Thursday, March 24, 2016


Dear Robert,

You got a deal - which I shall detail in full. But first a little help for those who can't figure out what you are trying to say:
  • Archdiasies = Archdiocese
  • caviate = caveat
Now to business.

First, thank you for confirming what the Archbishop continues to deny: "The Archbishop transferred the property..."

It really is comical. Apuron, David, Cristobal, and Jacque are all out there running around spending gobs of time and money trying to prove the Archbishop still owns the property. And meanwhile, you, The Diana, Pius the Putrid, the Zoltan, and all the kikocats are all shouting what you are shouting: that "The Archbishop transferred the property..." 

We'll get to the reason he transferred the property that you state in a minute. But let's begin with this. YOU, Robert John, state publicly for all to see, exactly what the man you are trying to defend is desperate to deny: that he, Archbishop Anthony S. Apuron, "transferred the property.

So thanks for backing up my claim, which is not only echoed by the CCOG, the Laity Forward Movement, etc., and of course proven in a 40 plus page Legal Opinion, and further demonstrated by Mr. Klitzie, but is now publicly echoed by you - though your "echo" of course is simply that of Pius and the Kikos. But anyway, welcome to our side

Now, let's get to the second part of your claim: "to prevent its sale.

This is the lie that Pius started when we discovered the 2011 document conveying title to RMS. Pius isn't as stupid as Apuron, David and Adrian. He didn't deny it. He immediately gave a reason for it. It was a lie, but then that's Pius. His life is a lie, which is why he has found a home in the neocatechumenal way, but we'll deal with that another time. 

But let's accept Pius' lie on its face. In fact, it's actually partly true. In fact, the partly true part is even more fascinating and clandestinely evil than the lie part. Let's deal with the lie part first. 

The "lie" part

Pius wanted kiko-ites like yourself to believe that Richard Untalan and Msgr. James wanted to sell the property. The problem is they had no authority to do so. Had they tried, they would have been easily caught and thrown in jail. But Pius relied on your ignorance to get you to think that. He relies on ignorance a lot, you know. But we'll deal with that another time. 

Mr. Untalan and Msgr. James had no authority to sell the property because they are not the owners. There is only one owner, and it is not really the Archbishop, it is Archbishop, Inc. Let me explain. 

There is a legal construct used almost exclusively by hierarchical churches like ours called a corporate or corporation sole. Unlike many non-Catholic churches which are non-profit organizations run by boards who hire and fire their pastors, the Catholic Church is run by bishops who are themselves appointed by bishops. Thus, the bishop, or more precisely, his office, is the legal entity, which under civil law, can own property. 

Thus, our local church, under Guam law is a "corporation sole" - a legal entity consisting of a single ("sole") incorporated office, occupied by a single ("sole") natural person.

Here's a fuller definition:

  • Public office...or ecclesiastical office (usually the owner of church land) that has a separate and continuing legal existence, and only one member (the sole officeholder). Contract made with a corporation-sole continues from one officeholder to his or her successor or, if made during a vacancy in office, to the appointee.

Now, the full legal name for this corporation sole is Archbishop of Agana, A Corporation Sole, Anthony S. Apuron, Incumbent.

Unlike regular corporations, a corporation sole has NO Board of Directors that can act independently of its incorporator(s).  Only the Incumbent occupant of the office "Archbishop of Agana" can sell, transfer, convey, grant property registered to the Archbishop of Agana, because ONLY the Archbishop of Agana is the Owner. 

This means that no finance council, no priest, no real estate group, no anybody could have ever sold or given away that property, ONLY the Archbishop of Agana. Got it? Good. Let's go on. 

Oh, one other thing. The fact that the Archbishop of Agana has transferred the property to a new owner, RMS, (remember, this is your claim too), ironically, the property is now in danger of being sold and the Archbishop of Agana can do nothing about it. 

Corporate structure of RMS

This is because RMS, under Guam law, is a separate legal entity (or juridic person in "church speak"). It is a corporation with a board of directors, authorized by Guam law to act independently of its incorporator, which is the Archbishop. 

The most the Archbishop can do as the sole incorporator or member, is replace members of the board. But per its by-laws, replacing members of the board is a process which takes noticing and a minimum number of days, days during which any current board could authorize the sale of the property. The Archbishop is also a member of the board. But despite his being its chairman, he is only one vote of however many directors there happen to be. (Currently there are five.)

By the way, there is also a clandestinely inserted second board, a Board of Guarantors, which truly controls RMS and makes the board of directors irrelevant. It's an illegal board. But apparently it slipped by the licensing people at Rev and Tax and thus remains quasi legal until its existence is challenged in court. And it will be. But we'll get to that another time. 

The "true" part

Okay, so we have established that Pius got you to believe the lie that the property was transferred to prevent its sale by the "evil" finance council. But here's what Pius was really referring to. And here's where the pure evil of those who run the Neocatechumenal Way is made manifest.

Recall that the owner of real property is the current Incumbent of the office of the Archbishop of Agana. Anthony S. Apuron is only the Incumbent, and, due to new rule requiring bishops to submit their resignations at age 75, he is not going to be the Incumbent for very much longer. 

The Gennarini's and their cadre of neocat lawyers cleverly planned for this by quietly inserting the clandestinely created and empowered Board of Guarantors into the corporate docs of RMS. It's creation did not get past Ed Terlaje, then the legal counsel for the Archbishop. According to one person who was at the meeting about this, Mr. Terlaje protested but he was shouted down, in the Archbishop's presence, by Giuseppe Gennarini. 

It is particularly pathetic to note that Mr. Terlaje had given decades of his service to the Archbishop, probably mostly pro bono, and was not only abandoned by Apuron, but Apuron permitted his "friend" of three decades to be verbally assaulted, humiliated, and abused by Giuseppe Gennarini. Let that be a lesson to anyone who thinks they are a "friend" of Anthony S. Apuron. 

Officially, the RMS incorporation docs give complete authority over RMS to the Board of Guarantors. And the Board of Guarantors must always include the "neocatechumenal responsible team for the United States." Currently this is Giuseppe Gennarini, his wife, Claudia Gennarini, the Kiko-priest, Angelo Poschetti (all residents of New Jersey) and one Anthony S. Apuron, personally, NOT the office of the Archbishop of Agana. 

For a full explanation of the powers of this unelected, un-removable, and unaccountable board, read the Legal Opinion of Attorney Jacques Bronze

Are you following so far, Robert? I hope so. Now, let's get back to why Pius REALLY said "to prevent its sale." 

The "next" bishop

Pius knew that neither the finance council nor anyone else could ever sell that property. But there is one person besides Apuron who COULD sell it. Are you ready for this, Robert? THE NEXT BISHOP. 

Remember now, the Archbishop of Agana is an office, and the owner of Archdiocesan property is whoever is the Incumbent. The Gennarini's wanted "insurance" that their power and money grabbing syndicate masquerading as a religious movement would continue after Apuron. Thus, they had Apuron secretly deed the property to RMS - which they controlled - so that, should the next bishop not be friendly to the NCW, they could use their ownership of the property as leverage against him. 

This is why the deed was not called a deed, but just a "Declaration of Deed Restriction." And like the pathetically "trained" (her words) lawyer, Jacqueline T. Terlaje personally opined, one was not supposed to look past the name of the document. LOL. Of course she did not want anyone to look past the name. That was the Gennarini's intent.

The name of the document was designed specifically to mislead the reader from the outset. Because once one looked past the apparently benign name of the document, one encounters legal language which recognizes RMS as 1) a corporation separate from the Archdiocese of Agana, 2) a "See", a church jurisdiction separate from the Archdiocese of Agana, and 3) the words "sell, transfer, and convey" which moved title to the property from the Office of the Archbishop of Agana to RMS and to the control of the Gennarini's. 

We weren't supposed to find the document

The problem was, that we weren't supposed to find the document. It was cleverly hidden by its clever name. Thus Land Management did not treat it as a conveyance, permitting the title holder to remain Archbishop Apuron in name. The document was designed to be produced upon the ascendancy of the next bishop who was not the planned for David or The Adrian, or not friendly to the kiko's. A sort of "Surprise!"

But the surprise was on them. Apuron's hostilities towards Fr. Paul and Msgr. James led to my digging. Something just smelled bad about the whole deal. And well, what do you know. There it was. Fr. Paul and Msgr. James were gotten rid of to make room for either David or Adrian as Apuron's successors, but just in case, the Gennarini's held title to the Archdiocese's most valuable piece of property as insurance against the next bishop. 

So you see, Robert. You are absolutely right. Archbishop Apuron DID "transfer the property to prevent it from being sold," from being sold by his successor who might happen to believe that the neocats did not need a SEVENTY MILLION DOLLAR seaside palace to themselves. 

It gets "better!"

But now we get to the really good part. Why do the neocats need a SEVENTY MILLION DOLLAR seaside palace even NOW? 

They don't. A much more efficient seminary in more humble surroundings could easily be constructed, fitted, and staffed at a fraction of that amount: a true seminary with real professors, permanent professors, real degrees, real priests - all of that could be possible for a fraction of not only what the Yona property is worth, but with the balance an endowment could have been set up for years to come to take care of all of its needs instead of having to rely on the Archbishop's annual fleecing of the poor Catholics of the Archdiocese of Agana. 

The Gennarini's knew that, but they did not want a seminary. They wanted the property. And they got it. And even more cleverly, they constructed the language of the Declaration to not only give them the property but give them the ability to do anything they want with it. 

You see, the language of the Declaration only declared that the property is for the perpetual use of a corporation currently named Redemptoris Mater Seminary. It does not state "for perpetual use as a seminary." Legally, the name of the corporation implies no specific task. And as an independent corporation it can change its name anytime it wants to. 

And while you sit and salivate over the warped idea inserted into your head by Pius the Yellow Tooth that I or someone else is after a sales commission (LOL), plans are already being made by your side to convert the property back into a hotel to create millions of dollars in revenue for its new owners. 

Now, there is one more thing, Robert, one more thing. The Gennarini's chose to act in 2011. Think about it. Apuron did not have to retire for another ten years. What was the rush in 2011? Apuron's story was that he was having heart health issues. But the real reason was another issue. And I have a signed affidavit from someone who knows the really ugly underbelly of all of this. And it is many times SICKER than anything anyone has yet seen on this blog. 

Apuron knows what it is. So does David. So does Adrian. But I'm going to let the story break on its own first...or maybe not. I'll see. People can only handle so much trash, and I've exposed enough this time around. 

So to your proposal. Well, according to today's editorial in the PDN and yesterday's promise by the Attorney General to "follow up" on this, it looks like it is going to happen. But don't expect Apuron to appear in court. He'll be long gone. Why not help him pack?



  1. If I was to step up and be the Benefactor making it possible for Archbishop Apuron to purchase this piece of property for the intention of all good for our local Church, though unknowing the outcome would create a huge disaster as it is now, I wouldn't even get myself involved in this deal. Now, many unimportant people has so much to say about the property ignoring the stipulations already made clear at the beginning by the Benefactor. What is all this mess and so many people involved, even the court system. I do hope that the True Benefactor of this piece of property is at peace and has moved on with his/her own life. Also, TO THE TRUE BENEFACTOR: I SAY, SI YU'OS MA'ASE FOR ALL YOUR CARE and HELP, AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU ABUNDANTLY!

  2. The Dungbat now gloats about missionaries from Spain going on mission to Japan.... I thought the Diocese of Japan has suspended the illicit activities of this cult...Wake up call to all; no matter how hard you try...these NEO Cult Zombies will keep coming back...

    Wednesday, March 23, 2016
    Family from Spain leaves everything to go as missionaries to Japan

    Diana at 11:31 PM

    No comments:
    Post a Comment

    1. Each individual has the authority to invite or disinvite. However, the myth that they "leave all" is a joke. They are better taken care of by their communities than if they did what they were supposed to do and raise their own families.

    2. Glad to be Back to Holy Mother ChurchMarch 24, 2016 at 1:20 PM

      Very true Tim. We have about 5-6 missionary families here on Guam. They live very comfortable lives. As far as mission, it seems they spend most of their time teaching at UOG, at the seminary, cook for the seminarians, do accounting work like Diana at RMS, do maintenance work, etc. And don't forget the travel perks that comes with being impoverished like the NCWs. Mostly secular callings if you ask me. And the Archbishop makes sure their kids go to catholic schools for free while he ignores the needs of local families who wanted the same for their kids. Rather disgusting when you know the dirty secrets.

    3. From the video; they are a family with six children...on mission to be pampered for sure for sure...

    4. Vicente A - BarrigadaMarch 24, 2016 at 1:52 PM

      My grandchildren wanted to go to San Vicente and my daughter was told by the school there wasn't any money for scholarships. My daughter paid one tuition, and my wife and I paid the balance. But then she found out there were 3 or 4 children from an Italian family who had their entire tuition waived because they were here on Mission. Why couldn't the mission family send their kids to public schools and leave tuition for local kids who can eventually give back to the community?
      I was very upset, but was told it came from the Archbishop, so no one dared to question it, including myself. Shame on me.
      NO, shame on the Archbishop!

    5. Janet B - MangilaoMarch 24, 2016 at 2:00 PM

      Correction Tim. You say "They are better taken care of by their communities." But from what Glad shared, it sounds like they are better taken care of at the expense of OUR Community. It sounds like regular Catholics are denied so foreign "missionaries" can receive more. I'm all for hospitality, but our bishop should treat us all the same, he is supposed to be the shepherd for us all, not a select few.

      That favoritism is what has so many people so upset. Tony panders to a small group of 500-600 cultists, but he totally ignores the rest of us and our needs and desires. 144,400 people are nothing, he only caters to the 600. I am filled with disgust!

    6. Janet B - MangilaoMarch 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM

      Thanks Diana for encouraging people to "Share". I hope many more people will share so we can see how corrupt this kiko cult really is!

    7. Vicente A., remember that that they are missionaries and are allowed to do work for and around the school in exchange for tuition fee. As parishioners we allowed our children to do happy labor for the school but as parents we still paid our tuition. No freebies for us.

      this says it all: I don't give to the appeal because I need every penny to pay for tuition, uniforms, lunch, snack, and other fundraising efforts that is associated with giving my children the best Catholic education ever.

      If you don't understand, San Vicente is The ONLY school that falls under the category of a PARISH SCHOOL, under the rule of the one and only Adrian Cristobal. On the other hand, is there a PTO at the school? Why don't you ask Danny Quichocho to open the books for transparency. You may be surprised to know what is in the books!

    8. I hear there is an upcoming $100-a-ticket fundraiser for San Vicente School in the summer and effort is being made to have alumni purchase tables. It sure would be nice to see my classmates once again but if this is how my money would be spent....gosh, I don't think so. This "parish school" and its leadership have been one BIG DISAPPOINTMENT.

    9. Remember prior to the start of the school year; everyone had to re-apply for their jobs....This is no longer a Catholic Parochial School....It is a NEO Cult School. The process begins with brain washing your children with their illicit ways of worship. I take it that the fundraiser is to pay for shortages due to the this NEO CULT Missionaries children receiving free tuition and books.

  3. Janet B - MangilaoMarch 24, 2016 at 1:01 PM

    Tim -

    I refuse to go to the Chrism mass to hear the hypocrisy spewing from tony's mouth. But a friend of mine goes every year to bring up her parish oils. What she commented to me this morning is interesting.

    She was shocked by the number of seminarians at the mass. She said she counted 34 that marched in and out of the Cathedral. I told her there were actually about 45 seminarians and she didn't believe me, but I assured her it was true. Her next question is a question all Catholics need to ask our kiko-bishop.

    Why does the bishop have so many seminarians for our diocese? Good question!

    Local vocations are a good sign of a healthy church. But we have all seen how vocations are suffering here on Guam. That's not to say we don't have them. We have some great new priests like Fr Richard Kidd and Fr Paul Gofigan. But they were presented with great challenges on their path to the priesthood by the eventual father, our tony. But praise God they persisted.

    We have men like Aaron Quitugua who have been refused by Adrian the joker because he did not want to become a kiko presbyter. He had a strong desire to become a real priest. So Adrian and tony do what they do best when someone wants to follow a non-kiko path - they lied! They told Aaron they couldn't afford to send him to a real seminary so he could become a real priest. But if he wanted to be a fake presbyter, they had a place for him in Yona. But Aaron wanted to follow the right path, so he actually found people to support his $120,000 price tag to go to a real seminary. All he needed was a letter of support from tony and he would be halfway to real priesthood by today. But tony showed his lie about financial reasons, and refused to write a simple letter of sponsorship.

    I understand that other men have similarly been refused their calling because they didn't walk in a kiko community.

    But God has allowed for us to have vocations on Guam, and not even tony can completely halt the Father's plans. The Capuchins have quite a few young men working hard to become real priests. We need to pray for them, to persevere.

    But back to the 45 seminarians at Yona. Almost all of them are not local vocations, they are imports from far off lands. So why does tony continue to place such a huge financial strain on our island with 45 seminarians? Will they stay on Guam after their fake ordination? We see the results from history. The rotten apples are quickly shipped off island to infest some other area. Harold, Miguel, Edwin, Pedro, Wadeson, Luis Camacho, etc. Some good ones also go off island because kiko wants them elsewhere. Some stay on Guam because tony wants kiko presbyters in every parish, so we will all be confronted with their heretical teachings and indoctrination.

    After we spoke about how messed up our diocese is, and after she understood why we have so many seminarians who will never serve the people of Guam, she was furious. She finally agreed with me that we need to stop all the money.

    I only hope that others at the mass last night will begin to see the truth and act accordingly!

    1. I wonder how those foreign seminarians in the RMS were able to have their visas expedited. Won't be a surprise if the Neo connections made it possible for them. What is brother Tony's cut, oops I mean fee, to have them come to Guam? For sure for sure Tony is getting something in return.

  4. Timmy,Timmy,Timmy, Timmy NO Casino, get a real J O B ....

    1. Rude-ee. Pants on. Go outside.

    2.'re nothing more than a punk!!!

    3. Rudee, i saw you hobble out of mass the other night and I wanted to kick the cane out from under you. I smiled at the thought. But in the spirit of Lent and in the spirit of following the example of Jesus Christ, i prayed for you instead. You took priestly vows, yet your words and actions, don't reflect them. It's not too late to change your ways and live your vows. Otherwise, you'll need more than just my prayers in the 'special' place you'll be headed when you leave this earth.

  5. May be His disgrace did not suffer heart complaint when he told us he was in hospital. May be he was away for another reason?

  6. May be His disgrace did not suffer heart complaint when he told us he was in hospital. May be he was away for another reason?

  7. No. He had real heart problems. Only question left is does he still have a heart?
    If he did he would step down and truly help our diocese.

  8. I'm sure Robert John is intelligent enough to understand now that only the Archbishop (whoever he is) of the Archdiocese of Agana has the power to sell, transfer, convey, grant property of the Archdiocese of Agana. WHICH APURON DID with the Yona property by virtue of his Decree and Deed Restriction in November, 2011! Now the beneficiaries of his action HAVE THE
    POWER TO SELL, CONVEY, ETC. this same property. And, who benefits from such a sale? Four people, three of whom are in New Jersey and Apuron as an individual, not as Archbishop! So, if the property is sold for Forty Million dollars (a conservative estimate), Apuron, the individual, benefits by TEN MILLION DOLLARS! Not bad for a dishonest day's work, wouldn't you say? (And you thought he just gave it away for nothing!).

  9. AAA does not have a heart, nor a conscience. All he has is a predilection for young boys and teenagers. His past is now catching up to him. It's COMING>>>>


    1. Resign Archbishop Apuron.
      You are Guam's shameful dark history.
      Please write in your will to forgo burial in Agana Basilica.

    2. Ok anon @ 5:37 - you have the world's attention. Is this going to be another Louie camacho that goes no where or is this going to be his swan song?

    3. Depends whether the Vatican will attempt to cover up and do a Louie by "reassigning" him to do further damage. If that happens, the world will know why the Catholic Church has a hard time trusting Catholic leadership these days.

    4. Here's a clue: "Try me." It was the perp's fave. HE will know.

    5. Not surprisingly, the Archbishop continues to lie to the public without even flinching. It just rolls off his tongue so effortlessly. Surely, he has (in his mind) perfected the art. But he is so stupid!

      These lies are so transparent to anyone not under a kiko spell...which is about 99.92% of the Catholic world. Yet he still tries.

      Today's PDN has another article about the great land scam of Guam in this century. In it, the Archbishop apparently speaks out about his side of the long last! But rather than grant an interview to the PDN, all the Archbishop did was to give them a press release where he states that the Certificate of Title proves that he still owns the property. He won't give an interview because Gaynor is smart enough to ask about a certain clause in the secret "Declaration of Deed Restriction" which reads, "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      That clause seems pretty clear to me, so I might wonder what it means to the Archbishop. An interview could ask these tough questions, which is of course why he will never speak publicly about it, except through carefully crafted press releases. But we all know those are just fabricated lies.

      But everyone else other than the Archbishop and his trained monkey, I mean attorney, Jackie, should ask what the following sentence in the deed the Archbishop gave to the seminary corporation:

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

    6. Archbishop Caught in Another LieMarch 25, 2016 at 12:19 PM

      The Archbishop gave a secret deed document to the Gennarinis and the seminary corporation. In it he says: "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

      Do you think the Archbishop still owns it, or do you think it now belongs to the seminary corporation?

    7. The Dungbat bosts that the island has a surplus of priests and that they too are sent out on mission to evangelize...Evangelize where? Places like Guam where there is already Catholic Churhes...For sure for sure ....this cult uses the resources of the local Catholic Church and fails to be transparant on what they collect (money, land and valuable possessions from the vulnerable members).

      DianaMarch 22, 2016 at 9:54 AM
      Dear Anonymous at 8:13 am,

      As a result of the seminaries on Guam, we have more priests in our diocese that we can send some of them out to evangelize for the Universal Church. :-)

    8. The title shows Archbishop of Agana as the owner BUT it ends there as the Archbishop of Agana is no longer in control of the property. The fools on the hill think that they're being smart by playing around with words instead of admitting that a patrimony of ALL of Guam's Catholics is now out reach and no longer useful to us, the MAJORITY of Guam's Catholics.
      Yes, the Archdeceiver, Anthony Sablan Apuron, SOLD US OUT!! He now holds the distinction of being Guam's Judas.


    1. You are a crazy fool. Now if there is stupidity, this is stupidity of the highest caliber. Do you know you once you comment in this blog, you are in this blog? Do you have half a brain? That's all of us in this blog that you are wishing (TO) burn in H-E-L-L. Are you really wishing that on yourself too. You are one crazy stupid fool.

    2. LOL. Looks like you guys are getting to RUDE-EE. Keep it up. Oh, hey, Rud-ee, almost forgot. Give "Try me" a call.

    3. Oh! Poor Rudy!
      I guess he is loosing it a little.
      A good friend who specializes in the treatment of psychological dysfunction, related to sexual inadequacies, explained to me over lunch several months ago,that the use of Capital letters while typing more than one word, is usually indicative of a very strong self-loathing rooted in physical shortfall. I guess the Short one, might be more that we wanted to know on the subject.

  11. Comment by 2:26 PM sounds like a directive from Pius the Maltese. Not worth paying attention to, just a standard statement in defense of their nefarious cult. The kikobots are fear-laden with hell and damntion that they cannot think for themselves. This happens once one disrobes one's dignity in front of everyone else in an attempt to rid themselves of their sins.

  12. 2.26 pm. Those who comment on this blog contribute to saving the Church of Guam.
    You on the other hand are protecting a perp.
    Be happy he will escape the fate of John Geoghan.

  13. Neo-Free Guam (World)March 26, 2016 at 7:57 AM

    To All the neocats who have been bashing that Tim, is preaching to a few frustrated Laity "read the thousands of comments and weep" Your gig is over the heresy that your Cult is is now being spread throughout the universe. God Bless Tim Rohr.

  14. Other than validating once and for all that Tony and his minions lied about the true purpose of the deed restriction which was a roundabout way of executing a deed transfer, what is the end game? It seems that the civil law will uphold that as a corporation sole, answerable to nobody, Tony has the legal right to dispose of church property as he wishes so long as he currently occupies the office of the archbishop.

    Canonical law is internal to the Church and not binding in civil matters, if I understand these explanations correctly. If this is the case, what is to stop Tony from transferring more property to the NCW on his way out the door? For all we know, they are letting this issue with the honda property drag on as a smoke screen while he records more deed transfers that nobody is looking out for.

    But still, what is the end game? How or could we even do anything to legally void or reverse what Tony has already done?

    1. Guam law treats a corporation sole as a trust and the bishop as a trustee possibly giving standing to the beneficiaries to bring suit against the trustee. But this will need lawyers, the court, and money. I'm told the estimate is 100k to even start, but the CCOG is said to be nearly half way there. Spread the word and help them. STOP TONY.

    2. Plus Tony also violated canon law and a church case can be brought against both him and RMS, and thus the Gennarini's and even Kiko. LETS DO THIS.

  15. You say that the we need about $100K as a start for a lawsuit and we're halfway there. That's good. Perhaps we can have a count-up in this blog as the donations (anonymous, of course) come in (small is good, big is better).
    Also, the big donors to the RMS seminary of yesteryears who were hoodwinked by the Arch Deceiver may be willing to underwrite any shortfall that may occur (after all, CCOG is also a registered non-profit organization, and donations made out to it is a tax deduction, too).

    If ever there is a reason to pray to Blessed Diego San Luis San Vitores for his help, this may be it! He died bringing the Faith to us, we don't have to die to preserve it. Just have to donate.

  16. Please post instructions to donate. This mess infuriates me! Their roundabout responses and malarky only makes me more and more disgusted!

  17. Let's do the math. If we need $50K more to get a law suit started, that's only 1000 people donating $50 each. Or 500 people donating $100 each. Of course, there are some people who are in a position to give more, but you get my point.
    Personally, I used to give $20 to the collection every Sunday, but now no more.
    I will donate that amount to CCOG from now on to help fund this lawsuit.
    Note to credit card holders: You know you can give bigger amounts and you don't have to pay it off in one lump sum.
    Go to the CCOG website to pay with your card.
    "LET'S DO THIS."

  18. I was planning to give a few dollars to the Archdiocesan Annual Appeal to help out the few local seminarians that we have, but now instead I will give to the CCOG lawsuit fund. It isn't much, but I believe every little bit helps. As Tim says, "let's do this."

  19. I will post the information on how to donate to the CCOG on Monday as well as address the questions in the latest comments. Thanks.

  20. a friend of mine just told me he will donate $1000 lump sum to CCOG using his credit card which he will pay off @$100 a month until fully paid. I don't have that luxury so I will just give what I can when I can. For now, all I can give is $20.