Thursday, October 6, 2016

NOW DO YOU SEE?

Posted by Tim

At the time of my post A STEAMING PILE OF EXCREMENT, I had not seen the "trained lawyer's" PRESS STATEMENT of October 5, 2016, so thanks to D. Anthony for pointing this out in his comment.

In her PRESS STATEMENT, Attorney Jacqueline Taitano Terlaje states:


She wants to be "abundantly clear" that she is "not the attorney for the Catholic Cemeteries," yet she does a PRESS STATEMENT on her law office letterhead:

Full document here



So, she is only speaking as "a public servant" ... on her official law office letterhead! Wow!

There are several matters here. But before I address them, let's clarify. JTT, as we will now refer to her, is NOT related to the long-serving archdiocesan legal counsel, Edward Terlaje. Nor is she the Terlaje who is running for senator. That would be Therese Terlaje who is the daughter of Edward Terlaje. Nor is she related to John Terlaje, who sometimes represents the archdiocese and is the brother of Therese. So let's proceed with JTT. 

  1. As an individual, JTT has no standing to do a PRESS STATEMENT. The press is only paying attention to her in this regard because she is a member of the cemeteries board.
  2. As a member of that board, she is not authorized to speak individually for the board. She can only speak for the board when the board has authorized a statement.
  3. The board did not authorize a statement or it would have released it on its own letterhead. 
  4. Because, by her own admission, she is acting alone (it is her statement, not the board's) the personal vendetta against Msgr. James (per Pius' orders to be sure) is on full display. 
  5. The current board was NOT "entrusted" with the cemeteries funds until AFTER the alleged "misuse" of funds. The new board was only entrusted with those funds going forward. 
  6. If the alleged "misuse" of funds was indeed a "misuse," it was the duty of the current board to make a report to the Member (the archbishop) and it was up to him to address the issue accordingly. 
  7. In fact, this was done initially in July 2014 and Apuron used the information to remove Msgr. James. Apuron at that point had the authority to make the report to the police and the AG. 
  8. Per the current board's Sep 30 resolution, the matter was again reported to the Delegate of the Apostolic Administrator this past July. 
  9. It was the duty of the Member (Hon) to act on the information. He did. He cleared Msgr. James. And this sent JTT into a rage. 
  10. We've seen this before. Last November 15, JTT pulled the same stunt, saying she did not represent the archdiocese as an attorney, but released a PRESS STATEMENT defending the archdiocese on her law office letterhead. 

We are now beyond whether or not the funds were "misused." We are now on whether or not WE are being MISUSED - by an attorney who appears to be MISUSING the privilege and position granted her by the Guam Bar and the laws of Guam which permit her to practice as an attorney.

Front and center in all of this, though, is that this STATEMENT, released on her law office letterhead, is a full and complete admission of the very thing she attempts to refute in the statement:

By positioning her personal statement on her law office letterhead and not the letterhead of the Cemeteries board, she is admitting that she lied about the "unanimous" decision to report Msgr. James to the police and to the AG, otherwise, the board would have issued this statement corporately, not JTT, individually. 

And this is also why, "The undersigned, being all of the Board of Directors" in the Sep 30 resolution, was not ALL, but ONLY one Jacqueline Taitano Terlaje. 

Now, just a word about a motivation. 

Now that Msgr. James is entrusted with overseeing the patrimony of the archdiocese, he will be in a position to expose the truth about the ownership of the Yona property. He will also be in a position to lead the suit for its return. Once this happens, not only will JTT be exposed, but a certain AG with whom JTT, back in March, "worked something out," which was necessary to cover for the acquisition and publication of a bogus certificate of title, obtained and paid for personally, by one Jacqueline Taitano Terlaje. 

Now do you see?

You may want to brush up on the CERTIFICATE OF TITLE FIASCO.

23 comments:

  1. Thanks, Tim, for putting the pieces of the puzzle together. This truth we are living is much stranger than fiction!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let not forget Mike Borja at Department of Land Management and Title Guaranty as well. This may include others that got involved from Preparing and issuing this bogus certificate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not forgotten. But he's a small fish. :)

      Delete
    2. Who owns title guaranty?

      Delete
    3. Who owns title guaranty?

      Delete
  3. David Cadaver Quitugua also connived actively in this scandal. Let us not forget his arrogant participation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Years ago I asked David C. Quitugua what the C. stands for. He joked, "Christian." David Cadaver is much more appropriate :)

      Delete
    2. More like a zombie in my opinion because the NEOs all act like zombies, Kiko's zombies. lol!

      Delete
    3. Must be from that hideous Kiko music. It puts people in a trance-like state. Whew, I almost became a zombie!

      Delete
  4. David Cadaver Quitugua he looks like walking death. For sure for sure walking dead.... Bye

    ReplyDelete
  5. Where is convivience?

    ReplyDelete
  6. i see , thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. oh and diana at 7.34..happy conniving

    ReplyDelete
  8. and diana at 7.34 what is the beginning of the year then. whatever it is seems to be just after you know what.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I guess JTT is easier to type than, "Jackass Jacque".

    ReplyDelete
  10. How can JTT aka the trained lawyer call herself Catholic? After all the damage she's done. She needs to do everyone a big favor and just get the hell out of dodge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She's not catholic. She's a NEO and they're far from being a catholic.

      Delete
  11. Hotel get together won't be the same without PUTRID.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't be to sure. Pius is lead catechist, so he has to be here. He will be the one to proclaim to news from Rome as per instructions from Kiko. The news of " he said, they said, I was told to say, etc. Can't celebrate the new year of the Neo cats without him. This weekend begins the beginning of their new liturgical year within the church. It is a cleansing. Then again it could be a gathering of strategies and game plans on how to attack. Courage!

      Delete
  12. Not to the subject posted. Why is it that when I click on real live feed traffic view to see the visitors, guam shows a Canadian flag?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rose de los Reyes (Seattle, WA)October 7, 2016 at 12:07 AM

      Perhaps it's a technical issue on your end. I just now checked the "live feed traffic" box and the correct flags (including the Guam flag) and correctly noted with the locations of the viewers.

      Delete
  13. The missing pieces of the puzzle are painting a picture worthy of God Father, the movie. Money laundering, extortion, pedophile priest raping altar boys, preysbiters seducing altar girls, lawyer defends the mob...you're right Andrew, like living the script of a movie.

    ReplyDelete
  14. yep, fr james's appointment is one of the first steps toward a big showdown with possible multinational and vatican-level consequences. here we go with the next step:

    the latest pdn article about the newly reconstituted archdiocesan finance council says: "to assess the church’s assets, including a multimillion-dollar property in Yona."

    i bet the first item to be formally noted for the record by the new council is that said yona property is no longer one of "the church's" assets.

    you ready, ncw? jtt? ag?

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch