Wednesday, July 27, 2016

DEAR ARCHBISHOP HON, THIS IS WHY FOLLOWING CANON LAW IS IMPORTANT.

Posted by Frenchie


DURING HIS PRESS CONFERENCE ARCHBISHOP HON MADE SEVERAL STATEMENTS THAT WERE NOT BACKED BY FACTS.

HERE IS A BIG ONE.







Regarding the reinstatement of Father Paul:
The Archbishop declared, to the Media assembled "There was no decree of removal".  
This is also a statement that was made in writing on another occasion.

If Archbishop Hon had followed Canon Law 481.2
{"When the function of the Diocesan Bishop is suspended, the power of the Vicar General and an Episcopal Vicar is suspended also, unless they are also bishops.
If the diocesan Bishop is suspended from office, priest vicars also have their power suspended consistent with their significant dependence upon him"}

Archbishop Hon would have avoided the risk to look foolish.
It is obvious to all, but the blinds and the deafs, that by leaving Quitugua and most of all Cristobal in power for 4 weeks, they had plenty of time to "clean" the files.

Out of the charitable spirit, called for by both Msgr James and Fr Paul, we shall then provide
Archbishop Hon with the decree of removal that apparently disappeared from the Chancery:

So here you go Archbishop, since it appears, that you cannot trust some of the people around you...
Prot. No 013-074





Now Dear Archbishop Hon,  it would seem appropriate that you take all appropriate actions to annul this decree, and investigate why such a decree would have disappeared from your files.

23 comments:

  1. Which is worst: 1 Hon said there was no decree knowing that there was; 2 Hon said there was no decree not knowing there was; 3 Hon doesn't much care either way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All of the above, however, if no one is removed soon enough, then the worst is no. 3.

      Delete
  2. Hon's behavior and attitude since he arrived has led me to be suspicious of him and we must be careful not to delude ourselves by putting our own meaning into his ambiguous statements. He reminds me of the woman who asked the fortune teller if her husband played around with other women. And when the fortune teller answered, "definitely not!" She left happy, thinking her husband was faithful to her.....until she found out her husband had a boyfriend! So analyze what Hon said and did not say, with suspicion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lurch and the Joker had plenty of time to "clean" the files at the chancery for sure for sure! Those two buffoons must have been doing fist pumps and high fives afterwards, forgetting the fact that copies exist elsewhere. Oh what fools. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  4. What is more telling is All the people involved in this decree are NCW Bishop and Priests (Apuron, Bibi, Alberto, Adrian, of course, we cant leave out Quitugua the Canon Lawer, and Pius pulling the strings). Now if that is not a coincidence, It smells of a ploy to inflict injustice on Fr. Paul, Could it be that he refused the NCW to operate in his parish, if they did not follow the prescriptions of the official liturgical books of the Church?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good Thing that Jungle Watch is practicing retention periods for very important documents of the Archdiocese. I think we should charge Hon for this copy of the Decree. Adrian and Quitugua, You did not expect JW to have a copy of this huh? Idioto's...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Whatever the case, both Fr. Paul and Msgr. James are satisfied with the Apostolic Admimistrator. They are both looking forward now that the case is closed, willing to accept whatever assignment the Holy Spirit, through Abp. Hon, decides is best. Let's leave this behind us now and focus on the NCW, both priests are doing the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is not about Fr. Paul or Msgr. James. They can do whatever they want. This is about injustice and lies perpetrated on the whole diocese. BTW, if not for Jungle Watch, neither priest would still be here. Don't forget that.

      Delete
    2. Biba, Fr. Paul and Msgr. James! You've both missed out so much, for so long the care, the loving father figure that Archbishop Apuron failed to provide you with. Truly, you both deserve to celebrate (how you wish) the good news of the Lord.

      In the conference, I hear the word patience again. With all due respect, the laity lives under the law of the land oppose to those clothe in the church, protected by their own kind of bizarre law were crimes committed are left to wait, in hopes that not necessarily prove but proves are submitted required to be then heard and maybe then, act upon. A big difference. While most laity, even the innocent ones have no other choice but to go directly to jail. "Patience", thank you junglewatch for all your support to speed up the process for what may not have taken place in the conference!

      Delete
  7. The matter that is of importance here though is that Hon appears to be trying to pull the wool over our eyes, declaring that there was no decree of removal, only a letter indicating that Fr. Paul was disobedient, yet behold "Decree of Removal" exist. Now we can also suppose that Laurel and Hardy, Adrian and Quitugua may have destroyed the decree, but what letter is Hon referencing? I would not bet my paycheck on reactionary Hon just yet...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing that Hon said ipso facto reinstates them. Hon used weasel words which were convincing to the gullible.

      Delete
  8. When listening to him this morning, I actually felt that he insulted what little intelligence I have.

    ReplyDelete
  9. SHAME ON YOU, Archbishop HON!

    Pietro (from Rome, Italy)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Whoopsy. Let's just hope the next Archbishop of Agana doesn't magically "find" that decree deep in the files someday and use it against that certain priest.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Whoopsy. Let's just hope the next Archbishop of Agana doesn't magically "find" that decree deep in the files someday and use it against that certain priest.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Where is Lurch and Adrian No Balls and Udovaldo? Are they still in the same positions as before, whether officially or not? If so, how can we believe
    Hon the Con Man?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eddie the Waldo, is still the Pastor of his parish. Actually if you check carefully,the tape of KUAM you will see that he is sitting at the left side of Bibi, during the conference.

      Personally I thought this was an insult to the victims, Hon was saying he was trying to reach to.
      The Apostolic Administrator is a having a press conference, where he declares he never condoned or approved of the declarations made by the Archdiocese prior to his arrival, and just after (through the Umatuna), and you have the priest who made the most egregious statements, sitting in the crowd with a huge grin on this face.
      While Bibi's presence could be justified by his official title of communication director, lets not forget that he was the same individual who told the media, that the allegations of abuse and rape by the victims, were a "miscommunication".

      This shows to say the least, a lack of sensitivity and a total disregard for the survivors, about which Hon was talking about.

      Finally Adrian is still in charge of his parish and Lirch is still the rector of the Cathedral, as well as the Dean of RMS. But they were wise enough to keep a low profile at this time.

      Delete
  13. Record tampering is a frequent occurrence in the church.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hon Still needs to address the cause of all the division in this Archdiocese, the presence of the NCW, Pontius Pius, The return of the Acion property, The Fake seminary, which teaches heretical doctrines. Have another press conference to address these issues Hon. Else another summons may be forthcoming. "Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny." Matt 5:25, 26

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hon,
    The people (Sex abuse victims) that were severely affected by the actions of Apuron, which you gave a press conference to announce, were not invited to attend the press conference. This is another sign that you are reacting to the fact that a lawsuit was filed to include you. Why was Udu-Valdu invited to this press conference, he is the reason you got a lawsuit and more than likely penned all the correspondence resulting in Libel and slander against the victims. I am sure Udu is there to get first hand info of your press release for his daddy Apuron, and master Gennerini.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Doris ConcepcionJuly 28, 2016 at 4:55 AM

    Sorry Hon but you say you want to meet up with me personally to talk about whatever it is you want to discuss....Sorry to burst your bubbles but not only is it NO but HELL NO!!...why don't you use the same lemosna you are going to use for my plane fare on APURON and bring him back to Guam..Im sure I am NOT the only one who awaits his return,NOT as an ARCHBISHOP of course..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good call, Doris!

      Delete
    2. This is very good, Doris.

      Delete

Recommendations by JungleWatch