Thursday, October 15, 2015

WHERE IS WADESON?

Ahh, yes. Working hard for the people of the Archdiocese of Agana who pay his bills.















42 comments:

  1. Ah, Jerusalem! I see the old city behind him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is this what we are paying for? Wadeson taking others on pilgrimage tours and enjoying every bit of it. You are suppose to be on a mission not a tour guide!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Note the scarf around the neck. I think it is for a neo high priest. Like Kiko ,or Generrini. Only they can wear it. And carry around a bible, too. No one can get me Wadeson.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is sick! And this confirms for me How Church officials move predator priests from one part of the world to another!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why dont we just put every Tom, Dick and Harry on the payroll, since we are being generous with the donations from Guam Catholics, or better yet, how can we all get some of that evil that we are exorcising from the faithful's bank account?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great job Junglewatch,you tracked down "Waldo" Apuron has so many enemies that information is volunteered in order to bring down Kiko and his Jesters. You too Jokers Wild.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wadeson, the accused child molester strutting his stuff in Jerusalem, living large, thanks to the sponsorship of apuron. How Guam Catholics have been lied to so that these megalomaniacs roam the earth looking for someone to devour! While we struggle to keep alive our parishes, apuron siphons off money in order to support these foreign leeches and their high end tastes. Shameless!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Did you hear the Archbishop's sermon? We must move forward with the NEW EVANGELIZATION! Guess that is what Father Danny from Agafa Gumas is doing? Which Priest wrote his homily this evening? Anong sipsip!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beautiful new vestments for Archie.

      Delete
    2. Diana, you cheat. You promised a big surprise in October. So where is it? C'mon, Diana.

      Delete
    3. Fr. Matthew Blockley.October 17, 2015 at 9:53 AM


      Diana believes an auxiliary bishop of Guam will be appointed prior to Archbishops 70th Birthday. Tony requested the Holy Father to give him an auxiliary. So let us see if he is gifted by his 70th.

      Delete
    4. Rumor has it that Tony will be retiring right after his 70th birthday due to illness.

      Delete
    5. You are right Father Blockley, this is what Tony is telling his neo flock. I guess this is kind of a saving face, last stand.
      But you know and I know, that he did NOT ask for an auxiliary, but rather he will be provided one by the Vatican, until Rome find a good candidate (at least we hope).

      He will be retired, because his protectors can no longer cover up for his mountain of inequities and misdeeds.
      The diplomatic version is "for personal reasons", the ecclesiastic version is "due to illness". To the end the man will be true to himself, and refuse to face his responsibilities.
      In the meantime, the kikos are trying to put forth one of theirs to replace him, and of course as usual , put a good spin to it. Which nobody will believe seriously, except of course the kikonuts.
      Ergo, las Dianas hints of a "good" surprise.... "See Tony has some pull in Rome, blah, blah, blah....".The reality is, he has finally overstayed his welcome, and people will rejoice at his departure.
      What we will have to be extremely careful with, is the crazy kikonuts and their burnt land tactics.
      St Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.....

      Delete
    6. Retiring due to mental illness. Serious mental illness.

      Delete
    7. Fr.Matthew BlockleyOctober 17, 2015 at 3:24 PM


      Thank you Frenchie. Yes you are right. I'm sad to tell our readers that the report compiled after the Apostolic Visitation in January showed a deeply flawed Archdiocese of Agana Guam USA. Not only did it manifest a flawed Archdiocese it showed an Archbishop who lost his way in life. He was asked to amend some situations. I'm sad to tell our readers he only amended one point. That was done because a threat was made by an external source that unless the Archbishop amended the problem by January 2015 end the Apurons empire would fall. Archbishop did as the email instructed him so we let him continue .But I'm not sure how much longer he can stay! It gets worse.

      Delete
    8. Fr. Blockley, what was the one point the Archbishop amended?

      Delete
    9. That is correct Father, the Apostolic Visitation, was extremely revealing to people in the Vatican, this is why they tried before Easter to mitigate some of the issues, (which Tim denounced in this blog)
      Further, even if it is legally hearsay, the John Toves letter arrived to compound the problem. I understand that the Archbishop knows that one of his victims is also ready to move forward with a formal complaint, so it is a race against time for our so called leader.
      Finally, as you know, if Apuron has protectors because of his alliances, he also made serious enemies. Many of these people, including yours truly, have contacted our friends outside and inside the Vatican, hence the ever growing mountain of evidence, piling up. I know that all the previously free time, for my upcoming trip to Europe has been fully booked by people asking for clarification and more, on the subject of our Archdiocese, but even more important on Pius, the Seminary and the Ncw on island. These are the same people, who just last year, were not available for me to see them.....
      This cannot last.
      The outrage of the Catholics on island has also grown louder and louder.
      Impending lawsuit, aside, his position is surely proving to be untenable.

      Delete
  9. I don't know that man, but that is the Domus Galilaeae, with a neocat community celebrating the end of the Way.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Janet B - MangilaoOctober 15, 2015 at 4:07 PM

    Top photo shows 25 people with Wadeson...none of them from his diocese of incardination - Guam. Folks, look and admire where your donations are going. If the ideas make you sick then stop giving anything to the Archdiocese. Any money given will eventually go to foreign lands, and this is the proof.
    Not enough money for schools, not enough money for insurance, not enough money to pay decent wages...
    but enough money for kikos to live the high life!
    Excuse me while I go vomit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Janet B - MangilaoOctober 16, 2015 at 7:20 PM

      Tim - look at the 8th and 9th picture down. Wadeson is clutching the bible and trying to look all serious. He is hiding a person in a green shirt behind him.

      Is that Tony boy with that snappy green priest shirt hiding behind Wadeson?

      Delete
    2. Nah. Not Tony.

      Delete
  11. The people are from the Archdiocese of Boston and O'Malley was with them. I know it's confusing, but yes, the good Cardinal "sends" out Neo missionaries from Boston and missionaries are sent to Boston from all over the world. Makes sense, right? It's a freakin' shell game.

    ReplyDelete
  12. According to this article in the U Matuna, Fr. Santiago Flor-Caravia is a missionary in Japan, Fr.Edwin Bushu is a missionary in Kenya and Tanzania, and Fathers Fabio Faiola and Aurelio Stoia are missionaries in "Asia".

    Does anybody else think it's odd that we don't get any updates on the missionary activities of these men in the U Matuna? Not a whiff of a whisper of news about them. I'd love to see a picture of Fr. Santiago, for instance, with the Japanese bishop who invited him. He once told me that he was actually incardinated in Japan, but I guess that's not the situation now. Hmmm. And Fr. Bushu! Let's see pictures of him with his happy congregation! Where are the pictures? Where are the

    requests for prayers and financial support for these Guam missionaries? And Fr. Fabio and Fr. Aurelio are on a secret mission in Asia! and to think that they must have spent years studying the language and culture of their mission field before going undercover! Who knew?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Getting tired of my old question who are the bishops who requested of Apuron for these men to be sent to their dioceses??? Hmmmm? Never an answer.

      Delete
    2. There are never any formal requests. These so-called missionaries just show up and do their Neo thing. Quite arrogant in my opinion.

      Delete
    3. Arrogant is the word. Well, Archie SAID they were requested by his brother bishops. I just can't believe he would LIE.

      Delete
    4. Anon @5:41 pm, itinerant Neo priests, oops, presbyters must be welcomed by the bishop who receives them. That implies approval.

      Article 32 of the Statutes of the Neocatechumenal Way states:

      In the case of the secular clergy, or members of institutes of consecrated life or societies of
      apostolic life, these must have the express permission of their own diocesan bishop or competent religious superior, in due form. The ordinary, in contact with the bishop who welcomes them, establishes the time frame of their availability, is periodically informed of their activity and ensures that the material and spiritual conditions of their ministry, lived in the spirit of being itinerant, are according to the provisions of the law.

      Delete
  13. If Wadeson is hiding out in Boston, then that's on the Kiko O'Malley. Why don't you just incardinate him and take him off our hands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kiko O'Malley is Pope Francis' clergy abuse GUY. He won't take Wadeson. Tainted goods. Looks good with scarf around his neck, tho. Chilly in Boston.

      Delete
    2. Tim - no one else will ever incardinate Wadeson.

      First he is damaged goods. Only an idiot of a bishop would ever consider that. And then he would never get it past his consultors. I give you Apuron as Exhibit A. Idiot to the max, so of course Wadeson's order was able to dump him on us. Approval of consultors? Most likely just skipped that requirement.

      Second, even if Wadeson wasn't damaged goods, what bishop in their right mind would incardinate a priest and become responsible for him for life? Especially when some idiot bishop is willing to lend a priest to you free of charge, while the poor people of Guam are forced to pay the bill. I again give you Apuron as Exhibit B.

      No, Tim, we're stuck with this rotten apple for life. But at least he's away from our kids and on mission somewhere. I hope the parents of those kids, Boston or wherever, know the peril their kids are in.

      Delete
    3. Consultors??? What are consultors. Ask them if they are ever consulted. LOL. ( even tho not very funny.)

      Delete
  14. Is that bearded fella presbyter OJ's cousin? Looks like he's vying to become a presbyter and come to Guam to be a perpetual tourist posing as a man of the cloth. Free room and board, free trips around the world on first class travel, per diem paid, unlimited massage parlor visits and the list goes on. That's why the presbyters walk around with that holier than thou attitude.

    ReplyDelete
  15. For sure, for sure and of course, of course Tony's going to keep Wadeson on the payroll because birds of a feather flock together. There will be no investigation, right Larry?

    ReplyDelete

  16. 1.38.pm. Archbishop holds Fr. Wadeson in very high regard. He had much larger plans for Father Wadeson. But you know how it is. Archbishop plans but God disposes of his plans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another nice try, Tony!

      Delete
  17. I agree with Anon @7:15 PM, Considering we do not have a choice that Apuron has Wadeson on the payroll, It is some consolation that this person is not on Island and an immediate danger to our Children. Someone should warn the poor unsuspecting families in Boston who have this person working in their midst.

    ReplyDelete
  18. On the more funny side, you shall note that most of the cadre of NCW in the USA is sporting a
    Genarinni style beard. That includes Fr Medeiros from the RSM Boston who is the rector there.
    Would not surprise me that Wadeson was one of their traveling "formators".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apuron won't be in the in group until he grows a beard. It's the trade mark!

      Delete
    2. NO more beard talk,PLEASE, do not associate beards with dishonest people

      beards are worn by these men, to hide their true face, they know when the IRS comes knocking, the beards come off, confusing at lineup, besides.....

      “…the male beard communicates an heroic image of the independent, sturdy, and resourceful pioneer, ready, willing and able to do manly things.”

      do you see any as described above, I DO NOT, is david, zoltan or the boston boy

      Delete
    3. Real men? They want to be like the characters of their favorite program "Duck Dynasty."

      Delete
    4. Duck Dynasty starring Monsignor David?? Now that will prove he's a quack canonist.

      Delete

Recommendations by JungleWatch