Saturday, May 13, 2017


I am receiving a lot of comments accusing different clerics of many different things. Unless you are willing to go public with your accusations and stand by them as John Toves, Roy Quintanilla, Walter Denton, Roland Sondia, and others have done - that means put your name and your face to your accusations and name calling - do not expect to see your comments here. As far as I am concerned you are as bad as the people you condemn because you are even more a part of the "legacy of silence." Find another blog. 


  1. Not accusing, ok? Just want to know why Fr Pablo rector of the RMS for some years just totally disappeared into thin air. He is a diocesan priest of Rome. Is he in Rome completely mum of things he learned under Apuron and putrid Pius? An element of mystery here. There has been zero administration at RMS since he left. Zero.

    1. I had been aware for awhile that Fr. Pablo wanted to give the property back to the archdiocese. He did not want the controversy and saw that the exposure of the theft endangered his mission. When things came to a head about the property, I heard Pablo insisted on giving back the property. He was out of here in no time and immediately replaced by Pius, who was subsequently replaced the Lurch, who gave the property away in the first place.

    2. So was he then one of the honest neos on island? Can we try to contact him and ask him questions? I heard he was kick out from Rome and was sent in his hometown. It seems like that he was trying to help us...

    3. "Honest" and "Neo" is a contradiction in terms. I would say that he, like many others, was one of the "duped" Neo's.

    4. The bishop in Rome is Francis. He sent Pablo to Bolivia and does nothing about Putrid? Doubt it. UNLESS trying to keep lid on Guam. He has aGreen card. Doubt he would not visit US in accord with rules.