was held valid on August 24, 1991 for the
proclamation of Ukraine’s independence and recognized by the
international community? And why are we scandalized today by a Russian
intervention in Ukraine, when NATO carried out the same sort of thing in
Yugoslavia (1991), Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2003), and
in Libya and Syria (2011), without anyone raising any objections? Not to
mention that in the last ten years Israel has repeatedly hit military
targets in Syria, Iran and Lebanon to prevent the creation of a hostile
armed front on its northern border, and yet no nation has proposed
imposing sanctions on Tel Aviv.
The mainstream media is careful not to show images of Russian soldiers helping civilians reach safe positions (here and here) or organizing humanitarian corridors, which Ukrainian militias fire upon (here and here).
It
is dismaying to see with what hypocrisy the European Union and the
United States – Brussels and Washington – are giving their unconditional
support to President Zelensky, whose government for eight years now has
continued to persecute Russian-speaking Ukrainians with impunity (here),
for whom it is even forbidden to speak in their own language, in a
nation that includes numerous ethnic groups, of which those who speak
Russian represent 17.2%. And it is scandalous that they are silent about
the use of civilians as human shields by the Ukrainian army, which
places anti-aircraft positions inside population centers, hospitals,
schools and kindergartens precisely so that their destruction can cause
deaths among the population.
The mainstream media is careful not to show images of Russian soldiers helping civilians reach safe positions (here and here) or organizing humanitarian corridors, which Ukrainian militias fire upon (here and here).
Just as it is also silent about the settling of scores, massacres,
violence and theft by fringes of the civilian population, to whom
Zelensky has given weapons: the videos that can be seen on the internet
give an idea of the climate of civil war that has been artfully fueled
by the Ukrainian Government. To this we may also add the convicts
released to be drafted into the Army and also the volunteers of the
foreign legion: a mass of fanatics without rules and without training
that will contribute to worsening the situation, making it unmanageable.
The
57-part television series that Zelensky produced and starred in,
demonstrates that the media planned his candidacy for President of
Ukraine and his election campaign.
President Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky
As has been pointed out by many parties, the candidacy and election of Ukrainian President Zelensky corresponds to that recent cliché,
inaugurated in recent years, of a comic actor or entertainment
personality being lent to politics. Do not believe that being without a
suitable cursus honorum is an obstacle to the rising to the top
of institutions; on the contrary: the more a person is apparently a
stranger to the world of political parties, the more it is to be assumed
that his success is determined by those who hold power. Zelensky’s
performances in drag are perfectly consistent with the LGBTQ ideology
that is considered by its European sponsors as an indispensable
requirement of the “reform” agenda that every country ought to embrace,
along with gender equality, abortion and the green economy. No wonder Zelensky, a member of the WEF (here), was able to benefit from the support of Schwab and his allies to come to power and ensure that the Great Reset would also be carried out in Ukraine.
The
57-part television series that Zelensky produced and starred in,
demonstrates that the media planned his candidacy for President of
Ukraine and his election campaign. In the fiction show The Servant of the People
he played the part of a high school teacher who unexpectedly became
President of the Republic and fought against the corruption of politics.
It is no coincidence that the series, which was absolutely mediocre,
still won the WorldFest Remi Award (USA, 2016), came among the top four finalists in the category of comedy films at the Seoul International Drama Awards (South Korea) and was awarded the Intermedia Globe Silver award in the entertainment TV series category at the World Media Film Festival in Hamburg.
The
media stir obtained by Zelensky with the television series brought him
over 10 million followers on Instagram and created the premise for the
establishment of the homonymous Servant of the People political
party, of which Ivan Bakanov, General Manager and shareholder (along
with Zelensky himself and the oligarch Kolomoisky) of Kvartal 95 Studio, and the owner of the TV 1+1
television network, is also a member. Zelensky’s image is an artificial
product, a media fiction, an operation of manipulation of consensus
that has managed to create the political character in the Ukrainian
collective imagination that in reality, and not in fiction, has
conquered power.
“Just one month before the 2019 elections that saw him win, Zelensky sold the company [Kvartal 95 Studio]
to a friend, still finding a way to get the proceeds of the business he
had officially renounced to his family. That friend was Serhiy Shefir,
who was later appointed Councilor to the Presidency. [...] The sale of
the shares took place for the benefit of Maltex Multicapital Corp., a
company owned by Shefir and registered in the British Virgin Islands” (here).
The current Ukrainian President promoted his election campaign with a commercial that was disturbing, to say the least (here),
in which, holding two machine guns, he fired on members of Parliament,
pointed out as corrupt or subservient to Russia. The fight against
corruption trumpeted by the Ukrainian President in the role of “servant
of the people” does not correspond, however, to the picture that emerges
of him from the so-called Pandora papers, in which 40 million dollars appear to have been paid to him on the eve of the elections by the Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky[1] through offshore accounts (here, here and here).[2]
In his homeland, many accuse him of having taken power away from the
pro-Russian oligarchs not to give it to the Ukrainian people, but rather
to strengthen his own interest group and at the same time remove his
political adversaries: “He liquidated the ministers of the old guard,
first of all the powerful Minister of the Interior, [Arsen] Avakov. He
rudely retired the president of the Constitutional Court who was acting
as a check on his laws. He closed seven opposition TV channels. He
arrested and accused of treason Viktor Medvedcuk, a pro-Russian
sympathizer but above all the leader of the Platform of Opposition - For Life party, the second party of the Ukrainian Parliament after his Servant of the People party.
He is also placing on trial for treason former President Poroshenko,
who was suspicious of everyone except for those who got along with the
Russians or their friends. The mayor of Kiev, the popular former world
boxing champion Vitaly Klitchko, has already been subjected to several
searches and seizures. In short, Zelensky seems to want to make a clean
sweep of anyone who is not aligned with his politics” (here).
On
April 21, 2019, Zelensky was elected President of Ukraine with 73.22% of
the votes, and on May 20 he was sworn in. On May 22, 2019 he appointed
Ivan Bakanov, Director General of Kvartal 95, as First Deputy
Head of the Security Services of Ukraine and Head of the Main
Directorate for the Fight against Corruption and Organized Crime of the
Central Directorate of the Security Service of Ukraine. Along with
Bakanov, it is worth mentioning Mykhailo Fedorov, Vice President and
Minister of Digital Transformation, a member of the World Economic Forum (here). Zelensky himself has admitted to having as his inspiration the Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau (here and here).
On
the other hand, just four months earlier Kristalina Georgieva had
launched the Great Reset together with Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles and
UN Secretary-General António Guterres.
Zelensky’s relations with the IMF and the WEF
As Greece’s tragic precedent has shown, national sovereignties and the popular will expressed by parliaments are de facto
erased by the decisions of international high finance, which interferes
with government policies by means of blackmail and outright extortion
of an economic nature. The case of Ukraine, which is one of the poorest
countries in Europe, is no exception.
Shortly
after Zelensky’s election, the International Monetary Fund threatened
not to grant Ukraine a $5 billion loan if he did not comply with their
demands. During a telephone conversation with the CEO of the IMF,
Kristalina Georgieva, the Ukrainian President was rebuked for replacing
Yakiv Smolii with a man he trusted, Kyrylo Shevchenko, who was less
inclined to comply with the diktats of the IMF. Anders Åslund writes at Atlantic Council:
“The problems surrounding the Zelensky government are mounting
alarmingly. First of all, since March 2020, the President has led a
reversal not only of the reforms pursued under him, but also those
initiated by his predecessor Petro Poroshenko. Second, his government
has not presented plausible proposals to resolve IMF concerns about
Ukraine’s unfulfilled commitments. Third, the President appears to no
longer have a ruling parliamentary majority, and he seems disinterested
in forming a reformist majority (here).
It is
evident that the IMF’s interventions are aimed at obtaining the
Ukrainian government’s commitment to align itself with the economic,
fiscal and social policies dictated by the globalist agenda, beginning
with the “independence” of the Central Bank of Ukraine from the
government: a euphemism with which the IMF calls on the Kiev government
to renounce legitimate control over its Central Bank, which is one of
the ways in which national sovereignty is exercised, along with the
issuance of money and the management of public debt. On the other hand,
just four months earlier Kristalina Georgieva had launched the Great Reset together with Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles and UN Secretary-General António Guterres.
What
had not been possible with previous governments was brought to
completion under the presidency of Zelensky, who entered the good graces
of the WEF (here)
along with the new Governor of the BCU, Kyrylo Shevchenko. Less than a
year later, in order to prove his subjection, Shevchenko wrote an
article for the WEF entitled Central banks are the key to countries’ climate goals and Ukraine is showing the way (here). Thus the Agenda 2030 is implemented, under blackmail.
There are also other Ukrainian companies that have ties to the WEF: the State Savings Bank of Ukraine (one of the largest financial institutions in Ukraine), the DTEK Group (an important private investor in the Ukrainian energy sector) and Ukr Land Farming (an agricultural leader in cultivation). Banks, energy and food are sectors perfectly in line with the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution theorized by Klaus Schwab.
On February 4, 2021, the Ukrainian president shut down seven television stations, including ZIK, Newsone and 112 Ukraine,
all guilty of not supporting his government. As Anna Del Freo writes:
“A harsh condemnation of this liberticidal act has arrived, among
others, also from the European Federation of Journalists and the
International Federation of Journalists, who have asked for the
immediate lifting of the veto. The three broadcasters will no longer be
able to broadcast for five years: they employ about 1500 people, whose
jobs are now at risk. There is no real reason why the three networks
should be shut down, except for the arbitrariness of the Ukrainian
political apex, which accuses them of threatening information security
and being under “malign Russian influence.” A strong reaction also comes
from NUJU, the Ukrainian journalists’ union, which speaks of a very
heavy attack on freedom of speech, given that hundreds of journalists
are being deprived of the opportunity to express themselves and hundreds
of thousands of citizens are being deprived of the right to be
informed. As we can see, what Putin is accused of was actually carried
out by Zelensky and, more recently, by the European Union, with the
complicity of social media platforms. “Shutting down television
broadcasters is one of the most extreme forms of restriction of the
freedom of the press,” said EFJ Secretary General Ricardo Gutierrez.
“Nations have an obligation to ensure effective pluralism of
information. It is clear that the presidential veto is not at all in
line with international standards on freedom of expression” (here).
It
would be interesting to know what statements were made by the European
Federation of Journalists and the International Federation of
Journalists after the blackout of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe.
Neo-Nazi
movements engaged in military and paramilitary actions operate freely
in Ukraine, often with the official support of public institutions.
Neo-nazi and extremist movements in Ukraine
A
country that calls for humanitarian aid from the international community
to defend its population from Russian aggression should, in the
collective imagination, stand out for respect for democratic principles
and for legislation that prohibits activities and the spread of
propaganda by extremist ideologies.
Neo-Nazi
movements engaged in military and paramilitary actions operate freely
in Ukraine, often with the official support of public institutions.
These include the following: Stepan Bandera’s Organization of Ukrainian
Nationalists (OUN), a movement with a Nazi, anti-Semitic and racist
matrix already active in Chechnya and which is part of the Right Sector, an association of far-right movements formed at the time of the Euromaidan
coup in 2013/2014; the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA); the UNA/UNSO,
paramilitary wing of the far-right political party Ukraine National
Assembly; the Korchinsky Brotherhood, which offered protection in Kiev
to ISIS members (here);
Misanthropic Vision (MD), a neo-Nazi network spread across 19 countries
that publicly incites terrorism, extremism and hatred against
Christians, Muslims, Jews, Communists, homosexuals, Americans and people
of color (here).
It
should be remembered that the government has given explicit support to
these extremist organizations both by sending the presidential guard to
the funerals of their representatives, as well as by supporting the Azov
Battalion, a paramilitary organization that is officially part of the
Ukrainian Army under the new name of Azov Special Operations Regiment
and organized into the National Guard. The Azov Regiment is financed by
the Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, the former governor of
Dnepropetrovsk, who is also thought to be the financier of the
nationalist militias of Pravyi Sektor, which are considered responsible for the Odessa massacre. We are talking about the same Kolomoisky mentioned in the Pandora Papers
as a sponsor of President Zelensky. The battalion has relations with
several far-right organizations in Europe and the United States.
Amnesty
International, after a meeting on September 8, 2014 between Secretary
General Salil Shetty and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, called on the
Ukrainian Government to end the abuses and war crimes committed by the
volunteer battalions that operate together with the Kiev Armed Forces.
The Ukrainian government has opened an official investigation into the
matter, declaring that no officers or soldiers of the Azov Battalion
appear to be under investigation.
In
March 2015, Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov announced that the
Azov Battalion would be one of the first units to be trained by US Army
troops, as part of their Operation Fearless Guard training
mission. US training was discontinued on June 12, 2015, when the US
House of Representatives passed an amendment banning all aid (including
weapons and training) to the battalion because of its neo-Nazi past. The
amendment was then revoked under pressure from the CIA (here and here) and the soldiers of the Azov Battalion were trained in the United States (here and here):
"We have been training these guys for eight years now. They are really
good fighters. That's where the Agency's program could have a serious
impact."
In
2016, an OSCE report [Organization for Security and Co-operation in
Europe] found that the Azov Battalion was responsible for the mass
killing of prisoners, the concealment of corpses in mass graves and the
systematic use of physical and psychological torture techniques. Just a
few days ago the Deputy Commander of the Battalion, Vadim Troyan, was
appointed Chief of Police of the Oblast Region by Interior Minister
Arsen Avakov.
These
are the "heroes" fighting together with the Ukrainian Army against the
Russian soldiers. And these heroes of the Azov Battalion, instead of
protecting their children, dare to make their own flesh into meat for
slaughter, enlisting boys and girls (here and here), in violation of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (here),
concerning the involvement of minors in armed conflicts: an ad hoc
legal instrument that establishes that no child under 18 is to be
forcibly recruited or used directly in hostilities, either by the armed
forces of a state nor by armed groups.
Inevitably,
the lethal weapons provided by the EU, including Draghi's Italy, with
the support of "anti-fascist" political parties, are destined to be used
against these children.
Reality
is ignored because it has already been decided to provoke a conflict as
a weapon of mass distraction that legitimizes new restrictions of
freedoms in Western nations, according to the plans of the World
Economic Forum’s Great Reset and the United Nations’ Agenda 2030.
The Ukrainian war in the plans of the New World Order
The
censorship being imposed against Russian broadcasters is clearly aimed
at preventing the official narrative from being disproven by the facts.
But while the Western media shows images of the video game War Thunder (here), frames from the movie Star Wars (here), explosions in China (here), videos of military parades (here), footage from Afghanistan (here), the Rome metro (here) or images of mobile crematoria (here)
by passing them off as real and recent scenes of the war in Ukraine,
reality is ignored because it has already been decided to provoke a
conflict as a weapon of mass distraction that legitimizes new
restrictions of freedoms in Western nations, according to the plans of
the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and the United Nations’ Agenda 2030.
It is
evident that the Ukrainian people, beyond the issues that diplomacy can
resolve, are victims of the same global coup d'état being carried out by
supranational powers that intend, not peace between nations, but rather
the establishment of the tyranny of the New World Order. Just a few
days ago, Ukrainian parliamentarian Kira Rudik told Fox News, while
holding a kalashnikov: “We know that we are not only fighting for
Ukraine, but also for the New World Order.”
The
human rights violations in Ukraine and the crimes of the neo-Nazi
militias repeatedly denounced by Putin could not find a political
solution because they were planned and fomented by the globalist elite,
with the collaboration of the European Union, NATO and the American deep state,
with an anti-Russian tone intended to make inevitable a war whose goal
is to impose, primarily in Europe, the forced adoption of energy
rationing (here),[3] travel restrictions, the replacement of paper money with electronic money (here and here) and the adoption of digital ID (here and here).
We are not talking about theoretical projects. These are decisions that
are about to be taken concretely at the European level as well as in
individual countries.
The intervention in Ukraine by NATO, the United States, and the European Union does not appear to have any legitimacy.
Respect for the Law and Standards
The
intervention in Ukraine by NATO, the United States, and the European
Union does not appear to have any legitimacy. Ukraine is not a member of
NATO, and as such it should not benefit from the assistance of an
entity whose purpose is the defense of its member nations. The same can
be said of the European Union, which just a few days ago invited
Zelensky to join it. In the meantime, Ukraine has received $2.5 billion
from the United States since 2014 and another $400 million in 2021 alone
(here), plus other funds for a total of $4.6 billion dollars (here).
For his part, Putin has given $15 billion in loans to Ukraine to save
it from bankruptcy. The European Union, for its part, has sent $17
million in funding, in addition to funding sent from various individual
nations. But this assistance has benefitted the Ukrainian population
only minimally.
Furthermore,
by intervening in the war in Ukraine in the name of the European Union,
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is violating
articles 9, 11, and 12 of the Treaty of Lisbon. The competence of the
European Union in this area belongs to the European Council and the High
Representative. In no case does it belong to the Commission President.
In what capacity does President von der Leyen presume to act as if she
were the head of the European Union, usurping a role that does not
belong to her? Why does no one intervene, especially considering the
danger to which European citizens are being exposed due to the
possibility of Russian retaliation?
Furthermore,
in many cases the constitutions of the nations that are today sending
support and weapons to Ukraine do not provide for the possibility of
entering into a conflict. For example, article 11 of the Italian
Constitution states: “Italy repudiates war as an instrument of offense
for the liberty of other peoples and as a means of resolving
international controversies.” Sending weapons and soldiers to a nation
that is not a part of either NATO or the European Union constitutes a de facto
declaration of war on the nation belligerent with it (in this case,
Russia), and should therefore require the prior deliberation of
declaring war, as is foreseen by article 78 of the Italian Constitution:
“The Chambers [of Parliament] deliberate on the state of war and confer
the necessary powers on the government.” It does not appear that to
date the Chambers have been called upon to express themselves in this
sense, or that the President of the Republic has intervened to demand
compliance with the constitutional provision. Prime Minister Draghi,
appointed by the globalist cabal for the destruction of Italy and its
definitive enslavement to supranational powers, is one of the many Heads
of national governments who considers the will of the citizens as an
annoying obstacle to the execution of the agenda of the World Economic
Forum. After two years of systematic violations of fundamental rights
and of the Constitution, it is difficult to believe that he will want to
place the interests of the Italian nation ahead of the interests of
those who have placed him in power. On the contrary: the more disastrous
are the effects of the sanctions adopted by his government, the more he
can consider himself appreciated by those who have given him power. The
coup perpetrated by means of the psychopandemic emergency proceeds
today with new unfortunate decisions, ratified by a Parliament without a
spine.
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict is a very dangerous trap that has been set against Ukraine, Russia, and the nations of Europe.
It is
also a violation of article 288 of the Italian Penal Code to permit
Italian citizens – and even members of the majority in the Government
and political leaders – to respond to the appeal of the Ukrainian
Ambassador for enrollment in the foreign legion: “Anyone in the
territory of [Italy] who without government approval enlists or arms
citizens to serve [in the military] in favor of a foreign nation, is to
be punished with imprisonment for a period of 4 to 15 years.” No
magistrate, at least for the time being, has intervened to punish those
responsible for this crime.
Another
violation is found in the activity of transferring children from
Ukraine to Italy (and presumably also to other nations) who have been
obtained via surrogate motherhood, ordered by Italian couples in
violation of Law 40/2004, without any penalty being imposed on those
guilty of this crime, as well as their accomplices.
It
should also be remembered that the utterances of members of the
Government or of political leaders with regard to the Russian Federation
and its President, along with the sanctions that have been adopted
against Russia and the repeated instances of arbitrary discrimination
against Russian citizens, companies, artists, and sports teams for the
sole fact of being Russian, are not only provocations that ought to be
avoided in order to allow for a serene and peaceful settlement of the
Ukraine crisis, but also place the safety of Italian citizens in very
serious danger (as well as the safety of citizens of other nations who
are adopting a similar stance toward Russia). The reason for such rash
temerity is incomprehensible, unless there is an intentional desire to
trigger reactions from the opposing party.
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict is a very dangerous trap that has been set against Ukraine, Russia, and the nations of Europe.
The
crisis has been prepared and fomented for a long time, certainly
beginning with the 2014 white coup that was desired by the American deep
state in an anti-Russian key.
Ukraine is the latest victim of accomplished executioners
The
Russian-Ukrainian crisis did not suddenly erupt a month ago. It has been
prepared and fomented for a long time, certainly beginning with the
2014 white coup that was desired by the American deep state in
an anti-Russian key. This is demonstrated, among other incontestable
facts, by the training of the Azov Battalion by the CIA “to kill
Russians” (here),
with the CIA forcing the revocation of the amendment banning aid to the
battalion made by Congress in 2015. The interventions made by Joe and
Hunter Biden have gone in the same direction. Thus there is evidence of
long-term premeditation, consistent with NATO’s relentless expansion
towards the East. The Color Revolution of Euromaidan, as well as the
establishment of a pro-NATO government composed of homines novi trained by the World Economic Forum
and George Soros, was intended to create the conditions for the
subordination of Ukraine to the NATO bloc, removing it from the
influence of the Russian Federation. To this end, the subversive action
of the Hungarian philanthropist’s NGOs, supported by media propaganda,
has kept silent about the crimes of neo-Nazi paramilitary organizations,
financed by the same people who sponsor Zelensky.
But if
the brainwashing carried out by the mainstream media in Western nations
has succeeded in conveying a completely distorted narrative of reality,
the same cannot be said for Ukraine, where the population is well aware
of the corruption of the political class in power as well as of its
remoteness from the real problems of the Ukrainian nation. We in the
West believe that the “oligarchs” are only in Russia, while the reality
is that they are present above all throughout the entire galaxy of
nations that formerly composed the Soviet Union, where they can
accumulate wealth and power simply by placing themselves at the
disposition of foreign “philanthropists” and multinational corporations.
It matters little if their offshore accounts are the primary cause of
the poverty of the citizens of these nations, the backwardness of the
health care system, the excessive power of the bureaucracy, the almost
total absence of public services, foreign control of strategic
companies, and the progressive loss of sovereignty and national
identity: the important thing is to “make money” and be immortalized
along with political personalities, bankers, arms dealers, and those who
starve the people. And then to come to the fashionable resorts of
Versilia or the Amalfi Coast to flaunt their yachts and platinum cards
to the waiter from Odessa or the cleaning lady from Kiev who send their
paltry wages to their relatives back home. These Ukrainian billionaires
wearing kippahs are those who are selling out Ukraine to the corrupted
and corrupting West, trading their own well-being for the enslavement of
their compatriots to the usurers who are taking over the world, using
the same ruthless and immoral systems everywhere. In the past they cut
the salaries of workers in Athens and Thessaloniki; today they have
simply enlarged their horizons to the whole of Europe, where the
population still looks on incredulously while first a health
dictatorship and then an environmental dictatorship is being imposed.
Without
the pretext of a war, how could they have made the peoples of the
Western world swallow the establishment of the tyranny of the New World
Order, when the pandemic farce was unraveling and bringing to light
crimes against humanity committed by BigPharma?
On the
other hand, without the pretext of a war, how would they have been able
to justify the soaring price of gas and fuels, forcing the process of
an “ecological” transition imposed from on high in order to control the
impoverished masses? How could they have made the peoples of the Western
world swallow the establishment of the tyranny of the New World Order,
when the pandemic farce was unraveling and bringing to light crimes
against humanity committed by BigPharma?
And
while the EU and heads of government blame Russia for the impending
disaster, the Western elites demonstrate that they even want to destroy
agriculture, in order to apply the horrors of the Holodomor on a global
scale (here).
On the other hand, in many nations (including Italy) the privatization
of waterways is being theorized – and water is an inalienable public
good – for the advantage of multinationals and with the aim of
controlling and limiting agriculture activities. The pro-NATO government
of Kiev did not behave much differently: for eight years the Crimea was
deprived of water from the Dnieper River in order to prevent the
irrigation of the fields and starve the people. Today, in light of the
sanctions being imposed on Russia and the huge reduction of grain
supplies, we can understand Bill Gates’ enormous investments in
agriculture (here), following the same ruthless profit-making logic already experienced with the vaccine campaign.
The
Ukrainian people are merely the latest unwitting hostages of the
supranational totalitarian regime that brought the national economies of
the entire world to their knees through the Covid deception.
The
Ukrainian people, regardless of what ethnic group they may belong to,
are merely the latest unwitting hostages of the supranational
totalitarian regime that brought the national economies of the entire
world to their knees through the Covid deception, after publicly
theorizing about the need to decimate the world population and transform
the survivors into chronically ill patients who have irreparably
compromised their immune systems.
The
Ukrainian people should think hard about calling upon the intervention
of NATO or the EU, provided that it is really the Ukrainian people who
do it and not rather their corrupt rulers aided by racist mercenaries
and neo-nazi groups in the pay of hierarchs. Because while they are
promised freedom from the invader – with whom they share the common
religious and cultural heritage of having once been part of Great Russia
– in reality what is cynically being prepared is their definitive
cancellation, their enslavement to the Great Reset that foresees
everything except the protection of their identity, their sovereignty,
and their borders.
Let
the Ukrainian people look at what has happened to the nations of the
European Union: the mirage of prosperity and security is demolished by
the contemplation of the rubble left by the euro and the lobbies of
Brussels.
Let
the Ukrainian people look at what has happened to the nations of the
European Union: the mirage of prosperity and security is demolished by
the contemplation of the rubble left by the euro and the lobbies of
Brussels. Nations invaded by illegal immigrants who feed crime and
prostitution; destroyed in their social fabric by politically correct
ideologies; knowingly brought to bankruptcy by reckless economic and
fiscal policies; led towards poverty by the cancellation of labor and
social security protections; deprived of a future by the destruction of
the family and the moral and intellectual corruption of the new
generations.
What
were once prosperous and independent nations, diverse in their
respective ethnic, linguistic, cultural, and religious specificities,
have now been transformed into a shapeless mass of people without
ideals, without hopes, without faith, without even the strength to react
against the abuses and crimes of those who govern them. A mass of
corporate customers, slaves of the system of detailed control imposed by
the pandemic farce, even in the face of evidence of the fraud. A mass
of persons without individual identity, marked with QR codes like
animals on an intensive farm, like products of a huge shopping center.
If this has been the result of the renunciation of national sovereignty
for all the nations – every single one, without exception! – that have
entrusted themselves to the colossal scam of the European Union, why
would Ukraine be any different?
It
is not the Ukrainians who ought to enter the European Union or NATO, it
is rather the other nations who ought to finally be jolted by pride and
courage to leave them, shaking off this detestable yoke and
rediscovering their own independence, sovereignty, identity, and faith.
Their own souls.
Is
this what your fathers wanted, what they hoped for, what they desired,
when they received Baptism along with Vladimir the Great on the banks of
the Dnieper?
If
there is a positive aspect that each of us can recognize in this crisis,
it is that it has revealed the horror of the globalist tyranny, its
ruthless cynicism, its capacity to destroy and annihilate everything it
touches. It is not the Ukrainians who ought to enter the European Union
or NATO, it is rather the other nations who ought to finally be jolted
by pride and courage to leave them, shaking off this detestable yoke and
rediscovering their own independence, sovereignty, identity, and faith.
Their own souls.
To be
clear: the New Order is not an inescapable destiny, and it can be
subverted and denounced, if only the peoples of the world realize that
they have been deceived and swindled by an oligarchy of clearly
identifiable criminals, who one day will have to answer for those
sanctions and those blocks of funds that today they apply with impunity
to anyone who does not bend the knee before them.
An appeal to the Third Rome
For Russia too, this conflict is a trap. This is because it would fulfill the dream of the American deep state
to definitively oust Russia from the European context in its commercial
and cultural relations, pushing it into the arms of China, perhaps with
the hope that the dictatorship in Beijing can persuade the Russians to
accept the system of social credit and other aspects of the Great Reset
that thus far Russia has been able to avoid, at least in part.
It
is up to Putin, regardless of whether he is right, not to fall into the
trap, and to instead turn the tables, offering Ukraine the conditions of
an honorable peace without continuing the conflict.
It is a
trap, not because Russia is wrong in wanting to “denazify” Ukraine of
its extremist groups and guarantee protection to Russian-speaking
Ukrainians, but because it is precisely these reasons – theoretically
tenable – that were created specifically to provoke it and induce it to
invade Ukraine, in such a way as to provoke the NATO reaction that has
been prepared for some time by the deep state and the globalist elite. The casus belli was deliberately planned by the real perpetrators of the conflict, knowing that it would obtain exactly that
response from Putin. And it is up to Putin, regardless of whether he is
right, not to fall into the trap, and to instead turn the tables,
offering Ukraine the conditions of an honorable peace without continuing
the conflict. Indeed, the more Putin believes he is right, the more he
needs to demonstrate the greatness of his nation and his love for his
people by not giving into provocations.
Permit me to repeat the words of the Prophet Isaiah: Loose
the bands of wickedness, undo the bundles that oppress, let those who
are broken go free, and break asunder every burden. Share your bread
with the hungry, welcome into your house the afflicted and homeless;
when you see a naked man, clothe him, and do not turn your back on your
own flesh. Then your light will arise like the dawn, and your wound will
quickly be healed. Your justice shall go before you, the glory of the
Lord will closely follow you. (Is 58:6-8).
The
world crisis with which the dissolution of traditional society is being
prepared has also involved the Catholic Church, whose Hierarchy is held
hostage by apostates who are courtiers of power.[4]
There was a time in which Popes and Prelates confronted Kings without
concern for human respect, because they knew they spoke with the voice
of Jesus Christ, the King of kings. The Rome of the Caesars and Popes is
now deserted and silent, just as for centuries the Second Rome of
Constantinople has also been silent. Perhaps Providence has ordained
that Moscow, the Third Rome, will today in the sight of the world take
on the role of κατέχον (2 Thess 2:6-7), of eschatological obstacle to
the Antichrist. If the errors of communism were spread by the Soviet
Union, even to the point of imposing themselves within the Church,
Russia and Ukraine can today have an epochal role in the restoration of
Christian Civilization, contributing to bringing the world a period of
peace from which the Church too will rise again purified and renewed in
her Ministers.
The
United States of America and the European nations should not marginalize
Russia, but rather form an alliance with her, not only for the
restoration of trade for the prosperity of all, but in view of the
reconstruction of a Christian Civilization, which alone can save the
world from the globalist techno-health transhuman monster.
May
my words – along with those of many intellectually honest people –
contribute to bringing to light the complicity and corruption of those
who use lies and fraud to justify their crimes, even in these moments of
great apprehension about the war in Ukraine.
Final Considerations
There
is great concern that the destinies of the peoples of the world is in
the hands of an elite that is not accountable to anyone for its
decisions, that does not recognize any authority above itself, and that
in order to pursue its own interests does not hesitate to jeopardize
security, the economy, and the very lives of billions of people, with
the complicity of politicians in their service and the mainstream media.
The falsification of facts, the grotesque adulterations of reality, and
the partisanship with which the news is spread stand alongside the
censorship of dissenting voices and leads to forms of ethnic persecution
against Russian citizens, who are discriminated against precisely in
the countries that say they are democratic and respectful of fundamental
rights.
I
earnestly hope that my appeal for the establishment of an Anti-Globalist
Alliance that unites the peoples of the world in opposition against the
tyranny of the New World Order will be accepted by those who have at
heart the common good, peace between nations, concord among all peoples,
freedom for all citizens and the future of the new generations. And
even before that, may my words – along with those of many intellectually
honest people – contribute to bringing to light the complicity and
corruption of those who use lies and fraud to justify their crimes, even
in these moments of great apprehension about the war in Ukraine.
“May
the strong listen to us, so as not to become weak in injustice. May the
powerful listen to us, if they want their power not to be destruction
but support for the peoples and protection for tranquility in order and
work” (Pius XII, Radio message to Heads of State and Peoples of the World in Imminent Danger of War, August 24, 1939).
May
Holy Lent lead all Christians to ask pardon from the Divine Majesty for
the sins of those who trample His Holy Law. May penance and fasting move
the Lord God to mercy, while we repeat the words of the Prophet Joel: Parce, Domine: parce populo tuo; et ne des hæreditatem tuam in opprobrium, ut dominentur eis nationes. Forgive your people, Lord, and do not expose your inheritance to reproach, to the derision of the nations (Jl 2:17).
+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop,
Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
March 6, 2022
More on the Ukraine situation — THE ERRORS of GLOBALISM: Russia, Ukraine, and the Suicide of the West
[1] In 2011, Kolomoisky was one of the co-founders of the Jewish European Parliament, along with billionaire Vadim Rabinovich. Cf. http://ejp.eu/.
Note that Rabinovich is a member of the Opposition Platform - For Life,
the Ukrainian pro-Russian political party whose leader Viktor Medvedcuk
was arrested by Zelensky.
[2]
According to Russian politician Viktor Vladislavovich Zubarev, a member
of the State Duma, Zelensky is also said to have $1.2 billion deposited
at Dresdner Bank in Costa Rica and a villa in Miami purchased for $34
million (here). For a more comprehensive picture, see the investigation by Slidstvo-info, an independent Ukrainian agency of investigative journalism (here).
[3]
It should be noted that the Italian Minister of Ecological Transition,
Roberto Cingolani, decided a few days ago to sell a share of oil stocks
to Ukraine “as a concrete aid also on the energy front,” exactly as
during the pandemic he gave away millions of masks to China, only to
then buy them back from Beijing shortly thereafter (here).
[4] In its March 6 issue, Famiglia Cristiana has
a headline, commenting on an article by the founder of the Sant’Egidio
Community, Andrea Riccardi: “Let’s stop the war and build a new world
order” (here).
