Sunday, November 23, 2025

CONSCIENCE IS NOT PRIVATE JUDGMENT

By Tim Rohr

The recent scuffle on this blog relative to a couple of candidates for governor who are also communion-going Catholics and Freemasons, has brought several issues to the fore, but namely the need to clarify the difference between conscience and private judgment. 

The Catholic Church authoritatively teaches that membership in Freemasonry is a "grave sin." Anonymous Freemason (in the aforementioned "scuffle") consistently argues that his membership in Freemasonry is not a grave sin because his conscience tells him so. 

I don't fault Anonymous Freemason for believing this as most likely he is a product of our contemporary CCD system, if not also adult faith formation, which has led him to believe that conscience equates to making up your own mind about what is a "grave sin" and what is not.

This isn't new. We have seen this time and time again with many Catholics when it comes to issues such as abortion, contraception, and same-sex relations. 

The real issue is a misunderstanding and thus a misdirection by Catholic formators (teachers and pastors) about the concept of "conscience."

In short "conscience" is formed from two words: "con" (with) and "science" (knowledge). CONSCIENCE = WITH KNOWLEDGE. Knowledge of what? In the matters of Catholic faith and morals, it is knowledge of what the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church believes and authoritatively teaches.

Conscience, at least in the Catholic moral context, is NOT private judgment - which is exactly what you see in all the arguments presented by Anonymous Freemason. However, as already stated here (and elsewhere), Anonymous Freemason is certainly not alone. 

Here's hoping that there are some pastors who are paying attention and will address the matter at soonest. By the way, in that regard, we should all be appreciative of Anonymous Freemason's obstinate denial of Catholic Church authority, otherwise, the Church's prohibition on Catholic membership may not have become known at all. 

Sunday, November 16, 2025

ON THE IRRECONCILABILITY BETWEEN CHRISTIAN FAITH AND FREEMASONRY

By Tim Rohr

Given the current debate about Freemasonry on this blog, it may be useful to set out relatively recent official Catholic Church teaching on the matter. So we copy here the following document on the "Irreconcilability between Christian faith and Freemasonry."


REFLECTIONS A YEAR AFTER DECLARATION OF CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
Irreconcilability between Christian faith and Freemasonry

(Emphases added)

On 26 November 1983 the S. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (S.C.D.F.) published a declaration on Masonic associations (cf. AAS LXXVI [1984], 300). At a distance of little more than a year from its publication, it may be useful to outline briefly the significance of this document.

Since the Church began to declare her mind concerning Freemasonry, her negative judgment has been inspired by many reasons, both practical and doctrinal. She judged Freemasonry not merely responsible for subversive activity in her regard, but from the earliest pontifical documents on the subject and in particular in the Encyclical Humanum Genus by Leo XIII (20 April 1884), the Magisterium of the Church has denounced in Freemasonry philosophical ideas and moral conceptions opposed to Catholic doctrine. For Leo XIII, they essentially led back to a rationalistic naturalism, the inspiration of its plans and activities against the Church. In his Letter to the Italian people Custodi (8 December 1892), he wrote: «Let us remember that Christianity and Freemasonry are essentially irreconcilable, so that enrollment in one means separation from the other».

One could not therefore omit to take into consideration the positions of Freemasonry from the doctrinal point of view, when, during the years from 1970‑1980, the Sacred Congregation was in correspondence with some Episcopal Conferences especially interested in this problem because of the dialogue undertaken by some Catholic personages with representatives of some Masonic lodges which declared that they were not hostile, but were even favourable, to the Church.

Now more thorough study has led the S.C.D.F. to confirm its conviction of the basic irreconcilability between the principles of Freemasonry and those of the Christian faith.

Prescinding therefore from consideration of the practical attitude of the various lodges, whether of hostility towards the Church or not, with its declaration of 26 November 1983 the S.C.D.F. intended to take a position on the most profound and, for that matter, the most essential part of the problem: that is, on the level of the irreconcilability of the principles, which means on the level of the faith, and its moral requirements.

Beginning from this doctrinal point of view, and in continuity, moreover, with the traditional position of the Church as the aforementioned documents of Leo XIII attest, there arise then the necessary practical consequences, which are valid for all those faithful who may possibly be members of Freemasonry.

Nevertheless, with regard to the affirmation of the irreconcilability between the principles of Freemasonry and the Catholic faith, from some parts are now heard the objection that essential to Freemasonry would be precisely the fact that it does not impose any «principles», in the sense of a philosophical or religious position which is binding for all of its members, but rather that it gathers together, beyond the limits of the various religions and world views, men of good will on the basis of humanistic values comprehensible and acceptable to everyone.

Freemasonry would constitute a cohesive element for all those who believe in the Architect of the Universe and who feel committed with regard to those fundamental moral orientations which are defined, for example, in the Decalogue; it would not separate anyone from his religion, but on the contrary, would constitute an incentive to embrace that religion more strongly.

The multiple historical and philosophical problems which are hidden in these affirmations cannot be discussed here. It is certainly not necessary to emphasize that following the Second Vatican Council the Catholic Church too is pressing in the direction of collaboration between all men of good will. Nevertheless, becoming a member of Freemasonry decidedly exceeds this legitimate collaboration and has a much more important and final significance than this.

Above all, it must be remembered that the community of «Freemasons» and its moral obligations are presented as a progressive system of symbols of an extremely binding nature. The rigid rule of secrecy which prevails there further strengthens the weight of the interaction of signs and ideas. For the members this climate of secrecy entails above all the risk of becoming an instrument of strategies unknown to them.

Even if it is stated that relativism is not assumed as dogma, nevertheless there is really proposed a relativistic symbolic concept and therefore the relativizing value of such a moral-ritual community, far from being eliminated, proves on the contrary to be decisive.

In this context the various religious communities to which the individual members of the lodges belong can be considered only as simple institutionalizations of a broader and elusive truth. The value of these institutionalizations therefore appears to be inevitably relative with respect to this broader truth, which instead is shown in the community of good will, that is, in the Masonic fraternity.

In any case, for a Catholic Christian, it is not possible to live his relation with God in a twofold mode, that is, dividing it into a supraconfessional humanitarian form and an interior Christian form. He cannot cultivate relations of two types with God, nor express his relation with the Creator through symbolic forms of two types. That would be something completely different from that collaboration, which to him is obvious, with all those who are committed to doing good, even if beginning from different principles. On the one hand, a Catholic Christian cannot at the same time share in the full communion of Christian brotherhood and, on the other, look upon his Christian brother, from the Masonic perspective, as an «outsider».

Even when, as stated earlier, there were no explicit obligation to profess relativism as doctrine, nevertheless the relativizing force of such a brotherhood, by its very intrinsic logic, has the capacity to transform the structure of the act of faith in such a radical way as to become unacceptable to a Christian, «to whom his faith is dear» (Leo XIII).

Moreover, this distortion of the fundamental structure of the act of faith is carried out for the most part in a gentle way and without being noticed: firm adherence to the truth of God, revealed in the Church, becomes simple membership, in an institution, considered as a particular expressive form alongside other expressive forms, more or less just as possible and valid, of man’s turning toward the eternal.

The temptation to go in this direction is much stronger today, inasmuch as it corresponds fully to certain convictions prevalent in contemporary mentality. The opinion that truth cannot be known is a typical characteristic of our era and, at the same time, an essential element in its general crisis.

Precisely by considering all these elements, the Declaration of the Sacred Congregation affirms that membership in Masonic associations «remains forbidden by the Church», and the faithful who enrolls in them «are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion».

With this last statement, the Sacred Congregation points out to the faithful that this membership objectively constitutes a grave sin and by specifying that the members of a Masonic association may not receive Holy Communion, it intends to enlighten the conscience of the faithful about a grave consequence which must derive from their belonging to a Masonic lodge.

Finally, the Sacred Congregation declares that «it is not within the competence of local ecclesiastical authorities to give a judgment on the nature of Masonic associations which would imply a derogation from what has been decided above». In this regard, the text also refers to the Declaration of 17 February 1981, which already reserved to the Apostolic See all pronouncements on the nature of these associations which may have implied derogations from the Canon Law then in force (Can. 2335). In the same way, the new document issued by the S.C.D.F. in November 1983 expresses identical intentions of reserve concerning pronouncements which would differ from the judgment expressed here on the irreconcilability of Masonic principles with the Catholic faith, on the gravity of the act of joining a lodge and on the consequences which arise from it for receiving Holy Communion. This disposition points out that, despite the diversity which may exist among Masonic obediences, in particular in their declared attitude towards the Church, the Apostolic See discerns some common principles in them which require the same evaluation by all ecclesiastical authorities.

In making this Declaration, the S.C.D.F. has not intended to disown the efforts made by those who, with the due authorization of this Congregation, have sought to establish a dialogue with representatives of Freemasonry. But since there was the possibility of spreading among the faithful the erroneous opinion that membership in a Masonic lodge was lawful, it felt that it was its duty to make known to them the authentic thought of the Church in this regard and to warn them about a membership incompatible with the Catholic faith.

Only Jesus Christ is, in fact, the Teacher of Truth, and only in him can Christians find the light and the strength to live according to God’s plan, working for the true good of their brethren.

Saturday, November 15, 2025

WHY CAN'T A CATHOLIC BE A FREEMASON? FR. MITCH PACWA SJ EXPLAINS

 

EXORCISMS NEEDED

By Tim Rohr



It wasn't news, but it was known by some that before Archbishop Byrnes moved into the Archbishop's house at the old Chancery, he performed an exorcism on the place. Given the evils that reportedly occurred in the Archbishop's house, including Apuron raping his own nephew (which was in the news), Archbishop Byrnes was right to be concerned about this "house of horrors" being occupied by demons let in by Apuron's acts and who knows who else and what else.

But given what we know now, after ten years, and after hundreds of lawsuits, a federal court trial, and bankruptcy, what about all the other places where these evil acts - the sexual molestation of minors, mostly boys, by many members of Guam's clergy, in otherwise sacred or at least blessed spaces (schools, churches, rectories). 

Notable places would be (in no particular order):

  • The Capuchin Friary
  • Santa Teresita (Mangilao)
  • Our Lady of Mt. Carmel (Hagat)
  • San Isidro (Maloloj)
  • Nuestra Senora de la Paz y Buen Viaje (Chalan Pago)
  • St. Anthony School (Tamuning)
  • Fr. Duenas School (where the infamous Fr. Louis Brouillard "taught" for several years)

All of these places and probably more should be exorcised followed by many rosaries and Masses for reparation. Otherwise, "Satan, and all the evil spirits, [will continue to]prowl about [this diocese]seeking the ruin of souls," including yours, our children, and our children's children.



 

Monday, November 10, 2025

ANALYSING A TROPHY PICTURE

 Posted by Frenchie:



Last week, we posted this picture, without comment after an expose about freemasonry, and why it is wrong, and a grave sin for any Catholic to associate with freemasonry.

As the article made the rounds on our local social media, a proxy for one of the persons on this picture, asked in a condescending manner, if this was meant to be an indirect attack on his patron, an insinuation.

Let me be clear there is no insinuation, it is a direct statement about two individuals: Senator Joe San Augustin (D), and Senator Tony Ada (R). Both of them are considered at this time as leading candidates to become the next Governor of Guam. Both of them pretend and claim that they are devout Catholics, both of them apparently see no moral dilemma in the obvious double standard they are trying to get away with.

This site is a Catholic site; it treats subjects related directly or indirectly with Catholic issues on the island of Guam.  Over the last 13 years we have covered issues far and wide from problem priests, to abortion, to mismanagement and everything in between

As we are an island officially Catholic at 80%, it is important that these two individuals advertising themselves as Catholic, but in fact being active in freemasonry, clarify their position.

You cannot be one and the other, at once.

Over the weekend the very good local Catholic website: Thoughtful Catholic, treated the issue, in a clear and concise way. You can read it 

Here

This is totally clear; there is no room for interpretation. You are either Catholic, or a Freemason. You CANNOT be both at once. Therefore, the question becomes why any of these two individuals, insist on showing up at mass, and taking communion, while they are clearly in a situation of grave sin? This situation is what the Church calls scandalous.


In the case of Senator San Augustin, who is a parishioner at our Lady of Lourdes Church in Yigo, I have personally witnessed several different parishioners on separate occasions over the last 4 years confront San Augustin about going to communion while wearing an oversized Freemason ring. On every occasion, the Senator was very flippant and dismissive, to the point that the former Pastor on several occasions made it very clear from the pulpit that being a freemason is being in a great state of Sin. To no avail. The Pastor even reached out to family members for an intervention, also without success. At the time the Apostolic Administrator (now Bishop of Chalan Kanoa) did not feel it was sufficient to intervene. Since then, the current parish administrator, does not appear to have taken any further step to address the problem. In fact, he has elevated Senator San Augustin's spouse to become a lecturer, which means the couple seats in the front row, while he continues to go to communion.

In the case of Tony Ada, it is not apparent that many people have been in the know, about this similar situation. But the problem here, might be even more controversial, because Senator Ada is a Knight of the Order of the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem. A prestigious Catholic Order created by Godfrey of Bouillon, the leader of the 1st Crusade. No communication here that has been noted. Apparently Msgr James who was the initiator of the Order in 2012, at the Cathedral, did an indirect admonition through the current Magistral Delegate of the Order, Rodney J Jacob. At this time, we do not know, if that admonition had any result. But the issue is extremely disturbing, especially for someone running for the Highest Secular Office of the Island. The apparent lack of judgment and morality is more than troubling for someone wanting to become our leader for the 21st century. Deceit and distortion are often affiliated with politics. That does not mean, we have to agree to it.



Let's see if either Archbishop Jimenes or our newly minted Exorcist will take the bull by the horns.

It would be logical for the Equestrian Order of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem to demand that Tony Ada, either resign as a Knight, and/or resign as a Freemason, then follow the process to be forgiven for his sins.

In any case, it is not a good way to start a political campaign for Governor

Thursday, November 6, 2025

UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM WITH FREE MASONS

 Posted by Frenchie

The Catholic Church forbids Catholics to join Freemasonry because it is considered incompatible with the Church Faith and Doctrine.



This is a pretty strong statement, but this is the reality for Catholics since the appearance of this sectarian philosophy back in the early 18th century.

This prohibition stems from free masonry philosophical and religious tenets, which the Catholic Church views as containing errors and being in conflict with Catholicism.

This is actually a fairly diplomatic position, since as some former grand masters have revealed, one of the main goals of freemasonry is the destruction of the Church.


Here are the reasons why the Church is unequivocal about free Masonry

1) Religious indifferentism:  the Church teaches that Freemasonry promotes the idea that all religions are equally valid and that truth can be found in any faith, a concept called Religious Indifferentism. This conflicts with the Catholic belief that Jesus Christ is the one true path to salvation.

2) Rival Religion: According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, Freemasonry displays the elements of a religion, including Temples, Altars, prayers, and rites and therefore becomes a rival to the Christian Faith.

3) Secrecy and oaths: freemasonry secret oaths, which can include threats of gruesome punishment for revealing its secrets, are seen as contrary to Christian Morals and public Christian Principles.

4) Conflicting Philosophy: Freemasonry emphasis on "enlightment" through reason and rationality is seen as a secular, naturalistic philosophy that is at odds with Catholic Teachings on Faith, Divine Revelation and Grace.

5) Anti-Catholic Sentiment: Historically, certain forms of Freemasonry have held Anti-Catholic views, and the Church has noted that some Masonic teachings and practices, such as viewing the Pope as an "impostor", are fundamentally opposed to Catholic doctrine.


Status of the Prohibition

The ban on Freemasonry has first been issued in 1738 and reaffirmed by numerous Popes since then.

1983 Code of Canon Law: The 1983 revision of the code of Canon Law removed specific mentions of Freemasonry, leading to some confusions about the ban's status.

Reaffirmation of the Ban: In the same year the Vatican issued a declaration clarifying that the prohibition remained in effect. The declaration stated that Catholics that joined Masonic Associations are in a state of grave sin and cannot received Holy Communion.

Continued Clarification: The Vatican has continued to reaffirm this position, most recently in a 2023 letter from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which explicitly stated that active membership is forbidden and those who join are in a state of grave sin.


As you see, it is very clear to all but the blind, the deaf and the stupid, that being a freemason is not possible for Catholics, and that any person who does this is in a State of Grave Sin.

The question, for the Catholic Church in Guam is therefore very relevant. 


If one watches in passing the back bumpers of other cars in traffic, you will notice without too much difficulty a fairly sizeable number of Masonic symbols on said cars. I first noticed this when I first moved to Guam, and I was quite surprised to see so many Masonic signs. After consulting with several friends, I was told many people associated with Masons were hailing from the Philippines. But in observing closely, I also noticed in my parish, and in other parishes I visited occasionally that several CHamoru, some with strong clan affiliation, were obviously active in Lodges. Which leads us to this next picture.


Next: unravelling the web of lies.