Thursday, August 20, 2015

THE "MILIEU FOR A NEW AESTHETIC"



Repairs which will necessitate moving table to the middle of CB with plenty of room for dancing around with accompanying clap, clap, clapping!!! Altar for sale to raise funds.
I don't know what the plans are for the main part of the Cathedral. They are probably going to hold off a bit before they mess with it. But there is no doubt about what they plan to do with the rest of the place.

There is no doubt about it because of what the Kikos believe and teach. In fact, they believe it so strongly that they are quite willing to publicly rewrite the Catechism of the Catholic Church to support their beliefs.

In 2010, then-vice-rector of RMS, Fr. Giovanni Rizzo, wrote a piece called "A Milieu For A New Aesthetic." Rizzo's piece was part of a special feature called "A Miracle for Guam." It was published by the Pacific Daily News as part of a tenth anniversary celebration of the erection of RMS.

In his piece, Rizzo wrote:
"...the Altar—that is at the same time the Cross, the place of sacrifice, the Lord’s table and the empty tomb of the risen Christ—is in the center of the Church [1182]."

The [1182] is a reference to the corresponding paragraph in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Rizzo adds the paragraph reference because he wants us to believe he is quoting the Catechism. 

He is not.

Here is what paragraph 1182 actually says
"...the altar, which is the center of the church, the sacrifice of the Cross is made present under sacramental signs."
Notice that Rizzo inserts the preposition "in" into the words "is the center of the church" so that his version reads "is IN the center of the church." 

Why does Rizzo, a priest, a canon lawyer, and the vice-rector of a seminary LIE to us? 

This is why:



 He must justify Kiko's "New Aesthetic" which requires placing the "altar" (even though they refuse to call it that) IN the center of the church. So, Rizzo, brought here to Guam to form RMS seminarians into "priests" (yah, right), alters the Catechism of the Catholic Church and publicly lies to us. 

Why?

Because Kiko is his god - just as he is for Apuron, Cristobal, David the VG, Pius, and all the kiko-worshiping liars on the hill. 

This is what these jokers will eventually do to the Cathedral and to every church on Guam. And they will do it because you won't stop them...or will you?

I first confronted Apuron about Rizzo's lie. (Note: the "battles" and "wars" that I reference in this note were the battles and wars I was fighting to protect Apuron from B.J. Cruz' legislative attack on Apuron at that time.)


Of course, Apuron did not reply, but my email was forwarded to Rizzo. I recount what happened with Rizzo here in an email to a friend:


This episode should teach us something. If a neo-priest, a man educated to be a canon lawyer, and a priest tasked with the formation of new "priests" as "vice-rector" of a seminary is willing to lie to us, and then argue so pathetically once caught, what does that say about the neocatechumenal way and  -"for sure for sure" -  the quality of clerics these people are forcing upon us?

Recommendations by JungleWatch