Interesting. Hon seems to have trouble stating in this interview that he had asked the pope to remove Apuron. He says that he gave a report about the "status" of the archdiocese" to "all the dicasteries" and mentions that "among other things" he asked the pope to declare the archdiocese "sede vacante." This is quite a different tone from his letter which was read to us this past Sunday where he says:
In his letter to us of only a few days ago, Hon says he URGED the Holy See to remove Apuron. Upon his arrival this morning on Guam he says he only mentioned it as "one of may things." Now why would he do that?