By Tim Rohr
The Banquet of Rupture: The Neocatechumenal Way and the Deconstruction of the Sacrificial Mass
Growing up within the Neocatechumenal Way provides a stark, unvarnished window into the "New Theology" that has permeated the post-conciliar Church, offering a firsthand look at a radical and outright rejection of the sacrificial essence of the Mass. To the initiate of the Way, the altar is not a place of bloody sacrifice made present again in an unbloody manner, but rather a table for a communal banquet.
This shift is not merely aesthetic; it is a profound ontological rupture. By replacing the traditional emphasis on the propitiatory nature of the Eucharist, the offering of the Son to the Father for the remission of sins, with a celebration of the "Paschal Mystery" centered almost exclusively on the Resurrection and the community's joy, the Way mirrors the broader post-Vatican II tendency to prioritize the horizontal relationship between men over the vertical relationship between man and God.
This theological pivot manifests most clearly in the physical and liturgical structure of the Neocatechumenal "Eucharist," which often takes place in a square formation around a decorated table rather than directed toward a tabernacle or a fixed altar. Such a configuration effectively deconstructs the priest’s role as the alter Christus acting in the person of Christ the High Priest, demoting him to a mere presider over a fraternal meal.
The "errors" of the Way are, in this sense, not isolated aberrations but are the logical conclusions of a specific interpretation of the New Order of Mass. When the faithful are encouraged to receive the Host while seated and to consume it simultaneously with the priest, the hierarchical distinction between the ministerial priesthood and the common priesthood of the baptized is blurred into oblivion. This practice serves as a practical manifestation of the "New Theology" which views the Church more as a democratic assembly than a supernatural, hierarchical body.
Furthermore, the pedagogical approach of the Neocatechumenal Way, with its long-hidden catechetical directories, echoes the doctrinal ambiguity that has characterized much of the modern era. By emphasizing an existential and experiential faith over the objective, dogmatic clarity of the Scholastic tradition, the Way fosters a religious identity that is often more tied to the group’s specific "path" than to the universal deposit of faith.
This mirrors the crisis of authority seen across the wider Church, where subjective "discernment" is frequently championed over the perennial Magisterium. In the end, reflecting on my 15 years spent within this movement reveals that the crisis of the liturgy is truly a crisis of faith; if the Mass is no longer seen as a true sacrifice, the very core of Catholicism is hollowed out, leaving behind a community-focused shell that struggles to point souls toward the transcendent reality of Calvary.
In this theological framework, the understanding of sin and propitiation undergoes a transformation that bears a striking, and often unsettling, resemblance to Lutheran thought, moving away from the Catholic doctrine of merit and toward a more fatalistic view of the human condition.
Within the Neocatechumenal Way, sin is frequently presented not as a willful transgression that requires the medicinal grace of the sacraments and personal penance to rectify, but as an inevitable symptom of man’s "slavery to the devil."
This perspective echoes the Lutheran concept of simul iustus et peccator, where the individual remains essentially corrupt but is "covered" by grace. By downplaying the capacity of the human will, aided by grace, to truly conquer sin and achieve sanctity, the Way risks reducing the Christian life to a perpetual cycle of acknowledging one's wretchedness without the transformative hope of actual interior justification.
This distorted view of sin naturally necessitates a rejection of the traditional Catholic understanding of propitiation. In the perennial theology of the Church, Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross is a propitiatory act: a satisfaction offered to the Father to atone for the infinite offense of sin.
However, the "New Theology" expressed in the Way’s catechesis treats the idea of satisfying divine justice as a "legalistic" or "pagan" construct. Instead, they emphasize the Cross solely as a sign of God’s unconditional love and a victory over death, stripped of its character as a necessary sacrifice for the remission of guilt. This shift effectively removes the "transactional" necessity of the Mass; if there is no need for propitiation, the Mass ceases to be a sacrifice offered for the living and the dead and becomes merely a memorial of a historical event that validates the community’s current state.
Consequently, the role of the individual in the economy of salvation is minimized to a passive acceptance of one’s own brokenness. The Catholic call to "fill up what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ" through sacrifice and mortification is replaced by a focus on "kerygma,” a proclamation of mercy that often lacks the corresponding call to a firm purpose of amendment.
This theological orientation mirrors the broader post-Vatican II crisis where the Sense of Sin has been lost, replaced by a psychological comfort that seeks to soothe the conscience rather than cleanse it. By framing the human person as someone who "cannot do otherwise" than sin until some mystical moment of enlightenment occurs, the Way inadvertently mirrors the Protestant denial of free will, further detaching the faithful from the traditional path of purgation, illumination, and union that has defined Catholic spirituality for two millennia.
MY NOTE
As someone (me) formed in the wake of Vatican II, it is hard to see the difference between what the NCW is doing versus what the rest of the church (or most of it) was doing since the mid-60's and even before Vatican II concluded. The emphasis on the "table" vs the altar, the community vs the sacrifice, the flowers, the guitars, the presider vs the priest...it's all there. The NCW is simply Vatican II, and its step-child Novus Ordo, writ large. Thus the modern Church has no moral authority to reign in the NCW.
No comments:
Post a Comment