We see here that you "conferred with the counsel for the property owner to gain an understanding of all of the facts and circumstances regarding this matter." Wonderful. Did you just take Jacqueline T. Terlaje's word for it or did you do any investigation yourself?
Did you actually read the subject document: the Declaration of Deed Restriction?
If you did, did you not look past its deceptive title and read the words: "the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed.."???
Do you not know that those words, especially "transferred, sold and conveyed" mean that the Archbishop of Agana is no longer the title holder?
Did you read the words: "...IN PERPETUAL USE AS A SEE OF THE REDEMPTORIS MATER ARCHDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY"???
Do you know what a SEE is? In case you do not, a SEE is an ecclesiastical jurisdiction. If the property was to remain in the hands of the Archbishop of Agana it would have said "AS A SEE OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA." But it doesn't.
Did you not know that the Redemptoris Mater Seminary is legally distinct from the Archdiocese of Agana? Did you bother to read its Articles of Incorporation or its By Laws?
Did you not read in the Declaration the words "...IN PERPETUAL USE"???? Do you not know that those words mean FOREVER?
Did you not put 2 and 2 together and see that the Declaration of Deed Restriction acts as an instrument to "transfer, sell, and convey" the property to a jurisdiction (RMS, Inc.) which is separate from the Archdiocese of Agana?
Did you just take Jacqueline T. Terlaje's word for it or did you bother to even look at the Jaques Bronze Legal Opinion regarding the effect of this Declaration upon the subject property?
Did you not know that Mr. Klitzkie GAVE the Director of Land Management a copy of this Opinion?
Did the Director of Land Management bother to furnish you the copy?
Did you not know that there is NO PROVISION for the cancellation of certificates of title in the section of the Code that you chose to use (§29160) instead of the one already agreed upon (§29195) by the Director of Land Management and your boss, Elizabeth Barrett-Anderson (at least according to what the Director wrote Mr. Klitzkie on January 20)?
Did Jacqueline T. Terlaje talk you out of following the AG's advice in order to avoid going to court?
Why do you think Jacqueline T. Terlaje did not want this to go to court, Ms. Finney?
And who gave you the authority to cancel the previously issued certificates? It is certainly NOT in the subsection of the Code that you used.
Did you just make that up? Or did Jacqueline T. Terlaje talk you into that too?
By the way, did Jacqueline T. Terlaje identify herself to you as the legal counsel for the Archbishop? We'd like to know that Ms. Finney, because she has told the press something else.
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that Jacqueline T. Terlaje was recruited by the Archbishop to convince the clergy of the accusations against Msgr. James Benavente?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that after ousting Msgr. James as director of the Cemeteries, Jacqueline T. Terlaje and her husband inserted themselves into the Cemeteries' management?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that Jacqueline T. Terlaje (according to Bertha Evangelista of Title Guaranty) "ordered" the first set of certificates, which were conveniently missing the subject memorial? Did you know that Jacqueline T. Terlaje (and Bertha Evangelista) personally paid for them?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that as of December 15, 2015, Jacqueline T. Terlaje had in her possession, the second version of the "amended" certificates of title which falsely named the Archbishop of Agana in the "in favor of" column in the memorials?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that there is no record of Jacqueline T. Terlaje ordering or paying for those amended certificates?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that all of these lies would remain lies had it not been for the perseverance of Mr. Bob Klitzkie - who not only does not like it much when his Church and his government lies to him but actually does something about it - and in effect did much of your job for you?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, did you know that Jacqueline T. Terlaje along with her husband, are the "Responsibles" for the neocatechumenal "community" in which sits "Brother Tony" aka Archbishop Anthony S. Apuron, Ofm. Cap. DD (as he always likes to remind the rest of us)?
And by the way, Ms. Finney, do you think you might have been used? That you are now just another name thrown on the trash heap of names used and abused by "Brother Tony" and people like Jacqueline T. Terlaje in order to cover for what is a multi-million dollar, multi-national money laundering, land grabbing, power usurping syndicate masquerading as a religious group?
Welcome to the club, Ms. Finney, welcome to the club.