Thursday, January 29, 2015

NOTICE TO MSGR. DAVID C. QUITUGUA, RECTOR, AGANA CATHEDRAL

Dear Msgr. Quitugua,

Since it is apparent by your public bashing of Msgr. James Benavente last Sunday that you prefer to conduct your private business in public, I will do the same. 

January 31, 2015 is the DEADLINE for employers to distribute the Form W-2 to its employees. 

Note that I expect to receive my W-2 for my 2014 Cathedral-Basilica employment via U.S. Mail by Feb 06, 2015 at the latest. 


If you need assistance in identifying my W-2, I have displayed below my paystubs for 2014. 

Also, the Cathedral Basilica Gift Shop still owes me a significant sum. I had intended to not bother to collect on it and write it off as a bad debt. However, your actions this past Sunday not just against Msgr. James, but against the integrity of the whole Catholic Church, have caused me to proceed with collections. Expect my bill.


28 comments:

  1. Is it true that AAA has a secret credit card that funded by the neos? This needs to be exposed. I heard that he gets some of the money from those black trash bag collections during their celebrations. Not to mention the scrutiny payments he receives whenever those happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since the NCW has no accountability, finances vary from diocese to diocese. In some dioceses a third of the trash bag collections go to the bishop, a third to priest of the parish and a third to the Responsible in charge to put into a NCW account. or the name of the highest Responsible for a given area. In some dioceses a third goes to the bishop and 2/3 to the NCW account. It all varies.

      Delete
  2. Maybe he'll be able to use that secret card to help Msgr. David Quitugua the "newly" discovered debt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like a job for Ms. Coreen. Msgr. David cannot rely on anyone else because she CAN and will do what her Neo master tells her. Besides, she's the only one left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No,no,no...she may be the only one left, but Therese her Mali' is still there...I am sure that Coreen will use Therese to make herself shine. Therese will be her tentago' ( slave).

      Delete
    2. CB vice wrecker! Can you please take care of one more little task? BTW how much is your salary. Coreen, you are not helping, honey.

      Delete
    3. Watch what you are saying cause it might hurt you,the Lord is not sleeping.please leave Therese out of this mess cause she has not nothing to do with what's going on, maybe you are jealous because she stayed back to sever the Lord.

      Delete
    4. That's right we should all sever the lord and not talk about anyone.

      Delete
    5. Yes. That appears to be the problem. The kikos have "severed" The Lord and replaced him with Kiko.

      Delete
    6. To 6:26 AM. Therese is a fine individual who just does her work to put food on the table. It is the neocrats who SEVER (LOL here) the Lord's Body in the island of Guam. They have inserted themselves in the lifeblood of traditional Catholics and now trying to infect the bloodstream to choke the Lord off. What ungrateful and strange strain of germs these neocrats are, but we are the antibodies that will fight off these parasitic infection. Jealous we are not, neos are unthinking bottom feeders that get animated when they hear the voice of pionut and kikofk.

      Delete
    7. Okay so let's all start praying cause our island needs all the prayer

      Delete

    8. Answer remove Anthony Apuron and peace is restored.

      Delete
  4. That is impossible, nothing is in the Neo name, they are apparently invisible, untouchable, and don't exist in the world as we know it, as stated in Diana's blog: The NCW is not a movement. It is a set of spiritual goods. I am a person, I can own property and money. A corporation profit or nonprofit can own property and money. They NCW is neither. It does not exist as a juridical person but as spiritual goods. Can ideas own money and property? The NCW is not a business. Nobody gets paid and nobody pays anything. When a collection is made (yes with trash bags) it always has a specific cause: repair church roof, pay for church flowers, pay for convivence, pay for Eucharist wine, buy presents for first communicants, pay for church electricity bill, etc etc etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check out hushmoney.org and read about the Corporate Sole. It's an eye opener.

      Delete
    2. I know Anon 9:13 was being sarcastic but besides the seminary, I think their shinning monstrosity called Domus Galilaeae is also owned by the NCW. The property was originally was originally part of the Franciscans, but they were forced to get let go of it as their numbers in the Holy Land dwindle. They also employ people at Domus Gaililaeae. According to Wikipedia, 150 people are employed full-time.

      Delete
  5. To Anon 9:13; you are right! Can not own anything just ask archbishop. That is reason archbishop do not file personal income for $50,000 cut he gets for every Scrutiny for every community. Ask the Responsibls because it goes in the "secret account" that is funded by the outright contributions deducted from each scrutiny collected from every community. So if there is 3 scrutinies in one year that means $150,000 go to the archbishop "for him to do whatever he wants to do with it. No question asked." That's bec we don't question. Opppss! Only the Responsibles supposed to know that. How do I know? Bec I was one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sounding more like irritation to joy than invitation to joy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems the only one that's joyful here is apuron's secret bank account but that is not enough: he still demands stole fees for his cameo appearance. Who needs him for functions anyway? Who wants the extra fuss of reserved parking and attention? He is a willful deceiver of the position given by the Church. He does not represent that Church, he is just a useless piece of sorry excuse.

      Delete
  7. Tim i suggest you post this on your blog (of course you are free to do as you wish) - i am also sending the same message to the ncw blog with the same suggestion ;) http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-no-to-ecclesial-elites-who-privatize-the-fait

    ReplyDelete
  8. Attention: fyi Take a few moments out of your day to celebrate Dianas post against Monsignor James. She has 100 comments of people who dont know what they are talking about. Clap clap clap. Right on Diana whoever you are!!! You are a big help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. No one with sense even opens the Diana blog.

      Delete
    2. 100 comments of total nonsense is impressive. Unlike intelligence, stupidity has no limit. LMAO

      Delete
  9. Thank you for that link, keith @11:57PM. I believe the Pope's message is very clear and applicable to the Neos...but I bet they will have a different spin on it (I'm always amazed at the interpretations they come up with). If the Pope wants to stop this nonsense, he will have to be blunt and just say it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you're welcome anonymous :) Yes it wouldn't be the first time they do that as i had gone to one of their conferences after the february audience they had with the pope and it was astonishing how the lead catechist of Malta interpreted and played with the words the pope said unfortunately. I hope each time the pope makes it clearer even more that they do not find a way to misinterpret his very clear messages.

      Delete
    2. Dear Keith, I include this message by the request of Jolene. She hopes you'll find it here. She tried to respond to your posts at Diana's blog but Diana is apparently creating black lists of people she wants to oppress and silence. Seems to be a typical neo practice! By now, Jolene may have earned top position on Diana's black list because whatever comment Jolene is trying to make will be thrown out. Among others, she is blocking any conversation between you and Jolene. It is especially sad that she decided to censure even Pope Francis because of his sermon about privatizing salvation!

      I refer to this exchange between you and Diana at her blog. We found Diana to be extremely arrogant, self-absorbed and dictatorial. She is true neo!

      ============
      keith xuereb February 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM

      when I suggested to post the homily by the pope about privatization of faith you did not take any notice of it. That is surely a biased response and that is how the catechists manipulate the members.
      ============
      Diana February 1, 2015 at 8:48 PM

      I notice that you suggested to post the homily of the Pope. But I still have the FREE WILL to decide whether to take your suggestion or not. I published your comment, which has the link to the Pope's homily, but whether I take your suggestion or not is MY CHOICE.
      ============

      Yeah, we hear you, Diana. We are so sorry for you! Your virtual power in your blog and in your neo hierarchy totally corrupted your moral sense and made you an unchristian person who has zero faith, hope and charity in her towards her fellow Catholics and even towards the Pope! As far as we are concerned, you made yourself an eminent role model for all neos. Congratulations and goodbye Diana!

      Delete
    3. Let me include Jolene's comments that she wrote and submitted to Diana but Diana did not allow to appear. I wonder why.

      ====================
      Jolene on January 31:

      Dear Keith, we both comment in both blogs. It is a good thing. However, there are some criticism even hatred because of that. My hope that despite these emotions our true intention won't be misconstrued and our standpoint will be tolerated. Common ground, if exists, ought to be explored and reached.

      Pope Francis points out: “It’s what we see and call: ‘the ecclesial elites.’ When these small groups are created within the community of God’s people, these people believe they are being good Christians and also are acting in good faith maybe, but they are small groups who have privatized salvation.”

      I think ecclesial elite can be any church group, not only the neos, but also the Pre-Vatican 2 communities or any other Catholic movements of the faithful. It all depends on how these groups behave in the parish communities.

      “They scorn the others, they stay away from the community as a whole, they stay away from the people of God, they have privatized salvation: salvation is for me and my small group, but not for all the people of God. And this is a very serious mistake.”

      I truly would like to see if this applies to the neos on Guam or not. I have read Ernie a while ago who said something that could be understood as “salvation belongs to the Way”. I am not sure if this is what he wanted to say or this is the neo’s viewpoint. That’s why I ask so many questions from Diana. I hope she will respect a spirit of clarification. Here is a list of questions based on Pope Francis’ sermon:

      Do neos scorn others?
      Do they stay away from the community as a whole?
      Do neos stay away from the people of God?
      Have they privatized salvation?
      Do neos believe salvation is for them and for their small group only?
      Do they deny salvation for all the people of God?

      Before rushing to answer these questions, let me recall that I have learned about a lot of facts of the neo from Diana that I truly appreciate. Based on what Diana says the neo cannot be equivocally condemned by these questions. Perhaps the truth is quite the contrary. Who knows? I think it is not only the Pope who wants to see these things more clearly.
      ==================

      Jolene on January 31:

      Diana, don't you want to make a new post about Pope Francis' sermon? Undoubtedly, we all could benefit from a new discussion about his points. I only would like to help...

      Delete
  10. Tim, be ready not to be paid. Did you know in the Cathedral, they even assigned someone to make sure the visitors/tourists drop their dollar to tour the place? No, they make sure that the visitors/tourists not only read the sign but put in their "donation." That is desperation, my friend. That's another all-time low. That never happened before.

    ReplyDelete

  11. 3.17pm. How tragic the cathedral is so poor it has resulted to such practices. Not even third world countries do this..

    ReplyDelete

Recommendations by JungleWatch