Friday, May 9, 2014

DID YOU CHECK WITH YOUR CATECHIST?

Seriously "Diana", did you check with your catechist before you posted this? I guess now we know that you really are just an ordinary "walker". Archbishop, do you actually allow this????



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "AND HE IS ULTIMATELY CULPABLE":
Interesting comment by Diana.. Please note last paragraph...WE ARE TOLD..... 
In the Neocatechumenal Way, the members receive the Body of Christ by hand standing up. After receiving the Body of Christ by hand standing up, we sit down still holding the Body of Christ. We do not consume the Body of Christ because the priest did not receive Holy Communion yet.  
For those who do not believe what I just stated above or do not find my statement above credible, you are always welcome to go to the Eucharist of the Way this Saturday and see for yourself.  
At any rate, we do not consume the Body of Christ immediately because the priest did not receive Holy Communion yet. Before consuming the Body of Christ, the priest proceeds to say "Behold the Body of Christ........" Then the members say, "Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof....." Then, we consume the Body of Christ together after the priest receives Holy Communion. And we consume the Body of Christ, sitting down. 
If your next question is 'why we consume the Body of Christ sitting down, ' the answer is because we are told to do so by the Team Catechists. The members are obedient to the Team Catechists who is in communion with Kiko Arguello who is in communion with the Pope. According to the Team Catechists, these instructions came from Kiko who in turn received the same instructions from the Pope. 

9 comments:

  1. Every thing that the NCW does seems to be oral instruction from Kiko. Where is the documented proof?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope that one day the documented is presented to the public. However, I doubt this very much. Why? Although, the statutes of the neocatechumenal way have been approved, what is alarming is that everything preached and practiced is not what is in the statutes. I surely believe the Pope will not approved such liturgical nonconformities the neos are doing at the celebrations at all. The movement have been warned many times to OBEY and yet are told what to do by a team of catechist. The team of catechist are the "Kikos" . Everything is done outside of the statutes. This is scary part of it all. There are alot of uncertainties regarding the methodology and practices of the neo way. Yes, everything seems to be dialogue of oral instruction nothing more. You don't even hear a word of the catechism of the catholic church. Wow!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hope that one day the documented is presented to the public. However, I doubt this very much. Why? Although, the statutes of the neocatechumenal way have been approved, what is alarming is that everything preached and practiced is not what is in the statutes. I surely believe the Pope will not approved such liturgical nonconformities the neos are doing at the celebrations at all. The movement have been warned many times to OBEY and yet are told what to do by a team of catechist. The team of catechist are the "Kikos" . Everything is done outside of the statutes. This is scary part of it all. There are alot of uncertainties regarding the methodology and practices of the neo way. Yes, everything seems to be dialogue of oral instruction nothing more. You don't even hear a word of the catechism of the catholic church. Wow!

    ReplyDelete
  4. When Rome came down on the NCW to conform, the communities in Guam were told by the Kikos of the change and began to comply. Inexplicably, about a month later, Neo priests including the archbishop started reverting to the original and nonconforming practice. The word was that Kiko said to go ahead because he was working on changing the Pope's mind. Yup, that is what happened. Despite the fact that Rome held fast, the NCW disobeyed anyway. How do I know? I was there when the NCW members including the priests were talking about it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. this is classic marxist infiltration of the Bride of Christ.
    ( read: AA-1025:The Diary of an Anti-Apostle - by Marie Carre
    http://www.afterthewarning.com/webpages/ReligiousReading/IniquityUnveiled/AA1025.aspx )

    Dear "Diana", the Holy Father has not changed the statutes of the Catechism of the Catholic Church as regards the proper reception of the Eucharist. these are Kiko's LIES passed along by 'useful idiots' ie. "people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they are not fully aware of, and who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause."

    Dear "Diana", THIS is how the rest of us 'judases' are receiving: "To receive Communion in the hand, open your hands until they are nearly flat with one hand underneath the other and raise your hands until they are at chest level. Respond "Amen!" to the "Body of Christ." The Communion minister will then place the host on the palm of your hand (do not take it). Step to the side and place the host in your mouth in view of the minister." http://www.stdominicparish.com/receiving_holy_communion.htm

    ~ 1395 "The Eucharist is properly the sacrament of those who are in full communion with the Church."
    ~ 1411 "Only validly ordained priests can preside at the Eucharist and consecrate the bread and the wine so that they become the Body and Blood of the Lord." (read AA-1025 )
    http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c1a3.htm

    ~ 45. "Cf. EM, no. 31 (DOL 179, no. 1260): "The faithful share more fully in the celebration of the eucharist through sacramental communion. It is strongly recommended that they should receive it as a rule in the Mass itself and at that point in the celebration which is prescribed by the rite, that is, right after the communion of the Priest celebrant. "In order that the communion may stand out more clearly even through signs as a participation in the sacrifice actually being celebrated, steps should be taken that enable the faithful to receive hosts consecrated at that Mass." "
    http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/norms-for-holy-communion-under-both-kinds/#footnote-26299-38

    ReplyDelete
  6. & THIS!!! ( Tim, this is an astonishing article! Please pray for us.
    regards, the little brother )

    "And Father Jabarek writes on his blog what many of us priests already know about Communion in the hand, that it is so easy for people to walk off with the Host to do God only knows what with the Precious Body and Blood of our Lord. We have found hosts on the floor, in missalettes and have had to chase people down walking out with the Host. We've seen parents break off a bit of the Host and give it to young children clamoring for it. In my previous parish a follower of Satan took the Host and immediately ran out of the church with it. I can assure you when Communion on the tongue and at an altar railing was the only method of distributing Holy Communion prior to Vatican II that what I have reported and have actually seen with Communion in the Hand seldom if ever happened."

    http://southernorderspage.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-smoke-of-satan-is-becoming-raging.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Kiko who in turn received the same instructions from the Pope."
    Really?! when did he tell him this, right after he told him to conform to the liturgical books?
    If you are referring to Pope Francis, did he tell him right after he told him that unity in the church is more important than your kikoism's?
    Stop it already!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Call Vatican then speculate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Mr. Rohr,

    After reading Diana's blog, she definitely stands behind His Excellency Archbishop Anthony Apuron,D.D. Her comments about this blog shows that people who voice their opinions have no respect for the Archbishop.

    My question is, did his Excellency Archbishop Anthony Apuron have any respect for Cardinal Arnize, when on the catholic radio channel, states, "what are his credentials" referring to His Eminence Cardinal Arnize's letter back then? Is this the example of a Man of the Cloth?

    Maybe it was through this example that we are the way we are...What are the credentials of the Team Catechist? What are the credentials of the responsible? But most importantly, what the credentials of His Excellency Archbishop Anthony Apuron? Are his credentials much higher than those of a Cardinal?

    Just by hearing this on a audio recording you provided, I am imagining his facial expression at this very moment. I see a man with a cynical smile on his face! A man who has a SMH attitude with eyes rolling. A man who says, I am the head of the church in Guam, don't tell me what to do!

    Thank you,

    An eighth grader

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch