Saturday, November 28, 2015

APURON AND HIS HANDLERS GIVE FAITHFUL CATHOLICS A BIG MIDDLE FINGER

Apologies, but this is EXACTLY what the front page of the U Matuna just did. 

If RMS was truly in the control of the Archbishop of Agana, there would be no need to keep using what is supposed to be a Catholic diocesan publication to try to convince (i.e. "bull___t") us over and over and over. 


In fact, according to Archbishop Apuron himself, he doesn't even know why people are protesting:

"Apuron said he was aware of the group outside but did not understand why they were protesting at that event." (Pacific Daily News, November 2, 2015)

It's a lie of course. But amazingly he proves he's lying about not knowing why people are protesting by (once again) using the U Matuna to try to bull___t everybody. If he really didn't know, then there would be no attempt to prove ownership of RMS. 

But this time it is SUPER SICK. SUPER SICK because the article in this edition of the U Matuna is a gross insult to the Catholics of Guam. 

These LIARS attempt to prove ownership by publishing a certificate of title. In real property transactions, certificates of title mean nothing unless they can withstand a challenge. That's why there are title insurance companies and title searches. 

Land Management does not decide who is the legal owner of a property. Land Management only records what it is given and issues documents based on recorded information. The real determination of ownership is determined by title companies and their attorneys. But normally title companies do not get involved in title issues until there is a transaction affecting the property. 

Let's make this really simple. 

You are the legal owner of a lot, but you deed it to another party for "perpetual use." Your name may still show up on the title, but you legally have given up control of the property forever. Anyone knows this. And this is exactly what Apuron did - gave it to another party forever. 

But Apuron's deed goes further. He just doesn't give it to them for perpetual use, he CONVEYS it to them. Apuron writes:
"KNOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed subject to the covenants and restrictions set forth herein..."

If all Apuron was going to do was give it to RMS for their use, then he would have stopped at "used." But he doesn't. He uses the words "transferred, sold and conveyed." Why does he do this? Because his real aim is exactly that: to convey title to the property to RMS forever!

Let's look at the "covenants and restrictions set forth herein..." 

The only "covenant and restriction" is that it be used by RMS and the Blessed Diego Institute. 

First, naming the BDI is a ruse. The Blessed Diego Institute is not constituted under Guam law as a legal entity - as is RMS. It's just a name. Only RMS is a legally constituted entity under Guam law - a non-profit corporation. So legally we are are only concerned with RMS, not BDI.

So now read this:


Note that the there is NO restriction that the property actually continue to be used AS A SEMINARY, but only that it be used by a corporation with the word "seminary" in its name, a name that can be changed with a simple board resolution. 

Moreover, as the Bronze Opinion demonstrates, the use of the word DEED itself operates as the actual "conveyance" of title. Bronze writes:



Apuron is betting on the stupidity of Catholics. He is assuming YOU ARE STUPID. He is saying YOU ARE STUPID in expecting you to believe that while he dare not publish the "Denver opinion" that supposedly proves his ownership of the property, he publishes a certificate of title.

We'll have some more fun with this, but there is probably nothing that has confirmed the CCOG's resolve to press forward with their lawsuit against Apuron than this in your face insult to the Catholic people of Guam. 

Catholics of Guam, if there ever was a time to seriously STOP THE MONEY it is now. This is a big middle finger to all of us. STOP THE MONEY. Fund the CCOG. Let's take this THIEF AND LIAR to court...and his thugs too. 

17 comments:

  1. TIMMY, TIMMY, TIMMY, .......... STOP CRYING :,,,,,,,,,,( getting a little rattled, you're going to get a Arch- Attack . the truth shall set you free!!!!!!! ,,!,,

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rude rudy is unable to stay away from JW as his master pius instructed. You neos are unable to refrain from getting the latest dirt on your sect. Like voyeuristic imbeciles that you are, you gravitate to the Truths that are researched and posted here but are unable to extricate yourselves from the "shit" that kiko has made you out to be. The real Catholic Church is far from perfect but it sure is more reassuring to know that I am respected as a child of God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Everybody knows that nothing true comes out of the Chancery any more. No credibility. Lies, lies, lies. We need a new shepherd. End of discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Rudy: ,,!,, &(+o+)? ,,!,, ooga chaka, ooga chaka, ooga chaka!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rudy,
    You got the nerve to lecture someone from being set free, you ought to look at yourself first, a crooked wolf in priestly garments, pretending to give that which is holy to God's people. You cannot give holy things if you your self are not living the Holy life. Practice what you preach man, you are obligated by your ordination.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I second Anonymous 1:17 p.m. I was so scandalized at the 9 a.m. Thanksgiving mass at St. Anthony's because (Fr.) Rudy was concelebrating that I couldn't concentrate on God. All I could think about was this sinful, hypocritical and arrogant presbyter who was participating in the mass unworthily. I wondered how Msgr. Arroyo who was the main celebrant could stomach concelebrating with such an evil man.

      Delete
    2. Mary Lou Garcia-PeredaNovember 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM

      Anonymous (November 29, 2015 at 1:33 PM), I thought it was interesting that the only two at the SASVCC Thanksgiving Mass were NCW Cult "supporters." I recall how, in years past, all — or most — of the priests assigned to SASVCC would concelebrate that Mass. It was the ideal time for parishioners to visit with all our priests and thank them for their ministry.

      Obviously I wasn't the only one who missed the other SASVCC priests. I couldn't bring myself to greet Rudy who was holding court inside the church but I did greet Msgr. Arroyo who was outside with other parishioners. One person asked where Msgr. Benavente was but Msgr. Arroyo did not respond. I was tempted to ask where Frs. Carl and Paul were, along with the absent Msgr. James, but I opted to bite my tongue and just wish the monsignor a Happy Thanksgiving.

      In response to your last sentence about how Msgr. Arroyo could "stomach" concelebrating with Rudy — I can only surmise that Msgr. Arroyo has learned to "not make any waves" and just accept whatever comes his way … even if it is having to concelebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass with someone like Rudy.

      Delete
    3. Richard NochefrancaNovember 30, 2015 at 5:37 AM

      Say it isn't so...this cannot be the same Father Rudy Ariola i worked with during the construction of Santa Barbara Church in Dededo. Back then, before the NCW infestation, Father Rudy was very pastoral and spiritual.

      Delete
    4. You didn't see Msgr. Benavente at the 9am Thanksgiving mass because he celebrated the 5:30am Thanksgiving mass at SAC. I'm also told that he celebrates the 5:30am masses on a daily basis.

      Delete
    5. Richard, I hate to be the bearer of bad news but it is him. He is BAD NEWS.

      Delete
    6. Glad to see you posting again, Mary Lou. I've been missing your thoughts. I also was disappointed that Msgr. Benavente wasn't at the 9 a.m. Thanksgiving mass. Last year all the priests except Fr. Gofigan concelebrated that 9 a.m. Thanksgiving mass. I was told last year that Fr. Gofigan was going to officiate at the evening mass on Thanksgiving. But Fr. Gofigan's mother was at the 9 a.m. Thanksgiving mass last year, as well as the very warm Fr. Mel who is now assigned to Piti. Last year it was so great to see all the priests, especially Msgr. Benavente.

      Delete
  6. And now Archie has all of his pastors thinking this is IT! THE TRUTH! is in his publication of the Chancery Newspaper. I say Chancery because it is ONLY from "them", controlled by "them". It is a communist way of controlling what gets printed, when, etc. J. Diaz has it correct and on the mark. Why are we concentrating on "mammon" when we should be focusing on what the First Sunday of Advent is about? HOPE! Can't fix stupid no matter what you do! Wonder what is the next manure smelling print will be out for the Second Sunday in Advent. It boggles the TRUE CATHOLIC MIND.

    ReplyDelete
  7. These NEOS think we are stupid

    A certificate of title isn't as cut and dry as you may think it is. Anyone can give or sell a property to another and have the transfer to the new owner "recorded" at DLM. However, it is what is "within" the deed that ultimately says what the new owner/owners can do with the property in the future. Everyone knows that DLM is just a recording agency but their research is only limited to the recordation of uncontested land titles.

    DLM is not an agency that determines what the "fine print" of the DEED is. That "fine print" however can limit thre new owner to what he/she does or how it is transferred in the future after the new owner is replaced or has passed on.

    So let these stupid NEORETARDS get ahead of yourself because not everything is as cut and dry as THEY may think it is. That is why they are such SUCKERS in their stupid cult. THEY BELIEVE everything that their responsibles want them to believe.

    They are taking advantage of the "Golden Jubilee Year" and want all of us to keep on giving in order to FUND their brainwashing techniques and their materialistic ways.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Blast from the past. Never hurts to review!


    TimAugust 19, 2014 at 3:23 PM
    You are correct. BOG would have never put a proviso on the sale. The Archdiocese originally worked a loan with BOG to purchase the property. A donor soon thereafter provided a donation to pay off the loan. The donor was from off island and gave the money with the following provisions:
    1. The donor would remain anonymous
    2. The money would be used for the purchase of a "defunct hotel" for the purpose of a seminary.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Priests like Monsignor James are very pastoral. Unlike the NEO cult presbyter's who need thier beauty rest knowing that they profit weekly from the black trash bags.

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch