Wednesday, March 9, 2016

ASST. AG: HAS NOT HAD A CHANCE TO "SIT DOWN WITH HER TO SEE WHAT CAN BEWORKED OUT"


In the March 9 KUAM News story entitled "Klitzkie working on 'bogus' certificate of title for Yona property," found here, there is a hyperlink to Mr. Klitzkie's letter to Michael Borja, Director of Land Management, dated February 17, 2016, found here

The letter is quite a read and a real education on the whole matter, but of immediate interest are these references to a female legal counsel for the archdiocese:





As Mr. Klitzkie states in his opening remarks to Mr. Borja, the letter serves "to memorialize" a meeting which Mr. Klitzkie appears to have had with Mr. Borja and his legal counsel, Kristan K. Finney, Esq., who (as per this link) is from the Attorney General's office. 

We see clearly from the excerpt above that Attorney Finney identifies the counsel for the Archdiocese of Agana as a female. However, as we have seen from the many mentions of his name, and particularly on the September 7, 2011 agenda for the finance council in which there is a record of his counsel to Apuron NOT to sign title over to RMS without amending the corporate documents, Atty. Edward S. Terlaje is the legal counsel for the Archdiocese of Agana. 

Perhaps Mr. Terlaje has since been replaced by a female attorney, but we wonder who could it be since Jacqueline Taitano Terlaje, P.C., CANNOT be the mystery female attorney since she herself has said so:
"Attorney Jacqueline Terlaje issued a statement to the media and dismissed the legal opinion of attorney Jacques Bronze. Terlaje said she issued the statement and her opinion in her capacity as an individual." 
Note: I don't know of any close family relationship between Ed Terlaje and Jackie Terlaje (which is her married name).

What is even more disturbing is that Atty. Finney, from the AG's office is saying on February 15, 2016, the date of the meeting, that she has to "sit down with her to see what can be worked out." 

WHAT?

First, there is the matter that this is almost two months after Mr. Klitzkie first brought this to the attention of the Director (first letter was on December 23, 2015), in which Mr. Klitzkie called for the Director's "prompt corrective action." And here we are two months later waiting for the AG to "sit down with her to see what can be worked out"!!!!!!

I believe Mr. Klitzkie will probably lay this out on Travis Coffman's show tomorrow afternoon on K57, but there is a legal process for such "corrective action" and I'm pretty sure it doesn't include the AG "sitting down" with the someone to "see what can be worked out" behind the scenes, ESPECIALLY if this female counsel turns out to be the same female counsel who procured the false documents to begin with. 

This is some SERIOUS (fill in the blank). And if said female counsel turns out to be who we think it is, then it will go to show just how deeply the evil is embedded in Apuron's "Way." 

Rome, are you watching? Since you won't take on the KIKO's, WE WILL! In fact, WE ARE. 

Tune in tomorrow afternoon to K57 about 4:30pm to hear the next chapter in this increasingly sordid tale. Rome, you can listen on line here:



13 comments:

  1. I was reading the article by Jasmine Stole re Klitzkie: Church published 'deceptive' property document and this caught my attention:

    Terlaje, in a statement, referred to the Declaration of Deed Restriction that Klitzkie wrote was omitted from the property's certificate of title.
    "In fact, the declaration declares that the Archbishop of Agana, a Corporate Sole, is the 'owner' of the property, imposing on itself a restriction.By imposing on itself a restriction, the archbishop, in the same way, can impose further conditions on himself as the owner of both the seminary property, and the seminary itself," Terlaje said.

    You don't have to go to school to twist facts like this. You just have to think that people think the way you do. The 'owner' of the property by imposing a restriction. And what is the restriction. "In perpetual use..." What of perpetual do you not understand? How can you further impose conditions on this restriction? In perpetual use is the end of the line. It doesn't open up again, except to make a fool of oneself. I stand corrected. They are capable of that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It'll be interesting to hear how this government explains this mess now that the government is involved by the actions of these neos. Someone's should be fired but that's just wishful thinking since it does take an act of congress just to fire a government of guam employee for tampering or falsifying public documents. The DLM management HAS their back up against the wall and it does force them to acknowledge the truth. So these neos are a funny cult. That's why I believe that if people wait long enough, these cults will trip and fall flat on their stupidness. Dianna can take to google and see how she avoids the situation since she clearly is stupid along with Adrian, Jackie the wanna be real estate attorney, Monsignor quitugua and brother tony.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rome not going to listen to you idiots

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. We don't need Rome, you idiot. We are going to school them on how to take down bad guys. Watch.

      Delete
    2. @4:09 AM, The tide will turn and Rome won't listen to YOU IDIOTS!

      Delete
  4. Janet B -MangilaoMarch 10, 2016 at 4:37 AM

    Yay. It's Thursday and I can hardly wait for the "Big Show" at 4:30 to hear the next chapter from Bob Klitzkie.

    Tim - this really seems to be an important topic with many people. More than 50 comments on the last post alone. Keep it going until we get to the entire truth!

    It would certainly be nice to get an honest answer from tony or David the vg on this matter of document falsification.

    Oops. Somebody pinch me. I must be dreaming. Did I actually call for an honest answer from the Chancery? Obviously I'm dreaming!

    No honest answer has come from these fools for a long long time.

    Tony, use the monies Agat sends to you to start a legal defense fund for your vg since it appears stripes are in his future wardrobe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ms. Kristan Finney's comment, "sit down with her to see what can be worked out," just leaves me dumbfounded! I get the impression that Ms. Finney secretly works for the Chancery, or at least gets her legal guidance from the counsel for the Archdiocese. Is she Neo?

    Already, Land Management is under suspicion. Are we to add the Attorney General's Office to that list? Is the highly respected Attorney General Elizabeth Barrett Anderson just going to ignore what is rapidly becoming a subject of island wide interest, preferring to leave the matter in the hands of Ms. Finney? Are we also going to have to suspect that Neos have infiltrated the AG's office, also casting doubt on all their activities?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Senator Mike San Nicholas, you are the most ethical senator taking on wrongdoing few others will. Please save us!

      Delete
    2. I'm sorry, but you just showed us why there is a problem in the first place. Do you want to guess why?

      Delete
  6. Time for a legislative oversight hearing on DLM.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The alteration of the CT is an example of the disturbing trend of the tactics employed by the Neo’s. Their objective is to deceive the Laity by “doctoring” the Certificate of Title of the Yona by falsely representing that the STOLEN property still belongs to the Church. Truth and honesty are distractions. The only objective is the preservation of NCW no matter the consequences or the cost. Truly sad, since a segment of the Laity still refused to believe that “their” Archbishop could betray them. This is just one sad example of the “fruit” of this Sect. We must double of efforts to remove them from our parishes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We as Catholics, have discovered with horror over the years, that an evil cancer had spread throughout our Church worldwide and here on Guam, in the manifestation of the NCW and its leaders.

    We discovered with irritation, that they had slowly taken over the inner workings of the Diocese, aided and abetted in the process by a corrupt Archbishop and a small cabal of career and profit driven cadre of priests.To the point that basically all real decisions in this Archdiocese are taken by non ecclesiastical personnel, some of them not even residing here.
    The cost for us, has been the fleecing of the assets of our Church, as well as the persecution of honest priests who stood in the way. (no puns intended)

    Now we also discovered, that not only this cancer has spread to our church, but it has also done so, to large sections of our civil society.
    It appears, that the possibility of the corruption of civil servants, and officers of the court, has grown exponentially during the same period.
    Our first hint of such possible corruption, was the sweeping under the rug of the cunilingal talents of a presbyter with a minor, and his subsequent hurried exit of the territory.
    Finally we see with revulsion, the possibility that key people in the administration and the Attorney General's office might also have been compromised.

    It is very frustrating, to realize that people hiding under the name of our Church, are using it for swindling people of large amount of money.
    It is time that we demand people in government to come clear on these disturbing corruption issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let us not forget the Blog secondary OP which is the Land Titles. The fleecing of personal property. People are finding out that the land has been given away to the NEO's when the head of a family passes away. Easy way to make these illicit transactions complete by having a NEO Cult Member inside Land Management.

      Delete

Recommendations by JungleWatch