By Tim Rohr
I'm sure Apuron - wherever he is - would like to tell The Diana to "JUST SHUT UP" because she (if it's a she) is the only one keeping Apuron's name in play - giving us at JW something to talk about and to keep our millions of views going (which average 1/4 to 1/2 million per month).
In a Jan. 18, 2025 post, "Responding to Anonymous," The Diana attempts - once again - to declare Apuron innocent of child sex abuse charges, stating:
"The Vatican never specified the offense Apuron was found guilty of."
The Diana's argument is based on the nebulously worded Vatican verdict of March 16, 2018 which stated that the Vatican had found "the accused guilty of certain of the accusations."
The Diana and the Kiko-ites have hung on to this as proof that Apuron was not found guilty of sexually abusing minors:
"...the Vatcan press release never listed those "other accusations" nor did they specified (sic) what offenses they found him guilty of. As many canon lawyers pointed out, the offense could not be child sexual abuse because Apuron still retained his title as Bishop. Other bishops, such as Cardinal McCarrick, who was found guilty of child sexual abuse, were laicized."
This may have flown for awhile, but Apuron sunk himself when he appealed because the Vatican decision denying his appeal made it very clear what he was found guilty of:
P.S. Dear Diana. You're welcome.
Well-written and well-said, Tim. The truth will always prevail. And we will not forget how Apuron brought shame and scandal to our Archdiocese and our Faithful. The Neocatechumenal Way in Guam and the CNMI better find another Diocese to hoodwink about how "they have been approved by the Pope." CCOG will not rest till they leave Guam and the Northern Marianas.
ReplyDeleteDiana's point still remains in the fact that Apuron "sacramentally remains a bishop." Can't she see that this is the case because of his "lapdog" association with the heretical Neocats at the top, the same sect she only continues to defend? How stubborn.
ReplyDeleteYes. Her associating what happened to McCarrick v what happened to Apuron as evidence of anything is typical Diana. However, the Vatican made it clear in the ruling on the appeal. But true, Apuron is probably still only a bishop because of his kiko connections in the Vatican since the kikos are putting him to good use I'm sure. Bottom line though is that McCarrick was high profile, so the pope had to do something once he was cornered. Apuron was a nobody.
Delete