AnonymousApril 3, 2016 at 6:55 AMBut the KAKA filled Dungbat claims that RMS is a Corporate Sole belonging to ArchNEO Cult Presbyter Anthony Sablan Apuron...
DianaApril 2, 2016 at 5:49 PM
Dear Anonymous at 11:25 am,
I said it was transferred to the same person. In other words, the owner transferred it to himself. I stated that RMS is a corporation sole, with the Archbishop as the only corporate sole. The transfer was from Archbishop Apuron, corporation sole of the Archdiocese of Agana to Archbishop Apuron, corporation sole of RMS. The owner is the same and has always been the same.
Okay. Let's say that this is true. It's not, but let's say it is. Let's say that "the owner transferred it to himself." Let's say that "RMS is a corporation sole." It isn't. But let's say it is. Then what is the legal name of the corporation sole?
Here is a copy of its most recent government-filed document.
The legal name of the corporation, as per the Government of Guam, is Redemptoris Mater Seminary, Arcdiocese of Agana.
However, the most recent version of the certificate of title says Archbishop of Agana:
The Archbishop of Agana is a corporation. Redemptoris Mater Seminary is a corporation. The Diana says they are both corporation soles. Fine. But as per government records, they have different legal names:
- The Archbishop of Agana, A Corporation Sole, Anthony S. Apuron, Incumbent
- Redemptoris Mater Seminary, Archdiocese of Agana
So, we will accept their premise that both are corporation soles and both are "subject to the same Ordinary" as Apuron says. Fine. BUT EACH HAS A SEPARATE LEGAL NAME and also separate government assigned identification numbers.
Legally, the certificate of title must show the title holder to be Redemptoris Mater Seminary, Archdiocese of Agana EVEN IF the corporation is still subject to Apuron.
This is extremely simple. Title to the property has been assigned to Redemptoris Mater Seminary, Archdiocese of Agana, and the latest version of the title DOES NOT reflect that. Thus the above Certificate of Title, the latest incarnation of it, IS WRONG.
This is why you should never trust Elizabeth Barrett-Anderson again. By concurring with a subordinate to bypass the section of Guam law specifically instituted to protect land titles from such errors, the WRONG corporation is now the title holder of a SEVENTY MILLION DOLLAR property.
It's not a problem for RMS, the real title holder, since the idea from the beginning was to camouflage the transaction.
But what about everyone else's titles? What if a conniving "trained" lawyer could convince more Elizabeth Barret Anderson's and Kristan Finney's to bypass 21 GCA 29195, instituted in Guam law for YOUR protection, and do other back room deals like this one?
Meanwhile, let's accept what The Diana says. Let's accept that both corporations are corporate soles and Apuron is the main guy in each one. Fine. But since the two "corporate soles" have different legal names, then let's at least get the title fixed. Don't you agree, Diana?