Thursday, August 14, 2014

SAY IT ISN'T SO

"I assure you, I am not a priest. I am a female,...I have been walking in the Way for 7 years and I am a Co-Responsible in the Way. I assure you, I am a female member in the Way."DianaFebruary 10, 2014 at 6:28 AM

"A young woman...seven years walking in the Way...not a priest". That would be about right. And Fr. Edivaldo's right hand. I hope it isn't true. No matter, she's still welcome to her opinion. Just leave our children out of this, please. 



If you want to further verify. Go to "Diana" in the labels section in the right side bar. Click on it for all the stories on this blog where her comments have been catalogued.

11:28 AM update. Within minutes after posting the above, I returned to her page and now the public posts and her personal pics are gone. It's okay if it's you, Holly. Nothing to hide. If it is you, at least now you can proudly put your name to your positions. The Neo needs a spokesperson who doesn't hide. 







64 comments:

  1. Oh, poor Diana has been found out it seems. The facebook page is no longer generally accessible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor Adrian, doesn't get the credit for all the pontificating. Still, for a young lady speaks with great authority! My, my. Actually, Fr. Adrian may not have been able to do this. AND, I doubt Holly did either. SOMEONE else is involved. Let's keep at it. BTW, Holly, you are not a concelebrant. Just a friendly reminder since we are on a first name basis, now. Do you have a social life? Seems like a lot of time online. Get out there and kick up your heels!

      Delete
    2. Yet another somebody being used by the NCW and she probably didn't know it.

      Delete
  2. I love this blog. Rohr would make a good spy!

    -Diana's cousin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, I haven't had to do a thing. Everything has been sent to me. But thanks.

      Delete
    2. I take that back. You are right! Everything has been sent to you.

      -I'm not really Diana's cousin.

      Delete
    3. he'd make a good spy BOSS hahah.

      Delete
  3. That photo of her really matches how I imagined her to look.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The bait was tossed and you dove in head first. Oh the fun!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And we should believe you because...?

      But as I've said many times. It really doesn't matter who Diana is. What matters is that her anonymity speaks loudly all on its own that the Neocatechumenal Way teaches people to be sneaky, cowardly, and to shoot at people from behind their dirty rocks. I only cared who Diana was when she dragged my daughter into this. I don't know if you are a parent, but if I knew who you were and I posted your daughter's picture on my blog and alleged her involvement in unethical doings, would you care? I would hope so. Or does the Neo come first even before your own children. I hear that it does for some.

      Delete
    2. 12:06, so if she's not the lady on the right of the pics, then is she the one on the left? because that'll be really silly.

      Delete
    3. Tim,

      I am not siding with the Neocatechumenal Way, but perhaps they do not want to be personally exposed. They can probably admit that youf blogs and words can be hurtful. Is Diana's blog just one way to say what they want without being directly targeted by you?

      Unfortunately, there are members of the way who are making it look bad for the rest of the members. Remember there are also many youth in the Way who do not know what they do when they give in to your blog posts. I say this because I know many members of the Way and they were told not to fight back with you, especially in the way you are targeting them. They pray for their bishop, and believe it or not, for you and your family as well with immense sincerity (of course, you probably don't care). It is also unfortunate that these people making mean comments to you may be from the Way and I believe there are those who would agree.

      Is there a lack of faith in God on both sides of this "war"? Speaking of God, where is he in all of this?

      I lack faith in Him.

      Delete
    4. BTW. Your comment confirms that we are right on target. If indeed we guessed wrong. You wouldn't be so quick to tell us that we were wrong. You would want to us to follow the wrong trail for awhile. So thanks for the quick confirmation. I don't have anything against Holly. In fact, I even offered her a job to work at my store once even though at that time she was already heavily involved with the Neo. I ended up hiring her good friend, also in the Neo, who worked for me for about 3 years. Both of them could tell you that though I had questions, I never had anything negative to say about their personal involvement, and if I was really against the Neo I wouldn't have offered them jobs.

      In addition, I know how much influence Edivaldo has, especially on the young, and especially with Holly and her friend, even back then. Edivaldo's involvement with the blog is why I first guessed that Diana was a priest. There were just too many complex things relative to the liturgy that Diana somehow knew to be just a lay person. Also, her interpretations of the GIRM were extremely familiar to me given my many conversation with the seminarians at RMS.

      In any event. I really don't care. Just don't bring other people's children into this.

      Delete
    5. I am in the Way, and I even disagree of Diana's decision to involve your daughter....

      Prayers Tim. God bless you brother....

      Delete
    6. Deal Anon 12:06 PM

      I am in the community, and your comment is not the way you should be replying to Tim. Pray.

      Delete
    7. Actually 12:32, what is really a shame is that I have no counterpart. All this time there has not been one person from the Way willing to engage me on an intelligent open level. I even offered to meet Diana in person and come to an understanding. She replied NO. Had there been someone early on, anyone, anyone of your leadership, who had invited me to a personal sit down, I would have accepted and maybe there would not have been this war of words. But there was not. Instead, for simply standing up for Fr. Paul, and now, for over a year,I am my family have been blasted with the most filthy names, degrading comments, and a viciousness of a level that I have never seen even in the rough world of business. And it continues. And it is only by the grace of God that I continue. For all this viciousness and secrecy from your side tells me that I am on the RIGHT side.

      Delete
    8. More misdirection from 12:06. They know who it is, go to plan B, throw them of our tracks.

      Delete
    9. Thanks, Tim, for being kind in response to Holly. Just to let you know in her great wisdom she has just proclaimed you and Chuck to be OK apologists, but NOT CHRISTIANS. Is that Holly or Edivaldo Da Juice.???

      Delete
    10. AnonymousAugust 14, 2014 at 1:12 PM
      what a laugh! OK apologists but not Christian?
      Why? because they are not in "the way"?

      Delete
  5. Quite a few of the Neo members use that profile picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. And they are all "walking in the way for 7 years, female, and a co-responsible." Diana told us who she was a long time ago. We should have believed her.

      Delete
  6. Didn't the picture-posting, name-calling start here on your blog? Why is it that everyone's at fault for doing what you've already done? For the record, it wasn't all that bad. Diana was simply inquiring as you always do. The only difference is you have a team delivering you and taking screenshots of properties.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What don't you get? I said to keep people's children out of it. Screen shots of properties is a bit different than pasting your child's face on your blog and making allegations of unethical conduct. Or don't you think so.

      Delete
  7. While I don't agree with much of Ms. LG's opinion and comments, I find myself feeling merciful of her after seeing who she is. She is my sister, my cousin, my neighbor, my friend, whereas 'Diana' did not exist therefore has no dignity and cannot speak Truth. It would have be honorable for her to be up front from the get go, we could all at least respect her opinion. It is very unfortunate the disagreements and all the hurt has not come to this level.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Friends" with Bernie and Jennifer could be a blog T E A M effort. She looks a little young to be a wisdom figure, HA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. It's a team. Directed by Edivaldo, the one who preaches to stay off my blog.

      Delete
    2. Father Edivaldo, watch it. Unless the Archbishop expressly told you to team up on the Neocatechumenal Way an Insiders View he may not be as pleased as you think. You are not one of the FAVS and lots of people know it.

      Delete
  9. yep, i agree with tim, who cares who she is, just leave all of our children out of it, pictures, innuendos, all of it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. When Diana spoke about your daughter's Facebook page she was called a stalker. Why aren't you being labeled the same?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, if there was any doubt about Diana being Holly and Holly being Diana, you just removed it. Thanks.

      Delete
    2. @ 1:57,

      Do you really need to ask the question? Is it not obvious that one is a minor.

      Delete
    3. Her age aside, my daughter has nothing to do with this argument and Diana does.

      Delete
  11. We have Fr. Edivaldo, Fr. Jucutan, products of RMS acting as they do, as priests!!!

    They keep looking for the mole in the clergy in their meetings, are you sure these are not the ones you are looking for?

    Sting operations on blogs by edivaldo and surveillance photos by jucutan! They can open their own tabloid, oh wait there is the u matuna for that already. It is their paper anyways, printing their nonsense then gets scared to have the people access them.

    God have mercy on us. This is the kind of clergy we are left with. ..shameful! Shameful!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. There are so many moles. They have no idea.

      Delete
    2. Is Edivaldo the priest that is on facebook? If he is, then I have an idea who we're dealing with. Even as a seminarian he exuded arrogance.

      Delete
    3. Yes he is. And yes he did. And yes he does.

      Delete
  12. DIANA the woman of many personalities said: "I am not Holly. An anonymous poster told me about a Facebook website and that someone put my bog in that website. That anonymous poster made the comment under the thread of my last post. You can see that comment there and my reply to it. Someone told me that some of the sisters in the Way copied my avatar and put it in THEIR Facebook page. Holly is not the only one who copied my Avatar."
    SO THERE YOU ARE TIM YOU STILL HAVE YOUR BLOG NEMESIS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While I will continue to respect Holly as a person, to me Diana is an ant. She and her blog mean nothing to me, unless she dares to drag my family into her filth.

      Delete
    2. She is a woman of multiple persons for sure, holly being just one of them. Too bad none of them want to put their names to their beliefs, mistaken or not. I'm anonymous bc I am not running my blog and mouth haha one thing is for sure. They make the rest of the neos look bad. Team diana. Your bros and sisters cringe at how you've handled this. at least take responsibility and own your blog and comments therein.

      Delete
  13. Oh... Hahahaha! Now that's funny. You didn't mind identifying an innocent kid, but now that you're called out, Diana, you hide!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hahahahahahaha Anon 3:41

      She's not Diana so STFU! haha

      Delete
    2. Bet you learned to talk like that in your first catechesis. :)

      Delete
    3. Actually, I'm young and from Agat. I learned it growing up.

      You and the Neos should just jump off a cliff or something. Especially those in Agat.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  14. Tim,
    I wondered what happened to the facebook page Guam Catholics Cry? They would always post or share what you put on your blog. Who was hiding behind that facebook page. One of your timmy followers? Don't worry timmy, your blog is a hate blog with everyone putting their opinions. Lol, see you at latin mass sunday!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh. Ow. Ow. Thank you for the persecutions. Ouch. Ooh. Ow. Ow.

      Delete
  15. On the NEO petition supporting Pius, Holly is one of the first four names listed to have signed. Maybe these names are ALL the people behind DIANA,. So that would include Neo Priest Edivaldo Oliveira, who signed first! The other names, you'll find are also heavily entrenched in the WAY. http://guamway.com/signatures-from-the-petition-in-support-of-fr-pius-sammut-o-c-d-and-his-efforts-in-helping-the-church-of-guam/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw that petition, more than half of those who signed up aren't even from Guam. If those other "communities" are in support of Fr. Prius, they should take him.

      Delete
    2. Please, please take him! Guam doesn't need him! We need more priests like Fr. Paul and Msgr James! True shepherds for the flock!

      Delete
  16. And a lot of them are children of one Neo cult member - she has 11 kids all under the age of 10 and they all signed the petition? T

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Numbers are climbing!! Praise our lord!!!! In God We Trust!

      Delete
    2. Anon 6:49PM at least their following the Catholic Church having more kids. You bicker about this hmmmmmm.

      Delete
    3. Anon 6:49 PM you insult family having more children! If you call the NCW a cult and you call the four Popes are Cult! Repent!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. The Catholic Church doesn't say to have "more children." Kiko does.

      Delete
    5. @7:44 and 7:47 PM : It is exhausting how you and your ilk purposely twist statements into something that was not even remotely suggested. Enough with the dishonest tears!
      6:49 correctly stated that someone was using their minor children to bump up numbers for a signed petition. Not only is that unethical, it is irresponsible for any parent to do so in this context.
      Yet, you chose to create a scenario that did not exist and ran with it in two comments. Please, nobody is fooled and quite frankly, it's tiring.
      And for the sake of sanity and decency, don't respond with a rationalization. Your exhausting the goodwill of those attempting to remain objective.

      Delete
    6. Exhausting is an appropriate description. Been at this for a year now.

      Delete
    7. How about posting a collection of the comments from the crazies?

      Delete
  17. @ anon 7:44 and 7:47,

    Are you really going to flip 6:49's comment and pretend that he is criticizing the number of kids they have? The issue is that he claims that all 11 kids, all under 10 yrs old, are listed on the petition. Are those the kind of tactics that is condoned by leaders of the NCW? All that effort to sign these kids up with email accounts just to sign a petition; LOL at the lack of integrity. That tactic is also similar the the one used to push out priest from the Yona factory; it's not about the quality, it's the quantity.

    You don't realize the negative impact you have on the NCW, but at the same time, you have helped many realize the type of fruit the NCW produces. The scary thing is that there may be no hope of fixing the mentality that has been programmed into the youths growing up in the "Way". The only way to move forward is to free ourselves of the tyranny of Archbishop Tony. Only then can we help to correct this mentality that threatens our church, culture, and safety.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I was on track when I posted about Edivaldo and the three girls signing the petition. There was something she said in her previous blog that took me back in time. Sorry but you are Holly!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Apparently there is a new trend on FB: known members of the NCW are banding together and using Diana's avatar as their new FB profile pictures, following Holly's example. Could it be a ploy to confuse and discredit you, Tim? I wonder what they could be so worried about. I did not see any of them jumping to the rescue when your daughter's identity was made known on "Diana's" blog.
    Note to you clever neos: this act only further provokes the suspicion that Holly does indeed partake in this Diana character. If it were otherwise, you'd have no inclination nor a need to attempt to conceal her identity. What is there to fear? It's like Tim said: the Neos need a spokesperson who doesn't hide. Aren't you all here to preach the good news? Well you certainly can't do so while you're hiding behind a rock.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The fact that Diana refuses to identify itself speaks volumes about the way. It's obviously a secret society so the use of a false name should come as no surprise. The fact that she or he refuses to identify themselves suggests shame and embarrassment.

    ReplyDelete
  21. it's a group project between the two at least, Fr. Egi obviously contributing to all her posts re the GIRM. In their blog sometimes the author takes on a definite male tone and there is a lack of temper control in subsequent replies. definitely the hot latino blood at work there!

    At another level, one can guess that the female of the group has used the collaboration project as a means to reach some kind of intimacy with Fr. Egi. It can only be a labor of love.

    I question too why all the subterfuge if the NCW calls you to be a witness for Christ? Especially Fr. Egi, why hide behind a skirt?

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch