Tuesday, August 12, 2014

LET'S DO IT THIS WAY

Rather than offer an award to anyone who will reveal Diana's identity, let me first appeal to the members of the Neocatechumenal Way who are ashamed at her actions and her willingness to single out people's children. My new challenge is at the end.

I had to think long and hard about this because it involves further exposing one of my children. And I have come to the conclusion that given Diana's singling out my daughter on her blog and the insinuation of an unethical connection between my daughter and the editorial staff of the Pacific Daily News, it is time to expose Diana before she acts similarly against other people's children.

For those who don't know, Diana is the pseudonym for a coward blogger who has become the default spokesperson for the Neocatechumenal Way. She (if she is a she) is welcome to her errors and her idiocies. But she is not welcome to post about members of my family. 

On August, 9, Diana alleged on her blog that my daughter was employed by the PDN and that her employment had influenced the PDN's handling of submissions in support of the Neocatechumenal Way. She also posted a picture of my daughter which she later removed after I threatened to call the FBI. 


When confronted with "stalking", Diana objected that she was only googling the PDN and came across my daughter's name. 


However, she also dug into my daughter on Facebook.


HERE ARE THE FACTS.
  1. My daughter is not employed by the PDN. She was a freelance contributor to the Vibe, a sub-publication of the PDN by and for teenagers. 
  2. Suggesting that my teen-aged daughter's involvement with the Vibe had some influence on the editorial decisions of the the Pacific Daily News is a pathetic attack on the editors and writers of the PDN, and a testament to the psychological sickness that is at the root of this whole ugly conflict. 
  3. Bringing any child or any family member into this conflict who has not chosen to enter it on his or her own is an attack on an innocent bystander and is to be condemned. 

Because of the new lows Diana and her neocatechumenal supporters appear willing to sink to, it is time to call her out and hold her to account for the garbage she seems willing to smear our children with. 

Therefore, I hereby call on the members of the Neocatechumenal Way who sincerely want the rhetoric against the Way to cease, to challenge Diana to have the simple integrity to put his or her real name to her statements as I do. Hiding behind a pseudonym permits her to do the kind of garbage that is detailed above without consequence. Is it Christian to hide? Is that a credible witness to the real fruit of the Neocatechumenal Way? It's up to you. You know who Diana is. It is time to come out in the open. If not, then I will take her dragging my daughter into this as a personal affront to my family and the endangerment of my daughter.


77 comments:

  1. A $500 bounty? C'mon, sir. You've made contact with the FBI, right? Let the law take matters in to their own hands. Offering a bounty may incite things to get out of control beyond even what you intend it to do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where does it say 500.00?

      Delete
    2. Then do something about it ANON 5:11 PM. If your daughter was dragged into something unjustly, what would you do? As for the FBI, will they be bothered with this? No, they won't. So, if you know Diana, put an end to her cowardly and dastardly ways.

      Delete
    3. At 6:36. I originally offered $500 to anyone who would expose Diana's identity because of her attack on my child. I then decided to give members of the Way who claim not to be like Diana an opportunity to do the right thing all on their own by helping to identify Diana without a reward. If that doesn't work, the $500 goes back up.

      Delete
  2. Diana is sick! The coward is desperate because you present facts and she presents fiction!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not the other way around, please? I haven't seen any fact, I mean ANY FACT, presented by Tim Rohr without distortion.

      Delete
    2. I suggest you open your eyes. Even if you disagree with Tim's positions, you cannot in good conscience deny the evidence presented and submitted by so many others not even affiliated with Tim.

      Delete
    3. @ AnonymousAugust 12, 2014 at 6:05 PM
      Are you delusional? Wow that koolaid must be good!

      Delete
    4. How about the fact that the archbishop wanted to transfer the seminary property to the Neo? What did Tim distort? If you think he is not being truthful, call Joe Rivera, Richard Untalan, or Sister Stephen Torres. As anyone of them.

      Delete
    5. @6:05 pm. Oh, Anonymous, if only you knew. Don't worry, they are facts. Nuff said.

      Delete
    6. Blockely, where did you go? Tim, when is Part II ?

      Delete
    7. Fr. Matthew BlockleyAugust 13, 2014 at 11:43 AM

      Thank you . I'm very much alive reading the page.

      Delete
  3. Diana you are doing a great job! Look at your brother trying to stalk you and even paying $500 of bribe. I suggest you go to GPD and file a report for your safety and family. Be careful! your wanted by their pastor TIM!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right. Already ran this past an attorney before I posted.

      Delete
    2. Here we go again the kaka neos twisting the story that Tim is stalking Diana. It always seem ok for their leaders' actions but not the other way around. You hypocrites!

      Delete
    3. I want to post this:
      I wonder why Tim changed the heading of this blog post from "500 Reward" to "Let's Do It This Way"? Maybe because it would be considered solicitation of criminal acts? How so? If the Rhor disciples were so moved by Tim's inciting words as to find information by criminal means...guess what? Rhor just committed solicitation and maybe even complicity by encouraging any means to get Diana's identity. I'm sure if Tim was on payroll, he would be able to give a bigger bounty to reveal Diana.

      Delete
    4. I think Guam's criminal code has a law against solicitation for actions which constitute a crime(s). Freedom of Speech does not protect against words meant to incite.

      Delete
    5. Sorry Anno 6:19 pm your kaka, following pastor Tim... Btw not a neo, ya'll in here have some much negative comments to the neo's. Why?? They are spreading the Good word!! Here you kaka following Pastor Tim!! Should be ashame of your self

      Delete
    6. Hey Anon 5:15 PM. Stop hiding behind the skirts of Diana or his trousers, whichever is your preference. Come out and show yourself.

      Delete
    7. 8:15 apparently doesn't know what KAKA is. Any you wonder why there are "some much negative comments to the neo's". Try yours.

      Delete
    8. At 7:40. Let's be clear. The solicitation for action is to reveal the identity of a person who has endangered my daughter, simply because I am man enough to identify myself.

      Delete
    9. At 7:02. No. It is still a solicitation. And wanting to know someone's identity who has endangered a member of one's family is not a criminal act. Good luck with that one. I even ran it past an attorney first. I changed it to see if there is anyone in the Neocatechumenal Way of those who claim to be not like the rest of you, who would be willing to assist me in stopping this kind of action against members of people's families. Because if she did it to my family, she will surely do it to others if she knew their identity.

      I have been willing to stand up for my beliefs and my positions. She has chosen to cower behind anonymity. That's fine. That's what cowards do. And what a shame that a coward is your spokesperson and your representative. Is it any wonder why so many think so ill of the Neocatechumenal Way.

      So I thought I'd give the Way a chance to redeem themselves, by giving them a chance to actually DO SOMETHING for someone else rather than just talk about themselves. If that doesn't work, then the $500 goes back up. I'd like to save myself $500, but my daughter's safety and the safety of other people's children is worth far more. Too bad you don't feel the same about your own.

      Delete
    10. Kaka means human feces in some language. Thank you very much!

      Delete
    11. Anonymous (August 13, 2014 at 6:02 AM), you are correct about the standard definition of the word as you wrote it. However take note that when Tim writes the word, he does so differently. He writes it as "KAKA" which is the acronym for Kiko Argüello's Kool Aid — get it?

      For more information, go to http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/03/drinking-kaka.html

      BTW: Before you lay the blame on Tim for coming up with that acronym, let me assure you that he didn't, which is why I can add the /'s/ to what was initially written.

      You're welcome very much!

      Delete
    12. As Tim at 5:19 PM indicated, he checked with an attorney before posting the original $500 offer to expose the identity of “Diana.”

      Considering that “Diana” also has access to the counsel of an attorney, one whose article was featured recently in the PDN, I think it would have served “her” well to check with him. He might have cautioned “her” about posting allegations that the PDN is run like a third-world newspaper, under the control of Tim Rohr and/or Chuck White. If it had been done once, in a single comment, it might have been dismissed as a poor choice of words or a fleeting thought. But clearly, in “her” delusional mind, “Diana” truly believes that the PDN cowers before Tim and Chuck. Here are some of the things “Diana” wrote; these don’t include other comments that malign the integrity of the PDN, which “she” approved:

      • “Could it be that Tim Rohr and Chuck White has influenced the Pacific Daily News?” from “What the PDN Left Out Again” (9 August) at http://neocatechemunal.blogspot.com/2014/08/what-pdn-left-out-again.html

      After the initial 9 August “Having the Upper Hand” post about how “ … Dana Rohr is an intern in the Pacific Daily News Vibes … I wonder if having a family member employed under the PDN would have any influence on the editing of … others submitted in favor of the Neocatechumenal Way? Would that not be a conflict of interest?” “Diana’s” comments included:
      • “… The fact that Tim Rohr's daughter worked and contributed to the PDN for the last 3 years CAN cause a conflict of interest in the matter… I do not think that it is coincidental that the press release of the Archbishop, Father Pius' comments and others from the Way are being edited …”
      • “… this shows the PDN's conflict of interest and may explain why some of comments of the Archbishop and those who support the Way were edited to show a more favorable view of the other camp.”
      • “Any famous person or celebrity will tell you that there is a price to pay for fame and glory. Many people know about the kids of famous people because that was the price they paid. … So, when I say that the PDN may have a conflict of interest because a family member of Tim Rohr works there…” (Looks like “Diana” thinks Tim is a “famous person or celebrity” which makes Dana fair game!?!) 



      http://neocatechemunal.blogspot.com/2014/08/having-upper-hand.html

      And then there’s the 10 August “Unbalanced Journalism” post which includes the following claims “It appears that the Pacific Daily News favors Tim Rohr, Chuck White and their followers. … There was no complaint from Chuck White about anything in his article that was edited.” and “… below is Tim Rohr's story … The title of his submitted article is the same as it is printed on his blog site. There was also no complaint anywhere from Tim Rohr about his article being edited…” and “…Apparently, Tim Rohr and Chuck White has more influence over PDN.” followed by this comment:
      • “And to add words and phrases that did not exist in the original article written by the author reeks of yellow journalism.” This is a comment by “Diana” — “yellow journalism”? Wow!
      http://neocatechemunal.blogspot.com/2014/08/unbalanced-journalism.html

      “Diana’s” oft-repeated claim that Tim Rohr and/or Chuck White can influence the content and/or editorial practices of the Pacific Daily News indicates that “she” and her disciples actually believe that these Tim and Chuck — not Rindraty Celes Limtiaco, Publisher or David V. Crisostomo, Managing Editor — are in charge of the PDN!

      And, in general, Guam's NCW members are pleased with how "Diana" represents them on "her" blog? I know the Kikos/Kikobots are quite pleased. But if the regular members, the "Neos," feel the same way, then things are worse than I thought.

      Delete
  4. Sorry, Tim. No proof but my best guess is Fr Adrian when he wears his pink undies.

    ReplyDelete
  5. For your eyes only. You can file a lawsuit against John Doe and subpoena the host website for the identity (ip address) of the poster/diana. Even if you don't go through with the lawsuit at least you will have an identity. I posted on that website solely to tell diana that that was just a new low and she should leave your kid out of this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Scared you will be exposed, huh Tim? She's got your every moved tracked, slowly piecing the puzzle together.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yah. Scared. Ummm, it wasn't me that was sent scrambling to suddenly retrieve and destroy 8000 copies of the Umatuna. You want to talk about scared. Go ahead. Just wait.

      Delete
  7. Give the kid a break. Hundreds of teenagers have been freelancing for the PDN for many years. This is the very first time anyone has taken issue with who a Vibe reporter is connected to family-wise. PDN selects these young adults largely for their interest in journalism and abilities. I that's The Way's modus operandi then add me to its growing list of its critics.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now you got hurt Tim? Huhh? But when you jump on others, is that okay with you...? Very interesting. You'd be better spend time with your kids, not on the blog! Family man...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, hello, Archbishop. What are you doing on this evil blog?

      Delete
    2. Now, I am the Archbishop? Wake up, Tim! You are delusional and you hurt people with no end. The Archbishop will survive this, he is not impeachable. Or if you know any impeachable offense then show the document and begin an official impeachment process. Everyone would be relieved if you show facts and not hearsay, believe me. But please, stop hurting people. Can you still hear me out, Tim?!

      Delete
    3. Yep. You are the Archbishop. Because you want to hide under a rock and play anonymous, I get to name you anyone I want. That's the price of anonymity. And as for facts, show me one thing where I have not use the facts.

      Delete
    4. To the Anonymous who commented "The Archbishop will survive this, he is not impeachable." and "Everyone would be relieved if you show facts and not hearsay, believe me."

      May I refer you to Guam PDN http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2014308070001

      A group of prominent men in the business and government community....Honest Catholic men with finance backgrounds held a press conference in front of the Dulce Nombre de Maria Cathedral-Basilica to refute Archbishop Apuron claims of Monsignor James mismanagement of finances.

      "We felt compelled to speak out after the archbishop released a statement accusing Monsignor James of financial practices that were grave and detrimental to the archdiocese," said Rivera, who also is a financial executive at Calvo's Enterprises.

      "Based on our review of the financial position of both the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic cemeteries, it is our professional opinion that the allegation of financial mismanagement was not supported by the facts," Rivera stated.

      Someone is LYING! Who is the leader of the my beloved Catholic Church? Why hasn't he made any appearances to to calm the flock and lead by example? HE IS HIDING SOMETHING?...TIME WILL ONLY TELL!

      The archbishop WILL NOT survive this. He has let it gone way to long.

      It seems like one of the root of all of this is money. Money misappropriated here. Millions of money from the Seminary property there. Money from the cemetery here...where is all the money going there! WHEN IS IT ALL GOING TO STOP!

      At last Sunday Mass collection, I only gave ONE DOLLAR.

      I WILL CONTINUE TO GIVE ONLY ONE DOLLAR UNTIL ARCHBISHOP IS REMOVED FROM OFFICE.

      Maybe if the money the church receives from people like you and me dries up....maybe...just maybe all this bickering in the Catholic Church on Guam end.

      IT ALL STARTS WITH THE LEADER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ON GUAM.....IF HE CAN'T LEAD (without Lies and deceit) HE NEEDS TO STEP DOWN!

      Delete
  9. DIANA is actually a community of people:
    D for Debbie,
    I for Ian,
    A for Annabel
    N for Nellie and
    A for Adolpho.
    Now you catch Diana... ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Give the kid a break. Hundreds of teenagers have been freelancing for the PDN for many years. This is the very first time anyone has taken issue with who a Vibe reporter is connected to family-wise. PDN selects these young adults largely for their interest in journalism and abilities. I that's The Way's modus operandi then add me to its growing list of critics.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I will do it for free for your Tim

    ReplyDelete
  12. Not only did she single out Tim's daughter, she also posted all the photos of the Vibe contributors, and specifically pointed to which one was Tim's daughter. She deliberately brought her readers (some who have questionable psyches just based on their comments) to the attention of who to look for. Nobody does this to a child unless they want to harasses the family.
    Shame on "Diana" and shame on all those on her blog that rationalize the behavior of this disturbing coward.

    ReplyDelete
  13. [POSTED ON DIANA'S SITE THIS EVENING] It is really getting disturbing. They are talking about family now!

    Elia August 12, 2014 at 6:07 PM

    Dear Diana,
    Tim Rohr has just put another piece of garbage in his jujglegarbage.
    It is a piece against you. Do not worry Rohr is only able to bark.
    PDN published the information of his daughter. So it is public dominion.
    Rohr decided to enter in something bigger than him, his family of course will pay the consequence, as usual those that are innocent. He had to think about this before he begun to write all that crap.
    Diana we are with you, Rohr has to understand that he is not God and his actions have terrible consequences, unfortunately also on his family. Again the innocents will have to pay the prize of Rohr garbage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You will soon see who will pay.

      Delete
    2. Desperation neocrats that you have to involved family members. Loosing the battle? Family has nothing to do with the issues, it's about the leadership of aaa and the neo stupidity.

      Delete
    3. so quick to line up behind an anonymous ghost, Diana.

      Delete
  14. Hey we got a petition going on to keep Father Pius! Guess what, we will get the support from all over the world. Our signatures are climbing to surpass yours. Peace

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So who are you going to send it to? The superior of the order he is awol from? The order that he divorced himself from to go play with Kiko? The order that was actually glad to be as rid of him as we will be? You have no idea who this man REALLY is, do you?

      Delete
    2. Bring it on neocrats, neo knights or whatever you call your group. Let's see who will get more support. By the way, why are you responding to this site, create your own. Dumb dumb.

      Delete
    3. Clap, clap, clap. If you believe with all your heart in Friar Pius, then you wouldn't have to make a petition. You would know that no petition of ours could do him any harm. Right? You wasted your time. You should be working on defending him for participating in what we now call hate crimes.

      Delete
    4. One group works so hard to preserve the Church despite a movement while another works so hard to preserve a movement despite the Church. Incredible.

      Delete
    5. Oh, very well said!

      Delete
  15. from Diana's Blog:
    AnonymousAugust 12, 2014 at 9:22 PM
    Kids and families are off-limits in all matters. Tim's family has nothing to do with the issues at hand. Any credibility that you may have had to begin with is gone by stooping so low...

    Reply
    Replies

    DianaAugust 12, 2014 at 9:33 PM
    Dear Anonymous at 9:22 p.m.,

    Any famous person or celebrity will tell you that there is a price to pay for fame and glory. Many people know about the kids of famous people because that was the price they paid. The beauty about living in a democracy is that we have freedom of expression. In our society, we can speak out our opinions. So, when I say that the PDN may have a conflict of interest because a family member of Tim Rohr works there......that is an opinion protected by our rights in the Organic Act of Guam.

    Reply

    AnonymousAugust 12, 2014 at 9:42 PM
    And hence the new low... You justify your actions without considering the danger you put that child in. Worse yet, you call it, "the price to pay". That is not the behavior of a Christian, regardless ... and just because something is "legal" doesn't make it "ethical" or "moral"....

    Just stop and think about what you are portraying as a representative of "the Way"... it's not a very good image if you think this is okay by any stretch.

    Reply
    Replies

    DianaAugust 12, 2014 at 9:52 PM
    Dear Anonymous at 9:42 p.m.,

    That is not justification. That is actually REALITY. That is why I would never have my child's photo on the Internet or even school newspaper. When they become an adult, they can make the decision to have their photo on the internet if they want.

    Besides, after 48 hours, I do not think this post is what is bothering Tim. The coverpage of Vibe has aleady been taken down. It is most likely my last two posts that bothered him, Fantasy news in the jungle and Is it Money?


    ****
    simply put, it's very, very sad....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First, please tell this idiot Diana that my daughter DOES NOT WORK THERE, nor does any other Vibe reporter.

      Second, tell her that I NEVER go to her blog because I am far to busy with mine. The bull crap about my daughter was sent to me, and in defense of my daughter I sent her one comment. So I have not seen any of her other crap, nor do I care about it.

      Delete
    2. Also, she did not take it down. Her naming my daughter and her allegation of an unethical connection with the PDN staff is still there.

      Delete
    3. Tim, you made existential threat against seminarians of the RMS who are on Visa. You want them investigated and deported by Homeland Security. Why? We consider these seminarians as our children and brothers through the Way. You believe it or not, your words cause pain and anxiety in our communities. Now you raise the stake and say to "scare the sh..t" out of us... These are the words of a sensitive father who wants to protect his kid from every harm.

      But you never ask one particular questions: who is really causing harm here to others? Who is really culpable? Who wants to inject fear and anxiety into our lives? ... Tim?

      Delete
    4. How about trying the Archbishop: Dear Son, (Fr. Paul) "resign or face an arduous and painful closure to your assignment." Love Dad.

      Apparently you have no children of your own.

      Delete
    5. So what? Fr Paul's case went to Rome. What do you have to do with it? How would this justify your actions and threat against innocent people?

      Delete
    6. @ anon 5:58am Don't be blinded by a misguided allegiance. Comparing seminarians to someone's minor child in this context is not only inequitable, it is disturbing. Disturbing because you would rationalize targeting a child and disturbing because you would rather manipulate the situation to make it about you rather than understand or accept the criminal intent.
      In other words, it is very clear in your comment that in your zeal to defend the indefensible and in spite of the evidence, you chose to spin the story, unabashedly portraying the Neo as the victim.

      Delete
    7. Jose: it was a NEO who said the seminarians are like children and brothers to us....not me. What on earth are you talking about? This post is bizarre.

      Delete
    8. HOLD THE PRESSES!

      Diana/Fr Adrian just let it slip..."DianaAugust 12, 2014 at 9:52 PM
      Dear Anonymous at 9:42 p.m., that is not justification. That is actually REALITY. That is why I would never have my child's photo on the Internet or even school newspaper. "

      Fr Adrian has a minor child!
      Pray for him/her!

      Delete
    9. The folly of responding to anons: To the person of 8:39am are you the author of the comment made at 5:58am? That was who I was responding to. If indeed you are 5:58am, and you were quoting someone, then that was not clear at all.

      Delete
    10. AnonymousAugust 13, 2014 at 6:13 AM
      So what? Fr Paul's case went to Rome. What do you have to do with it?

      I am so glad you asked. Actually everything. It was I who directed Fr. Paul's friends to the canons and provisions for the removal of pastors. It was I who recommended that they help him procure a canon lawyer. It was I who rallied the public support for Fr. Paul. And it was I who provided the facts and documents to the appropriate people in order for Fr. Paul to make his case. Yep. I had everything to do with it. And I am proud to say so. But the book and learn all about it :)

      Delete
  16. why is it that "Diana" doesn't mind making a minor child's identity known, but yet does not have the courage to make her own known??

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hey Diana, do you really think that the PDN is going to distort its stories on account of the fact that one of its unpaid interns is a Rohr when all the while the PDN publishes the Archbishop's propaganda rag, U Matuna? If there is any risk of breach of journalistic integrity, it is the risk that PDN would write sympathetically toward the Archbishop in order to keep its contract to publish the U Matuna.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "I hereby call on the members of the Neocatechumenal Way who sincerely want the rhetoric against the Way to cease"

    Is this a bribe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, poor David. Do I have to explain everything. Have you not seen the protests from many of the decent people who walk in the Way of being plastered with the same label as Diana because of how she represents them? I am calling on their intelligence. If they sincerely do not want to be categorized as freaks then I am calling on them to do something. Because Diana is a coward, she/he would not have the courage to continue if she/he was known. I am calling on decent people. At one time, I thought you might be one.

      Delete
    2. Oh, David G. a.k.a. Diana

      Delete
    3. So your saying, those who do not help you or answer to you, are "categorized as freaks"? Shows what you really think of the NCW.

      Delete
    4. Okay, David, here we go again. Let's take baby steps. The outrage on this blog has been towards the NCW members in general even though I personally have tried to mitigate it by separating the Neos and the Kikos. The problem is that the Neos let the Kikos speak for them and in the case of Diana, your representation is freakish, not to mention all the other insane insults I get.

      So here's for the people who say they do not want to see this division to actually do something to show that Diana and the Kikos DO NOT represent them. By doing that, others too will see what I see, that not all Neos are FREAKS, that there are many sincere people, and that they are being poorly represented by Diana and her ilk.

      See what you can do, unless of course you are the real Diana.

      Delete
  19. Check how much you can get in jail for posting minors on your blog without the explicit permission of both parents who must sign a document. If it is a cut and paste from the original, it is a deep sentence, I believe life in jail.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Back in the day, when Diana was foolishly pontificating by way of copy/paste she was a harmless little pain in the butt. LATELY she has made herself far too familiar with too many details to be simply "a woman and not a man and not a priest, walking for eight years." And then the post which said, a young girl in her early twenties. When realities get hot she gets vicious. Posting about Tim's daughter was simply part of her blind unthinking rage. We can tell when a certain somebody is busy at work because the blog is silent. She misses all the breaking news because methinks she is the news in many cases. If only you didn't wake the quiet Jungle insisting you are a CONCELEBRANT! You've had your moment in the sun. Bye, bye blog. Scram. Get back to work at your job. It is a big help to us.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bunch of cry babies. Tim be carefull your digging you're on hole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess you didn't hear about why the bishop had to suddenly retrieve and destroy 8000 copies of the Umatuna Friday afternoon. Talk about a hole.

      Delete
    2. Now it's becoming more clear that Diana, David G, and some anonymous comment is from one person.

      Delete
    3. Uh, oh, a seminarian , one of those who are like children of the Kikos. ...."Bunch of cry babies. Tim be carefull your digging you're on hole." Can you believe that you can write a thesis with these language skills?? And then get ordained Presbyter??

      Delete
    4. All seminarians from RMS graduate with the hard earned honor of -
      Summa cum Pizza

      Delete
  22. Just read Diana's recent post, and as usual, I got made daily, uncontrollable, body shaking laugh. He/She/It says that Tim offered cash for her...hold on. Are you ready for this?

    DIANA SAYS THAT TIM OFFERED CASH FOR HER CAPTURE! HAHAHAHAHA....HAHAHAHA...sorry, excuse me I can't stop laughing....HAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!

    Stay tuned for the next episode of "What will the dumb dumb say next"

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lock her up in the dungeon.

    ReplyDelete