Sunday, July 6, 2014

PACIFIC DAILY NEWS - SUNDAY, JULY 6, 2014


58 comments:

  1. Archbishop gave canned homily. However worked in about the gossipers. Hopefully that's not how he sees our request for transparency. That's what it's all about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gossipers? A man who implies that one of his priests is in a homosexual relationship behind his back? Gossipers? Gossipers? A request for the same financial transparency that bishops have had the courtesy to give their dioceses around the world? Gossipers? He continues to fall like lighting.

      Delete
    2. Slam dunk, Tim.

      Delete
    3. Looked like a very small man with a big, big, tall mitre ...monotone sermon. NOT sincere and not preaching!

      Delete
    4. Five more acolytes from RMS. Moving right along a a very fast pace. VERY sorry to say, the photo of the men does not say JOY. I feel sorry for them. It would be so much better if it were a real celebration for our Archdiocese. Sad situation. Guess they look perseccuted.

      Delete
    5. Seriously, that photograph says alot. They should have chosen a better shot than that. Nice KIKO Vessels though. Donated, I'm guessing.

      Delete
    6. Where is this photo?

      Delete
    7. Online U Matuna this week

      Delete
    8. Thank you Anon 6:49 I found it and I agree with the above comments. There seems to be no JOY!

      Delete
    9. I wouldn't read to much into the picture of the acolytes. Just pray they wake up. Meanwhile, read all you want into the picture of the flower laden altar, er I mean table.

      Delete
  2. Gossipers archbishop this language is not building unity in our church. Please show some respect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There has not been for long time.....you just noticed now!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Diana can't be any more tone deaf than she is: ("And here you are asking why the Archbishop has an expensive and luxurious car????? Do you think that God will reward His chosen ones and His children with small, pathetic, and worthless things??") of course we don't Diana; a hand made Rolls if we can get it for him. Is she kidding us? Or WHAT???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's more interesting is the identity of the woman who bought it for him. And some of the other "gifts"...

      Delete
    2. There she goes again! Diana, really. Your comments about the car are so ignorant. The point is most people here dont have that kind of income. Your famous quote of the day: "So, the Archbishop has a luxury car." P.S. the Chancery has been remodeled in the last 20 years.

      Delete
    3. As mentioned elsewhere, it's not the car so much as where the money came from.

      Delete
    4. Brand of car not important. Rather where did the money for the car come from.

      Delete
  5. Wow Tim, could this be Annie?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Annie? Hope not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That relationship has cooled off. Annie is smart.

      Delete
    2. Annie doesn't ring a bell. But that could be another name.

      Delete
  7. Good Morning, Diana! If you can't blog today, that's ok. Know you have work and stuff today. Busy, Busy, Diana!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. High level meeting at the chancery today.

      Delete
    2. Yes has a long distance phone meeting .

      Guess they are worried Now Tim.

      Delete
    3. Diana is tooo slow to realize her intermittent blogging is giving her away. Diana, forget it. Just concentrate on the matters at hand. Urgent matters, at that. NO comments, but she has a translator and blog song. Pathetic, Diana. Where's Bernie? Can't she fill in for you while you are otherwise occupied?

      Delete
  8. Diana quiet why.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hormones you know what there like dear.

      Delete
  9. Something wrong on the hill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe they have a visitor?

      Delete
    2. Trying to shut up " little Lord Fontleroy in Manila"

      Delete
    3. Busy, Busy, Diana and Busy, Busy, Archbishop! Is lazy, lazy, Monsigor David on island?

      Delete
    4. How did Tiim know about a visitor on July 7th at 4.17pm . Chancery under gag order at the time. Since last Wednesday things on the hill were on tight lockdown. Seminarians were first to be silenced. Priests silenced. Fontleroy appeared. Then lock down. Now word is apostolic Delegate.

      Delete
  10. I posted this to Diana's blog- "Why the concern about money" (let's see if she publishes it)

    Diana, unlike the NCW who don't even know where the money goes- the "Real World" people do. Ask any finance council member of ANY parish and they will GLADLY tell you- - the parish assessments are KILLING them. Cathedral owes almost hundreds of thousands in insurance costs to Calvo's Insurance and other companies. Power bills, utility bills, etc. St. Thomas Aquinas is in financial ruin and will be closing down. Malojloj Retreat House would have been a great place to house and invite the Poor Clares to minister but what did the Archbishop do- waste more money and now it sits idle. Parishes are swimming in debt. Churches need repairs, cemeteries are broke and only the rich can afford to be buried there- the lists goes on-and the NCW/RMS keeps on thriving? The people aren't giving cause the failed leadership of the Archbishop. Poor financial decisions, mismanagement and a lack of concern. He will single handedly destroy the Catholic Church of Guam. The secrets to sell Tumon parish, guilt trip a family to donating the land, or the easement issues of St. Andrew Kim- shall I go on? The sad part is you ALREADY know everything I posted- you just pretend it isn't there. If you knew my name and what I did for a living you would be shaking in your shoes cause the truth hurts and we are coming for you. See you at the meeting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You were told so many times the archbishop is destroying the Archdiocese. Only tiim has acted to bring this to your attention. Guam needs to act fast and be called to action people power. Fail to act now the archdiocese will sink into Mariana's trench.

      Delete
    2. @8:43 you're mean to a young woman in her early twenties named Diana. How do you know she doesnt have a vocation to the Poor Clares? Interesting, we don't have Poor Clares here.

      Delete
    3. 5:00pm. Poor Clares? Guess her clergy family member didn't think opening a convent for this order was necessary back when. She can always go to the Mo in NJ. Heard the weather is just like Guam!

      Delete
  11. @4:55 PM sort of reminds me of Lucy and Ethel at the chocolate assembly line...getting ahead of the Hill staff. FRENZY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fontleroy has always been operating in the Jungle.

      Delete
  12. Who Fontleroy ? Tagle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cardinal tagle is not Fontleroy. Fontleroy was the description Archbishop gave a priest years ago.

      Delete
    2. To think Cardinal Tagle comes in the middle of this fiasco.

      Delete
  13. David has been lazy all his life. Locks himself in his room sleeping all day all night. Waste of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He better wake up soon!! Daaaavid, time to rise and shine!!

      Delete
    2. Fontleroy was sent away with the agreement of two bishops. He was disturbing the peace of the ultimate plan . May have back fired now.

      Delete
  14. Maybe we should ask for a financial statement from the NCW too. As per Diana the NCW knows where their money is going too...AUDIT PLEASE!

    Dear Anonymous at 10:04 a.m.,

    We know where the NCW money is going. You are not in the NCW and don't contribute anything to the NCW anyway. The members of the NCW knows where their money is going because it is being announced.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to its statute, the NCW is an entity of the parish which hosts it. This makes the money it collects subject to the parish. It is not authorized to distribute that money autonomously.

      Delete
    2. Okay, so why is it not published separately in the parish bulletin as NCW collection! Parish entity? I doubt they even turn it in, at least not for the Cathdral!

      Delete
    3. Because they do whatever the hell they want. And the Archbishop covers for them.

      Delete
  15. Neo do what the hell they want and the Archbisjop allows it to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Fontleroy entered Guam last week on a flite from Manila.

    ReplyDelete
  17. He was seen on Thursday afternoon during the debate on Diana Vreeland. As he sat at lunch his security were operating on junglewatch.

    ReplyDelete
  18. True Friday morning clergy believe Fontleroy was on island with two Filipino security .

    ReplyDelete
  19. He entered Guam Thursday and left Friday met with media.

    ReplyDelete
  20. My God beginning to make sense comments of the past months.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I just called Fontleroy .

    ReplyDelete
  22. Fontleroy is a lose canon. He should have been completely exterminated years ago little roach.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Is Fontleroy in Manila or Rome?

    ReplyDelete