After we ask and answer these three questions, then we must ask THIS ONE:
Why was Apuron...
- despite the advice of his legal counsel
- despite the objection of his finance council
- despite knowingly violating canon law
- despite the fact that he was robbing the Catholic faithful of a mega-million dollar asset
...so determined to give the property away?
If you think it was to serve his neocatechumenal masters, you're wrong. The real answer is very different. The real answer is the answer EVERYONE knows, but they haven't put two and two together yet and got 1,977.
The real answer is why "Brother Ton" is NOT HERE.
NOTE to John Toves. He's headed your way.