Thursday, July 24, 2014

APURON'S BEHAVIOR IS DANGEROUS - SNAP

Guam- Abuse victims blast priest & archbishop

For immediate release: Wednesday, July 23, 2014
For more information: Joelle Casteix of Newport Beach, 949-322-7434 cell, jcasteix@gmail.com, David Clohessy of St. Louis, SNAP Director (314) 566-9790 cell, SNAPclohessy@aol.com
Abuse victims blast priest & archbishop
Twice-accused cleric lived in Guam for years
SNAP: Archbishop knew about abuse but did nothing 
Now exposed, child molesting cleric heads to Bay Area
Read more

4 comments:

  1. Apuron dangerous snap.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tony apuron you see what happens after you remove father Paul from our dededo parish church I believe the saying what goes around comes around but pay back will come back 10 times and look what's happening to u now lmao it takes one bad apple to start up something you should be happy all eyes are on you but you should be ashamed be caused it's about accepting an abuser yes they are 2 sides to a story and yes your innocent until proven guilty but what you did to father Paul is not justified and wrong he remove the person that did wrong but everybody makes mistake it's a life learn lesson and I thought as catholic not to judge but to forgive I know you are such a selfcentered person bcuz you don't practice what you preach so do the right thing,,,,but then again it's up to you because your the man and you know it all I am so glad I'm not related to you because you have bring shame to our island and to the people of Guam ,,,,sad sad sad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree with you except for one thing. Fr. Paul did nothing wrong. He was removed for acting like the Father in the Prodigal son story. The person they used as a pretext for Fr. Paul's removal, has done his time. Has obviously repented for his sin. Put order into his life by marrying his loved one in church. He was forgiven by society. And yet, our archbishop needing a fall guy, used this person. Humiliated him, his wife and his two children. It was a malicious act that the Archbishop did. After a year, this should be as clear as daylight. Fr. Paul was removed for doing nothing wrong. Or maybe, done one thing wrong. If it is wrong to ask the Neo to have their masses at Santa Barbara church/chapel and post the time of their masses, then Fr. Paul is guilty of wrong doing. Time to bring back Fr. Paul.

      Delete
    2. Come to think of it. The Neo actually wants to be in Santa Barbara. They would gladly acceded to Fr. Paul' s first request. Not just have mass in the chapel. But gladly have it in the church. It is beautifully set up for them. The altar is in the center.

      Alas, they couldn't accede to the second request. Publish the time of their masses. I can't understand why. The archbishop said we should allow the weed to grow with the wheats. How come they can't stand us weeds?

      Delete

Recommendations by JungleWatch