Saturday, August 9, 2014

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS. THE WAR SPILLS OVER INTO THE VILLAGES.

Sorry Mayor Rudy, your anger is understandable. But when village leaders like you do not hold your church leaders accountable, then this is what happens. Archbishop Apuron has ignored the press at every turn. They have a job to do. Since the Archbishop will not speak to them on his terms, then they will speak to him on theirs. By the way, we have yet to hear an account of your meeting with Archbishop Krebs. Would you like to tell us?

PNC: "Were you at least aware of the allegations that were made?"

Archbishop Apuron: "There were no allegations."

http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47647:video-yigo-mayor-dismayed-at-media-qambushq-of-archbishop&catid=45:guam-news&Itemid=156

Other stories today:

Archbishop silent during slew of church controversies

http://www.kuam.com/global/story.asp?s=26229653


Group demands archbishop release names of accused clergymen

http://www.kuam.com/global/story.asp?s=26229619

14 comments:

  1. Mayor you should not open your mouth. Archbishop is held to a higher authority and also his character. He has not shown it lately. If you condone his actions....then....I feel sorry for you. ...Also THIS WAS NOT YOUR FUNCTION....its not your private party....is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rudy Matanane is a joke of a Mayor and is full of excuses. He was pardoned for his drug offenses by Gov. Calvo. He is a do nothing say everything all talk mayor. He likes to walk around saying "I'm the Mayor". Sorry sir, you are a tax payer paid public servant. He rode Gov. Calvos coat tails into office and sadly everyone I know is regretting and wondering how he won. With Rudy it is all... Me, me, me.

      Delete
  2. Archbishop, you brought this man into the fold, the flock deserves an explanation, and your response is go away it's none of your business? the allegations from LA diocese were false? They were so false that the LA diocese banned him from performing as a priest, and called you in 2011 to inform you of it. What flock are you shepherding, cause it doesn't seem like it's the Catholic one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rudy, your defense of Apuron wouldn't have anything to do with your trying to get an annulment, would it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Guess what I overheard at the Bank this morning????? Gentleman came up to me asking where he could find the petition to sign! Said gentleman spoke highly of Father Paul as he is a parishioner of Dededo. Interesting question from said Gentleman? Do you know about the Chemical company behind the Lamlam tours in Harmon, I heard he owns it. Who owns it? Him. Who is him? The Archbishop! Oh..endo of conversation. Archbishop do you have shares in the company? Do you own it? Am I missing something here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We want to keep away from this sort of hearsay. We have enough REAL stuff. However, I allowed the comment to be posted to clarify a common misconception. Not all priests take a vow of poverty, and particularly diocesan priests do not. They are able to draw personal pay checks, own property, etc, just like anyone else. Though the Archbishop was a Capuchin, he was released from his vows when he became a bishop. He may or may not own the chemical company. You are free to provide the documentation that he does. However, he personally owns properties, both here on Guam and in the states.

      Delete
  5. Oh that's bc he's trying to get an annulment which cannot happen without Tony's blessing. Selfish fool. You have just lost your reelection. Sometimes the smartest thing a person without knowledge of the facts can do is say nothing ie shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Janet B - MangilaoAugust 9, 2014 at 12:14 PM

    Funny clip at a serious event. Archbishop scurrying like a kitchen cockroach when the light is switched on. Roaches are bold when they creep through the dark night. But they scramble for dear life when the light of truth is shone upon them.
    New name for our spiritual head - Tony S. ApuRoach.
    Those lights are pretty bright on you now bishop. Better go find a dark place to hide while you still have your title. Any more exposure and you may lose your precious letters after your name.
    Near the very end Tony says no allegations? This reveals the truth of what I heard someone say last week.

    "How do you know when the Archbishop is telling a lie?"
    Answer - his lips move!

    BTW - wasn't that Deacon Harold running past Tony heading for the car? I thought he was supposed to protect the Arch, but I guess youthful speed is more important than protecting the bishop. They have already abandoned the bishop, and are now scrambling for darkness on their own.
    Too Too Tragic!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Think Harold will get to keep the EQUUS when Ordinary Tony leaves? Or will he have it shipped? Brown nose Harold. Cocky arrogant Harold. Does he have a license?? Or is he driving without the way lots of them do as Edwin the billy goat said. That was billy goat , not escape goat.

      Delete
  7. Tim, Maybe if you filtered comments that are downright demeaning, or speculations or gossip. N not allow comments that are just plain non-sense, bullying or name calling then some might be convinced of your arguments and give you more integrity. It's such a turn off for some who are reading your blog for the 1st time or just want to see some of the more meaningful or articulate comments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Currently out of 12,601 comments published on this blog, 1025 have not been published, most of them saying some pretty terrible things about the Archbishop. I let ALL the really nasty ones about me through. I respect the intelligence of the people who read this to decide for themselves what is meaningful and what isn't. I don't think I have to worry a wit about my integrity. I think you, since you are unable to use a name, should worry about yours.

      Delete
  8. And I thought I was trying to help you. .. for those who don't know who Tim Rohr is. I only see a handful of names here though and mostly anonymous... so I guess I will just assume most of the comments here lack integrity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone is welcome to comment on the topics to their anonymous' heart content. Everyone is NOT welcome to address me personally to their anonymous' heart content. I receive hundreds of comments a week and it is difficult to decipher the intent. Yours implied that I personally lacked integrity due to the comments I allowed through, when in fact I spend many hours filtering through the grossly offensive ones. If you wish to actually help me, then email me. Your comment was a public statement. People who are sincere about helping contact me personally.

      Delete
  9. Yes, Tim, do not worry about proving your sanity and integrity.

    You actually have both of those, you are sane and you have integrity. Unlike the other people that have been named so many times, most certainly do not. Do not let these people derail you from the cause...they spit and fight because the truth is shining through!

    Now they say that their articles to the pdn were fixed to show partiality toward you and Chuck. S-T-U-P-I-D! They attack family and friends to try to hurt you into submission--true works of the cowarding devil. Do not let him have power over you, for we ALL know which side is true.

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch