Wednesday, June 14, 2017

APURON ADMITS GUILT....OR AT LEAST HIS ATTORNEY DOES

Yesterday, after a status conference at the District Court of Guam, the "trained lawyer" said this:

"...my client is not considering settling any cases until such time as a canonical trial is complete."

If Apuron did not commit any of the abuses he's accused of, then why is "settling" even on the table? If Apuron is clean, then his "trained lawyer" would have said:

"My client is not considering settling cases because there is nothing to settle. He did not do the things he has been accused of." 

But she didn't.

Recommendations by JungleWatch