Tuesday, April 7, 2015


I just read the article in the PDN and I think it important to note that Fr. Zoffoli passed away in 1996, several years before Saint Pope John Paul II had the statutes reviewed by 5 Dicasteries in the Curia and 12 years before the statutes were approved. Additionally, Fr. Zoffoli was a strong GLBT supporter. You decide.

Again we have a classic example, EXHIBIT A, of what Kiko Arguello produces. As expected, not a single point of Zoffoli's is engaged, but he is attacked as a "strong GLBT". (Umm, it's LGBT, btw.)

The commenter also chose to ignore the prefatory remarks in my post where I specifically noted that Zoffoli's analysis was published in 1995, several years before the final versions of the NCW Statute and catechetical directory were approved in 2008 and 2011. 

Also, note how the kiko's completely eliminate any reference to all the revisions and corrections that had to be done to both the Statute and the directory before they could be approved. Like this kiko, they try to give the impression that the Vatican just reviewed their documents and approved them in their original form.


The Vatican severely revised and corrected both the statute and the directory before approving the "final versions." However, the kiko's have chosen to ignore the final and approved versions of both and have continued to trample our church with their abuses and their heresies, even admitting that they are doing so by saying "Rome knows and hasn't stopped us", which is like a little kid saying "well mommy hasn't spanked me yet."

The disregard for the final version of the statute is blatant. The original statute of 2002 is featured on the official NCW website and NOT the corrected and approved version of 2008. There is a reason for this. The kiko's have continued their practice of consuming the consecrated host seated after they were told to eliminate the practice in 2005 and the 2008 statute officially and finally eliminated it. The kiko's don't want their members to know this so they make sure visitors to their site only see the 2002 statute, which permitted the practice. 

The 13-volume catechetical directory was severely revised and to it was added a voluminous compendium of references to the Catechism of the Catholic Church so that members of the Neocatechumenal Way would not be led astray by their catechists. The kiko's responded by keeping the corrected version of the catechetical directory from their members and from everybody else as well, probably because the kiko's are continuing their heretical instruction and do not want to be held accountable.

In fact, we can absolutely assume this because of the product produced by the Redemptoris Mater Seminary. The beliefs and practices of the presbyters who are ordained from RMS are now fully on display in several parishes, and there is no hiding the fact that they were formed and educated in a way that substantiates most if not all of Zoffoli's criticisms.

And now, back to the kiko who left the comment. It's really a prize for us to have this. The comment bears witness that we are absolutely right in rejecting the heretical doctrines and abuses of the Neocatechumenal Way. For NOT ONCE, has any thing presented on this blog ever been countered with documentable evidence to contradict or discredit our own documented evidence. Not once.

Having no argument and having no truth on their side, they attack the messenger. There is no better evidence of the falsity of the Neo-doctrines than this. (And of course there is also the fact that all liars are also cowards, so they never put their name to their statements.)

Continue the fight. STOP THE MONEY. 

Read further at The Thoughtful Catholic

Recommendations by JungleWatch