Thursday, May 5, 2016

HEY GIUSEPPE

Just because the morons on the hill are morons doesn't mean the rest of us are morons and you can lie to us like they do. Let's get this out in the open once and for all since the masturbating primatologist was stupid enough to get you on the radio.

You said that RMS is a "corporation sole" because RMS has only one member who has all the power. You're a liar.

The very first paragraph, the "formation paragraph," of the the RMS ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION say that Apuron "does hereby form a nonprofit corporation under and by virtue of the provisions of the Guam Nonprofit Corporation Act, 18 G.C.A. §10101..."

Link to full document.

Here is the beginning of the first page of 18 G.C.A.:



RMS was formed under §10101. A Corporation Sole must be formed under §10102. You are one nasty thief. Oh. P.S. That thing at the airport the other night? That's called "The Magellan Welcome." Courage.

20 comments:

  1. They present themselves as the presumptive leaders of the archdiocese. And they are. G basically threw the arch under the bus by saying he did not know why he does not respond to the people.

    Oh, and he did not know the name of the archdiocesan attorney who drafted the deed of restriction and other documents. His wife quickly interjected with "Ed Terlaje" and G embellished that the attorney felt the archdiocese needed to "protect the assets of the archdiocese." When do assets need to be protected? Is he trying to make Mr. Terlaje culpable for these egregious acts that, in truth, he advised the arch not to adopt? Did not Gennarini scream in Mr. Terlaje's face in his anger to that advice? Weren't there witnesses to this? Those present at that meeting should confront G about that bald faced lie this morning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's coming. Someone who was there will take out Gennarini in one swoop. We're just timing it.

      Delete
    2. 12:50 PM IS THAT A THREAT?? TIM TIM

      Delete
    3. It's a promise. But just in case you're a thug from New Jersey, take out is not referring to what it refers to in New Jersey. I mean he will take out Gennaini's lies. And I believe Me. Big G knows who it is. Courage.

      Delete
  2. As I said on the radio after my lecture tomorrow, we can talk. Patti offered to arrange the meeting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, we are not interested in talking to you. According to you you had nothing to do with the construction of any of the corporation documents. So you are useless. We want to talk with who put those documents together. According to you it was the Archbishop and his legal counsel. Great. We will wait to hear from them.

      Delete
  3. Is this Genarini? If so, why sign it with anonymous? If it really is you, welcome to the jungle! Now here is the place where there's actually documentation and proof to the assertions made - not spins and half-truths.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it is professori gepetto Genarrini

      Delete
    2. Pretty soon the NEOS will be calling him The Prophet-Doctor-Professor-King of the Sea Genarrini! lol! We all know him what he really is and that's the liar from New Jersey

      Delete
  4. Giuseppe Pinocchio Gennarini, where is your Jiminy Cricket?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How silly of you to ask such a question 3:47 PM. Jiminy Cricket was there pumping some juice into him. OJ is his conscience while on Guam. Full of juice eh OJ! If you run out of tropical orange juice from Florida OJ, we would gladly give you some calamansi, dalangdan, lemon cheena, adamelon, etc to squeeze to make homemade juice.

      Delete
  5. Now this is grounds for cyber bullying. You threat people on this blog calling it a promise.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you all catch Mr. Gennarini's assertion in today's interview with Patti (50 minutes into it) that the conveyance, excuse me, "assignment" of the RMS property to the RMS corporation was done to protect the "estate of the Archdiocese" from a lawsuit, as is commonly done by the Church in the States?

    The only reason they do that there is to save the Church's assets from sexual abuse lawsuits. Hmmm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, of course anon!!!
      In fact, he did not lie on that one. This was his intention from the beginning. Back in 2011, when that threat was alive, Genarinni main concern was saving the property. Of course he tells us it is to save it for the diocese. We know better.

      This has been the assertion from many of us, from the get go.

      Glad you noticed, straight from the horses mouth.
      In fact this public relation campaign from Genarinni and Co, will be like the Diana's blog, a mother lode of information, that will keep on giving.
      I think Giuseppe should have brought his son, who is a professional at this, not try to wing it on his own.
      But you know what they say about pride.....

      Delete
    2. By all indications, they knew way back that a lawsuit was coming one way or another. AAA really F'd Up big time! Resign Tony!! You are a disgraced archbishop unworthy of your position!

      Delete
    3. did he just admit...

      Fraudulent Conveyance or fraudulent transfer...

      Delete
    4. I am starting to think that the Dianas are nothing other than the direct mouthpiece of this Gennarini, and if truth be known, was established under his direct order.

      Delete
    5. Really Anon at 9.37?
      Whoa!!!
      Well I guess better late than never.
      Glad you are on board....

      Delete