Copied from Diana's blog:
Diana June 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM
Dear Anonymous at 8:42 a.m., Tim Rohr wrote on my blogsite in March when he invited to meet with him. From his comment, I see a lot of emotion in it. From his comment, I also see that it has more to do with the Archbishop than it does about the Way.
http://neocatechemunal.blogspot.com/2014/03/controversy-and-reconciliation_11.html#comment-form
As for the priest, he is supposed to be obedient to the Archbishop. He took a vow of obedience. This means that IF THE BISHOP TELLS THE PRIEST TO OPEN HIS PARISH FOR THE WAY, THE PRIEST SHOULD OBEY THE BISHOP. (my emphasis)
*****
The person who copied and left this as a comment on my blog (here), speculated that "Diana" might be spilling the beans about the real reason Fr. Paul was fired. Of course, we don't need any speculation at this point. Not a person outside the kiko-clan believes that his firing had anything to do with anything other than Fr. Paul's resistance to the Neocatechumenal Way. But the comment offers us some other insights.
I pray that victims (of kiko's deceit and fraudulent teachings) may humbly be open to what is catechetically pointed out here; that it may help them see the errors (even the heresies) in kiko's teachings which is contrary to authentic Catholic Teachings. This is particularly so on Core Catholic doctrine about the Holy Sacrifice of The Mass, and about the Real Presence in the Consecrafed Host, among others.
It's not about Tim nor who is on the archbishop's side; it's not about siding with one or the other; because when all is said and done, it is about the potential perdition of souls. Following authentic Catholic doctrine, which contains the Fullness of The Truth, is the One and Only WAY.