Friday, July 14, 2017

FILONI EXPOSES VATICAN TO LIABILITY



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "ONE STUPID PERSON!": 


As per John V. Doe v. Holy See, the sovereign state immunity of the Holy See does not shield it from civil litigation. The Holy See is vicariously liable for negligent bishops. Therefore it is foreseeable that Apuron shall not be found guilty in Rome because although not binding it would be inconvenient for the Holy See to deny it`s liability for Apuron after convicting him in it`s own jurisdiction. 


Of course civil litigation against the Holy See would be prohibitively expensive and it would appeal the ying-yang out of it. Then again; if it was the charitable entity that it represents itself to be, the Diocese of Rome would simply unload a small chunk of it`s billion dollars in assets in it`s jurisdiction and compensate victims for it`s negligence concerning Apuron. 


Even though the commenter has his facts wrong, there is still something very important here. I'll explain. 


First, the case cited does the exact opposite from what the commenter claims. The U.S. District Court judge in the case ruled "the Holy See cannot be held liable because there was no relationship of employment in the case." The mega-lawyer, Jeff Anderson, attorney for the plaintiff, apparently planned to appeal the decision but the case was dismissed in August 2013. 

The second issue is with the commenter's belief that the Church is a "charitable entity" and that the "Diocese of Rome" has billions of dollars. Aside from that ridiculous idea, the problem remains the same for the Diocese of Rome as for the Archdiocese of Agana: the clergy will not be personally penalized. Whatever assets any diocese has are due to the gifts of the laity. 

To penalize "the church" is to penalize the laity who are already abused by the clerics they are trying to clean their church of. We only worked to pass the local legislation permitting us to penalize "the church" because it was the only way to flush out the bad guys. But none of them will personally pay a dime - except for maybe Apuron. But at least we got rid of the bad guys (some of whom we're still working on). 

But now we come to the crux of the matter, and FILONI and the neocats had better pay attention.

Per the District Court's decision, the ONLY protection the Vatican has from being held liable in the mega-billion dollar universal clergy sex abuse scandal is "no relationship of employment." While it was always the case, Vatican II specifically underlined the absolute autonomy of bishops in the administration of their dioceses. That's why Apuron used to brag "no one can get me." He knew that except for something extreme, not even the pope could take him out - which is in fact, why Francis has not done so, only asking him to resign. 

However, Cardinal Fernando Filoni's letter to Msgr. David C. Quitugua of September 7, 2016 forbidding the visit of a few members of the Laity Forward Movement to RMS, clearly casts Filoni as an employer, or at least in an administrative role, while bypassing the local bishop. 



Filoni is a high ranking member of the Roman Curia, the Prefect for the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, and his direct intervention in the temporal affairs of this diocese EXPOSES the Vatican to liability and law suits from lawyers like Jeff Anderson.  

With this letter, Filoni (aka the "Red Pope", aka "Kiko's pope"), in his lust to protect his neocats, handed hundreds of attorneys the ammunition they need to go after the Vatican. All it will take is one more intervention like this one into the affairs of the Archdiocese of Agana, and the Vatican, or at least Filoni, may well be dragged into a secular court. 

Good thinking, Fernando. But thinking isn't something Kiko's like you ever do. 

22 comments:

  1. And again they take aim and shoot themselves in the foot! Truth is, indeed, stranger than fiction!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad to be back in Holy Mother ChurchJuly 14, 2017 at 3:46 PM

    The kikos are in crisis mode. The whole web of lies is unraveling at a pace never before seen. They are so desperate that you can be sure they will use every bit of influence they can to preserve their cushy life of immunity from Church laws.

    If they involved Filoni (rhymes with Baloney) in a little matter like the visit of some ladies, you can be sure the kikos will tap that influence well once again to try to preserve their existence on Guam.

    The Jungle Nation waits to see how they will press their Red Pope friend into action!

    This is a great time for the true Catholic world, and a very bitter time for the kiko-cult!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Filoni v. LFM, not a fair fight!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Filoni + Swiss Guard v. LFM, not even then.

      Delete
    2. Not a fair fight at all. The Olympian Lou Klitzski will eat the Cardinal up...if he dare come to Guam. Most likely he'll choose to fight from afar and let the kiko rats here do most of the dirty work.
      But I would love to see Filoni-baloni go one round with Lou and her LFM!

      Delete
    3. LFM MMA LOL!!!

      Delete
    4. Andrew. The Swiss guard cannot stand Filoni.

      Delete
    5. Evil Filoni can blow Guam away without leaving the Vatican.

      Politically, the Swiss Guard are powerless. There has been serious talk about Francis wanting to get rid of the ornamental soldiers altogether because the Vatican's Security and Intelligence services are larger and stronger.

      Delete
    6. No he can't and he won't. JungleWatch is bigger than he is. You'll see. Soon.

      Delete
    7. The metaphoric shot will be fired at Filoni's command by someone completely unknown to Jungle Watch and when it's least expected. Filoni is evil, not stupidly overconfident.

      Delete
    8. Filoni, is powerful, no doubt about that. But he also has made many enemies. Certainly there is no love lost for him here, but he is also despised around the Vatican.
      He might be a good politician, but he still think we are a bunch of country bumpkins.
      He has not grasped yet, that we are very American, in our willingness to fight, and make sure to see the end of that fight.
      We are not blind to his shennanigans.
      He might be Goliath, but we are dozens of David.
      Right now he is taking advantage of the mess created in Rome by the unveiling of their ill timed reforms. But we are not alone.
      People are watching for us and with us.

      The higher they are, the harder is the fall.
      Baloney should beware....Protecting a network of child abusers, and directing the choreography could turn out to be lethal for his career.
      What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

      Delete
  4. Filioni is interfering again, trying to illegally gorce Archbishop Byrnes to do his bidding. Archbishop Byrnes should turn his back on him, drop his pants, lean over, and tell Filioni to kiss his ass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Webster sure has a way with words.

      Delete
    2. Be careful, Filoni might take up the suggestion, after all, he cannot resist temptation. He might even command the younger Quitugua stoogie to test it before he does.

      Delete
  5. Get real. When was the Vatican ever successfully sued for anything? Like never!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They don't have to be successfully sued for us to make our point. And that point is that Filoni, because he is bought and paid for by the Kiko's, is doing really stupid stuff. Our goal is to keep him from becoming the next pope.

      Delete
    2. Get real. Near-bankrupt, disintegrating Guam has zero influence over who the next Pope will be, or anything else Vatican-wise. If Rome gave a damn about the place, Apuron would have been vaporized long ago.

      NCW fan O'Malley is the one to fear as papabile. He's way more powerful than Filoni. He's a top-tier Vatican insider, a close personal friend of Francis and the runner-up to him at the last conclave.

      Delete
    3. LOL. Get real. Show me any other diocese in the world where the laity were able to run their bishop out of town.

      Delete
  6. Blockley, so what? Now you go silent on us? Crying in your soup?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @2:58 PM, not bloody likely. Blockley is probably lounging by a swimming pool at one of the NCW's fake seminaries.

      Delete
  7. The sovereign state immunity of the Holy See does not shield it from civil litigation precisely because Doe did sue the Holy See in a civil action. You are misreading into this that because Doe lost his case the Holy See isn`t shielded from civil actions.

    I never said that the Church was a charitable entity. I said that it represents itself as a charitable entity.

    I still think that you have done a good job in exposing clerical abuse on your beautiful island.






    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @5:08 Guam is anything but a "beautiful island". It's dirty, crime-ridden, quite expensive and it has a very poor educational system. Not a place favored by travel agents.

      Delete

Recommendations by JungleWatch