Did you really say this?
"If CCOG's attorney actually believes that the RMS property does not belong to the Archdiocese of Agana, he can take the Archbishop to court. I am sure the Archbishop has his lawyers and documents ready to show that the RMS property does belong to the Archdiocese of Agana. CCOG's attorney, on the other hand, is going to have to show his documents (whatever that is). We have not seen any documents showing that the RMS property does not belong to the Archdiocese of Agana. "
If so, then you really are as stupid as they say. No wonder you use a pseudonym. At least you are smart enough to do that. Here, let me help you out, you ditz.
- Attorneys do not take people to court, their clients do.
- The CCOG has never alleged that the property does not "belong" to the Archdiocese of Agana, only that the Archbishop has deeded complete control of the property to RMS, removing it as an asset of the Archdiocese of Agana, severely harming its patrimony and thereby violating church law (not civil law, you idiot).
- LOL. The Archbishop's "lawyers". Obviously he doesn't have anybody smart enough to defend him otherwise he wouldn't have had to go to Denver and to a firm that is not licensed to practice law on Guam. To practice law in Guam an attorney or firm must be a member of the Guam Bar (the Denver firm is not) or be admitted by the court pro hac vice (and the Denver firm was not).
Oh, and I understand that you are also countering my op-ed today by touting the Denver firm (not licensed to practice law on Guam) as one of the most prestigious law firms in the country. LOL. They didn't even make the Vault 100 which lists the most prestigious law firms in the United States. In fact if you search for Lewis and Roca LLP the only ranking you get is "coming soon". LOL. (The name Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP - the firm Apuron used - doesn't even come up.)
But actually there is something Apuron can and will be sued for. You just better hope he retires first.