Saturday, August 27, 2016


Posted by Tim Rohr

When I saw the headline "Hon: Apuron defied pope" on the morning of August 19, I already knew what the Kiko's were going to do. And sure enough, they did it. 

I say "they" because the letter from Apuron released yesterday by his attorney, Jackie Terlaje, was not written by Apuron. It was written by "they." But let me get back to who "they" are another time. 

What I knew they were going to do is exactly what Apuron was made to say in his letter, a clear denial that he "defied" the pope:

"I wish to declare that this is absolutely false…I have always obeyed the Holy Father…”

Once again, if you understand the Neocommunist ethic of the "ends justifies the means," there is no contradiction here. They simply make words mean what they want them to mean. 

Here's what happened.

On August 18, Archbishop Hon released an "announcement" stating:

"In truth, more than a year ago, the Holy See recognized the problems such a Deed Restriction created. Ever since then, more than once the Holy See has instructed Archbishop Anthony Apuron to rescind and annul it. Clearly, this instruction has not been carried out accordingly."

Saying "the Holy See," is like saying "the White House" or "the Office of the Governor." It is commonly understood that any directive issuing from such an office is the same as issuing from the person who inhabits the office. 

Unfortunately, not personally naming the individual who actually issued the instruction "from the office," permits ambiguity and the Putrid Pius immediately saw his opening, telling KUAM a day earlier:

"The Pope never gave any directive. It was a congregation of the Holy See, which gave this indication and, as I said, an archbishop answers only to the Holy Father." (Aug 25, KUAM)

The Kiko's used the same trick back in 2005 when Cardinal Arinze, the then-Prefect for the Congregation for Divine Worship issued a cease and desist directive to the Kiko's ordering them to stop receiving communion sitting down. 

Apuron infamously barged into the KOLG studio during a live radio show hosted by Fr. Mike Crisostomo and effectively shouted for the whole world to hear: "who is this Cardinal to tell us what to do?" (Audio File here. Transcript here.)

(For further reading, see how Apuron was speaking directly from Gennarini's talking points, captured in Gennarini's exchange with Catholic Answers apologist, Jimmy Akin here. This was in 2006 and it shows just how deeply Apuron was already controlled by Gennarini.)

A few weeks later, the pope himself told Apuron who the Cardinal was: he was "the pope." In front of Kiko Arguello himself and thousands of neocatechumenals, Pope Benedict, reminded the Kiko's that the instruction issued by Cardinal Arinze had been issued "in my name." 

The pope took the opportunity of addressing the neocats at their annual "missionary send-off" in Rome to remind them of the authority of the Arinze-directive because upon its issuance a few weeks earlier, Kiko was telling his neocat zombies the same thing Pius told KUAM: "it didn't come from the pope." 

The Kiko's are masters of bullshit. Sorry for that word but there is no other. Kiko has learned the Hitlerian technique of simply burying people in words, words that can be redefined at any moment to make them fit the "ideal" to which the rest of the world must "adjust" (a Marxian maxim explained in my post GO TO HELL, PIUS.)

Following is an example of Kiko doing the opposite. 

Instead of denying the validity of a directive because it only came from a Vatican office instead of the pope himself, in the following account Kiko trumps up a letter coming from a lowly Vatican office and makes it appear to be handwritten by the pope. 

On May 16, 2014, the Kiko-controlled Vatican news agency, Zenit, posted the headline: "Pope Francis Backs the Neocatechumenal Way." Given the headline one would have thought that the Pope himself, with his arm around Kiko, had just made some sort of public proclamation. 

However, the real occasion for such a celebratory headline was nothing more tha a short note from a Vatican underling, with the title of "Substitute," who worked in the the office of General Affairs which is an office under the office of the Secretary of State, who simply passed on a message from the pope's office. 

And what's more, the focus of the letter was not only NOT congratulatory, it was a reprimand reminding Kiko not to stray from his" regulatory charter of reference," i.e. the approved Neocatechumenal Statute.  (Read my whole expose of this here.)         

Kiko knew this was a slap down. He had initially asked for a personal audience with the Pope after he got some ill-treatment from a few bishops after the pope's own public slap down of Kiko and his Way at the big meeting with the Neocats a couple months earlier. And all he got was a short note of reprimand from a "Substitute." 

But Kiko has made a career of turning dung beetles into eagles, and with the help of the dutiful Zenit, within minutes turned the lowly missive into an Apostolic Exhortation. 

This works for Kiko because like all the evil dictatorial monsters before him, Kiko understands that the people don't understand, and he only has to exploit that hole. Thus Pius exploits "that hole" between the words "Holy See" and "pope." The bottom line is that Pius, Apuron, Gennarini, et. al. are counting on us being stupid. 

Here's an example of some other "holes" to be exploited in Apuron's letter:
  • Apuron says that had he not restricted the property it would have already been sold. What Apuron does not tell you is that he is the only one who can sell it. Apuron says "you're stupid." 
  • Apuron says that RMS was to produce priests. What Apuron doesn't tell you is that it was only to produce priests for the Neocatechumenal Way. Apuron says "you're stupid." 
  • Apuron refers to documentation from the Pontifical Council of Legislative Texts and the law office of Lewis and Roca. What Apuron doesn't tell you is that neither opinions of either of these entities has any bearing on Guam law. Apuron says "you're stupid." 

And here's another thing. 

Over and over Apuron has defended his "deed restriction." However, he has only done so since January 5, 2015. And why is that? Because that is when we uncovered it at the Department of Land Management. 

The document was recorded three years earlier. If Apuron is so righteous about his preserving the property for the formation of priests (like The Waldo - LOL) then why did he record the document in secret and fire the finance council to keep them from knowing about it? 

Well, we know why. Because it's all a lie. But now, as of yesterday, we don't have to deal with Apuron, we can go after his attorney: Jacqueline C. Terlaje (aka "Jackie" the "Trained Lawyer"). 

Now that the the Trained Lawyer has issued "Apuron's" statement and identified herself as his personal attorney, let's call on the Trained Lawyer to produce those documents from the Pontifical Council and the Lewis law firm. 

After all she (er, I mean Apuron) is publicly referencing them to discredit the CCOG, the former finance council officers, Bob Klitzkie and others, as well as a bona fide legal opinion from Guam real estate attorney, Jacques Bronze, a real attorney not a trained one. 

Let's call on the Trained Lawyer to tell us WHO can sell archdiocesan property. Let's see if she says anyone other than the Archbishop. It's a simple question. 

Let's call on the Trained Lawyer, the very one who bashed Msgr. James in front of the presbyteral council and the college of consultors, WHO can authorize a debt instrument? Let's see if she says anyone other than the Archbishop. It's a simple question. 

One last thing. That Apuron (or his handlers) were willing to pick a public fight with Archbishop Hon, should send a shiver down our spine. This is unheard of and it would be death to Apuron but for one thing: they are SURE of their support in the Vatican. Apuron is even now planning his triumphal return.

The fight comes down to us, folks. I hate to say "I told you so," but for three years I have been hammering on the whole "Rome help us" bullshit. There's that word again. The PICKET continues this Sunday, 9am, in front of the Cathedral. Apuron is just waiting for us to get tired.


  1. Dillusional........that is what apuron, the trained lawyer and all those other idiots are. SMH. I've also said in the past, Rome is not the answer. "WE", dear Catholics of Guam, need to step up and rid ourselves of these imposters to the Catholic faith. Continue the battle. St. Michael protect us.

    1. Raymond, step up to the picket tomorrow at 9 at the Cathedral.

    2. Public opposition on Sunday's in front of the Cathedral is like a sticker burr in Hon's crotch.

  2. The melodrama (worthy of an Oscar for worse actors) continues
    as they dig themselves deeper into a pile of dung. Pinocchio
    (Pius,et al) needs to extend his nose from here to Timbuktu to
    cover all their crooked lies!!

    1. Let's not assume they are digging themselves into anything. If there's no one to bury them, even if they dig a hole, there are still no consequences. We must be there to bury them every time they stick their head out of that hole. Sunday protest does it.

  3. "However, I must add that the recent declaration that "such an act of concession was not done in a usual way by an internal Ecclesiastical agreement," does not correspond to the truth." In my limited vocabulary and simple minded thinking I deduce from this that AAA is calling Hon a liar. Am I wrong? Now who is telling the truth here? Two Archbishops making public statements, kind of like elephants mating, way above our heads. Someone needs to put their foot down! Seda Plena in my understanding is that the current Archbishop is "incapacitated", in my dictionary, cannot do his job. So what is he doing making comments? Why is the Apostolic Administrator even tolerating his comments? Can someone with a pair of gonads settle this issue? So many questions! In the mean time see you at 9 AM to 9:45 o'clock, tomorrow.

    1. The problem is rooted in the fact that Hon was originally just supposed to be a stooge for Kiko. However, the CCOG etc has forced him to say things he never was supposed to say. This is why Apuron feels he can publicly beat him up. He knows that Hon is not following orders.

  4. The battle is joined. Join the fight and save your Church or sit it out and give it all back to Apuron, Pius and the Gennarinis.

    See you at 9 tomorrow at the Cathedral. ,, l

  5. hon can quickly discredit apuron just by producing the very directives sent by the vatican to apuron. for maximum discreditation, hon should do it with a press conference before all guam media, and make sure it's disseminated internationally as well.

    but some people will still take apuron's kikoesque spin on it, wherein the neocats say that it's not from the pope himself. but those are the very people the neocats are counting on for being stupid. unfortunately, we can't do much about stupid, in the short term, or perhaps ever. but there's no excuse for the non-stupid. sorry to say, but the people of guam will have to prove that they're not stupid. apuron has challenged them to that.

  6. Apuron is going down. We don't know how long it will take but it will happen. I see a movie in the works produced by local film makers. I was getting discouraged but now I have renewed faith that we will win. Thank the Lord for Tim's efforts in not giving up and for getting the rest of us to see the truth of Apuron's deceitfulness. Thank the Lord for the CCOG and the other groups that formed to take a stand against the evil perpetrated by Apuron and his Neo handlers. Can't make this Sunday's protest but will definitely be there next Sunday with my handy dandy Rollator walker!
    Eileen Benavente-Blas

    1. Apuron is going down for sure.
      It will be the greatest scandal to hit thw American Catholic Church since George Patrick Zieman of Santa Rosa CA.
      Apuron's sexual life will all be revealed.

    2. eileenbb, I look forward to having you join the Rollator Team at the Sunday picket. I may be slow as I plod along wheeling my DEFROCK APURON sign, but I will continue to roll along with my Rollator. See you next week.

  7. My opinion. ..seems like this group NCW main objective is to destroy the Church by creating division and mistrust, so people can leave the Catholic Church. Why? So they can rise up as a new religious group in the chaos and take control. Wolves are in the hen house...where is the farmer to drive them out? I pray that the people see the evil and remain strong and steadfast in the faith. We are surely being tested. I pray our brothers and sisters being misled by NCW leaders return to the Church.

    1. WE are the "farmer." If WE don't drive the wolves out no one else will. See you tomorrow at 9 at the Cathedral.

    2. Rose de los Reyes (Seattle, WA)August 27, 2016 at 1:27 PM

      The farmer who is supposed to drive out the wolves is a wolf himself this is why the wolves easily almost took over the hen house. But, the true "farmer" is not just one farmer but many --- the faithful of Guam. At present the all are mobilizing to drive out the wolves!

  8. I'll stay off the substantive critique, and leave that to others more learned than I, but.....

    Just a few MINOR observations (perhaps purely cosmetics) about the letter:

    1,How did the letter get to the attorney - by letter, courier, email, fax, etc. I guess it's the same as asking "How did the attorney get a hold of it?"

    2.The letter wasn't signed. Isn't this odd (at the least), considering the seriousness of the matter?

    3.Not only was the letter not signed, there is the blatant omission of "D.D." (Doctor of Divinity) following his name -an omission that was never (or hardly ever to my recollection) done in other official documents coming from the desk of AB Apuron? It is uncharacteristic of his penchant to add titles to his name!

    4.I'm so used to seeing "Servus Tuus" as a closing; now I see "Servus tuus" (not capitalised "t". Simple error (as in misspelling), or not written by AB Apuron himself?

    I guess this does not add anything to the issue (substance) of the letter, but to me it begs the question: "Did AB Apuron actually write the letter" or did a "ghost writer" write it on his behalf? (I have my own hunches! I saw certain "similarities" in phraseology and substance to a recent article I read in PDN). If the latter, isn't this yet another deception?

    JUST ASKING! Curious JRSA. (8/27/16)

  9. "Apuron is just waiting for us to get tired."

    Over my dead body.

  10. Wait a minute. So Apuron finally "speaks" and it is only about the Yona property? WHAT ABOUT THE SEX ABUSE ALLEGATIONS? AND WHERE ARE YOU? No more money folks. No more money at all funding these sex fiends gallavanting all across the world.

    1. The statement is not from Apuron. Pius' (the NCW) orchestration does not include restoring Apuron's "good name" except for the purposes of promoting his false narrative in order to preserve the RMS for the neo. The NCW could care less if Apuron is guilty or not of the allegations of sexual molestation.

      The recent statements by Pius are not about protecting Apuron's honor. They are about exploiting Apuron's authority.

  11. We are in this battle for as long as it takes. We are not getting tired!

  12. We are in this battle for as long as it takes. We are not getting tired!

  13. Right Lou, it's worth saying twice!

  14. Apuron we will fight you to the grave even beyond .we will even stop your burial in the Cathedral. All out war on you until justice is served.

    1. Anonymous at 1:01 PM, it sounds like you and I have something in common — we both reject the idea of Anthony Sablan Apuron being buried in the Sanctuary of the Cathedral-Basilica.

      I hope you've been coming to picket. If not, please join me as I wheel my DEFROCK APURON sign from 0900-0945 on Sunday mornings in front of the Cathedral-Basilica.

  15. So AAA comes out when Hon is not on island...
    While Hon was here in acting capacity AAA whereabouts is unknown...
    If no one ever noticed the rift in our church this should be it right here. Imagine that the Bishop of Guam not listening and disagreeing with the Bishop sent here from Rome to clean his mess, things are already ugly snd will get what will Pope Francis just step in once and for all?

  16. i remember ABAA running around downtown with only the handsome seminarians in tow, Harold Colorado ring a bell?

    1. Then why did Apuron run around with Edjivaldo? Edjivaldo is so ugly.

    2. Chu le guagua.

    3. Tony doesn't look at his face because of his (sic) position.


  17. Handsome seminarians been going on years.Apuron was in love with Vincent a seminarian in St.Patrick's years ago. Harold is one of his many lovers. Lets pray in court it all comes out.

  18. - So Sad Sad This Excuse of A Man This Apuron! He really still thinks that the Good People of Guam Love Him! So Delusional and Egotistical! What kind of drugs is he taking? Could he have multi-personalities? So Sad Sad This Excuse of A Man This Apuron!

  19. "What kind of drugs is he taking?" It ain't coming from Holy Communion the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.