Thursday, August 7, 2014

ON THE FRONT PAGE THIS MORNING

Archbishop 'absolutely wrong'

http://www.guampdn.com/article/20140807/NEWS01/308070001/Archbishop-absolutely-wrong-


Church shakeup ‘just the beginning’

http://mvguam.com/local/news/36335-church-shakeup-just-the-beginning.html#.U-KFzICSxOQ

12 comments:

  1. Fr.Matthew Blockley.August 7, 2014 at 12:23 PM


    God Bless the people of Guam for you are truly the Heart of the Spiritual Revolution that will return truth justice and integrity .

    ReplyDelete
  2. too bad-so disappointing

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where is the archbishop, Quitugua, Kim, Cristobal, Diana and the rest of the neocrats. Why are they not defending the charges they levied against Msgr Benavente? Are they caught in their lies.
    It is hard to hide the truth. Tell Kim to stop doctoring up the books and making false charges. Where did he get his accounting degree? From North Korea? They lie about everything there and they persecute then execute those who do not OBEY their WAYs. This part of their accounting curriculum. Is this the regime that the arch is implementing? If so, he hired the best of North Korea. So who is next on the chopping block or the guillotine?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yes!!! It looks like they are employing the tactics of North Korean president Kim Il-sung: file false charges against the opposition then eliminate them.

      Delete
  4. For those who are berating the Archbishop after the revelation of these financial experts, he will all prove your wrong. Just give him time. Remember, it took him 2 years to gather information on Fr. Paul. At least give him time to rebutt the rebuttal point by point. This is only Day 1.
    I wish tomorrow, or the next day, or the day after, the Archbishop would have answered all your doubts. Alas, I am just daydreaming. He has to pray that we all lose our memory today so that tomorrow he can say just about anything and we will not know any better. I am sorry. From where I am looking, it's impossible for him to extricate himself out of this hole. If he didn't take advantage of the opportunity to reconcile with Fr. Paul (the one that was brokered by Pale Mike) and granted whatever concessions Fr. Paul asked, it is imperative now that he follows the advice of Mr. Joe Rivera to admit that he made a mistake and ask for forgiveness. If he is unforgiving to a person who had suffered in jail for his crime, we will do better. We will forgive him and give him his penance. Take an indefinite leave of absence for your penance and take Fr. Pius with you if he is not taken out by our signed petition. He is the serpent who tempted you. But like Adam and Eve who had themselves tempted, you too have to be banished from this island paradise of Guam.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Schools are opening. Soon, Archbishop will visit the schools for new Academic Year...No one can look at him the same way again. Lots of youth have heard adult conversations...too late, damage done. Then off to San Giorgio ITALIA with Pius to go fish in the sea of foreign seminarians from all over the world. If they say you are called to Guam run home as fast as you can. News from Guam has surely polluted the sea of vocations by now.

      Delete
    2. 2 years to gather info on father Paul and yet archbishop was STILL wrong hahahahah good lord lets get the guy some better researchers and investigators. Oh what a tangled web he has weaved.

      Delete
  5. I do hope that the Chancery respond to these men who had the courage to stand up to the archbishop. Why? Because I am sure these courageous men have more information to release if compelled! lol...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Today on Page 5 of Umatuna Si Yu'os the same press release from July 29 regarding why he (Archbishop) swiftly and unilaterally dismissed Monsignor James is reprinted and the January Deloitte letter that has been very well explained is reprinted.

    Do they think reprinting after it has be rebutted will make it any truer?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Today on Page 5 of Umatuna Si Yu'os the same press release from July 29 regarding why he (Archbishop) swiftly and unilaterally dismissed Monsignor James is reprinted and the January Deloitte letter that has been very well explained is reprinted.

    Do they think reprinting after it has be rebutted will make it any truer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is indeed strange. Seems wasteful that the archbishop is again using the Umatuna to advance his personal crusade under the guise of reformation. It would help transparency if the Umatuna allowed opposing opinions such as that decisive rebuttal by Mr. Rivera and company. But that would mean the archbishop will have to be fair and transparent!!!!!!! lol.

      Delete

Recommendations by JungleWatch