Tuesday, November 29, 2016

ARRIVING



Archbishop Hon, Bishop Jose Arturo Cepeda Escobedo (Archdiocese of Detroit), Archbishop Martin Krebs (Apostolic Delegate to Oceania), Bishop Andrew Harmon Cozzens (Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis) - Photo credit: Peter Roy Martinez

24 comments:

  1. I'll still be a the picket line this Sunday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope you don't spoil the special day for our First Communicants.

      Delete
    2. We have SAVED and ARE SAVING "the day" for our First Communicants. Until the laity you see protesting and picketing got involved those same First Communicants were the very children our predator archbishop and (now we are finding) many others like him preyed on and ravaged their innocence.

      Whether or not those First Communicants end up having to cross a picket line (that will be up to the picketers) their parents would do well to thank those brave people that their children will not be receiving their First Communion from the hands of a bishop which grabbed the genitals of children their age nor hear the words "the body of Christ" from the mouth of the same bishop who (per Ray De Plata's testimony) sucked the penis of a ten year old while being forced to suck the penis of the filthy priest, Antonio Cruz.

      Delete
  2. bishop cozzens is auxiliary bishop in st. paul-minneapolis. incidentally, that archdiocese had a lot of recent problems reported in the media with how they handled sex abuse cases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is the new auxiliary Bishop following the resignation of the previous Archbishop and the previous auxiliary that were involved in the cover-up

      Delete
  3. Maybe Diana might claim credit for this "good news" too.... Such a delusional lady she is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. that's a lot of airfares

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These guys aren't NEO's. They paid their own way.

      Delete
  5. Say it with me… “Byrnes in the house”
    Again… “Byrnes in the house”
    Pray tell, what's a neo to do… woe is me… woe is me…

    DianaNovember 26, 2016 at 9:40 PM
    Dear Anonymous at 9:07 pm,

    Our leader is arriving on Monday and the other is still going through a canonical trial.

    A sample of leadership, taken from the 2008 ncw statute – its use of the word “bishop”, NOT every use of the word from the footnotes…
    The Neocatechumenal Way is at the service of the bishop
    under the jurisdiction, direction of the diocesan bishop7
    to make available to the diocesan bishops
    to maintain regular relations with the diocesan bishops
    Art. 4 [Temporal goods] - my favorite statute - the ONLY reason apuron is NEEDED…
    The Neocatechumenate is an instrument at the service of the bishops
    assigned them by their diocesan bishop
    under the authority of the diocesan bishop
    from the hands of the bishop
    In so far as they are collaborators of the bishops - the ncw’s get out of jail card
    according to the dispositions of the diocesan bishop
    The Neocatechumenal Way is also an instrument that is offered at the service of the bishops
    are erected by diocesan bishops – reference rms
    It is the task of the diocesan bishop to appoint
    in the name of the bishop – with apuron monkeys are in charge
    and to the bishop
    presided over by the bishop
    The Neocatechumenal Way is thus an instrument at the service of the bishops
    The Neocatechumenal Way is also an instrument at the service of the bishops
    with appropriate communication to the diocesan bishop,116
    It pertains to the diocesan bishop
    in the name of the diocesan bishop
    in agreement with the bishop
    which promotes the encounter between the bishop
    and to present to the bishop
    informing the bishop
    these must have the express permission of their own diocesan bishop
    in contact with the bishop
    upon request by the bishops – reference families in mission – are they formal/verbal request?
    They are usually sent by their own bishop – reference to mission

    Is this is so, WHY is EVERYTHING MESSED UP UNDER apuron and THE ncw CONTROLED leadership…
    “why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why,…

    apuron OUT… apuron OUT… apuron OUT… apuron OUT… apuron OUT…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diana is full of shit, If the NCW is at the service of the Bishop, Then why is it necessary for the Bishop to answer to his Catechist, why does the Bishop need to be catechized by a Catechist, priest or Lay person. The Bishop is not only Chief Shepherd, but also Chief Teacher. However in the NCW, Tony has relinquished his Chief Teacher, Shepherd, Spiritual Father responsibilities, and becomes answerable to a Catechist like Pius. His Excellency then becomes brother Tony.

      Delete
    2. According to that prelate from Legislative Texts, the NCW isn't under the bishops "recognisably"!

      Delete
    3. Explains why there has been a dearth of catechesis and right instruction in the archdiocese ex cathedra: the shepherd himself lacked it. You cannot give what you do not have. Unfortunate he looked for it from a street artist instead of from the Master himself, Our Lord Jesus Christ!

      Joining something such as the ncw is not usual behavior for a bishop. And a well grounded one would have detected the warning signs, ceased, and stopped them in their tracks. Apuron didn't know and later, didn't care.

      Delete
  6. WHAT?? No gypsy music at the airport for these three? LOL The NCW only kisses the booty of the reigning archbishop?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps, they didn't know the time of their arrival? lol

      Delete
    2. Even better, They didn't know at all. LOL

      Delete
  7. Welcome to Guam.

    ReplyDelete
  8. They're probably here to find out what the child serial rapist told him while galavanting in Baltimore. The TRUTH will be told and the Wrath of God will fall upon the neocatechumenal way.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Why are they here!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is normal for bishops,archbishops, and Cardinals to attend the ceremony which officialize the new responsibilities of a fellow Bishop. The Nuncios is here in his official capacity. Since we are a archdiocese it would be normal to have the bishops of the dioceses attached to Guam to also be in attendance. We shall see tomorrow the whole list of attending prelates.

      Delete
    2. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you...

      They are here because apuron told Brynes the location of his year old lost document, during his time away from eusebio and terlaje he had a moment of clarity, and had remembered his safe place...
      Bishop Byrnes has brought the other bishops to witness first hand the accuracy of apuron's decades old kaka filled mind...

      TIME SINCE ARCHBISHOP APURON SAID HE WOULD FIND IT.
      Archbishop Apuron, December 15, 2014.
      "Rome has approved it – even the way we’re receiving Communion. That they receive the host standing and they can sit down and everybody who receives it and they eat together...Rome has given permission for that. And it’s somewhere I need to find out where exactly, but they told us that permission is given."

      Delete
  10. AB Byrnes' first order of business should be to remove all incendiary materials from the Yona property. These Neos act and talk like they have been drinking a little too much of the Kool-aid and refuse to see the obvious truth about their leaders. I fear they may go the way of the Branch Davidians

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's hope it doesn't go that far. But they are locked up in Yona. Where is Lurch? 'The rector' what made Hon think he would be one iota better that putrid? Nightmare.

      Delete
  11. HAFA ADAI and Welcome to Guam, gentlemen. Looks like the Bishops of Detroit and Minneapolis are showing some support for their brother from Detroit.

    Now please get rid of Apuron, once and for all, of us.

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch