Diana |
Here's a copy of something from Diana's blog that I would like to ask you to read very carefully and to remember what is said here. You will know why I am asking you to do this in a little while. Never mind the comparison of the Archbishop's silence to the silence of Jesus and even Padre Pio. That is so asinine it is not worth a comment. Read the rest...and check back later today. [I added some notes in red.]
Anonymous June 6, 2014 at 11:11 AMOkay just in today on Princess Di's page! So what is it...invited or not invited?
Diana June 6, 2014 at 10:24 AM
Dear Anonymous at 9:42 a.m.,
Jesus practiced being silent against his accusers, and that is what the Archbishop is following. Padre Pio did the same thing. When the other side is already making accusations, it is a sign that they are not willing to listen at all.
As an example, just look at what happened recently in Junglewatch. Someone copied and pasted my response to an anonymous poster and gave it to Tim Rohr. All I said is that Kiko was invited to the Phiilippines by the Cardinal. After the Philippines, he will be going to Japan. He was also invited by the Japanese bishops. After that, Tim Rohr was up in arms calling the Archbishop and/or the Team Catechists a liar. He has demanded a retraction in the Umatuna after the article written by Jennifer Dulla was taken out. And he was also demanding that the Archbishop apologize because a cardinal's name was used.[Tim: So Diana, if it was true Kiko was invited to the Philippines by Cardinal Tagle, why would Jennifer Dulla's article have to be "taken out"?]
Afterwards, he published the Pinoy Catholic website on to his blogsite because they also copied and pasted my response on their website. However, it's apparent that Tim Rohr did not read the entire post on Pinoy Catholic because this is what it stated:[Tim: I did read the whole post and I understood what the Pinoy Catholic was insinuating about the Chancellor. I also understood how they might do that since they don't have the whole story - AND I DO.]
"They claim that it was Cardinal Tagle who invited them to come to Manila! But THE CHANCELLOR who is into Mass ad-lib says the Cardinal DID invite the Loony-cats. Is Fr. Sescon also ad-libing this?"
http://thepinoycatholic.blogspot.com/2014/06/breaking-news-loony-cats-to-evangelize.html
In other words, the Pinoy Catholic website only VERIFIED what I stated.....that the Cardinal DID invite Kiko. When an anonymous poster (who actually read the website) pointed that out to Tim, he stated this in his comment to Mary Lou:
"Actually at this point, we have more inside information than the Pinoy Catholic. The PC is critical in general of priests who "ad-lib" the Mass (as well we all should be), so it appears the blog used the scandal to take a parting shot at the Chancellor. In any event, the Chancellor could make no invitation to another diocese (ours) on his own. Such an invitation would have to come from the Ordinary (Cardinal Tagle). It did not."
http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/06/look-diana-youre-famous.html
In other words, what Tim is saying is that he has more INSIDE information about their cardinal in the Philippines than the Pinoys (Filipinos) who actually live in their own country. Clearly, this does not sound like a man who is willing to listen. The rest of his followers are the same.[Tim: No, it sounds like a man who actually has the FACTS...as I always do, don't I!]
AnonymousJune 6, 2014 at 10:32 AM[Tim: I am NEVER "careless". See you in a few hours.]
Ha! Pinoy Catholic just copy and paste. Tim Rohr is carelessly looking for a flaw. I hope the guy don't get a stroke swinging at the air. His audience don't realize little by little he is punking out.
time to publish the letter that everyone's been passing around. diana must not have seen it.
ReplyDeleteThis was an error in my grammar and I wish to apologize. I have now edited the article to:
ReplyDelete"They claim that it was Cardinal Tagle who invited them to come to Manila! THIS IS A BIG, FAT LIE!
But they insist on this lie and even use THE CHANCELLOR who is into Mass ad-lib. According to the big, fat liars, Fr. Sescon confirmed that the Cardinal DID invite the Loony-cats. Is Fr. Sescon also ad-libing this? Becuse there IS proof against this."
This is in keeping with the general theme of the post. The FACT remains. The Cardinal did not invite Kiko or anybody from this cult.
The Cardinal IS expected to show up later. Their shindig starts at 3 in the afternoon local time. But that does not mean that he invited the group. No, no, no.
Read the other articles on this cult and more at thepinoycatholic.blogspot.com
So Cardinal Tagle shows up, pictures taken, then used for their propaganda! Later they will say "see the Cardinal DID invite us!"
DeleteJust a thought here Joe, is his Eminence Vardinal Tagle going to entertain these KIKONIANS, KIKOMORROS, KIKORONs late this evening?
DeleteI am sure that a picture of these ?????? With his Eminence will certainly spark the attention of millions of Filipinos and also we will see it on the front page of the Umatuna Si Yu'us!
The great big color foto like the one of Fr. Egivaldo preaching about fruits. Gigantic front page picture.
DeleteIf Fr Edivaldo was talking about fruits, cover your daughters ears, lest he repeat his "boys will suck all the juice out of girls, and when they are dry the boys will spit them out" talk. Lord have mercy on our poor youth!
DeleteTo Joe Yang:
ReplyDeleteYour article is also confusing.
Where is your proof that the Chancellor of Manila confirmed the claims (lies) of the "Loony-cats" that the Cardinal invited Kiko?
You even started with "BUT" and then proceed with "DID", as Mary Lou pointed out:
I'm a little bit confused. According to The Pinoy Catholic: "They claim that it was Cardinal Tagle who invited them to come to Manila! But THE CHANCELLOR who is into Mass ad-lib says the Cardinal DID invite the Loony-cats. Is Fr. Sescon also ad-libing this?"
Even though the second sentence starts with the word "But" the rest of the statement verifies what "Diana" says, that "THE CHANCELLOR who is into Mass ad-lib says the Cardinal DID invite the Loony-cats." (Grammatically, it should have been "DID NOT")
You just pasted Diana's post that claims the Cardinal and Japanese bishops invited Kiko.
Tim says otherwise and claims more information.
I really hope this issue of invite/non-invite gets clearer today.
Let the truth prevail!
As I said, I have more information than does the Pinoy Catholic. Don't bother answering, Joe. I'll take care of it in a few hours. Peace.
DeleteJoy
DeleteAnon 12:59,
DeleteJoe states in his correction above, that "According to the big, fat liars, Fr. Sescon confirmed that the Cardinal DID invite the Loony-cats." He stresses that the information is coming from the loony-cats, and that there is information to prove otherwise. He was trying to clarify what he meant to say on his initial post on his blog.
So Diana's use of his initial comment as proof is worthless!
*Wonders if the BIG REVEAL is going to be worth waiting around for a few more hours*
ReplyDeleteThe big reveal is that we need to clean up the archdiocese and restore dignity and integrity.
ReplyDeleteGuam is a divided catholic community and it needs to be healed.