Tuesday, September 26, 2017


On 9/21/17, the Catholic Herald ran a story titled: 

Priests guilty of abuse will have no right to appeal, Pope says

It sounds good, but look who is at the center of the pope's promise! The pope even calls him a "prophet!"

The Pope admitted he made a mistake softening the sentence of an abuser priest

Pope Francis has endorsed an approach of “zero tolerance” toward all members of the church guilty of sexually abusing minors or vulnerable adults.

Having listened to abuse survivors and having made what he described as a mistake in approving a more lenient set of sanctions against an Italian priest abuser, the pope said he has decided whoever has been proven guilty of abuse has no right to an appeal, and he will never grant a papal pardon.

“Why? Simply because the person who does this (sexually abuses minors) is sick. It is a sickness,” he told his advisory commission on child protection during an audience at the Vatican on September 21. Members of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, including its president — Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley of Boston — were meeting in Rome from September 21 to 23 for their plenary assembly.

Setting aside his prepared text, the pope said he wanted to speak more informally to the members, who include lay and religious experts in the fields of psychology, sociology, theology and law in relation to abuse and protection.

The Catholic Church has been “late” in facing and, therefore, properly addressing the sin of sexual abuse by its members, the pope said, and the commission, which he established in 2014, has had to “swim against the tide” because of a lack of awareness or understanding of the seriousness of the problem.

“When consciousness comes late, the means for resolving the problem comes late,” he said. “I am aware of this difficulty. But it is the reality: We have arrived late.”

“Perhaps,” he said, “the old practice of moving people” from one place to another and not fully facing the problem “lulled consciences to sleep.”

But, he said, “prophets in the church,” including Cardinal O’Malley, have, with the help of God, come forward to shine light on the problem of abuse and to urge the church to face it.

Typically when the church has had to deal with new or newly emerging problems, it has turned to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to address the issue, he said. And then, only when the problem has been dealt with adequately does the process for dealing with future cases get handed over to another dicastery, he added.

Because the problem of cases and allegations of abuse are “grave” — and because it also is grave that some have not adequately taken stock of the problem — it is important the doctrinal congregation continue to handle the cases, rather than turning them over directly to Vatican tribunals, as some have suggested.

However, he said, the doctrinal congregation will need more personnel to work on cases of abuse in order to expedite the “many cases that do not proceed” with the backlog.

Pope Francis told commission members he wants to better balance the membership of the doctrinal team dealing with appeals filed by clergy accused of abuse. He said the majority of members are canon lawyers, and he would like to balance out their more legalistic approach with more members who are diocesan bishops and have had to deal with abuse in their diocese.

He also said proof that an ordained minister has abused a minor “is sufficient (reason) to receive no recourse” for an appeal. “If there is proof. End of story,” the pope said; the sentence “is definitive.”

And, he added, he has never and would never grant a papal pardon to a proven perpetrator.

The reasoning has nothing to do with being mean-spirited, but because an abuser is sick and is suffering from “a sickness.”

The pope told the commission he has been learning “on the job” better ways to handle priests found guilty of abuse, and he recounted a decision he has now come to regret: that of agreeing to a more lenient sanction against an Italian priest, rather than laicizing him as the doctrinal team recommended.

Two years later, the priest abused again, and Pope Francis said he has since learned “it’s a terrible sickness” that requires a different approach.



  1. These men are all bought and paid for by Kiko, their new master.

  2. Let us hope this message from the Pope is a precursor of good things to come. Maybe Apurun was on his mind when he went off-statement to make these comments. After all, Francis is the one who said zero tolerance for sex abusers.

    The battle in Rome must be fierce but I hope this is a sign that it is over, and we will be hearing soon that the tribunal has finished, made a decision, and now we all get to move forward.

    Zero tolerance is zero tolerance, even for bishops...especially for bishops!

    If Apurun gets off lighter than zero tolerance, Francis will be derided by the world media, and Kiko will have drained some of his vast fortunes into a Vatican account. But for me, I am confident now that Francis has spoken so forcefully on this subject that Apurun is locked in his cross-hairs, and our Co-adjutor Archbishop will soon just be Archbishop.

    Can we then drop Apurun's name from all mention at any mass?

  3. Let us not count our chickens before they are hatched. We still do not know if apuron was tried for sex abuse or something else, like "disastrous" mismanagement of the archdiocese.

  4. It was for all of the above, for sure for sure.