Wednesday, March 30, 2016

THERE ARE ONLY THREE QUESTIONS

Too bad nobody in the government appears to be intelligent enough or willing to ask them:
  1. Does the Declaration of Deed Restriction rename Title to the property from the Archbishop of Agana, A Corporate Sole to RMS, Inc?
  2. Is the Archbishop of Agana, Corporate Sole, legally separate from  RMS, Inc under Guam law?
  3. Is RMS, Inc. "subject to" the Archbishop of Agana, a Corporate Sole?
Answers.
  1. Apuron says it does.
  2. Apuron says they are.
  3. Apuron says yes. Guam law says no.
The end.

1 comment:

  1. Janet B - MangilaoMarch 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM

    The Archbishop gave a secret deed document to the Gennarinis and the seminary corporation. In it he says: "...Owner hereby covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold and conveyed ..."

    Do you think the Archbishop still owns it, or do you think it now belongs to the seminary corporation?

    Duh! Everyone but the three idiots on the hill know this answer.

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch