Friday, November 4, 2016

BISHOP JUAN IGNACIO ARRIETA OCHO DE CHINCHETRU: CORRUPT OR DOESN'T KNOW CRAP - PART 1


This is Bishop Juan Ignacio Arrieta Ochoa de Chinchetru. He is the Secretary for the Pontifical Council of Legislative Texts. And he is either a corrupted kiko or he doesn't know crap.

In the April 19, 2015 UMATUNA, Apuron proffered the opinion of this man as evidence that the Yona property had not been alienated from the patrimony of the Archdiocese of Agana. Apuron never published Arrieta's opinion, and now I know why, and I intend to show you why as well, piece by painful piece.


The really sad thing is that this opinion was put out by a Pontifical Council, and as you will see, it is so full of holes and errors that we have no choice but to be embarrassed by the ineptitude of today's Vatican. Bishop Arrieta, do you realize how many souls have been lost here in Guam because you helped Apuron perpetuate his lies and in so doing, cover the real reason the property was alienated: to hide his hideous past?

Let's start with this:




1. The Accion Hotel was NOT under construction when it was purchased by the Archdiocese in 2002. The Accion Hotel was completed and open for business in 1998. In fact, I had a janitorial supply company at the time and I visited the hotel several times as a prospective vendor. 

2. Arrieta refers to the Archdiocese of Agana as the "Diocese of Guam." HUH? Not only are we an Archdiocese, we are not even an Archdiocese "of Guam." The correct name is Archdiocese of Agana, Guam. This is really pathetic, coming from a Pontifical Council! Additionally, he capitalizes Diocese twice and uses the lower case the third time. Just plain careless. 

3. "an agreement that it would be actually destined to the Seminary." HUH? "destined to the Seminary." And besides the discombobulated sentence, how does he know the property was "destined (to be used) as a Seminary"? Where is the source document from the donor? He doesn't have it. And wait till you see where he is getting his information!

4. "'Corporation Sole' with the Archbishop as the only member." Ummm, no Bishop Arrieta, a Corporation Sole has NO members. That's why it's a Corporation Sole. The bishop himself is the corporation:
§ 10102. Religious Corporations. Corporation sole.For the administration of the temporalities of any religious denomination, society, or church, and the management of the estates and properties thereof, it shall be lawful for the bishop, chief priest, or presiding elder of any such religious denomination, society, or church to become a corporation sole unless inconsistent with the rules, regulations, or discipline of his religious denomination, society, or church or forbidden by competent authority thereof.
http://www.guamcourts.org/compileroflaws/GCA/18gca/18gc010.PDF
We'll be back with more fun soon. Geez. SMH.

Continued on Part 2

20 comments:

  1. Sad and corrupt leaders within this church. Just too embarrassing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Who leaked this Tim? Pale Mike?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. Why do u care, Adriann? Get your ass to Umatac!

      Delete
    2. Doesn't matter if Tim flew to Rome and broke into an office to get this. The fact is that it exists and it plainly shows the incompetence of our religious leaders.

      Delete
    3. Pale Mike has no access to these materials. The person who has access to these materials is a mole within the NCW. Lol

      Delete
    4. Why are you picking on Pale Mike and asking if Pale Mike is the one who leaked this - Anonymous November 4, 2016 at 7:51 PM? ARE YOU JEALOUS BECAUSE HE IS LOVED AND NOT YOU!

      And if this is Adrian Cristobal - Yes - Barrigada Loves Pale Mike a Lot More (and so do his congregation in Toto) Than You so Give Up on Trying to Discredit Him!

      I am from Barrigada and I know both families very well and your parents must be very proud of you - NOT - while Pale Mike's parents are cheering for him from above!

      Pale Mike does not have a mean bone in his body. Leave Him Alone and Obey Hon, except that the people in Umatac do not really want you there either! How Sad!

      Delete
    5. Adrian, Since the parishioners of umatac don't really want you there, why don't you and Udu move to the RMS seminary where you can be with Lurch and the people who care for you. You can spend the rest of your prebyster ministry there, until we kick you all out.

      Delete
  3. Yeah, get your ASS down here to Umatac so we can kadun pika you! Lechaaay, take the transit if you don't want to drive - your personalized parking spot is waiting for you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adrian, ponetero Hanao papa para umatac a nai ma otdin hao para un setbi i Tao Tao Yuus. Basta bumabichi sa sempre Hu patik i dagan mu.

      Delete
  4. ncw system of lies and corruption becomes clear. Those who contributed to upholding the lies of Apuron should have no place in the future leadership of our church. Best for Adriann to leave Guam.

    ReplyDelete
  5. look at his hair fake color.
    A bishop who colors his hair not a good sign.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Something similar afoot. I would lean towards ineptitude. We know opus de I never cared much for Kiko.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A massive prayer crusade is called for here. If everyone sends out a prayer request to all their catholic friends and invites them to forward it to 10 others so that the prayer crusade reaches around the World. the prayer could be something like--
    Holy Mary mother of God please intercede with your son who is Our Lord Jesus Christ that he will see justice done and done swiftly in the Arch Diocese of Agana. Please bless Bishop Byrne and give him all the graces he needs to expose any corruption and lies and to protect all the faithful catholics and their diocese. If the NCW has manipulated either the facts or individuals may the truth set them free. May the fire of the Holy Spirit purify their hearts. Amen

    ReplyDelete
  8. Some people in the UK are praying already. Shall update them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Tim,
    I like the deep and scientific resarches you do to discover and render public the lies and dishonest behaviors of some of our Bishops and Cardinals. But dont forget to pray for this lousy people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. I pray that they be exposed and repent before it's too late.

      Delete
  10. If he is a Kiko, It is definitely glaring cover up, If he is not a Kiko it would seem like he is forming his opinion without sufficient knowledge of the subject matter. Of course there is also the possibility that Kiko cult are his source of information in which case it is one sided and biased to the NEO cause. As is quite obvious, no supporting evidence is provided.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Arrieta refers to the Archdiocese of Agana as the "Diocese of Guam." HUH? Not only are we an Archdiocese, we are not even an Archdiocese "of Guam." The correct name is Archdiocese of Agana, Guam.

    Unless the city bears a name used by another diocese elsewhere in the world, the city is all that is used. Not the country, state, province, or territory, etc.

    Thus, in English and Latin:

    Archdiocese of Agaña
    Archidioecesis Aganiensis

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Archdiocese_of_Agaña

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct. I didn't mean to make the comma and Guam part of the name.

      Delete
  12. Adrian must have heard that the Umatac neos are half unemployed. And there are only 5 to begin with bwahahahah

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch