Tuesday, April 29, 2014


I think it's becoming quite clear who this person is, but no matter, we'll continue to let him hide. See here for the context. 
"And "idiot"? What else to call people like you who make malicious and ignorant generalizations like the one you just made about the supposed group I belong to. For the record, I only know one person in that "group" who opposes the NCW."I invite you to check again and clarify. There are bad apples who are making your "group" victims of this generalization. 
That's strange. You're the one making the generalization and thus making them victims, victims of your generalization. That's intelligent.

I know for a fact of more than a handful of people who attend the TLM who are on this blog commenting against the NCW. There are others who also on your JW Facebook page are "liking" your anti-NCW posts and you say you only know of two. 
Well then name them because obviously you know more than me. I went to the JungleWatch Facebook Page and counted 3 people who have "liked" the page who attend the TLM. One who already uses her name (Mary Lou), another who rarely comments here except on links to his own posts (Chuck White), and another from whom I've seen no activity and who has never mentioned anything to me. But even if every single person who attends the TLM, all 40, including children, supported my expose of the you Kikos, they still would only make a tiny fraction of the VERY ANGRY whole. Who do you think hired Fr. Paul's canon lawyer? But I'm glad you tried to do this. You have once again demonstrated that you are unable to engage the argument. And you are unable because you can't. And you can't because you know THE LIE. 
By the way "ad hominum" is defined:An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Everything I have shared is relevant in regards to the topic. When you enter into a debate or argument everything about you is relevant. Even the selection of jurors for a court case is extensive because of this. 
Merriam Webster definition of "ad hominum":
1. appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
2. marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made.

Here, let me list again the "contentions made" and see if you can respond to them on their own merit. I know it'll be a challenge, but challenge yourself:

  • I have seen both Kiko and the Archbishop give Rome the finger and that is WRONG. 
  • I saw the Archbishop abuse his power and bring false allegations against a priest whose spiritual and material well-being has been entrusted to his care. 
  • I saw the Archbishop try to give away a major asset of the Archdiocese and then illegally terminate the members of the finance council who opposed him, a council tasked by Canon Law to keep out of control bishops from doing exactly this. 
  • I saw the people of Guam lied to for a decade about how RMS was our seminary for our priests, and when confronted with the truth that it was not, we all saw a fake seminary "erected" to cover for that lie. 
  • I saw a son of Guam LIED TO by the Archbishop about why he could not attend a non-Neo seminary.
  • I saw a neo-priest incardinated here in an instant while beloved priests from the Philippines were denied incardination, some of whom have served us for decades. 
  • I saw the Archdiocese lie about its mission status so that it could keep sucking money out of the Catholic Extension Society - money that could have been better used for true mission lands - while we spend hundreds of thousands flying guys in here from all over the world, putting them up in a palace, "educating" them, and flying them all over the world so they can do things like spend Holy Week with their homies. 
  • I also see "priests" being spit out of the Yona presbyter factory who have serious psychological problems, who are seriously theologically deficient (since they were fed Kiko's), who abuse the confessional, and who don't even know how to say Mass.

Go ahead, just try one. Or shall we again see you default to "an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made."
You already know this but you choose to mislead your readers. This is why I choose to comment here, for the love of those who do not know better, those who are being misled by their judgments and by your influence. 
Oh, that's too good. Another one of those who believe Guam Catholics are stupid and can't think for themselves. Is this the Archbishop by the way?
Ive tried to share with you also but you have denied because of my anonymity. You wanting a name shows the amount of faith we are dealing with. 
To accuse me of ad hominum is false. Joy! hope you be man enough to post this up. 
At least one of us is a man. 

Recommendations by JungleWatch