Friday, January 23, 2015


I know that I am Arch-enemy No. 1 (pun intended). 

None of what is happening now would have befallen AAA if I had not endeavored to make public and to keep public his ongoing transgressions against certain members of the clergy, many lay members of the diocese, liturgical norms and the legitimate magisterium of the Church, and now, his sneaky mega-million dollar deal with the Gennarini's and RMS.

Remember that it was "sneaky" because while the archdiocesan finance council and the finance officer were under the impression that they were to meet to discuss the matter on December 6, 2011, AAA had already deeded away control of the property on November 22, 2011, and AFC president, Richard Untalan, was belittled and mocked by AAA for calling the meeting. If it was not sneaky and a truly above-board transaction, there would have been no need for AAA to smear Mr. Untalan. But he did.

So all of this became known because of the intense scrutiny of this blog as well as the tens of thousands of comments and the rapidly accumulating pageviews - which average nearly 8 to 10 thousand per day and will probably pass TWO MILLION tonight.

So AAA needs to stop me. 

He first tried to do this by going to Cardinal Edwin O'Brien, the Grand Master of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher - of which I am a member. You can read about that here, here, and here. It is instructive to note - after you read those entries, that Cardinal O'Brien never responded after I presented my case against AAA.

Through others I have been threatened, my family threatened, my friends threatened, where I go to Mass threatened. The "other blog" has made it nearly their full time business to discredit me and members of my family. 

Of course, nothing has worked. So now, fresh from being passed over for a red hat and with nothing to lose, he is going to go after his perceived enemies (not just me) with the only weapon left to him: excommunication or some sort of delict. 

However, he can't willy-nilly excommunicate me. He needs an offense. He's working on it (which is why the chancellor recently left the comment: "That's what you think. Stand by.")

I'm sure he'd like to use Can. 1373 which states:
A person who publicly incites among subjects animosities or hatred against the Apostolic See or an ordinary because of some act of power or ecclesiastical ministry or provokes subjects to disobey them is to be punished by an interdict or other just penalties.
However, he would have a hard time proving that my aim was to "incite animosities or hatred" just for the sake of inciting "animosities or hatred." My aim was and has always been to call the archbishop into question when he himself violates church law - as he demonstrably did in the Fr. Paul case, liturgical law - as he does every time he permits neocats to testify during Mass and of course the illegitimate neo distribution of Holy Communion, and perhaps now even civil law - with the possible violation of Guam law relative to the rights and duties of a corporate sole. 

These aren't just my personal opinions. The appeal filed in behalf of Fr. Paul by his counsel, Fr. Dacanay, affirms my observation that Archbishop Apuron bypassed required canonical procedure for the removal of a pastor - and then comically tried to say later that Fr. Paul wasn't removed at all, even though he was locked out of his office and stripped from the parish schedule of presiders. The violation of liturgical law has been noted and documented over and over. And by the way, every Catholic has standing to oppose any pastor who knowingly transgresses liturgical law. As for the civil case, well, we'll see.

So, if "animosities and hatred" have been incited against the archbishop because of the truth, then so be it. The record shows that he has no regard for the feelings of the people and has simply continued to march down his destructive path. However, not once have I ever called for or organized any public action against the bishop other than to tell readers to let your wallets do the talking. This call is legitimate because we have shown that RMS was NOT what we were told it was and our money has been taken under false pretenses. 

So, Can. 1373 won't work, so that's why his buddies have been trying to stir up something they can use: Can. 1370. Here's the whole Canon:
Can. 1370 §1. A person who uses physical force against the Roman Pontiff incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; if he is a cleric, another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state, can be added according to the gravity of the delict. 
§2. A person who does this against a bishop incurs a latae sententiae interdict and, if he is a cleric, also a latae sententiae suspension. 
§3. A person who uses physical force against a cleric or religious out of contempt for the faith, the Church, ecclesiastical power, or the ministry is to be punished with a just penalty.
This is why, if you haven't noticed, there have been many attempts to try to corner me into admitting that I have wished ill health and/or physical harm on the archbishop. Of course that is nowhere to be found. I will copy here such an instance and my response:

Didn't you wish (posted here) that he would fall ill or incarnate evil? Yes or no?

Goodness your English is bad. No. But plenty of people have wished that on me

Many people love you also but answer the question. Yes or NO?

Maybe this is what you are referring to. But due to your lack of language skills you completely miss the significance of the "either/or".

"We can only hope, if we are to give charity a chance, that Archbishop Apuron is severely ill and must be immediately removed. Because if this is not the case, then we have a bishop who is evil incarnate, and he wouldn't be the first one. "

They have also tried to link me to the alleged slashing of AAA's tires, and have tried to make me the reason why they have had to wire the chancery with security cameras and lock their gates and the reason AAA needed body guards on December 8. 

You see where this is all going. AAA needs to make it look like he is physically endangered and that it's because of me. If he can do that then he thinks he has a canonical basis to impose a "just penalty" on me. He may do so. But the only problem is that it will not be a "just penalty" and I could civilly sue for psychological harm and canonically sue for the abuse of his office. 

However, by then I'll probably have to wait in line. 


  1. John Charles "Typhoon Toves"January 23, 2015 at 4:28 PM

    LIKE!!! 😃😉😂😛

  2. Replies
    1. Step one: If he's tall, thin, sickly, and goes by the title, "Monsignor," RUN!

      Oh, sorry. That wasn't accurate. The title of the link was "How to Find a Canon Lawyer;" not "How to Find a GOOD Canon Lawyer."

  3. BTW, you wonder where I learn this stuff? Your people run their mouths, that's where.

  4. Oh I think I saw my name on their list once on the Diana-sue blog. I consider myself in good company

  5. John Charles "Typhoon Toves"January 23, 2015 at 7:08 PM

    Hey! So not fair! I want to be excommunicated too! How come just you? Mann!!!

    1. Mary Lou Garcia-PeredaJanuary 25, 2015 at 8:48 AM

      Per "The Dianas" blog, you made the list … TWICE:

      "Anonymous January 24, 2015 at 9:36 AM
      If the EXCOMMUNICATION were to happen today the list of people that need to be on the list who continue to malign and discredit the Catholic Church.

      Tim Rohr,Chuck White, John Toves, Agnes White, C Benavente, Gerald Taitano, Janet B (Stay anonymous if I were you), Mary Lou Garcia, Jesus Cepeda, Msgnr Benavente, Father Mike Crisostomo Jonathan Diaz of Barrigada,Blockley, Tommy Tanaka, Gil Shinohara, Owen Bollinger, Dave Sablan,Mary Lou Pereda,Patty Arroyo, Sen Tina Muna Barnes, Art Illagan, Rev Crisostomo, Rev Efren, Rev Gofigan, Becky Terlaje, Ray Dalisay, Vangie Lujan and John Toves and DEACON MARTINEZ was given a chance and beg to be reinstated. You may have your earthly VICTORY but the day of JUDGEMENT, you'll be facing the MERCY CHAIR.

      I pray for POPE Francis to expedite the process.

      Manuel Ayuyu of Latte Heights"

    2. Why did they forget to include the 2 million JW visitors in their excommunication list? They think we're in Iraq or Afghanistan where people will be severely punish if they go against their religious leader. GET REAL! They can take their list and ....


  6. Previously mentioned brother tony held 100 bullets. brother tony fired around forty bullets.already. They had no effect on the archdiocese or those he attempted to destroy. This is because brother tony no longer holds respect or authority in Agana Guam. He remains a lame duck awaiting the decision of the pope regarding his future. Mr. Rohr do not be concerned with edicts or penal codes from brother tony. For brother tony simply does not understand church law. church law is for the salvation of souls. brother tony uses church law as bullets to hurt and destroy priests and people. Do not fear Mr. Rohr for good will always prevail over evil.

  7. Wow, they really are stuck in their own little reality! As if excommunication would silence you or the jungle. The only purpose this recourse serves is to exact vengeance...which I'm pretty sure the pope would consider a gross misappropriation of Canon law. Don't worry, there are many clerics I'm sure who would minister to you if unjustly excommunicated. Besides, not that you would, but if he did excommunicated you what's left to deter you from using physical force? Can't excommunicated you again. These guys really don't think these things through. Guess you have to lose some common sense to make room for the Kiko trash.

  8. Souls possessed by demons foam at the mouth, curse violently and utter all sorts of blasphemies at the exorcist.

  9. disgusted at our leaderJanuary 24, 2015 at 12:45 AM

    The irony is that as aaa misuses Church Laws as bullets at non-neo priests and lay faithful, at the same time aaa also digresses from following Liturgical norms, Rubrics or Cannon Law in celebrating The Holy Sarcrifice of The Mass AND supports the ncw digressions of The Mass. Imagine that! What a Church pastor, leader and role model aaa is. NOT. NOT. NOT.

  10. Diana knows what Archbishop Saverio Hon Tai Fai told Tim. Tim, seems you are not obeying. Tsk tsk tsk

    1. I wasn't asked to obey. I was only asked to help and was not told how. I said I would not call the bishop a liar. That's it.

  11. Thank you for your transparency, Tim.

  12. John Charles "typhoon Toves"January 24, 2015 at 4:19 AM that something like Californication? Well, Tim, you will soon have both badges to wear proudly! It is a big step, but I know you are well prepared for it. I feel so proud! I think we should throw you and your most beautiful family a huge fiesta!!! Maybe the CCOG can form a committee to study the feasibility and cost versus benefits. Oh, hell, I will take you and family out to a lavish dinner when I get there.

    My greatest admiration, love, and deepest respect,

    1. Great idea John...You guys don't know me and I don't know who you all are but Tim, CCoG, you, and others who fight to protect our religious culture deserves a break. If you guys decide to have a "fiesta", I will donate $500 to help. I will continue to remain anonymous and I appreciate all your efforts. FYI, I will redirect my Charity Appeals donations to you folks.

  13. John Charles "Typhoon Toves"January 24, 2015 at 4:35 AM

    Dianna Shmyanna - don't even let my dogs dig in the dumpster. Sespooll of character disordered, narcissism, weakness, stupidity, low IQ's, deranged, inept, robotic, sad, depressed, NO HUMOR (and that's a big giveaway), spineless, degenerates, and WANNA BE VICTIMS. Isn't there a spray?

    BTW, I still need Sue's last name, agents!

  14. Replies
    1. Last name of Sue aka Dianna???

  15. Okay lost the comment about RTV you tube....AAA gives the Pope a present...could it be more chocolates?


Recommendations by JungleWatch