Wednesday, January 14, 2015


  1. Who is Archbishop Convoloo???
    the comment
    There is no full time professor with a Ph.D. in theology at RMS. No requirement is satisfied, no quality control is fulfilled. How do you make sure your seminarians do not obtain a fake education?
    response by lady diana
    Do you not keep up with the news? This is why Archbishop Convoloo on was on Guam last December to certify the Redemptoris Mater Seminary. That was only last month.
    google search......returns to diana's blog (google >> Did you mean: Archbishop Connolly)

    1. Bishop Enrico Dal Covolo is the Rector of the Pontifical Lateran University to which the Blessed Diego Institute has an affiliation, and by which BDI’s charter to act as a real educational institution depends.

      BDI initially established the affiliation with the Lateran in 2007. However, such affiliations have to be reviewed just as accreditations must be reviewed.

      This is what we believe Bishop Covolo was doing here in Guam in 2013.

      It is instructive to note that the Umatuna article on Bishop Covolo’s visit (Dec. 29, 2013) only notes that he was here to visit with faculty and students.

      That is misleading. He was here to review the institute to see if it was in conformance with the provisions which would allow BDI to continue to use the Lateran affiliation.

      The fact that there was NO follow up story celebrating the renewal of the affiliation should tell us something. We should also note that Bishop Covolo was called to meet Pope Francis on the same day Archbishop Apuron met with Pope Francis on Nov. 21, 2014.

      In hindsight, though Apuron tried to position it as a cordial meet and greet with the pope complete with non-indigenous “Guam chocolates", it is very possible that Covolo was called to give his report about BDI to the pope, the pope figuring “while you’re in town” about Apuron.

      We can speculate about this because within days of Apuron’s visit he gets a notice that he will be getting a “visit” from Rome and the delegation included a seminary specialist, Fr. Nowak.
    2. BTW. Bishop Covolo was NOT here to "certify" the Redemptoris Mater Seminary. The Lateran has nothing to do with the seminary. It's only affiliation is with the Blessed Diego Institute. 


  1. We already know that Diana cannot spell names correctly. Poor girl. But who is Jolene?

  2. Hi, I am Jolene. I just had my experience at Diana's blog. This lady is not a "poor girl" she is a venomous snake. She is manipulating the submitted comments, throwing out one half of what I said. She is so careless she erased her own comment after I responded to it and quoted from it!! I mean my response is just hanging there now without her comment being there that I answered and refuted in each and every point. She loathed her defeat so much that she simply erased her own original comment. How silly and manipulative is this?! Her latest fiasco about the issue of Biblical interpretation is a sure sign of her ignorance of basic Catholic theology.

    Apparently, Diana is already at the brink of mental collapse. This is because of her control freak blog managing style when she must be in total control, furiously debunk every single comment from outsiders and have the last vicious word in every minuscule verbal exchange. Because she is such a control freak, she foolishly gives away a lot of incriminating information about her sect. But she would not acknowledge that their "prophet" Kiko is free to interpret the Bible on his own. perhaps because their Kiko is not human anymore, but became a divine person... Lol!

    I see that if she is inundated with many short, targeted questions, she just goes absolutely berserk. I am so sorry for her.

  3. Jolene is right. She asked me to write to Diana on her behalf, questioning Diana's treatment of Jolene's comments. Of course, Diana had never published my comment. She is such a coward, she is afraid of open discussion because she is aware of her intellectual limitations. Actually, I see Diana as a plain dumb girl with a mantra given to her by her handlers to repeat on her blog every day.

    Jolene did not mention but Diana's latest is just a joke. Jolene wrote an extensive comment about the Catholic interpretation of the perpetual virginity of Mary in the context of the brothers of Jesus who are explicitly mentioned in the gospels. Diana became so furious that she started to debunk Jolene's comment without even publishing it. Lol, how silly is that?! Diana makes herself such a fool, I am deeply concerned neos will silence her blog because of her incriminating silliness.