- CONTACT NUNCIO
- CONTACT US
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- APURON'S CRIMES
- FILE BOX
- NCW'S ILLICIT LITURGY
- CERTIFICATE OF TITLE FIASCO
- NCW ERRORS/HERESIES
- ORCHESTRATED (SERIES)
- ARCHDIOCESE IN THE NEWS
- TRICKY DICK SERIES
- LUIS CAMACHO FILE
- SUPPORT THE BLOG
- SWORN STATEMENTS
- MEMOS FOR BISHOP BYRNES
- THE ULTIMATE TREACHERY
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
AND WE SHOULD BELIEVE HIM BECAUSE....?
REV. Adrian Cristobal, spokesman for the Archdiocese of Agana, has denied that Archbishop Anthony Apuron met with Pope Francis last Friday at the Vatican about an accused pedophile.
LOL! And we should believe him because...?
Because he told us the truth about Aaron Quitugua? Because he told us the truth about the Museum? Because he told us the truth about Msgr. James? Because he told us the truth about Wadeson? Because he told us the truth about Joseph Lastimoza ("danger to children")? Because he told us the truth about Fr. Paul?
We have documented Cristobal's lies along with the Archbishop's for a year and a half.
“The meeting of the pope and archbishop was not regarding the accused pedophile. That is totally inaccurate,”
Really? What interest would an international news agency have in getting it wrong? Are they another "evil blog"? (Adrian's favorite description of this one.)
If you go to the news agency's website for 11-21-14 you will see that the story about Apuron is just one of a list of church-related stories. You will also see that you can go to any date and see a similar list of news stories. There is no commentary. It is just a news service. It has no agenda and like any news service has a vested interest in reporting correctly.
Cristobal is right about one thing. Apuron did not go to Rome to talk about his hiding of an accused pedophile. But that doesn't mean Francis didn't talk to him about it when he got there. Francis would have a particular interest in doing so since he is fresh from having removed a Paraguayan bishop for doing the same thing.
Interesting. Cristobal tells us that he doesn't know the content of the meeting but tells us that he knows what was not the content of the meeting. Ah, we are so used to this from him. Really, chancery, with all that's going on do yourself a favor and make someone else your spokesman.
The MV story says:
Cristobal said Apuron made the appointment to speak with the pope and was granted an audience with him. “The archbishop was very pleased with the meeting,” Adrian said, adding that Pope Francis was supportive and encouraging, and that the meeting was positive.
What a laugh. Had Francis said such encouraging things to the Apuron you can bet that those things would have been not just announced but trumpeted immediately back to Guam. Instead we get: "The archbishop was very pleased with the meeting."
It doesn't matter. We are not waiting for the pope. We are demanding truth and justice from Apuron and Cristobal all by ourselves.
The fact remains that Apuron hid Wadeson's record from us for 14 years and now that Wadeson's record is exposed he is hiding Wadeson himself.
Never forget that it was not WE who accused Wadeson of wrongdoing, but Apuron himself when he stripped Wadeson of his ministry instead of defending him. Oh, and there's also the little fact that Apuron LIED to the Archdiocese of San Francisco. THAT did not go unreported to Rome.
What a mess these people continue to make!
Buck up friends. Enjoy your Thanksgiving knowing they aren't.